Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

There Is No Such Thing as "Automatically Uncoiling" in the Golf Swing


Note: This thread is 3622 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Coiled_Wire_or_Machined_Springs_Making_tThis will be a quick one.

It's been said many times, by many people both educated in the golf swing and otherwise, that you can "coil up" in the backswing and then let yourself "unwind" into the downswing.

I want all of you reading this to try something right now.

  1. Go to the top of your backswing.
  2. Go a little farther. Because… why not?
  3. The muscles that you feel holding yourself there, "coiled" up… relax them. Stop holding yourself there.
  4. Note what happens.

I'm willing to bet all I have that you don't "snap back" and "uncoil" rapidly into the golf ball. You're not a spring. You're not a rubber band.

Is a "big" and proper turn important? Absolutely! It gives you the time to build up rotational speed (speed you generate yourself from your muscles, not speed which is just a result of "unwinding" automatically). It lets your arms travel back so they have time and space to accelerate on the downswing.

But none of that comes automatically. None of that speed comes from "automatically unwinding" or "releasing the coil" or anything like that.

As with many things in golf, you don't get much "automatically." You have to make your muscles do what they need to do.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It probably another feel is not real things. If you feel tight at the top of the swing something's wrong anyway.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Lihu said:

It probably another feel is not real things. If you feel tight at the top of the swing something's wrong anyway.

Yeah this is how I've always thought of it. You have to feel like you're loading your energy then you release it on the downswing.

 

But if the body did work like a spring/coil, the longer you held the faster you would swing right ;D

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am finding out about dated ideas in golf. The unwinding coil was a popular concept a long time ago. Now it obviously isn't.


Posted
30 minutes ago, Lihu said:

It probably another feel is not real things. If you feel tight at the top of the swing something's wrong anyway.

I think it's more that people had no clue about the actual biomechanical movements of the golf swing. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

I think it's more that people had no clue about the actual biomechanical movements of the golf swing. 

True, and many people will argue based on what they feel against the science behind a good swing.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with @saevel25 we're not rubber bands or springs but people think of muscle tissue and tendons as being similar but forget that it's the flexion of the muscle, not the coiling that generates the power.  There are a lot of golfers and instructors that still believe or at least describe the effect as coiling and uncoiling. 

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I think it's more that people had no clue about the actual biomechanical movements of the golf swing. 

 

4 hours ago, Lihu said:

It probably another feel is not real things.

Or... players and PGA instructors have been taking Hogan's Five Lessons a bit too literal since 1957. 

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

Reminds of something I saw when Tiger was in his prime. He stopped his downswing when his hands were about waist high when a camera went off! When I go from the top I am fully committed! There's no stopping it! Makes me wonder just how much control these pros have over their golf swings!

Edited by Buckeyebowman
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

This came up in a recent lesson for me.  I was coiling up into my back swing as much as I possibly could which was slightly bad for me.  Instead, I should "leave something in the tank", in the words of my teacher, so that when I change directions I can go even faster . . obviously by force, not "automatic uncoiling". 

Edit - "go even faster" is probably not quite what I mean . . ."apply even more force" is more like what I mean. 

Edited by Rainmaker

Posted (edited)
On 2/21/2016 at 4:12 PM, JonMA1 said:

Or... players and PGA instructors have been taking Hogan's Five Lessons a bit too literal since 1957. 

Obviously there's no rubber band like or spring-like material in the body (let alone electric generators).

I think what Hogan ultimately was describing as important for his swing was more of a sense for timing. A slight feeling of tension may have indicated to him that he had turned 'enough' and it was time to go.

There is, however, something called the Stretch-Shortening-Cycle that might indicate why the kinetic sequence separation (leading movement) of the lead hip relative to the trail shoulder seems to be important in the golf swing as well as with pitching and batting in baseball as well as several other sports with similar basic motions. If it wasn't a potential contributor, you'd think that a pitch type motion where the shoulders and hips are synchronized would work just fine for the driver.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


  • Administrator
Posted

Beside the point, @natureboy.

I'm also well aware of the stretch-shorten cycle. :-D

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎2‎/‎20‎/‎2016 at 11:08 PM, iacas said:

I want all of you reading this to try something right now.

  1. Go to the top of your backswing.
  2. Go a little farther. Because… why not?
  3. The muscles that you feel holding yourself there, "coiled" up… relax them. Stop holding yourself there.
  4. Note what happens.

Well, thanks a lot.  I tried this at the range, and shot upwards like a slingshot, bouncing off the ceiling before flying outwards into the back fence, 250 yards away.

Embarrassing.

  • Upvote 1

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, Hardspoon said:

Embarrassing.

Ha! I knew someone would fall for it!

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 6/30/2016 at 6:36 AM, BeemerK12S said:

250 yards is a great hit in my book :-)

Agree! After reading this I went to my local range and tried the same thing . .I got into my good, coiled up position.  Then I coiled up some more because . .why not?  Then I let it go and ended up 150 yards out and 50 yards to the right.  Probably because I was wearing flip-flops.

Edited by Rainmaker

Note: This thread is 3622 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.