Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3059 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mod Note: this topic was created from an off-topic discussion in the Predict Tiger's 2018 Season discussion, after about 31 or 32 posts (hence @billchao's plea in post #31 to get back on topic. ;-)

 

On 1/5/2018 at 11:07 AM, iacas said:
On 1/5/2018 at 10:13 AM, Secretmove said:

Tigers swing requires a lot of timing moves

??? No more so than almost every player on the PGA Tour. And less so than a good chunk. I don't know where you're getting that, but I disagree

I'm getting that from watching this video and othes.  He dips down 6 inches on a five iron, and stays down there, pulling off a massive timing move pulling up his left side to have an 8 inch level low spot.  Amazing, but I see no one on tour doing that much.  Lots of guys dip down to the ball, but non like Tiger.  His shoulders steepen from X to X-20, more than anyone on tour.  He puts massive twist and strain on his back maintaining posture with that speed with his angles. 

BTW, I will continue to make absurdist funny (to me and anyone who's ever read more than 3 books) statements as long as I live, cause its the right thing to do.  Do you really not get Monty Python?   Sad.   

Seriously, is it impossible to walk away from this absurd game with half a billion and do anything else?   Al Frankin made a switch.  Now he's back to comedy, but at least he gave it a shot.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
41 minutes ago, Secretmove said:

 

I'm getting that from watching this video and othes.  He dips down 6 inches on a five iron, and stays down there, pulling off a massive timing move pulling up his left side to have an 8 inch level low spot.  Amazing, but I see no one on tour doing that much.  Lots of guys dip down to the ball, but non like Tiger.  His shoulders steepen from X to X-20, more than anyone on tour.  He puts massive twist and strain on his back maintaining posture with that speed with his angles. 

BTW, I will continue to make absurdist funny (to me and anyone who's ever read more than 3 books) statements as long as I live, cause its the right thing to do.  Do you really not get Monty Python?   Sad.   

Seriously, is it impossible to walk away from this absurd game with half a billion and do anything else?   Al Frankin made a switch.  Now he's back to comedy, but at least he gave it a shot. 

 

That swing obviously is the old Tiger who dipped and got stuck ala Hank Haney.  Recent videos that he put out has him more erect and very little dip.  That is why he played so well at the Hero.

Mike Rooker


  • Moderator
Posted
48 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

That swing obviously is the old Tiger who dipped and got stuck ala Hank Haney.  Recent videos that he put out has him more erect and very little dip.  That is why he played so well at the Hero.

Actually this swing is during his time with Foley, like the description says, "5th hole final round 2014 Hero World Championship".

But I agree it's better now. He's always lowered and will always lower, it has more to do with the sequencing of when it happens. I don't think the "steep" shoulders and arms connected to the body move Foley was trying to work with him on was the right fit. It is for some players. Seems like Tiger is better with a bit "longer" and "freer" backswing.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, mvmac said:

Actually this swing is during his time with Foley, like the description says, "5th hole final round 2014 Hero World Championship".

But I agree it's better now. He's always lowered and will always lower, it has more to do with the sequencing of when it happens. I don't think the "steep" shoulders and arms connected to the body move Foley was trying to work with him on was the right fit. It is for some players. Seems like Tiger is better with a bit "longer" and "freer" backswing.

What other tour player garners so much attention to every minute detail of his swing?  Quick answer:  Absolutely no one.

Mike Rooker


  • Administrator
Posted
3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

I'm getting that from watching this video and othes.  He dips down 6 inches on a five iron, and stays down there, pulling off a massive timing move pulling up his left side to have an 8 inch level low spot.

a) Tiger's always dipped. He dipped in 2000 when he played the best golf of anyone, ever, to date.
b) That video is not his current swing. It's from 2014.

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

BTW, I will continue to make absurdist funny (to me and anyone who's ever read more than 3 books) statements as long as I live, cause its the right thing to do.  Do you really not get Monty Python?   Sad.

I've watched my fair share of Monty Python. Doesn't mean you get to call it "pathetic" that Tiger isn't fostering 500 children or whatever.

24 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

What other tour player garners so much attention to every minute detail of his swing?  Quick answer:  Absolutely no one.

What's your point? Not being snippy, just asking. Cuz I agree, but… so what?

It doesn't mean what @mvmac wrote was wrong.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, iacas said:

a) Tiger's always dipped. He dipped in 2000 when he played the best golf of anyone, ever, to date.
b) That video is not his current swing. It's from 2014.

I've watched my fair share of Monty Python. Doesn't mean you get to call it "pathetic" that Tiger isn't fostering 500 children or whatever.

What's your point? Not being snippy, just asking. Cuz I agree, but… so what?

It doesn't mean what @mvmac wrote was wrong.

Secretmove was so far off track, it is amazing he wasn't flagged for moderation.

Mike Rooker


  • Moderator
Posted
7 hours ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

What other tour player garners so much attention to every minute detail of his swing?  Quick answer:  Absolutely no one.

Not sure what this means as a response to what I posted.

You said the swing was a Haney swing, I was pointing out it's from 2014. Then I gave my take on his head lowering move.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
16 hours ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Secretmove was so far off track, it is amazing he wasn't flagged for moderation.

You only get warned for violating the forum rules, i.e. rude behavior, spamming etc. You don't get warned for having an opinion. We just ask folks to be polite.

We all love golf. That is why we joined the forum, to talk golf. A lot of threads get into debates because we love golf, we want to talk about it, we want to help others get better or we want to learn more ourselves. This topic is a good example because it is about one of the greatest golfers of all time that we have had the privilege of watching play.

At times things can get heated because we think no one may be understanding our position or misinformation appears or more often, we read emotion in a post that really is not there. This happens a lot. We read the post as snarky or sarcastic or sanctimonious when it really isn't. Then we respond emotionally. 

If you think someone's post is being like this, try re-reading it with the voice of Winnie the Poo in your head or some other funny voice. It will read totally different. Then you can be objective and respond objectively.

 

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎1‎/‎5‎/‎2018 at 9:45 PM, mvmac said:

Not sure what this means as a response to what I posted.

You said the swing was a Haney swing, I was pointing out it's from 2014. Then I gave my take on his head lowering move.

Would you agree that the new swing has far less head lowering?  The videos seemed pretty conclusive to me.

Mike Rooker


  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Would you agree that the new swing has far less head lowering?  The videos seemed pretty conclusive to me.

I said I agree and I think the swing looks better. I wouldn't jump to conclusive yet because he's only played in one tournament and I honestly haven't done a side by side comparison from the '17 Hero to a swing during Foley.

Lots of good players lower their head on the start of the downswing. With Tiger's swing I don't think his head lowering should be high on the list of priorities.

rory-squat-1.jpgtiger-squat-1.jpgAdam-Scott.jpgmcilroy.jpgspieth-squat-1.jpg

 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
  • Informative 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
23 minutes ago, mvmac said:

I said I agree and I think the swing looks better. I wouldn't jump to conclusive yet because he's only played in one tournament and I honestly haven't done a side by side comparison from the '17 Hero to a swing during Foley.

Lots of good players lower their head on the start of the downswing. With Tiger's swing I don't think his head lowering should be high on the list of priorities.

rory-squat-1.jpgtiger-squat-1.jpgAdam-Scott.jpgmcilroy.jpgspieth-squat-1.jpg

 

Peter Kostis analyzed Tiger's swing for years showing it in slow motion.  He would point out that dipping the head leads to getting stuck coming down and resulted in blocks to the right primarily.  The new swing seems to have eliminated that fault to a great degree.   Standing more erect has also helped.

Mike Rooker


  • Administrator
Posted
37 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Peter Kostis analyzed Tiger's swing for years showing it in slow motion.  He would point out that dipping the head leads to getting stuck coming down and resulted in blocks to the right primarily.  The new swing seems to have eliminated that fault to a great degree.   Standing more erect has also helped.

In the opinion of many, Peter Kostis is a lousy instructor. @mvmac just showed you a bunch of PGA Tour winners dipping.

Brandel Chamblee and Johnny Miller would rail on Tiger dipping every time he hit a poor (often really only by his standards) shot, and ignore it when he hit good shots. And yet…

Good players go down so that they can explode upward.

That video, btw, is from 2010.

BTW, that's not to say that Tiger should dip as much as he wants, or that any method or way in which he "dips" is okay. Tiger tended to dip a bit differently at various times. When it got really extreme (perhaps in trying to create even more power at the bottom), it was not only a little excessive but it was done kind of improperly.

But blanket statements about Tiger dipping are almost always pretty inaccurate. Tiger dipped when he was playing well in 2000, he dipped when he was tearing it up as a junior, he dipped in 2007-2008 when he was playing well… etc.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, iacas said:

In the opinion of many, Peter Kostis is a lousy instructor. @mvmac just showed you a bunch of PGA Tour winners dipping.

Brandel Chamblee and Johnny Miller would rail on Tiger dipping every time he hit a poor (often really only by his standards) shot, and ignore it when he hit good shots. And yet…

Good players go down so that they can explode upward.

That video, btw, is from 2010.

BTW, that's not to say that Tiger should dip as much as he wants, or that any method or way in which he "dips" is okay. Tiger tended to dip a bit differently at various times. When it got really extreme (perhaps in trying to create even more power at the bottom), it was not only a little excessive but it was done kind of improperly.

But blanket statements about Tiger dipping are almost always pretty inaccurate. Tiger dipped when he was playing well in 2000, he dipped when he was tearing it up as a junior, he dipped in 2007-2008 when he was playing well… etc.

So you think there is no merit in analyzing the excessive head dipping resulting in getting stuck and blocking the ball.  Hey, it was all there in slow motion.  More than Kostis reached that conclusion.  4 instructors later, it looks like the problem is pretty much cured now.  Much straighter, good iron play with the better set up and swing.  Keep that up and he will win this year.

Mike Rooker


  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, Veteran Golf Fan said:

So you think there is no merit in analyzing the excessive head dipping resulting in getting stuck and blocking the ball.  Hey, it was all there in slow motion. More than Kostis reached that conclusion. 4 instructors later, it looks like the problem is pretty much cured now.

Genuinely curious… do you read what people type before you respond?

  • Tiger has always dipped.
  • Many other good players dip.
  • Tiger can occasionally dip a little too much or a little "incorrectly," but that doesn't mean he should ever strive to have "no dip."
  • The commentators who said they never dipped are easily shown to be wrong.

I'm just saying the above. Including the first bullet point. Tiger has dipped as long as he's been on the world stage.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, iacas said:

Genuinely curious… do you read what people type before you respond?

  • Tiger has always dipped.
  • Many other good players dip.
  • Tiger can occasionally dip a little too much or a little "incorrectly," but that doesn't mean he should ever strive to have "no dip."
  • The commentators who said they never dipped are easily shown to be wrong.

I'm just saying the above. Including the first bullet point. Tiger has dipped as long as he's been on the world stage.

Genuinely concerned about your know it all attitude.   Do you even know what "excessive" means?  Do you know what "getting stuck" means from excessive dipping?  I didn't think so.  Keep on ranting.

Edited by iacas
removed - again - double quote

Mike Rooker


Posted
6 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Genuinely concerned about your know it all attitude.   Do you even know what "excessive" means?  Do you know what "getting stuck" means from excessive dipping?  I didn't think so.  Keep on ranting.

 

I'm pretty sure anyone would take the results that Tiger had with that "excessive" dipping.

Are you making comments, or do you feel you have to not only have to be right in what you've said but have everyone else agree with you?
(not that there aren't others who also want to be right and have others agree)

Why is it so important to you not only that Tiger returns to dominate the tour, but you to question or challenge those who just don't see it (yet)?

Life is short - make a post & move on (and get out and play golf - unless your like those of us who are living where snow covers the course)
 

  • Like 1

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Genuinely concerned about your know it all attitude.   Do you even know what "excessive" means?  Do you know what "getting stuck" means from excessive dipping?  I didn't think so.  Keep on ranting.

This is getting old, fast.

25 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

So you think there is no merit in analyzing the excessive head dipping

I never said that.

You haven't defined "excessive," though I will add here that I did say:

40 minutes ago, iacas said:

BTW, that's not to say that Tiger should dip as much as he wants, or that any method or way in which he "dips" is okay. Tiger tended to dip a bit differently at various times. When it got really extreme (perhaps in trying to create even more power at the bottom), it was not only a little excessive but it was done kind of improperly.

That, combined with your previous response to @mvmac, had me genuinely wondering if you read what other people typed.

25 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

resulting in getting stuck and blocking the ball.

You can dip - even "excessively" and not get stuck. Heck, in a lot of ways, goat humping (the opposite of Tiger dipping in many ways) would lead to getting stuck. Dipping as Tiger did often provides more room for the right elbow.

9 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Do you even know what "excessive" means?

Do you? It's not like we've defined it here, so my answer is actually that "nobody knows" because we've not defined it. More correctly, "nobody agrees," at any rate.

11 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

Do you know what "getting stuck" means from excessive dipping? I didn't think so. Keep on ranting.

Yeah, dude, you don't get to behave like that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

This is getting old, fast.

I never said that.

You haven't defined "excessive," though I will add here that I did say:

That, combined with your previous response to @mvmac, had me genuinely wondering if you read what other people typed.

You can dip - even "excessively" and not get stuck. Heck, in a lot of ways, goat humping (the opposite of Tiger dipping in many ways) would lead to getting stuck. Dipping as Tiger did often provides more room for the right elbow.

Do you? It's not like we've defined it here, so my answer is actually that "nobody knows" because we've not defined it. More correctly, "nobody agrees," at any rate.

Yeah, dude, you don't get to behave like that.

Allow me to define it since you said I haven't defined it.  Excessive - Going beyond the usual, necessary or proper limit or degree.  Yes, Tiger went way beyond the proper limit or degree when starting down and it led to inconsistency and numerous blocks due to getting stuck.  During the Haney years, he had trouble hitting the world with a driver because of "excessive" head dipping and the stuck position.   Kostis was right, by the way.

Mike Rooker


Note: This thread is 3059 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • They weren't necessarily short - I don't remember the exact specifics of all of it, but some of them were missing a little left or right or both. Day 1 they were landing on the edge and kicking on, where day 2 they were just missing and kicking down into the bunkers and did it a lot. I think all told I actually went into bunkers on 8 holes. Some of them were not good shots. Like a few examples, on 8, the pin was in the back. I hit it solidly, but pulled it and it went long, over the bunker into long grass. I had the ball in sandy earth with long grass around it and about a foot below my feet. That next shot I tried to do what I could but it went into the bunker in front of me. Into a footprint. That one I dug out of the footprint, but still in the bunker. Got that one out of the bunker, but into the fringe grass in front of me. Chipped that one on a bit hard and two putts later made a 7. Another was on 14. The flag was on the little finger of green front left. I tried to play a little past it and a little right. Shoved it maybe 10 yards right of where I wanted to and the carry over the bunker gets longer the further right you go and that one hit the grass between the green and the bunker and came back down into the sand, left it in there and didn't get up and down on the next one. I think carrywise it carried about as far as I was planning on it doing so. Another was on 6, leaked my drive a little right into the fairway bunker. Hit a nearly good shot from there that went a little left and a little short and kicked into the bunker front left. That was a strike thing and just a hard shot. Did similar on 18. Drive in the right bunker, slightly heavy second that hit the bank between green and bunker again and kicked back into the sand. I think the tiredness manifested more as not squaring the face up so well and less as slowing down.
    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.