Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SAGolfLuvr

Is worrying about my non-conforming clubs silly?

11 posts / 2521 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Good Day Gents,

My best handicap was 7.7 years ago. Now I am a 14.4 because I don't practice like I used to (time constraints and poor fitness). However I still love to play and will play in a tournament when I can. I try my best to follow all USGA rules. However, I play with Ping i3 irons. I can't find them on the conforming list. It bothers me that my clubs wouldn't be allowed in a USGA sanctioned event. Is it silly of me to think this way? Yes I see many others are also playing old non-conforming clubs but that doesn't matter to me. I just don't want to feel like I would be breaking a rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

Yes. I want to play in some Alamo City Golf tournaments this year to get some experience. Then play next year to see how I would place. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only matters for "Official" events. Anyone who would notice and complain in a casual round has issues. I play in many events and I can say for certain that I have never looked at my opponent or playing partner's bag. I wouldn't be shocked if someone I plaid against had 15 clubs. I have my own game to focus on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For the current Rules, the requirement that clubs meet the 2010 groove is only adopted under a specific Condition of Competition, and the USGA suggest that this only be applied for very high-level competitions.  I doubt that a local tournament would have the requirement, so your i3 clubs will be perfectly legal.  See Decision 4-1/1, end of the second paragraph 

Quote

A Committee that wishes to limit players to clubs manufactured with grooves and/or punch marks that conform to all aspects of the Rules of Golf, including those that are effective from January 1, 2010, may adopt the condition of competition detailed below. While this condition of competition may be adopted for any competition, it is recommended only for competitions involving expert players (e.g., professional golf or the highest level of amateur golf).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As re you 100% sure your your I3s are non confirming? Is it the grooves that might be a problem? 

I would contact a Ping rep and ask to find out for sure. 

If you are not playing in a sanctioned events, or for a handicap, I probably wouldn't worry about it. Myself, when playing, I never worry about the equipment the other person is playing. This includes balls too. I just don't care. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am pretty sure the i3 irons are non-conforming to the groove regulation.  However, as stated earlier, this doesn't apply unless there is a condition in effect for the event you are playing.  This is what the USGA site I located says:

Clubs that conform to the rules that were in effect prior to Jan. 1, 2010 will continue to conform to the Rules of Golf until at least 2024, unless the Condition is in effect.

i3 irons have U grooves which met the rules prior to the 2010 cut off; I'm only familiar as I am playing the i3 O-Size irons.  I recall that my irons became non-conforming with the newer USGA groove rules.  My specific model irons don't appear in the USGA equipment search.  There are several i3 models listed in the USGA search tool.  You can find it at this link.  If I can manage to find where I read about my irons when this all came about, I'll pass it along.

https://www.usga.org/InfoClubsDB/intro.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DaveP043, Weberd27 and all that are telling me I should be fine. The rules Dave and Weberd posted make me feel much better about it. So now I can save up for some new clubs for 2024 and I have no excuse. Gents, Thanks again.

P.S. I checked the conforming database. My Ping i3 are non-conforming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just asked my club's mrn's club guru about the groove issue. He said that they had no intentions to impose a pga,  professionals' rule on the amateurs who play their courses. That making amateurs buy conforming groove clubs, would probably cost the GC, and the mens'/womens'  clubs lost revenue, due to a decline in members. 

Now to the purist, this is a poor attitude as far as rules are concerned. However, from a business stand point, it's not a bad call. 

He went on to say that most amateurs don't hit the ball well enough to take advatage of the difference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, like @weberd27 mentioned, clubs manufactured prior to 2010 are conforming until 2024, except for PGA Tour play or elite amateur events like the U.S. Am and similar events.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Golf is an obscenely expensive pastime.

Neither the R&A nor the USGA subsidizes my expenses.

That being the case, I play with the clubs and the number of clubs with which I most enjoy playing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • during edit it became a double post, so ive deleted all from this one, but have to add one chart i cant add in to the first post.
    • Make sure you can see where you make impact on the face. The numbers above is form a impact LOW on the face, where launch is low and spin is high. In your case there is room for improvement if you can dial in a better impact position, so make sure impact is on the upper 1/3 of the face. If your preference for ball flight is a draw, the upper 1/3 and 3/8 to 4/8" against the toe side is what makes the longest carry. The same club, shaft player and swing, might see spin levels from 4000 to below 2000 ALL depending on where we make impact (height) Launch angle might vary by up to 4* from low on the face to the upper 1/3, so just by dialing in a better impact, you can both gain a few miles ball speed, get launch angle 2 or maybe 3 higher, and cut spin levels below 2400. AS average we see a difference of 240 rpms of spin for each 1/8" we go up or down on the face, so to get below 3000, we need to move impact 3/8" higher than its now, but i suspect it to be way down, so your potential for improvement is very good. For ball speed, 154 is within reach, and if we say launch goes up by 2* and we  raise impact by 6/8 we should see 1400-1500 as drop in spin, and if we enter those numbers on Flightscope optimizer (who give shorter return numbers than Trackman), it will look like this. All numbers from Flighstscope so we get the DIFFERENCE right. 151.5 Ball speed - 10.7 Launch - 3667 spin = 234 carry - 251 Total 154 Ball speed - 12.7 Launch - 2250 spin = 251 carry - 278 total About 16 yards more carry...total is depending on fairways, and lower spin is always more roll. Its still more than "1 club shorter inn" to get from the same club and swing. Both Trackman and Flightscope has CHANGED their algorithms lately, Trackman return numbers has become longer than they was, Flightscope has gone the other way and return shorter numbers, but dont ask me why, its just a observation where i notice that Flightscope has shrink-ed their numbers average about 5%, i dont have a number for Trackman, but i seems like 3-4% longer, so they are now close to the generous distances we might see from CG2,   I made this chart using Flighscope optimizer a few years ago, and they are more inline whit what Trackman returns now. They was made to illustrate what we could gain simply by dialing in a better impact, so start numbers for spin and launch comes from Trackmans Optimum charts, but ive used 1.5 as smash instead of 1.48 as they use on their charts as the max for 100 mph club speed.
    • It should apply to anything you order from them, but you don’t need that thing and I recommend just kneeling on a towel or something.
    • To make this right, club length alone is not enough, we need "the 3 holy" parameters set right for the actual player, and those are Play length, Total weight, and Balance or how the player feels the weight distribution between head shaft and grip. Way to many player has the idea that the longer the shaft is, the more club speed are we able to generate, but thats not true at all, since its also a question of total weight and balance or resistance if you like. At some point we can no longer gain club speed, and all we get going longer than that is inconsistent impact. No drivers has the same BALL speed all over the face, so unless we are able to make impact where COR is at the max, we loose ball speed and distance, and impact who is to far out from VCOG puts horizontal gear effects to play, so we also loose directional dispersion. Thats why Tour players dont play standard, they loose directional dispersion and cant choose what side of the fairway they wants their lay up, so a potential few yards longer as max cant pay back what we loose on dispersion. Ive wrote a DIY driver tune up guide, who is the same method ive been using during fitting of players of all levels, and it works. You WILL improve both your average distance, AND dispersion, and thats good for scoring, so unless the club we make is for LONG DRIVING, most players benefit from going shorter than standard. If you fit to play "standard" length irons, 44.00" is a good match on the driver, and if your irons is plus 0.5" you might add the same to the driver who then becomes 44.50". Elite amateurs and PROs with a very good eye to hand coordination might add up to 0.5" inch on those numbers. ONLY players with a natural flat swing plane, with a very good eye to hand coordination will benefit from a driver longer than this, and thats why i never made a driver longer than 45.00"  When we go shorter we loos SW or feel of head weight, but DONT reset the original value, but use this opportunity to find what works the best for you, and that might be both lower or higher than standard, so dont trace "standard values", its not the same as that they work for you.  During this testing, lead tape is a must, and if you dont want to play with lead tape there is other options when you know how much weight is needed, but until then lead tape is whats needed so we can dial in what works the best. Total weight is also important, and when we go shorter, we can use 5 grams pr inch UP on shaft weight as rule of thumb, so if we have a club thats 45.00" who feel right on shaft weight, that shaft is not ideal at 44.00", so when going shorter, we should start from a shaft weight ABOVE our needs. About distance and ball speed. Many players who plays a standard length driver has a average PTR or Smash factor below 1.44 (on Trackman or Flightscope), and if this player has 100 mph as measured club speed he gets average 144 mph ball speed. If he can keep the same club speed, and improve his impact, he should be able to see a PTR of 1.50 to 1.52 as the max, (or 150 to 152 ball speed in this case), and for each mpg ball speed we can gain, we get average 2 yards more carry. The average player has the potential to improve ball speed from 144 to 150 or 152, so thats 6-8 Mph ball speed or 12-16 yards more carry, but now with better dispersion side ways. Some player will actually GAIN club speed going shorter, AND improve impact at the same time, so its all about finding the players limit for how long a club he should play, what total weight that club should have, and what balance, the rest is feel, and LOFT to get ball flight as we want it. Those who doubt this should give it a try them self, and pay attention to impact pattern on the face. Ideal for a draw is on the upper 1/3 of the face, 3/8 to 0.5" against the toe side, but to really make it right, we should start by finding where VCOG i located on the face. .
    • I’ve lifted weights for years, long before I ever played golf. I can only assume it helped because I always get complimented on my power. I hit it further than anyone I play with (just not straight lol) I weight train for strength and size primarily 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. ghphjuriya
      ghphjuriya
      (27 years old)
    2. GolfGuy1980
      GolfGuy1980
      (39 years old)
    3. RyckyRych
      RyckyRych
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...