Jump to content
IGNORED

Club head speed


Buckeyebowman
Note: This thread is 2104 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

There have been many discussions about what Palmer, Nicklaus, etc, could do with modern golf balls and equipment. Being as there were no flight monitors, Trackman, Flightscope, or whatever back when those guys were playing we may have no idea. But I had an idea. Are there any slo-mo videos of their swings? We know there are those all the way back to Bobby Jones, and that ground breaking series of instructional films he produced.

I figure that a normal 30 fps frame rate wouldn't work since the clubhead would just be a blur going through the ball. It would have to be slo-mo. If such footage existed couldn't some calculations be done comparing distance traveled over time elapsed, by counting frames, to come up with a good approximation of mph clubhead speed?

I don't know where this idea came from, it just popped up in my head.

Edited by Buckeyebowman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I actually remember someone doing an experiment like this using old videos along with videos of current pros using old clubs. IIRC they concluded that he majority of player were around 120 mph based on distances and frames per second.

Not sure how accurate this estimate is, but it seems pretty close..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 7/29/2018 at 10:26 PM, A Gap Wedge said:

I actually remember someone doing an experiment like this using old videos along with videos of current pros using old clubs. IIRC they concluded that he majority of player were around 120 mph based on distances and frames per second.

Not sure how accurate this estimate is, but it seems pretty close..

That seems off. Today's players are much more athletic than previous generations, and the current average is about 113. There's no way they were faster back then.

  • Upvote 1

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, colin007 said:

That seems off. Today's players are much more athletic than previous generations, and the current average is about 113. There's no way they were faster back then.

Older pros were also swinging heavier and shorter clubs, both factors that will reduce clubhead speed.

Of course you're talking about tour average and it's possible whoever did the study @A Gap Wedge is alluding to only looked at the top pros of any given era, so the numbers will get skewed a bit. According to this pga.com article:

Quote

Using high-speed film analysis, experts estimate legendary amateur Bobby Jones had a swing speed of 117 miles per hour in the 1930s - using hickory shafts. 

It's entirely possible Jones would exceed 120 mph with modern equipment.

Then there's also this article saying Jack Nicklaus had his swing speed measured for the first time at 58 years old and he hit 118 mph.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 hours ago, colin007 said:

That seems off. Today's players are much more athletic than previous generations, and the current average is about 113. There's no way they were faster back then.

That's a point, but I'm talking about the top guys like Palmer and Nicklaus. The big hitters. In particular, I've seen film clips of Jack taking some thunderous cuts with a driver!

And, years ago, Palmer came to town to play the inaugural round at a Pete Dye design, Avalon Lakes, against the top local pro. Palmer drove it so far past this guy, I felt sorry for him. On one tee, as Palmer was teeing up his ball, someone in the gallery called out "Crunch one, Arnie!" Arnie did, indeed, crunch one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 hours ago, colin007 said:

That seems off. Today's players are much more athletic than previous generations, and the current average is about 113. There's no way they were faster back then.

I was referring not to the average, but the top guys that were amount the longer hitters. Heck even I can do 113 if I go at i, just not average it. I’m sure the average back then was below 113 due to shafts and golfers being less focused on conditioning, but there were longer hitters getting close to 120mph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And to think they were doing it while wearing suits and ties (e.g. Bobby Jones, Walter Hagen, Ben Hogan, etc...)!

If they were indeed hitting 300 yards drives, and the measurement of those hasn't really changed much since then, they had to have the swing speed needed to produce those today, and then some given how much better the equipment (and the ball) is today. I think Arnie, Jack and Greg Norman would all be up there, in terms of swing speed, with the best of them today, save perhaps the long drive competitors.

Philippe

:callaway: Maverick Driver, 3W, 5W Big Bertha 
:mizuno: JPX 900 Forged 4-GW
:mizuno:  T7 55-09 and 60-10 forged wedges,
:odyssey: #7 putter (Slim 3.0 grip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
8 minutes ago, sjduffers said:

And to think they were doing it while wearing suits and ties (e.g. Bobby Jones, Walter Hagen, Ben Hogan, etc...)!

I've never seen a picture of Hogan playing in a suit and tie. He's like two decades after Jones and Hagen.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, billchao said:

I've never seen a picture of Hogan playing in a suit and tie. He's like two decades after Jones and Hagen.

Maybe not the full suit, but definitely the tie.

Use Google Image search ("Ben Hogan pictures")...

Regardless, he was still wearing dress shirts, much like Phil is doing now, lol! 

 

Edited by sjduffers

Philippe

:callaway: Maverick Driver, 3W, 5W Big Bertha 
:mizuno: JPX 900 Forged 4-GW
:mizuno:  T7 55-09 and 60-10 forged wedges,
:odyssey: #7 putter (Slim 3.0 grip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just thinking about the the balls used by the ancient ones. Hitting 300 yards back then, may have required faster swing speeds, than what today's balls, and clubs might require for the same distances. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't have any concrete facts to support this, but I do not believe the previous generations were  carrying the ball anywhere near the modern guys. Any number of circumstances back then could've lead to a 300 yard total after a 250 carry.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

28 minutes ago, colin007 said:

I don't have any concrete facts to support this, but I do not believe the previous generations were  carrying the ball anywhere near the modern guys. Any number of circumstances back then could've lead to a 300 yard total after a 250 carry.

I'd tend to agree. If for no other reason, in the absence of proof it's human nature to exaggerate.

But there have always been freaks of nature in every era. I assume an occasional 300 yards of carry might have been possible, just very rare.

Shorter distances compared to today with lesser equipment still would have been impressive as it would have been relative to what everyone else was hitting. (I wonder what kind of expressions you'd hear from the gallery in 1955 when someone hit a 280 yard drive?)

Without the internet, arguments between amateurs would take place at the clubhouse and would consist of someone calling bullshit on his buddy's claim of carrying his 1 wood 230 yards. They'd have to go out there and step off the yardage just to settle it.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know that they were hitting it 300, but they were hitting farther than everybody else at the time. Plus, there's the debate of what some of these players might be able to do with modern equipment.

I figure if Jones and Hagen might generate 110 mph clubhead speed w/hickory shafts and persimmon driver heads, God only knows what they might do with graphite and titanium!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, colin007 said:

I don't have any concrete facts to support this, but I do not believe the previous generations were  carrying the ball anywhere near the modern guys.

I don't think anyone is saying that.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2104 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 554, May 9, 2024 Practiced a bit downtown at Golf Evolution. Would have loved to get more work in, but oh well.
    • I think if I could hit a 2nd shot when I did not like the result from the 1st I am sure I would get some lower scores.  I guess the idea is to mentally put yourself in a position where you need to make a really great shot, not just a good shot.  For example, hitting from the lie next to the creek his 1st chip was, in my view, pretty good but it was not "Great" in his opinion so he tried to do better on the mulligan, but he failed and was farther from the hole. I see myself doing this more on the range.  For example, after a period of practice I will mentally say I need to hit 4 good shots in a row.  I start with a Driver and if that is good then I do a 3 Hybrid followed by a pitch with a wedge and finally by a short chip.  If any shot is "Bad" I have to start over.      
    • That’s how I interpreted it. You’re giving yourself two mulligans on every shot. Yea it’s just a variation of getting used to scoring low. I’m curious how valuable that practice is. I guess for some people they feel mounting pressure from playing a string of holes well? I’m kind of the complete opposite TBH. Once I start putting together good holes, I get a little swagger and if anything I get overconfident. I start thinking I can hit the green from anywhere, I can hit my driver to the smallest of targets, and everything inside of 10’ is going in. None of that is true, of course, and I inevitably will hit a miss that brings me back down to earth.
    • Wordle 1,055 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I saw this video yesterday, couldn't figure out what he meant, then saw this thread and thought "oh maybe someone knows what he was talking about" and you guys are in the same place as me.  I *think* what he's suggesting is that you play a game such that going low is expected. He said there are different variations of it. I think his variation is you get three goes at a shot. You hit your first shot and it's good enough, then you just take it. If it's not good enough then you can abandon that shot and play another. If you still don't like it, you can hit it a third time, but then you're stuck with it. He's good enough that three goes at a shot ought to give him one that's good enough to move on. He did mention his parameters for what counts as "good enough", although I do note that he should have hit a third go on that pitch from the hazard based on that. He holed the putt though so it worked out in the end. I think if you're not as good as he is (which let's face it is everyone here and virtually everyone on the planet), then you'd adjust those rules to make it such that you might manage to make 5 birdies in a row. So maybe you play a two ball scramble with yourself and if you don't like either one then you can abandon those and hit a third or you play a three ball scramble or whatever it is that you need to make your standard work.  At its base though, it's just like going out and playing from the front tees or playing a scramble with yourself. The goal is to gain comfort with making lots of birdies and going way under par, so that when you find yourself in that situation in a real game, you don't panic. It's an interesting variation and if I ever got to play "for fun" at my home course, then I'd definitely try it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...