Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
broombroom

Does increasing xfactor almost guarantee increasing distance?

18 posts in this topic

In other words if I don't change anything in my swing apart from restricting my hips a little more will I see improved distance?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I would say the only thing increasing "x factor" would do is make for some sore joints.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by broombroom

In other words if I don't change anything in my swing apart from restricting my hips a little more will I see improved distance?

God no. The X-Factor is a crock of shit, and pretty much every regular from this community knows it. For the love of all that is sacred, don't restrict your hip turn!

Please read this thread so you don't ruin your swing and/or hurt yourself: http://thesandtrap.com/t/55080/myth-of-maintaining-address-flexion-in-the-rear-knee

Bubba Watson has the biggest backswing hip turn of anyone on the PGA tour. Hmmm, I wonder how far he hits it?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Pretty sure the "inventor" of the X factor has stopped promoting the X factor because of the aforementioned crock of brown-stuff.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

God no. The X-Factor is a crock of shit, and pretty much every regular from this community knows it. For the love of all that is sacred, don't restrict your hip turn! Please read this thread so you don't ruin your swing and/or hurt yourself: [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/t/55080/myth-of-maintaining-address-flexion-in-the-rear-knee]http://thesandtrap.com/t/55080/myth-of-maintaining-address-flexion-in-the-rear-knee[/URL] Bubba Watson has the biggest backswing hip turn of anyone on the PGA tour. Hmmm, I wonder how far he hits it?

yes I understand this but he could still have a big xfactor with a big shoulder turn. There are different ways of achieving speed. Bubba swings very wide with a big arc his power source.does xfactor play a part in speed?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't like the answers you have been given so far, you could very easily try it for yourself the next time you are at the range.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

X-Factor... Y-Factor... Both are poor instructional swing jargon.  Do yourself a favor and check out this thread...

http://thesandtrap.com/t/55426/introducing-five-simple-keys

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

God no. The X-Factor is a crock of shit, and pretty much every regular from this community knows it. For the love of all that is sacred, don't restrict your hip turn!

JetFan,

You need to stop holding back and tell us how you really feel! .  Your response made my day!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

God no. The X-Factor is a crock of shit, and pretty much every regular from this community knows it. For the love of all that is sacred, don't restrict your hip turn!

Please read this thread so you don't ruin your swing and/or hurt yourself: http://thesandtrap.com/t/55080/myth-of-maintaining-address-flexion-in-the-rear-knee

Bubba Watson has the biggest backswing hip turn of anyone on the PGA tour. Hmmm, I wonder how far he hits it?


You might want to read up on McLean's latest (2008) discussion about his X-factor.  Not about restricting the hip turn, but increasing the differential between the upper body and the hips at the beginning of the downswing, one of the reasons for the pro player's length.  In other words, leading the downswing with the lower body, which is pretty good advice.

There's big world out there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Harmonious

You might want to read up on McLean's latest (2008) discussion about his X-factor.  Not about restricting the hip turn, but increasing the differential between the upper body and the hips at the beginning of the downswing, one of the reasons for the pro player's length.  In other words, leading the downswing with the lower body, which is pretty good advice.

There's big world out there.

That's called the X-Factor Stretch and McLean didn't invent that, it was more the biomechanists that used his X-Factor term and added the "stretch" to cover an increase in that angle during transition: http://philcheetham.com/the-importance-of-stretching-the-x-factor-in-the-downswing-of-golf-the-x-factor-stretch/ . Contrary to the Mclean X-Factor stuff, it's a legitimate thing in the golf swing. The X-Factor itself... not so much.

In other words, you're both right.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've already read about that. Erik's posted about it. The OP was not referring to this, clearly. He specifically said he wanted to restrict his hip turn, and the "X-Factor stretch" is not about restricting the hip turn, as you said.

I'm aware of this bigger world. Bubba Watson, who I referred to my first post as having an enormous backswing hip turn, increases the differential between his hips and shoulders on his downswing by a pretty considerable margin:

So much hip turn his belt buckle is facing the camera.

Shoulders still really closed. Hips have already rotated something like 50 degrees? Insane.

Originally Posted by Harmonious

There's big world out there.

Mmm hmmmm. I agree. Do you really think I'm that close minded though?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sorry for the double post, but the edit time ran out on the above one.

Originally Posted by boogielicious

JetFan,

You need to stop holding back and tell us how you really feel!  .  Your response made my day!

Hehe, thanks, man. Yea, I figured I'd save the guy his lower back with some tough love. If this was the first ever "should I restrict my hip turn for power" thread, I'd probably have approached it differently. But because this is like the 100th one, I thought I'd go this route this time

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Let me play devils advocate here. Go back a good 3-4 years when Anthony Kim was playing well. The guy has little to no hip turn and he bombed it. I wonder how he did it honestly. He most likely could have gotten more power through a larger turn of the hips but instead he choked up and kept his back knee flexed. For some I truly believe that keeping that back knee can be beneficial because it could be easier to hit the ball squarer. What I mean by that is you could have an easier time staying in posture and making crisp contact. Just my two cents.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by jd924

Let me play devils advocate here. Go back a good 3-4 years when Anthony Kim was playing well. The guy has little to no hip turn and he bombed it. I wonder how he did it honestly. He most likely could have gotten more power through a larger turn of the hips but instead he choked up and kept his back knee flexed. For some I truly believe that keeping that back knee can be beneficial because it could be easier to hit the ball squarer. What I mean by that is you could have an easier time staying in posture and making crisp contact. Just my two cents.

Yea, I understand what you're saying. Anthony Kim is a good example of someone who can do this. Yani Tseng does this too.

You've really gotta be gifted though to pull it off -- meaning you are flexible enough to do it and still turn your shoulders a lot, not hurt yourself, not let your head sway a bunch, and not turn your shoulders too flat. Sure, if someone can do that comfortably and still hit the ball with power and accuracy, I would agree it's probably fine. Most can't though. Like 99% of people can't.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Yea, I understand what you're saying. Anthony Kim is a good example of someone who can do this. Yani Tseng does this too.

You've really gotta be gifted though to pull it off -- meaning you are flexible enough to do it and still turn your shoulders a lot, not hurt yourself, not let your head sway a bunch, and not turn your shoulders too flat. Sure, if someone can do that comfortably and still hit the ball with power and accuracy, I would agree it's probably fine. Most can't though. Like 99% of people can't.

99%? Can I have some statistical backing for this assumption

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by jd924

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Yea, I understand what you're saying. Anthony Kim is a good example of someone who can do this. Yani Tseng does this too.

You've really gotta be gifted though to pull it off -- meaning you are flexible enough to do it and still turn your shoulders a lot, not hurt yourself, not let your head sway a bunch, and not turn your shoulders too flat. Sure, if someone can do that comfortably and still hit the ball with power and accuracy, I would agree it's probably fine. Most can't though. Like 99% of people can't.

99%? Can I have some statistical backing for this assumption

Yes, those statistics I believe are somewhere tucked away in a file cabinet in my rear end. I'll check with my secretary ... perhaps a little hyperbole with that post you quoted, but I really only think its just a little.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Leaving your shoulder turn at 90 degrees and starting your hip turn in the downswing is what gives you power, is this what they refer to as disassociation?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by jd924

Let me play devils advocate here. Go back a good 3-4 years when Anthony Kim was playing well. The guy has little to no hip turn and he bombed it. I wonder how he did it honestly. He most likely could have gotten more power through a larger turn of the hips but instead he choked up and kept his back knee flexed. For some I truly believe that keeping that back knee can be beneficial because it could be easier to hit the ball squarer. What I mean by that is you could have an easier time staying in posture and making crisp contact. Just my two cents.

Anthony Kim is one of the only people I've ever seen do this on the PGA Tour.

Exceptions to every rule. And he may not even be an exception - he might have hit the ball longer with a little hip turn. We don't know.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • alternatives inside the well being
      alternatives inside the well being university, launches a manufacturer new digestive and immune Beard Czar  product Probiotic   Viatropin  evaluation Probiotic American American that entails newly realized traces of micro organism worthwhile to more than a few wellness issues. It has a difficult technique to alleviate digestive problems and toughen whole physique wellbeing.An educated health practitioner and wellness advised who studied comfort on the tutoring of California, perfect Biotics is a gut yeast complement that has the capabilities to absorb diet and minerals safely, fight off infections and strengthen healthful digestion," experiences James.When requested involving the selections of excellent Biotics, Dr. Cary outlined, "There are two types of micro organism decided all through the digestive tract, hazardous micro organism and worthy micro organism.  http://drozforskolin.org/beard-czar-reviews/
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      Here's some more below about the lowest you might expect - even on an easy course. I think this is largely true, but pros don't tend to play a lot on 'easy' courses so there doesn't seem to be even much anecdotal stuff. The quote below describes what's considered the 'perfect round'. I guess you could also consider a 'go-for-green' perfect round where you also hit all the par 5's in two and one-putted those for eagle for a 'go-for-green perfect' score of 50. Obviously the likelihood of doing this in a single round defies the essence of golf, but it's a good a hard theoretical lower limit that probably depends more on the par than the course rating. Likely the odds grow exponentially as the percentage of birdied / eagled holes rises. I think we can discount albatrosses as a 'perfect round' option. Most tournament pro scores don't get below 56 and 59 with about an 80/20 rule separating the more frequent 59s from the 58's. That's 4-5 strokes (assuming par 72) over the 'perfect round' and 8-9 over the 'go-for-green perfect round', each of which represent grabbing about 75% and 61% respectively of the potential shots under par realistically available. I suppose a short par-4 would add another potential eagle opportunity, but we'll discount that as I'm not sure how universal they are. The lowest tournament round was 55 (par of 71) by one single golfer out of how many total tournament rounds by pros and plus HCP amateurs over the years? So while 55 is humanly achievable it's super rare and likely represents the lower limit of any possible likelihood. That would put the absolute lowest threshold around 17.8 below the course rating (72.8) and 16 below par. So there's a lot of room to go below even a low course rating or par of 70. I don't think the expected scores would get too squished and the distribution would still likely be normal in shape. The thing that is probably unrealistic is how narrow the range of expected scores is. The field is extremely consistent, but I think a single individual player (whose average score is the same as the field) will have a score variance significantly larger than the field. I think the mode likely stays the same while the distribution flattens / spreads out more into the tails with a little more probability to both go low and high and less certainty of shooting within a stroke or two of the mode / most likely score.  
    • Difference in These Putters Besides Price?
      My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts! Someone beat me to it, but there are obvious differences in the appearance of those two putters. The most obvious is that the alignment marks don't align! And the mark on the instep (if that's what it's called), looks like it was hacked in with a machete or maybe a cold chisel. Never mind that it looked like it laid in a barn for 10 years! Hey, I'm a senior and retired, so I'm always on the lookout for a bargain, but I refuse to buy cheap crap just because it's cheap. I remember a radio show I heard years ago where the discussion was about value vs cost. A woman called in and said she didn't have a lot of money, so she couldn't afford to buy "cheap". The host asked her what she meant. She replied that buying cheap stuff that does not perform and wears out early is more expensive in the long run than buying top quality goods that do the job and will last! Admittedly, they weren't talking golf equipment here, but the idea is the same.
    • Graduate School Study. Please fill out this 5 minute survey.
      Please take 5 minutes out of your day and complete this survey for our research paper.  Thank you very much! https://usfca.co1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_5pRgiaKHZleaZjT
    • http://www.athleticgreensfacts.com/lift-x/
      Therefore, use a nurturing day cream to which at least a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 15 has been added. If you spend the day out in the sun, use a sunscreen with at least SPF 30. Anti if you have oily skin, it is wise to opt for oil-free sunscreen creams. Sensitive lift x  skin: do's and don'ts in skincare Uiterlijk8 April 2016 sensitive skin: Do's and Don'ts Sensitive skin often needs additional attention. However, a wrong approach can be harmful to your skin, leaving your delicate skin exacerbates rather than reduces. http://www.athleticgreensfacts.com/lift-x/
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries