Jump to content
IGNORED

Question for teachers: Why are Dan McLaughlin's (www.thedanplan.com) numbers so low


garybbq
Note: This thread is 3919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by soon_tourpro

No wonder you suck due to golf instruction pretty much is clueless in general its not your fault.

I find it funny when I see a PGA well known trainer who people think is good, train someone and my brain is like why do he teach that way as it makes it hard to learn and do?

I talked to some trainers also, and I talk to players also, once you know as I done added 50 yards to someones driver and they hit it long in regard to others in 5 minutes, you have to ask what they are doing in golf.

I see so many posts about what happens inside your head before the impact and I go, dont they know once you start the swing its automatic and no consious interuption is needed?

why do people insist they can control things in a swing action that happens in a second or so that is beyond their own perception during the sequence?

oh yes, your golf instructor said you can do it.

Talent is a conceptual idea people use when they have no clue and make guesses.

its more comforting for people that fail and blame their lack of talent for the reason insetad of something else like drug abuse, or being lazy or simply listening to bad instruction.

In regard to Dan, he is doing a plan, wont mean its a good one.

He works a bit to much, he has bad mechanics IMO, but a good short game, so once he get the ball striking going which is unlikely he be dropping a lot of shots due to the rest of his game is good and solid. he struggles now due to being short and wild.

due to a lack of sequence and pivot.

Talent includes genetics, you were dealt a bad hand having to overcome cancer at 13 and the host of problems that followed.  It's a credit to your efforts and determination that you've gotten this far in the sport, but you can't dispute you'd likely be even better had you not had to overcome the physical limitations that you've faced.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You really think so? I mean 4000 hours is a seriously long time to spend on golf. I have seen quite a few high handicap golfers in reasonable shape carry past 250 and they certianly didnt spend 4000 hours with a coach.

I recently played with a guy who's swing plane was perfect. He would get over the play rehearse his swing getting it into postions (to mechanical for my liking). He left all or most of his weight on his front foot...can you guess that I was passing him like a slow boat to China. I wanted to say something but never did. I am by no means a big hitter. Your first move to the ball Is getting forward. You can't get go forward if you never go back. Leaving weight forward is good for a low punch shot. Google YouTube video Bobby Jones on clearing the left side

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

soon_tourpro, three quick things:

  1. Some people can train all they want and will never be able to jump as high as Michael Jordan does when he rolls out of bed in the morning. Talent is not a myth - it's a very real thing.
  2. Multi-quote when you want to respond to several posts.
  3. Stop knocking "instruction" because you're posting on a site with some great instructors, and you've never done anything on here to help anyone, or engaged in any real conversation, or anything like that. It's rude, and shows that you've not done anything to actually read what's posted here by Mike, myself, and others.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by MS256

My opinions with nothing to back them up

Hehehehe...this sounds like 99.99% of everything ever said on the interweb ;)

Regards

Mailman

Mailman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Whenever talent or natural ability come up I go watch this,

http://www.ted.com/talks/black_my_journey_to_yo_yo_mastery.html

However I am sure he had talent and natural ability and succeeded the first time and pulled all that off in a minute.

He had God given gifts and his hand behind him I am sure.

Most can practice a lot, wont make you good, just a bit better, then a few understand that deliberate/deep practice allows you to become good not just better and then there are even fewer that also understand that a superior strategy allows you to succeed beyond what people call talented and natural ability.

Robert Something

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I don't care how much he works at it, or how superior his strategy is, this dude ain't playin' for the Red Sox!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by soon_tourpro

Whenever talent or natural ability come up I go watch this,

http://www.ted.com/talks/black_my_journey_to_yo_yo_mastery.html

However I am sure he had talent and natural ability and succeeded the first time and pulled all that off in a minute.

He had God given gifts and his hand behind him I am sure.

Most can practice a lot, wont make you good, just a bit better, then a few understand that deliberate/deep practice allows you to become good not just better and then there are even fewer that also understand that a superior strategy allows you to succeed beyond what people call talented and natural ability.

Talk out of your ass much?

Yea, and good luck with getting people to view practicing a freakin' yo-yo with playing golf.

Seriously though, this constant platitudes thing is endless with you, man.

Constantine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Talk out of your ass much?

Yea, and good luck with getting people to view practicing a freakin' yo-yo with playing golf.

Seriously though, this constant platitudes thing is endless with you, man.


You mad Bro?

;)

Upset even?

Dont you understand?

Dont feel bad I can help you with that.

I understand the limited mindset you have and others have, its ok.

You dont want to understand? cool :)

Robert Something

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You mad Bro? ;) Upset even? Dont you understand? Dont feel bad I can help you with that. I understand the limited mindset you have and others have, its ok. You dont want to understand? cool :)

I realise you arent talking to me but, understand what? I don't recall you ever really saying anything of substance. It's all very vague.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

I realise you arent talking to me but, understand what? I don't recall you ever really saying anything of substance. It's all very vague.

I speak knucklehead, so allow me to translate.....

STP believes that with proper instruction (specifically his.....), superior strategy (does not translate to English), and proper practice, ANYONE can become a tour level player.   Talent and natural ability have no bearing on anyone's ultimate capacity to perform.

Of course, even though he's set that level of play for his own goals, in the past 3 years, he's still struggling to break 80.  But hey, he hasn't said how long it's supposed to take, so I guess there's still hope for us all, even an old, arthritic, guy like me.  I can't wait......I'm comin' after you Freddie, SOON!

  • Upvote 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by soon_tourpro

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Talk out of your ass much?

Yea, and good luck with getting people to view practicing a freakin' yo-yo with playing golf.

Seriously though, this constant platitudes thing is endless with you, man.

You mad Bro?

;)

Upset even?

Dont you understand?

Dont feel bad I can help you with that.

I understand the limited mindset you have and others have, its ok.

You dont want to understand? cool :)

Haha, I got what I wanted. A troll response. To the newer players here, this should be obvious now that soon_tourpro has nothing to offer here except providing us an example of someone who claims to know a lot about golf when in fact he is all smoke and mirrors. And I believe that I'm about the fifth or sixth member now to have called you out, so this is nothing new, I admit.

A non-troll response might have included DanPlan's swing with concrete suggestions over how he can improve. That wouldn't have been too difficult for a good instructor because DanPlan has a lot of swing flaws.

Constantine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That wouldn't have been too difficult for a good instructor because DanPlan has a lot of swing flaws.

I personally am beginning to wonder if he is truly interested in getting better or making the whole thing into a circus. Many of his posts in his blog now are which equipment he is working on and what conference talk he is giving, or interviews or other non-golf nonsense.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Why do we have another thread on the Dan Plan?  Isn't one enough?

Pretty sure OP is new enough that he didn't know about that thread and nobody bothered to combine them.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Pretty sure OP is new enough that he didn't know about that thread and nobody bothered to combine them.  ;)

Just to chime in here, I did read the other thread. I started this one to get different opinions just on Dans distance (or lack of). Not the born with talent / talent doesnt matter stuff it seems to have turned into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by mchepp

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

That wouldn't have been too difficult for a good instructor because DanPlan has a lot of swing flaws.

I personally am beginning to wonder if he is truly interested in getting better or making the whole thing into a circus. Many of his posts in his blog now are which equipment he is working on and what conference talk he is giving, or interviews or other non-golf nonsense.

I definitely think he wants to get better, but I guess it's hard to talk about his swing all the time when he doesn't really know what's wrong (I'm not saying that I do, I'm just saying that he doesn't). He doesn't spend a whole lot of time talking about his lessons or specifically the trials and tribulations on working on his teacher's suggested solutions.

I'm mostly surprised that given his enthusiasm and interest in technology that he hasn't found this website or the instructors here. Or at the very least, given his fondness for writing, reading and photography, he hasn't discovered many of the various teaching schools of thought in golf like, say, TGM or S&T; or 5SK, or MORAD, or whatever. I'm not saying he should be jumping at anything specific, I'm just saying it's surprising at this point he has yet to blog about anything like that. Maybe he has seen that stuff and just hasn't told anyone, but if he hasn't, I'm surprised at the lack of intellectual curiosity in this regard based on his own personal Trackman and his constant internet use.

If nothing else however, it seems this proves that Trackman alone in the hands of an amateur doesn't translate into better golf!

I agree though that it's a bit circus with the equipment related postings, interviews, and speaking engagement updates that dominate his website. There are numerous swing threads on this forum that are far more interesting. In fact, I'm surprised that his blog doesn't have a section devoted solely to his instruction and swing videos, like a swing thread here. And I'm obviously not referring to his Video section, which he hasn't updated in while. That part of his site was pretty darn cool. And I loved that video he posted of a nine-hole round he played earlier this winter.

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Why do we have another thread on the Dan Plan?  Isn't one enough?

Pretty sure OP is new enough that he didn't know about that thread and nobody bothered to combine them.  ;)

Haha, good point.

Constantine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I definitely think he wants to get better, but I guess it's hard to talk about his swing all the time when he doesn't really know what's wrong (I'm not saying that I do, I'm just saying that he doesn't). He doesn't spend a whole lot of time talking about his lessons or specifically the trials and tribulations on working on his teacher's suggested solutions.  I'm mostly surprised that given his enthusiasm and interest in technology that he hasn't found this website or the instructors here. Or at the very least, given his fondness for writing, reading and photography, he hasn't discovered many of the various teaching schools of thought in golf like, say, TGM or S&T; or 5SK, or MORAD, or whatever. I'm not saying he should be jumping at anything specific, I'm just saying it's surprising at this point he has yet to blog about anything like that. Maybe he has seen that stuff and just hasn't told anyone, but if he hasn't, I'm surprised at the lack of intellectual curiosity in this regard based on his own personal Trackman and his constant internet use.  If nothing else however, it seems this proves that Trackman alone in the hands of an amateur doesn't translate into better golf!  I agree though that it's a bit circus with the equipment related postings, interviews, and speaking engagement updates that dominate his website. There are numerous swing threads on this forum that are far more interesting. In fact, I'm surprised that his blog doesn't have a section devoted solely to his instruction and swing videos, like a swing thread here. And I'm obviously not referring to his Video section, which he hasn't updated in while. That part of his site was pretty darn cool. And I loved that video he posted of a nine-hole round he played earlier this winter.

I know his current coach Adrian knows a good deal of S&T.; He coaches one of my friends and most of what my friend tells me they work on is S&T-like; stuff.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...