Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
garybbq

Question for teachers: Why are Dan McLaughlin's (www.thedanplan.com) numbers so low

189 posts in this topic

Here is a link to one of his recent TrackMan stats:

http://thedanplan.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Dan-Plan-2013-04-21-Multi-Group-Report.pdf

Im just curious as to why his numbers especially his driver are so short (and not very accurate)? I mean hes been doing this for over 4000 hours and it seems odd to me that he cant hit the ball any farther.

Would his coach specifically be telling him to slow down and work on length later?

Thanks,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

He's hitting down (average is -1.3) and making poor contact (path is -2.0, face is 1.4 [push-fade], yet the spin axis is -2.6), so he's hitting the ball quite a bit towards the toe.

That's just a quickie glance at it. He does swing only 100 MPH.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am not a golf pro, but I would say this has a lot to do with the fact that natural ability is a major determining factor in how good someone can be at golf. Dan McGlaughlin is putting in as much or more time practicing golf as many tour pros, and he has had loads and loads of instruction, but his natural "god given" abilities can only take him so far. Not everyone can be a tour pro, heck not everyone can be a scratch golfer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So do you think he is capable of swinging faster then 100MPH? I guess my question is more that usually when a young(ish) guy takes up golf they swing super hard and enjoy trying to hit 300 and have 0 control, then a coach gets them to slow things down a bit and work on accuracy. I bet lots of golfers on this forum can carry the ball over 250 with their driver, accuracy is a different story.

Dan seems to be doing neither, short in length and also not accurate..... so does it seem normal for the guy to be hitting balls every day for 4000 hours and have those numbers?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, but I would say most given 4000 hours can carry the driver farther then 250.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by garybbq

I agree, but I would say most given 4000 hours can carry the driver farther then 250.

I wouldn't, working at a golf course for 8 years has allowed me to see thousands and thousands of golf swings. I would dare say 50% or more of men couldn't learn to hit a ball 250 yards.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Of course there is no hard an fast rule, but one of the things that surprises me when I go to a PGA Tour event is how big physically the average PGA Tour player is. Yes there are excepts so please don't blast me with a "what about Luke Donald" comment, but the overwhelming majority of today's PGA Tour pros is athletic and pretty big guys. I have seen Dan in person, he is really small. In fact Luke Donald might be bigger than him (maybe not height, but overall weight). I just think he is not physically gifted enough to be a PGA Tour pro. I think he can be a scratch golfer maybe even better, but I doubt he will be on Tour for a living.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Look up James Oh ( no not related to Ted Oh ) I think he is 5' 8". He shot 24 under out in the desert on a track the pros hate, designed by Jack Nicholas. One of those rounds was a 62 or 63.this was in a qualifer to get his pga tour card. I don't know how far he hits it but I would wager at least 280
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by mchepp

Of course there is no hard an fast rule, but one of the things that surprises me when I go to a PGA Tour event is how big physically the average PGA Tour player is. Yes there are excepts so please don't blast me with a "what about Luke Donald" comment, but the overwhelming majority of today's PGA Tour pros is athletic and pretty big guys.

I have seen Dan in person, he is really small. In fact Luke Donald might be bigger than him (maybe not height, but overall weight). I just think he is not physically gifted enough to be a PGA Tour pro.

I think he can be a scratch golfer maybe even better, but I doubt he will be on Tour for a living.

I was actually surprised the other way when I went to watch the Tour Championship. Tiger and a few other guys that I had seen on TV for so many years were smaller in person than I expected. It does seem like there are a lot of 6'3" guys among the younger players and almost all of them in outstanding physical condition.

BTW I was even more surprised at the LPGA event I went to just how well conditioned some of those girls were. Much more than they looked on TV. Especially Suzanne Peterson, as well conditioned an athlete as anybody. More what I would have expected from an Olympic athlete than a golfer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by NM Golf

I wouldn't, working at a golf course for 8 years has allowed me to see thousands and thousands of golf swings. I would dare say 50% or more of men couldn't learn to hit a ball 250 yards.

wow seriously? so even with proper instruction and practice less then 50% of men 30ish years of age in reasonable shape cant cary over 250?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by garybbq

So do you think he is capable of swinging faster then 100MPH? I guess my question is more that usually when a young(ish) guy takes up golf they swing super hard and enjoy trying to hit 300 and have 0 control, then a coach gets them to slow things down a bit and work on accuracy. I bet lots of golfers on this forum can carry the ball over 250 with their driver, accuracy is a different story.

Dan seems to be doing neither, short in length and also not accurate..... so does it seem normal for the guy to be hitting balls every day for 4000 hours and have those numbers?


he worked backwards, he havent hit driver as long as he hit the shorter sticks.

He isnt a long hitter and he is inconsistent, however his game once it picks up a bit more consistency will be good.

atm 40% gir hurts him more than anything else.

fear from tee with driver then hard to make greens due to fear from tee.

his clubfitting might make a tad better action going which would hopefully translate to 60% or more gir.

People who belive in talent make bad guesswork.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by soon_tourpro

People who belive in talent make bad guesswork.

I am going to guess English is not your first language and let the obvious grammatical errors go. I guess you are from the same camp as Dave McGlaughlin.

Taken from the Dan Plan Website:

Talent has little to do with success. According to research conducted by Dr. K. Anders Ericsson, Professor of Psychology at Florida State University, “Elite performers engage in ‘deliberate practice’–an effortful activity designed to improve target performance.” Dr. Ericsson’s studies, made popular through Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers and Geoff Colvin’s Talent is Overrated, have found that in order to excel in a field, roughly 10,000 hours of “stretching yourself beyond what you can currently do” is required. “I think you’re the right astronaut for this mission,” Dr. Ericsson said about The Dan Plan.

I disagree with the above statement wholeheartedly. Natural talent has a lot to do with success. It certainly does not guarantee success though. I don't care how much someone works at playing golf or any activity, their natural talent will eventually be the limiting factor on how far they go or how good they get.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by NM Golf

I disagree with the above statement wholeheartedly. Natural talent has a lot to do with success. It certainly does not guarantee success though. I don't care how much someone works at playing golf or any activity, their natural talent will eventually be the limiting factor on how far they go or how good they get.

I think you are taking the statement a little out of context.  It says "elite performers engage in roughly 10,000 hours of deliberate practice."  The part it leaves out is that those elite performers had talent.

It doesn't say "any idiot who practices anything for 10,000 hours will become an elite performer."  I believe that all of the people ripping on the thoery think this is what it means.

I read Outliers and I remember the example Gladwell used from Eriksons study was the violinists.  The study was comparing elite level (world class soloists), mid level (symphony), and "low" level (maybe they'll become music teachers), all from a prestigious music school.  The fact that they were accepted to that music school in the first place means they had talent.

10,000 hours doesn't separate you or me from Kobe Bryant, but it does separate Tracy McGrady or Vince Carter from Kobe Bryant.

At least, that is the way I've interpreted the thoery.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

It doesn't say "any idiot who practices anything for 10,000 hours will become an elite performer."  I believe that all of the people ripping on the thoery think this is what it means.

I do think that any idiot (in resonable shape) after 4000 hours of practice and some proper instruction should be able to carry the ball farther then 250

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by garybbq

I do think that any idiot (in resonable shape) after 4000 hours of practice and some proper instruction should be able to carry the ball farther then 250

And I think that you underestimate exactly how far that is.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by garybbq

I do think that any idiot (in resonable shape) after 4000 hours of practice and some proper instruction should be able to carry the ball farther then 250


Distance is A LOT harder to gain than accuracy

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

And I think that you underestimate exactly how far that is.

You really think so? I mean 4000 hours is a seriously long time to spend on golf. I have seen quite a few high handicap golfers in reasonable shape carry past 250 and they certianly didnt spend 4000 hours with a coach.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play a lot of golf and I don't see many men carrying it 250 and I live in CO, the ball flies here. I see a lot of guys that think they carry it 250 that are terrible at math. They make the claim when their ball is 40 yds south of the 150 marker on a 400 yd par 4.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Lessons, depending on your arrangement with your home course, can be a much better way to make money than if you just work in the shop.  In the shop I would imagine you're not making much more than $15 an hour, even as a professional, assuming that you aren't salaried to run the golf operation for a city. Even if you charged a relatively cheap rate of $50 an hour for lessons, and the course took half of your inexpensive fee, you would be making $10 more an hour than you would otherwise and it might be more enjoyable that pro shop work for you. Playing lessons could be even more lucrative depending on your rates, and you can even play some golf yourself (either playing with the player or demonstrating a shot, for example).  Youth programs can be highly profitable if that's something you're interested in. A local course with two PGA professionals has a weekly group lesson for junior golfers at $20 per person. On the days that this program is running they easily have 30-40 kids ($600-800) out there working on chipping and putting (and then the kids go out to walk nine holes afterwords). Depending on how your course operates and how busy it is this is something you could look into organizing. Put up flyers both on the course and in public areas where you are allowed to post things to get the word out. If you are somewhat tech and business inclined it might be a good idea to look into starting up a small business of your own selling golf apparel and equipment. Take advantage of your PGA membership and start up accounts with the major brands such as Titleist, PING, Taylormade, Scotty Cameron (they kind of do their stuff separate from Titleist) and put up a storefront on your own website. Squarespace is one web-hosting company I know of that does an excellent job of making it easy for you to put together what you want. Nearly everything in most golf shops is marked up at keystone pricing or higher, so there is definitely profit to be made if you can get some web traffic (and it never hurts to have it up for people to stumble upon).  Look up public courses in your area and figure out who the person in charge of contracting out the golf courses is. The title in my city is the "Golf Operations Manager", but this varies from city to city. Get to know this person and learn when the management contracts for various courses expire so you can put your bid in to run one of the courses on behalf of the city. This is where you'd likely end up making the most money, but it would be the most administrative of the options. You would likely be responsible for hiring, firing, reports, and other day to day tasks but the big advantage is that the city, in most cases, will allow you to use the pro shop to sell your own merchandise. This becomes huge since then the profits (or at least a large portion of them) from every pro shop sale goes into your pocket, though it does come with the added work of managing inventory and negotiating terms with the city. This is, though, by far the most lucrative option that would be somewhat easily (with enough background work and a good proposal/interview) attainable. One other thing, along the lines of the previous point, that you could do is see if there are any professionals that are contracted to run two golf courses through the city. My city currently works this way, but the professional has to subcontract the second course to another PGA professional in order to manage everything smoothly. As a result of this the professional at the course I work for (the subcontracted professional) is now a near shoe-in to win the bid to manage the golf course he's been running when the city contract becomes available this January, just because he has been running the show there for the last four years. Continuing to excel at your current position at the golf course while networking and getting to know your customers (a large factor for the aforementioned pro is that he has developed close ties with the clientele and has increased revenue as a result) is something that will be viewed favorably if you later put in a bid to manage the course.
    • It took me two years to get from a 24 handicap (my starting point) to about a 6-8 handicap when I started playing seriously. It then took me another two years to get from about a 7 to a 2. In the last year I had a big jump that got me from the 2 handicap to my current +1.5, which I would consider to be the largest leap I've ever made (which is somewhat funny, considering I've probably practiced the least in the last year as compared to previous years). It just kind of clicked for me that it's okay to expect to make birdies, whereas before I felt like I never could make any.
    • Thanks for the suggestions. I will certainly think about my wrists / forearms next time I putt or practice putting, and the Stan Utley book looks good, seems to get good reviews on this site and others so will definitely check it out. Can anyone recommend a good video tutorial? Verbal advice is useful but nothing beats seeing it for yourself. I'm careful of just googling this kind of thing, there's a whole load of info out there and I've got no way of knowing what's good and what's crap.
    • I was finally able to get a decent bag. After spending the past couple years using a $40 bag that was a pain to deal with, I've upgraded to a Sun Mountain C130 cart bag. 70% of the time I walk with my 3.5+ cart, so I am looking for some suggestions on ideal club arrangement. I bought the tour bag kit to get the bag a bit more upright, but I wonder if there is an arrangement that would be best when I am using the push cart. Right now I have been leaving the clubs in the powered cart arrangement, but it isn't quite as nice as I think it could be. any thoughts?
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. JLeeWildcat9
      JLeeWildcat9
      (30 years old)
    2. Ping Man
      Ping Man
      (52 years old)
  • Blog Entries