Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1945 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I’m wondering about something regarding the dynamic loft. So if I understand correctly in ideal conditions the dynamic loft with the driver is static loft + angle of attack (let’s discard opening/closing the face at impact for now - so ideal impact conditions, so no shaft unloading as well). 
 

So if we look at the trackman carry optimizer for my range. I swing in the 105-110 range. 
 

Optimal dynamic loft at +5 AoA is 16,2° so an ideal driver loft would be 11,2° at 105mph and at 110mph the numbers are 15,2° and 10,2°. 
 

If I were hitting down on the ball with an AoA of -5° and not wanting to change that the optimal dynamic loft numbers are 11,1° and 9,9° respectively. So that would mean my driver lofts should be 16,1 and 14,9° to maximize distance while still hitting down with the driver.

 

Now let’s do the same with a lower swing speed - 90mph. At +5° AoA the dynamic loft should be 18,5° so that would mean the optimal driver would be 13,5°? So basically a 3 wood? What am I missing and why don’t they make drivers that are that high in loft if that is what it takes to optimize the carry? Ok the total optimizer might be better to use for swing speeds of 90 and lower as for that you want 15,3° dynamic loft so a 10,3° driver but isn’t the carry number more important than the total number as it is highly dependent on conditions?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, Killa said:

So I’m wondering about something regarding the dynamic loft. So if I understand correctly in ideal conditions the dynamic loft with the driver is static loft + angle of attack (let’s discard opening/closing the face at impact for now - so ideal impact conditions, so no shaft unloading as well). 
 

So if we look at the trackman carry optimizer for my range. I swing in the 105-110 range. 
 

Optimal dynamic loft at +5 AoA is 16,2° so an ideal driver loft would be 11,2° at 105mph and at 110mph the numbers are 15,2° and 10,2°. 
 

If I were hitting down on the ball with an AoA of -5° and not wanting to change that the optimal dynamic loft numbers are 11,1° and 9,9° respectively. So that would mean my driver lofts should be 16,1 and 14,9° to maximize distance while still hitting down with the driver.

 

Now let’s do the same with a lower swing speed - 90mph. At +5° AoA the dynamic loft should be 18,5° so that would mean the optimal driver would be 13,5°? So basically a 3 wood? What am I missing and why don’t they make drivers that are that high in loft if that is what it takes to optimize the carry? Ok the total optimizer might be better to use for swing speeds of 90 and lower as for that you want 15,3° dynamic loft so a 10,3° driver but isn’t the carry number more important than the total number as it is highly dependent on conditions?

Well... um... hm... I was told there would be no math.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Killa said:

So if I understand correctly in ideal conditions the dynamic loft with the driver is static loft + angle of attack (let’s discard opening/closing the face at impact for now - so ideal impact conditions, so no shaft unloading as well). 

I don’t think this is correct. I always thought it was loft presented at impact. 
 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

I don’t think this is correct. I always thought it was loft presented at impact. 
 

Yeah, this is it. Static loft and angle of attack are both factors in dynamic loft, but it's not an equation using those numbers.

What-is-Dynamic-Loft-TrackMan.jpg?w=640

The vertical angle of the club face at the center-point of contact between the club and ball at the time of maximum compression Dynamic Loft is the amount of loft on the club face at impact and is …

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Justin

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Draw 11* Evenflow Blue 65 X

Fairway Wood: :callaway: Epic Flash 5 Wood 18* Tensei Blue AV 75 X
Irons: :titleist: AP3 4-PW Project X 6.5   |   Wedges: :callaway: MD4 50*/56*/60*
Putter: :odyssey: O-Works Tank #1
                                                                       

My Swing

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, BC-to-MI said:

Yeah, this is it. Static loft and angle of attack are both factors in dynamic loft, but it's not an equation using those numbers.

What-is-Dynamic-Loft-TrackMan.jpg?w=640

The vertical angle of the club face at the center-point of contact between the club and ball at the time of maximum compression Dynamic Loft is the amount of loft on the club face at impact and is …

 

Well yes, but the other factors are shaft flex, impact position etc. For example if you deliver your club slightly open it will be higher, and slightly closed lower, if your shaft unloads before the impact it will be higher, if your shaft is still loaded it will be lower etc... but like the best physics phd I decided to ignore that for now, as you can actually hit the ball with these factors not adding anything to the equation. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, Killa said:

but like the best physics phd I decided to ignore that for now, as you can actually hit the ball with these factors not adding anything to the equation. 

Very unlikely that a person would present the static loft of the driver at impact. 

Making any determination of what loft to choose is impossible. That is why club fitting is important in this regard. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
7 hours ago, Killa said:

Well yes, but the other factors are shaft flex, impact position etc. For example if you deliver your club slightly open it will be higher, and slightly closed lower, if your shaft unloads before the impact it will be higher, if your shaft is still loaded it will be lower etc... but like the best physics phd I decided to ignore that for now, as you can actually hit the ball with these factors not adding anything to the equation. 

It’s not a theoretical physics discussion, though. You can’t just ignore shaft kick and the amount of ulnar or radial deviation by the player at impact when discussing dynamic loft. That’s why it’s called dynamic loft.

  • Upvote 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 minutes ago, billchao said:

It’s not a theoretical physics discussion, though. You can’t just ignore shaft kick and the amount of ulnar or radial deviation by the player at impact when discussing dynamic loft. That’s why it’s called dynamic loft.

Well you can assume these factors can be the same for a golfer with 75mph and a golfer with 115mph. I do get @billchaos point about the importance of club fitting to get these things correct. But I’m still wondering if there is a large group out there that would benefit from an 15°+ driver head...

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Killa said:

But I’m still wondering if there is a large group out there that would benefit from an 15°+ driver head...

Someone who swings very slowly. They need the dynamic loft to make up for the lack of spin rate that keeps the ball in the air. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
4 minutes ago, Killa said:

Well you can assume these factors can be the same for a golfer with 75mph and a golfer with 115mph.

No you can’t. A club head traveling at 115mph is going to load a shaft more than a club head traveling at 75mph.

Everyone swings differently. There’s no set rule that says all shafts add 2° of loft at impact or something.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, billchao said:

No you can’t. A club head traveling at 115mph is going to load a shaft more than a club head traveling at 75mph.

Everyone swings differently. There’s no set rule that says all shafts add 2° of loft at impact or something.

...

yet 95% of us use stock heads and shafts that “kinda” fit our swing speed. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Killa said:

yet 95% of us use stock heads and shafts that “kinda” fit our swing speed. 

I'm not sure what you mean there. Nothing you said there refutes what @billchao said.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Killa said:

...

yet 95% of us use stock heads and shafts that “kinda” fit our swing speed. 

The fact that most people are doing something is not an indicator that it's the best way to do things.

There is so much more to fitting a shaft than swing speed. 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

FWIW I have a 9.5° driver with an x-flex shaft and I tend to deliver the clubhead with about +3° AoA.

My ball launches at about 14-15°.

Almost all of that difference is the added shaft kick. It's important.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/26/2020 at 10:44 PM, iacas said:

I'm not sure what you mean there. Nothing you said there refutes what @billchao said.

I’m saying there is a not negligible chance that the other factors contribute a small percentage in a number of people. 

On 8/26/2020 at 10:45 PM, billchao said:

The fact that most people are doing something is not an indicator that it's the best way to do things.

There is so much more to fitting a shaft than swing speed. 


I agree on everything. 

On 8/26/2020 at 11:30 PM, iacas said:

FWIW I have a 9.5° driver with an x-flex shaft and I tend to deliver the clubhead with about +3° AoA.

My ball launches at about 14-15°.

Almost all of that difference is the added shaft kick. It's important.

Looking at my last trackman session my dynamic loft was 14,7 my AoA was 3,9 my driver was 10,5. Dynamic - AoA = 10,8 in that instance. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 minutes ago, Killa said:

I’m saying there is a not negligible chance that the other factors contribute a small percentage in a number of people. 


I agree on everything. 

Looking at my last trackman session my dynamic loft was 14,7 my AoA was 3,9 my driver was 10,5. Dynamic - AoA = 10,8 in that instance. 

Now y'all are tempting me to do a trackman session just to see what my numbers are. :-$

  • Like 1

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1945 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
    • Day 6 - 2025-12-25 10 minutes of swing work on the mat and net. Focus on turn and weight shift.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.