Jump to content
IGNORED

Cutting Open Refurbished and Refinished ProV1s


Note: This thread is 963 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

So I cut a Prov1, a refurbished Prov1, and a refinished Prov1.  It seems that the refurbished one isn’t actually a Prov1 as it doesn’t have the extra core layer.  Thoughts?

I found these balls and thought it would be neat to see. I may cut open all refinished/refurbished Prov1s that I find and track them. 
B103AE17-8A76-4F97-B2B2-8505702B5868.thumb.jpeg.fa035f05f6e40dd7ee648ffb67abf986.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ok, so what are you trying to accomplish? From your picture, the middle ball is a Pro V1x  ('x') which is 4 layers.  The ball on the left has a red number, so it's probably also a Prov1x, again, 4 layers.  And the ball on the right has a black number, so probably a Pro V1 (no 'x') which is a 3 layer ball.  So?

  • Informative 1

Mike

Driver: TM Sim2 9* Ventus Black, M5 9* Kuro Kage
Fwy: TM SLDR 3W, 5W;    Hybrid: TM M1 4 Hybrid
Irons: TM Tour Preferred MC 2014
Wedges: TM Tour Preferred, 52 @ 51*, 56
Putter: Ping Scottsdale TR Anser 2 or Odyssey Rossie

It isn't the hours that you put in at practice that count. It's the way you spend those minutes. -- tony lema

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to Cutting Open Refurbished and Refinished ProV1s
18 minutes ago, mohearn said:

Ok, so what are you trying to accomplish? From your picture, the middle ball is a Pro V1x  ('x') which is 4 layers.  The ball on the left has a red number, so it's probably also a Prov1x, again, 4 layers.  And the ball on the right has a black number, so probably a Pro V1 (no 'x') which is a 3 layer ball.  So?

Easy there bud. I was just interested in finding out if the refurbished or refinished balls are actually Prov1s.  No need to be defensive

Link to comment
Share on other sites


12 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Easy there bud. I was just interested in finding out if the refurbished or refinished balls are actually Prov1s.  No need to be defensive

I do not think he was being defensive, you may have read a little "Tone" into his email that I did not sense.  He is providing specifications of different versions of Pro-V balls which appears to explain the different visuals you are seeing when you cut them in half.

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, StuM said:

I do not think he was being defensive, you may have read a little "Tone" into his email that I did not sense.  He is providing specifications of different versions of Pro-V balls which appears to explain the different visuals you are seeing when you cut them in half.

Yeah it seemed defensive or condescending with the “so what are you trying to accomplish?” And “so?” Comments. I find quite a bit of these and typically don’t play them being they’re refurbished or refinished.  So that’s why I posted. Interested in finding out if any of these balls are ever not Prov1s 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
7 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Yeah it seemed defensive or condescending with the “so what are you trying to accomplish?” And “so?” Comments. I find quite a bit of these and typically don’t play them being they’re refurbished or refinished.  So that’s why I posted. Interested in finding out if any of these balls are ever not Prov1s 

I think you're still missing his original point.

  • The current Pro V1x is a four-piece ball.
  • The Pro V1 is a three-piece ball.

The "Pro V1" and "Pro V1x" are different models of golf ball. They have different compositions and different performance characteristics. They're both premium balls, but they're fundamentally different golf balls.


For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, the Titleist Pro V1 golf ball provides total performance from tee to green. Shop directly from Titleist today.

For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, look no further than the Titleist Pro V1x golf ball. Shop directly from Titleist and make the Pro V1x your own.

Look, @checkerfred, just read the words as they're written. The only "tone" in reading a written word is the tone you add to it. I can say "f*** off" to a buddy when he's told me he just made another hole in one and it can be completely nice and friendly and astonished and happy for him, and I can say "f*** off" to someone who just stole something from me and ran away and it can be none of those things. Just reading those words you have no idea the "tone" of the words because you can't hear them in the author's voice as he would have said them at the time.

So, benefit of the doubt, man.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

39 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think you're still missing his original point.

  • The current Pro V1x is a four-piece ball.
  • The Pro V1 is a three-piece ball.

The "Pro V1" and "Pro V1x" are different models of golf ball. They have different compositions and different performance characteristics. They're both premium balls, but they're fundamentally different golf balls.


For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, the Titleist Pro V1 golf ball provides...

For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, look no further than the Titleist Pro...

Look, @checkerfred, just read the words as they're written. The only "tone" in reading a written word is the tone you add to it. I can say "f*** off" to a buddy when he's told me he just made another hole in one and it can be completely nice and friendly and astonished and happy for him, and I can say "f*** off" to someone who just stole something from me and ran away and it can be none of those things. Just reading those words you have no idea the "tone" of the words because you can't hear them in the author's voice as he would have said them at the time.

So, benefit of the doubt, man.

Definitely didn’t miss the original point. Obviously had I known the prov came in a 3 piece I wouldn’t have posted.  Just trying to be a little more active on the forum but no worries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
5 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Just trying to be a little more active on the forum but no worries. 

Then stop reading "tone" into plain text.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, checkerfred said:

Interested in finding out if any of these balls are ever not Prov1s

Ok, so back on topic, how would you know simply from cutting them open? I’m pretty sure Titleist tweaks their ball formula periodically, so even if two Pro V1s don’t match, you could just be looking at balls from different years or something.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, billchao said:

Ok, so back on topic, how would you know simply from cutting them open? I’m pretty sure Titleist tweaks their ball formula periodically, so even if two Pro V1s don’t match, you could just be looking at balls from different years or something.

Good point, on the other side of that though, how would you know it’s not some other 3 piece ball? I’ve found some of these that are definitely harder feeling that others especially compared to the original ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Good point, on the other side of that though, how would you know it’s not some other 3 piece ball? I’ve found some of these that are definitely harder feeling that others especially compared to the original ones

You found them though, right? They’ve been exposed to the elements for who knows how long?

I’m sure a business that refurbishes random balls and sells them as Pro V1s would get into trouble if they were caught, but this isn’t exactly a definitive way to prove anything. If there aren’t any markings indicating so, you don’t even know which company did the job, do you?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

If we believe the marketing, these golf balls are tweaked every two years or so.  The thickness of the various layers may change a little, and the coloring of the materials may also change.  For the "original" ProV1, you can probably look at the markings and determine which version you have.  But the refurbished/refinished balls won't have their original markings, they'll have new paint, so you'll have no idea what to try to compare them to.   I wonder if the color of the compounds might change for different ball plants, I just don't know. And as others have said, there's the difficulty of comparing a 3-piece ball against a 4-piece ball, if the refurbishing is done right the color of the number should differentiate those for you.  Its an interesting exercise to cut the balls open, but I'm not sure you'd ever be able to prove anything.

  • Like 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

If we believe the marketing, these golf balls are tweaked every two years or so.  The thickness of the various layers may change a little, and the coloring of the materials may also change.  For the "original" ProV1, you can probably look at the markings and determine which version you have.  But the refurbished/refinished balls won't have their original markings, they'll have new paint, so you'll have no idea what to try to compare them to.   I wonder if the color of the compounds might change for different ball plants, I just don't know. And as others have said, there's the difficulty of comparing a 3-piece ball against a 4-piece ball, if the refurbishing is done right the color of the number should differentiate those for you.  Its an interesting exercise to cut the balls open, but I'm not sure you'd ever be able to prove anything.

Interestingly enough, they were all marked Prov1 x. So I guess it must have been a sorting error.  I’ve never cut them open before. The original Prov1 has lumps on the cover so I wasn’t going to play it. You can see them on the outside of where I cut it. The other two I had on my shag bag 

6 hours ago, billchao said:

You found them though, right? They’ve been exposed to the elements for who knows how long?

I’m sure a business that refurbishes random balls and sells them as Pro V1s would get into trouble if they were caught, but this isn’t exactly a definitive way to prove anything. If there aren’t any markings indicating so, you don’t even know which company did the job, do you?

I did but they weren’t out that long when I had found them. I just watched a video that Rick Shiels had done comparing them to an original. He noticed they were harder feeling too. He actually picked them out on a blind test. I’ve found a few where I’d try to make a fingernail mark and they wouldn’t mark as easily as ab original prov1.  But I’ve also noticed the yellow Prov1s seem to do that too. So idk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
5 hours ago, checkerfred said:

Interestingly enough, they were all marked Prov1 x. So I guess it must have been a sorting error.  I’ve never cut them open before. The original Prov1 has lumps on the cover so I wasn’t going to play it. You can see them on the outside of where I cut it. The other two I had on my shag bag 

I did but they weren’t out that long when I had found them. I just watched a video that Rick Shiels had done comparing them to an original. He noticed they were harder feeling too. He actually picked them out on a blind test. I’ve found a few where I’d try to make a fingernail mark and they wouldn’t mark as easily as ab original prov1.  But I’ve also noticed the yellow Prov1s seem to do that too. So idk 

Titleist tweaks the coating formula to adjust for spin when they make modifications to the interior layers. Some revisions may scratch easier than others. The top mantle layer does provide some of the feel of hardness too.  It’s a balancing act to optimize ball flight. Other OEM do the same. There have been many revisions of the ProV1 and ProV1X balls.

You can find videos and other details on the OEM sites.

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

28 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Titleist tweaks the coating formula to adjust for spin when they make modifications to the interior layers. Some revisions may scratch easier than others. The top mantle layer does provide some of the feel of hardness too.  It’s a balancing act to optimize ball flight. Other OEM do the same. There have been many revisions of the ProV1 and ProV1X balls.

You can find videos and other details on the OEM sites.

 

I like those videos. BTW - Often the color of the layers is just an adder. They add the colors so that they can do internal quality checks. If all the rubber was the same color it would make it more difficult on their own QA team's inspections. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 963 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 111 - Worked on my grip and higher hands in the backswing. Full swings with the PRGR. 
    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
    • I would think that 3 in a row with the same players might get some behind the scenes examination from the SCGA if they were suspect.  Are there any clubs questioning the results?
    • What simple fact? A golf match is not a coin flip — there is a fact for you. I'm trying to help you, and you're throwing out what could easily be called sour grapes. Come with FACTS, not weak analogies. Then you've got nothing. Hopefully they've done a better job of making their case. 😛 
    • It's pretty close. The odds of a 50/50 shot going your way 21 times are greater than 1 in a million!  I guess your point is, that simple fact is not enough to declare these guys dirty rotten sandbaggers. I disagree, but fair enough. I posted it here on the message board to get different perspectives, after all.  I probably won't be digging further into specific scores. I have no dog in this fight beyond a generalized contempt for sandbagging. With that said, it would not surprise if a lot of clubs shared my concern and were grousing about it to the SCGA.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...