Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 764 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm going to guess here that most of us do not shoot par or less.

And we take all the help we can get with driver, fairway woods (and I'll include long hybrids and rescue clubs in there, 'cause that is where they belong).

So why not irons? Why do we shy away from real help? How many of us have even tried an "ultra game improvement" 7, 8 or 9 iron?

 

The insperation for this post was me buying some old Cleveland HiBores, the originals from 15+ years ago. Which TBF, in general, 99+% of the time return a better result than a brand new set of Cleveland CBX's.

For every given swing path from full on duff, fat or thin to slight miss-hit the ball goes higher, longer and straighter. Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

  • Like 2

  • Moderator
Posted

The short answer is people have different launch conditions and SGI short irons or even hybrid clubs would not suit everyone’s swing.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, billchao said:

The short answer is people have different launch conditions and SGI short irons or even hybrid clubs would not suit everyone’s swing.

How many have tried them?

For a season, on the course?

 


Posted
43 minutes ago, Fontyyy said:

I'm going to guess here that most of us do not shoot par or less.

And we take all the help we can get with driver, fairway woods (and I'll include long hybrids and rescue clubs in there, 'cause that is where they belong).

So why not irons? Why do we shy away from real help? How many of us have even tried an "ultra game improvement" 7, 8 or 9 iron?

 

The insperation for this post was me buying some old Cleveland HiBores, the originals from 15+ years ago. Which TBF, in general, 99+% of the time return a better result than a brand new set of Cleveland CBX's.

For every given swing path from full on duff, fat or thin to slight miss-hit the ball goes higher, longer and straighter. Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

Why not iron head covers?

  • Booooooooo 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
53 minutes ago, Fontyyy said:

How many have tried them?

For a season, on the course?

 

Speaking for myself here, but why would I? I was fitted properly for my irons.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I personally use a 2 and 4 hybrid.  From 5 downwards I have irons.  The reason I prefer irons here is that I can still hit them properly (swing, clubhead speed etc) and they are a bit more versatile for me than hybrids in the shorter irons.  Over time I will move to more and more hybrids in my set, but not right now

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Fontyyy said:

For every given swing path from full on duff, fat or thin to slight miss-hit the ball goes higher, longer and straighter. Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

I don't necessarily believe the part about straighter - that has to do with face and path.

I was fitted for my irons, and I don't have any issues with launch conditions, and any bad launch conditions are a swing problem, not a club problem.

Edited by Darkfrog

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

Why not iron head covers?

Because the "irons" in question (my HiBore's") were £130 and are heavily chipped anyway.

But yes, I do agree, even I would struggle walking down the fairway with 13 head covers!


Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Darkfrog said:

I don't necessarily believe the part about straighter - that has to do with face and path.

 

So, you NEVER miss a par 3 green left or right?

They're just more forgiving. Trust me, they are straighter, hit 50 shots with a hybrid "7i" and a real 7i, the dispersion will be tighter with the hybrid.

Not trolling, really,  but if don't play off + something ....

Edited by Fontyyy

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, Fontyyy said:

How many have tried them?

For a season, on the course?

 

He has and so have I. I have a 4 and 3 hybrid and have tried a 5. I found that I hit the 4  and 5 irons better in all conditions, off the tee, fairway and especially rough. I tended to hook the 4 and 5 hybrids and even tried heavier shafts than stock. For me, the hybrids aren’t as good out of the rough either, which is counter to what the OEM state. I do like the 3H off the tee and in the fairway, but I will go with an iron out of the rough.

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

 For me, the hybrids aren’t as good out of the rough either, which is counter to what the OEM state. I do like the 3H off the tee and in the fairway, but I will go with an iron out of the rough.

I believe this might be related to your swing.  I reckon a steeper swing will help an iron cut through the rough better and a flatter swing will help the hybrid more.

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have a 3h and 4h and had put away my 3i and 4i not too long after I switched to less forgiving irons. Now that I have learned to hit my irons better, I am leaving my 4h in the trunk more often depending on how some tees are set up.

I think the long irons will give more consistency on length than the hybrids. When my swing is crap I will reach for the hybrid more often and make adjustments to reduce distance if needed. But I really want to get striking the ball better and better and leave one of the hybrids behind. 

I have a tendency to draw a hybrid too much as many are set up with a bias for people who tend to come over the top.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, billchao said:

The short answer is people have different launch conditions and SGI short irons or even hybrid clubs would not suit everyone’s swing.

This.

Personally, I normally carry 4 hybrids ... ish... Here's my normal bag:

  • Driver
  • 3-wood
  • Cobra F7 3 hybrid
  • Cobra F7 4 hybrid
  • Tour Edge Golf Hot Launch E521 Iron-Wood 5-iron and 6 iron (These are basically hybrids) 
  • PXG Game Improvement 7 iron
  • PXG players irons for 8 iron through Gap Wedge. 
  • A 54 degree sand wedge
  • A 60 degree lob wedge 
  • Putter

I do have a PXG Game Improvement 6 iron and 5 iron. Sometimes I'll replace one or both of the Tour Edge Clubs with one of those. One of the issues with Hybrids or Even Super Game Improvement clubs is they tend to be one-trick-ponies. They are going to hit it high and straight. Which may or may not be the desired shot. 

An example is that at one time I did all of my low punch out shots with my 5 iron. When I carry the Tour Edge Hybrid Iron it sucks for punch out shots. Hits them too high, its tough to hit a low runner. So, since carrying them I've actually learned to hit punch shots with my 3 wood. 

It all depends on what you want/need out of your clubs AND what skills/swing speed you have. 

 

53 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

For me, the hybrids aren’t as good out of the rough either, which is counter to what the OEM state. I do like the 3H off the tee and in the fairway, but I will go with an iron out of the rough.

Yeah, this is different for everyone. I'd much rather hit one of my hybrids out of the rough than any of my irons. But again, it's going to vary depending on the hybrid you choose, the irons you choose and the way you swing. 

Neither is "better". Some may be "Better for you", or "better for me". That's why you are given choices. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Upvote 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Year it's subjective, how many times have you hit a friend's driver and smashed it down the middle. Trick is to realize you were much more focused on that swing, took me a long time to get it LOL...


Posted
2 hours ago, Fontyyy said:

So, you NEVER miss a par 3 green left or right?

Of course I have missed a green on a par-3 before. Are you suggesting that if I played hybrid irons I would never miss a green on a par-3?

2 hours ago, Fontyyy said:

They're just more forgiving. Trust me, they are straighter, hit 50 shots with a hybrid "7i" and a real 7i, the dispersion will be tighter with the hybrid.

"Trust me" isn't going to convince me. Show me real world data that 7-hybrid has tighter dispersion than a 7-iron. I'm no

2 hours ago, Fontyyy said:

Not trolling, really,  but if don't play off + something ....

I'm not sure how to respond to this, I'm not close to being a + handicap, and I likely never will be, but not once has my swing teacher suggested I switch to hybrid irons.

 

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, Fontyyy said:

They're just more forgiving. Trust me, they are straighter, hit 50 shots with a hybrid "7i" and a real 7i, the dispersion will be tighter with the hybrid.

For you, maybe. Again, not for everyone. I play exactly one hybrid and it’s the only club in my bag I can hit a hook with without deliberately trying to.

Distance control is harder with hybrids, too.

51 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

"Trust me" isn't going to convince me. Show me real world data that 7-hybrid has tighter dispersion than a 7-iron.

Exactly. If they were magic clubs that instantly improved people’s game as claimed by @Fontyyy, everyone would be playing them.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, Fontyyy said:

For every given swing path from full on duff, fat or thin to slight miss-hit the ball goes higher, longer and straighter. Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

Nobody's saying you can't play the hybrid short irons. If they help you, then by all means play them. 

Personally (as I've mentioned) I play hybrids and my long/mid irons are very hybrid like or at least heavy on the game improvement side. 

Yes, I've tried the hybrid style short irons. They are fine if all you want to do is hit the same shot every time and you aren't consistent with finding the middle of the club face. 

BUT - Think about what you are giving up. With hybrid style irons you will have a MUCH harder time hitting punch shots and knock downs and varying the distance. I'm not a great golfer (many on this forum can attest.) But even I will hit knock-downs and punch shots and partials and chippy short iron shots along with the standard 135 yard stock 9-iron shot. My standard 9 iron is a 135 yard shot. But I will pull 9 on occasion to hit 145 or 105 and almost anything in between. I will, can, and have bent shot around trees. Similarly with my other short irons. You give all of that up with hybrid style short irons. AND THAT'S FINE. If that's what you want. Really. It's fine. Nobody will stop you from playing them. 

However you asked "Why, oh why, do we not want this help?" Well, people have answered. Because to get that help you give up versatility and distance control. 

Life is a series or trade offs. You choose what you like/need. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

For the better ball strikers, I think they can work the ball better with forged irons and get better feedback because the steel is a bit softer. I think this is the case with either forged or cast type irons.

Edited by WilliamB
updated info

Note: This thread is 764 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.