Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1070 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by soon_tourpro

External focus from body.


In other words, it's kind of off topic for this thread. Please start a separate thread. Thanks.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

i have a question... so assuming someone looks good at p4.... when the hips start to slide from the top are the accumulators starting to release.... have a buddy starting to convert to the system but looks like shoulders get to vertical instead of turning the shoulders on a constant circle


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So Iacas or mvmac, would you still recommend practicing a linear hip slide to a low handicap who has a tendency to not release pa's 1 and 4 quickly enough?

how do you make sure practicing the linear hip slide does not lead to early extension issues?


  • Moderator
Posted

Originally Posted by miami8miami

So Iacas or mvmac, would you still recommend practicing a linear hip slide to a low handicap who has a tendency to not release pa's 1 and 4 quickly enough?

how do you make sure practicing the linear hip slide does not lead to early extension issues?

Sequencing issue, have to practice the arms lowering as you kick in your transfers.  Or could be a trail elbow issue at A4(P4), PA's 4&1 not having adequate space to lower down.

But the short answer is yes, if the player doesn't move the hips far enough forward, let's say 4-5 inches, then that would be something they need to improve.

Big part of the linear hip slide is adding pressure into the lead foot, squashing a bug under your left foot feeling, that helps get those hips go forward.  Adding that pressure will also help you regain flexion from A4-A5 so you don't move off the wall (early extension). Remember the right hip has released it's address flexion at A4 and goes back into address flexion by A5/5.5.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So is there a glossary somewhere on this site?

Brandon

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
If you mean the positions, accumulators etc., you got a nice list here: http://thesandtrap.com/a/big-list-of-golf-terminology

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That'll do.

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

So practicing the hip slide will not inhibit pa's 1 and 4 to release fast enough. where should the weight be felt on your lead (left foot for a rightie) foot? on the heel?

The hip slide done correctly puts the body back in flexion by itself? Or can there be an intentional squetting i.e. tiger woods to get back into address flexion?


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by miami8miami

So practicing the hip slide will not inhibit pa's 1 and 4 to release fast enough. where should the weight be felt on your lead (left foot for a rightie) foot? on the heel?

The hip slide done correctly puts the body back in flexion by itself? Or can there be an intentional squetting i.e. tiger woods to get back into address flexion?

1. Why would it?

2. More forward than the heel. Not to the toes though.

3. No.

4. Tiger overdoes it (which is okay to a point).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am not an instructor of the golf swing, still just a student after more than fifty five years of observing this incredible game.  I see the hip slide as a way to get a players weight over to the front side which in turn provides the player with the leverage needed to strick the ball with power.  Not unlike a baseball player's stride forward just before swinging at a fastball.  The more weight transferred, the more force the player can apply to the swing without loosing their balance.  In fact, most power hitters in baseball not only stride into the pitch with their front leg, they also post up to a degree and encounter some hip slide as well.  Not kidding here, but I have also noticed women have more trouble with sliding off the ball on their backswing and have to be reminded to keep that back knee bent.  I presume that is because their hips seem to move more than ours....thank God!  First post on this sight, hope to be a regular.


Posted

Originally Posted by wrx143

I am not an instructor of the golf swing, still just a student after more than fifty five years of observing this incredible game.  I see the hip slide as a way to get a players weight over to the front side which in turn provides the player with the leverage needed to strick the ball with power.  Not unlike a baseball player's stride forward just before swinging at a fastball.  The more weight transferred, the more force the player can apply to the swing without loosing their balance.  In fact, most power hitters in baseball not only stride into the pitch with their front leg, they also post up to a degree and encounter some hip slide as well.  Not kidding here, but I have also noticed women have more trouble with sliding off the ball on their backswing and have to be reminded to keep that back knee bent.  I presume that is because their hips seem to move more than ours....thank God!  First post on this sight, hope to be a regular.

Welcome to the forum. I would recommend you start here: http://thesandtrap.com/t/55080/myth-of-maintaining-address-flexion-in-the-rear-knee

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wow, I wish I would have read this earlier.  I had gotten so obsessed with hip turn that I wasnt sliding forward.  I basically just opened my shoulders up before impact and sliced everything.  I am going to try this tomorrow at the range.

Great read.  Thanks.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


  • Moderator
Posted

Originally Posted by pumaAttack

Wow, I wish I would have read this earlier.  I had gotten so obsessed with hip turn that I wasnt sliding forward.  I basically just opened my shoulders up before impact and sliced everything.  I am going to try this tomorrow at the range.

Great read.  Thanks.

Yes, there is slide and rotation.  Depending on the student's needs, may feel more of one than the other.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Originally Posted by pumaAttack

Wow, I wish I would have read this earlier.  I had gotten so obsessed with hip turn that I wasnt sliding forward.  I basically just opened my shoulders up before impact and sliced everything.  I am going to try this tomorrow at the range.

Great read.  Thanks.


this sounds like exactly what I was doing with my driver. slice city


Posted

I just wanted to say that I joined today after reading all, yes all, 25 pages of this thread. Fantastic information here, I can't wait to get out on the range and practice. I've struggled with consistent ball striking and i'm really hoping this helps. I'd go from thin shots to fat. Not even close to consistent. I REALLY hope this helps. Thanks Everyone that has contributed to this thread.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

My first post.  I'm enjoying this site.  Lot's of interesting info posted by genuine enthusiasts.  I'm getting back in to golf after many years.  I'm fascinated by the S&T concept, especially when seeing elements of that concept being used by some of the great players of the past.  My question is, how does sliding the hip toward the target reconcile with S&T where the weight is already beginning to transfer toward the target at the top of the swing?  It seems to me that S&T causes you to "blow your wad" so to speak, leaving little ability to further slide the hip toward the target in the downswing.

Thanks!


Posted

^^^ ED problem?  lol...JK!

from the top of the backswing, the weight should be moving to the left side.  pushing your weight towards the target for a longer period than most are accustomed to will allow you to deliver the club from the inside, and will shallow out your path.  just because you begin to push forward from the top doesnt mean you should keep pushing through the downswing before turning.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1070 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.