Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
kilbyman

14/15 degree hybrid, 3 wood, or lob wedge?

16 posts in this topic

Hey guys,

I was wondering about your thoughts on whether i should keep the 60 degree lw or if gaming a 3W or a 1 hybrid would be more advantageous? I struggle with the driver quite a bit, swing around 90 mph, use 8i for 150.

Thanks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

What's the LW have to do with anything? Are you meaning your club count in your bag? Or are you teeing off with it? hah.

If you're looking for better shots off the tee without your driver, I'd go with the 3W. Seems to me to be a much more versatile option. A 1-hybrid would be pretty tough to hit, especially off the ground I would think.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Chubbs - this sounds like two separate issues.

Your 8-iron yardage has little to do with your driver. Your long irons are more relevant. I have an old set of MacGregors where the 8 iron is my 140 yd club - I hit the 2-iron from that set about 225. When I use that set, I bring a 5 wood and a driver.

The 2-iron in another set I use goes about 245. When I use them I bag either the 2i or a 5w, then either a 3w or driver depending on the course. It's nice to have options.

I wouldn't go without a 60* wedge, unless I had a 56* or 58* that I could really open up. There are times when a lob wedge is simply the best club for the task at hand - no matter what anyone says.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

I suppose we all have bag configuration issues. I'm sorta weighing my opotions now, as well....how to fill that 14th slot.

I also went with 5 iron through 4 wedges. I guess we differ at the long end of the bag. Struggling with the driver isn't an unusual quandry. I was in a local golf store the other day and heard the owner comment that he sold more drivers and putters than any other single type of club. He said the amounts were way ahead of anything else. I'm not sure of what time frame he was talking about. Anyway...thing is that many people make changes with the two lowest lofted sticks in the bag quite often. It seems odd that your driver swingspeed is 90mph yet you are getting 150 yds from your 8 iron. That is a long 8 iron for a 90mph driver swingspeed. What is your trajectory like? I can't tell you what to do, but I can stress that the correctly fitted 3 wood can work magic for your game. You can swing smoothly off the tee and get some great placement in the fairway. It can add some nice trajectory on those tee shots. It can also work wonders eating up distance from the ground on long par 4's and 5's. You'll be thrilled when you see the ball rocket off the face and eat up the distance to the pin from way out. Getting the right fit is huge. Look at the shape of the clubhead. Get a 3 Wood that is made to launch the ball up for you. Get one with a forgiving shaft that will complement the head design and get the ball up quickly and provide lots of carry. I'd stay away from the deep faced heads that seem to be nice off the tee but don't do so well off the deck. Get the stick that inspires confidence off the deck. You can always tee it very low for tee shots. A properly fitted 3 wood will give you options that you simply will grow to rely on heavily. Tee shots on tight par 4's and 5's, long par 3's, long approach or positioning shots. It can be quite liberating. Looks like from your signature line that you've got the wedges covered. I don't recommend the low lofted hybrids as they would require tremendous clubhead speed to gain anything more of them than you are getting from your higher lofted hybrids. I really think the right 3 wood would help you a lot. I've been very pleased with the Taylor Made Burner. Mine is one of the 2007 models that you can find at Dicks, TGW.com and other places for $129. There is always ebay, too. These sticks are really easy to hit from any lie. The stock "superfast" shaft is very, very light but still has some degree of spine. My misses with mine are high left misses. I can aim down the right side of any fairway (tee box or from the ground) and know that I've eliminated the right rough. The ball is gonna hold true and then draw a bit. I maybe should have gone with the next flex up. I've been toying with the idea of adding a 5 wood. Cleveland Launcher Fairways come highly recomended, too. Check out the 17 degree high launch 3 wood. It's a great "one wood does it all" choice for many golfers. Good luck.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say go with a 3-wood and drop the LW.

One reason for this: LW takes a lot of practice to hit well. With a higher handicap, you would likely benefit more from practicing other parts of your game. Us amateurs only get so much practice time.

Your driver problems may be swing related. Have you had a lesson lately?

If a 3-wood seems difficult to hit, try a 4-wood - a little more loft, but still gets good distance.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would say go with a 3-wood and drop the LW.

But it's a lot easier to practice with a LW in your backyard than a 3 Wood.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go with a 60-degree sand wedge but that's just me... I don't carry a "lob wedge" that's because my 60-degree has 10 degrees of bounce i guess...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

60 is great club...58 is the perfect club for me. I can open it as wide as needed and it plays less bounce then my old.

I do have volkey 60 with a 6 bounce in my garage...that one is shovel though. learning to use it for tight lies is on the spring time agenda for me.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm, this is a tough one. i just wish they would revise the rule and allow us to carry 15 clubs, haha.
if it were me, i would drop the 17º hybrid and replace it with a 3 wood, which would enable you to keep your LW. you already have 3 hybrids in your bag, and theres prolly not much of adifference in distance between the 17º and the 19º hybrid...anyway, that would be my suggestion
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked up an Adams Speedline 3 wood/hybrid. I think I'm going to dump the LW for now, I just duff it far too much. Maybe when I get better i'll ditch the 2brid and put the LW back in. But the new club is nice... nice high trajectory with the ProLaunch blue axis, nice small head.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are your distances on the 17 and 19 hybrids?

You must have to hit a lot of 180 plus shots for all those hybrids.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently took my 3 wood out of my bag and went with a 15˚ hybrid instead. I did this mainly because I felt like I could control the direction of a hybrid much easier than a fairway wood (more upright with a shorter shaft). I hit the 15˚ hybrid about 240-250 yards, but like has been said before you need quite a bit of clubhead speed to get any distance from a low-lofted hybrid.

Seeing as you said you are looking for a new club because you can be inconsistent with your driver, I'd say first make sure your driver is properly fitted to you and practice hitting that.

At the end of the day, you still have to swing the club and if your swing isn't in shape it won't matter what club is in your hand.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO unless you just really Love your 60 degree Wedge and are very confident/competent with it, I'd take it out of the bag. I think most High handicappers (and many low handicappers) can be more consisent and get the ball closer to the hole more often playing less lofted clubs (8,9, PW, 52, 56) in the Short game. At a 36 Handicap level you might really find a hybrid as a 'go to' club for par 5's and control off the tee. I have a 16 degree hybrid that I play that has been pretty nice.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went out several days ago and realize my 60 is my go-to from 70 to 15 yds, so probably i'll keep that guy in the bag. So I've decided to ditch either the 17 degree or 19 degree, since i also have the 22 degree. The difference in the 17 and 19 is about 15 yds and from 19 to 22 is about 10 or so. Any suggestions on which one to take out?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went out several days ago and realize my 60 is my go-to from 70 to 15 yds, so probably i'll keep that guy in the bag. So I've decided to ditch either the 17 degree or 19 degree, since i also have the 22 degree. The difference in the 17 and 19 is about 15 yds and from 19 to 22 is about 10 or so. Any suggestions on which one to take out?

Seriously?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon