Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just have a simple question for you guys:

At the range today, I was talking to a few other golfers who were there while I was taking a break. One of them asked what I was hitting, so I showed him the bag.

He made a comment that I found very strange. He asked me a question about my choice of clubs, since I have a bunch of different manufacturer's clubs in my bag. I told him when I go to buy a new club, I go in and hit as many as I can, regardless of brand name, and whichever one I hit the best is what I buy, regardless of brand name.

He made a comment that he would only buy clubs from Callaway, and that's what he preferred, and everything in his bag was Callaway except for his putter, which was a Scotty Cameron.

My thoughts are that since I'm not getting paid to play a certain brand of club, I want what I hit the best in the bag, who cares is every club is from a different manufacturer. Just wondering if this is common practice, or do most of you stick to a single brand name throughout the bag?

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Being biased towards a single brand is the single worst thing a golfer can do, I know this because I was guilty of it. When I upgraded my set a couple years back I was so set on buying a certain brand that I disregarded how well I hit with other clubs and went with my loyalty. Now, I hate my clubs and finally realize that matching your driver, irons, wedges, balls, and bag is a terrible idea. The best thing anybody can do when trying out new clubs is to disrgard brand names and get what works best, unfortunately most people don't do this.

Ozone Stand Bag............Tour Burner 10.5............MX-300 Project X 6.0............Marilyn 34"
.............................................................


Posted
Currently in my bag it would seem as if i am brand biased cause i have a Callaway hyper x driver and Callaway x18 irons but in all actuallity im not. I do just what you do and hit as many clubs as possible to find out what i hit best. I normally would get a demo club and play a round with it or just hit the simulator at my local golf shop. It took me 3 months to figure out what clubs I was gonna buy for myself. I previously was using my step dads old ben hogans and then when I and started playing 2+ times a month I decieded I was gonna get my own. I think you are correct that most ppl are brand biased tho.

WITB:

  • Driver: Titleist TSR3 8.0 A3, Badazz 60g S
  • Hybrid: Cobra Baffler 17*
  • Irons: T200 P-4
  • Wedges: Callaway X Forged 48*,56*,60*
  • Putter: Ping Anser Milled 
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ummmmm, possibly.

Shocking as this may sound, there aren't many Nike golf fans out there. Since I tend to be different and not afraid to make a bit of a statement, I choose to game Nike equipment.

Plus, I honestly think their equipment is great. I wouldn't "be different" just for the sake of being different, I mean, the stuff has to be good too.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Posted
Kinda I guess, but mostly I rule out brands. Some brands I just don't like, so chances are scarce that I'll buy any of their equipment. Still got a lot of good brands that I can pick from. Currently got four different brands on the clubs. I don't care about keeping the same brand on everything, I want good clubs that I feel comfortable with.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm frugal, so I usually end up with clubs that aren't the most popular. The companies that spend mucho dinero on advertising have to mark up the price of their products.
However, if there is a hot club or ball that lives up to the hype and proves itself to outperform others in the marketplace, I'll end up buying it second hand or wait until it goes on sale in a year or two.

For example, when the '07 Burner came out, I couldn't rationalize spending $300+ on a single club. However, some of my friends bought it and I witnessed firsthand the dramatic increase in their driving distance. I ended up purchasing an '07 Burner last year for $100.

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333


Posted
I am definitely biased, it all started in 1968 when I would dream of buying a full set of Wilson Staff Dynapower irons, (when I was a kid Wilson clubs were the ultimate but I never had the money) took me over 30 years but I have a set to hang on my wall now. When I go looking for clubs I start with Wilsons but will and have played other brands, they are dissapearing from the market around here so I may need to switch brands in future club purchases. I do play Titeilist driver and woods currently and don't foresee making any changes with my bag in the near future. I have stocked up on 8802 putters as I have never found another putter brand or style that I like better. There are so many great clubmakers now we don't know how good we have it, I am sure I could find a model from nearly any brand that I would enjoy playing with.
ogio.gifedge bag
titleist.gifdriver 10.5* 907D1, 15* 906f2, 18* 906f2
wilson_staff.gif21* hybrid, 3-PW PI7, TW9 wedges
wilson_staff.gif: 8802, 8813, or Arnold Palmer Original
wilson_staff.gifX1 or 50

Posted
...My thoughts are that since I'm not getting paid to play a certain brand of club, I want what I hit the best in the bag, who cares is every club is from a different manufacturer. Just wondering if this is common practice, or do most of you stick to a single brand name throughout the bag?

I played Pro Tour irons (very hearty Ping Eye2 clones) for 14 years, along with assorted metal woods. When I begain switching out in Fall 1998, I knew it was time to dump Stiff for Regular, and tried lots of brands of clubs. I ended up with a lot of Callaway stuff, but Callaway won in an open audition against lots of other clubs.

Woods: Tried several drivers here and there in Fall, the tested six on luanch monitor during Thanksgiving time. Hyper-X Tour tied the Cleveland HiBore XLS Red on the printout, but the Callaway felt better and was easier to set up. Irons: Tried full range of Ping, Titleist and Callaway. I10 had the early lead, but felt klunky compared to others. AP2 felt great, but would have cost $1,200 for shaft combo I needed; plus my swing was under rebuild. Finally got X20 - felt good and got super deal on slightly used set. It's confusing because there are probably a half dozen iron models I could play well if they had the proper shaft. I do like Cleveland wedges, and have one. Basically, I track Ping, Titleist and Callaway clubs. These three make good clubs, and I compare among them. But, I don't have time to hit every club in the kingdom. (Have played Tour Edge woods in past, might consider them too)

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am willing to hit any brand that is recommended to me. During my last iron fitting, my pro recommended several irons and in the end my choices came down to Mizuno and Adams. While I was willing to hit many different brands during my fitting, I ended up choosing Mizuno because I "felt more confident" with the name Mizuno in my bag instead of Adams.

In my Grom stand bag:

V2 Rapture 9* with Mitsubishi Rayon Diamana Blue stiff shaft
Launcher 15* 3 wood with Proforce V2 stiff shaft
18.5* 3DX 3+ Hybrid with Adila NV Hybrid 75 stiff shaft MX 200 3-PW with True Temper XP S300 stiff shaftsVokey Spin Milled 52.08Vokey Spin Milled 58.12 CX2 34 in


Posted
I will say that i go in looking for clubs with a bias and other companies really need to "win me over." and thats just from past experience. I know that I hit mizuno better than other clubs, so when i go looking for new stuff, usually the first place i look is mizuno. now if i hit something better ill go with it, like my driver, i hit my taylormade much better than my old t-zoid driver. but i go in with a different mindset about mizuno, its hard to explain, but i know how theyve performed for me in the past, so they kind of have a leg up i guess

~Grey
in the nike.gifsasquatch blue/silver bag:
taylormade.gif R580 10.5* driver | mizuno.gif MP-01 13.5* 3-wood | mizuno.gif F-60 18* 5-wood | mizuno.gif MX-200 4-GW |
mizuno.gif MP-T10 56*/13* satin black | mizuno.gif MP-R 60*/9* black Ni | odyssey.gif White Hot 2-ball XG 35" putter |
bridgestone.gif e6


Posted
Bias can be developed over time based on good or bad experience (or impression) with brands. However, I am trying my best to test as much as I can before making purchase decision.

Driver: Big Bertha 460, (9° Steel) | Wood: X Fairway 3W (15° Steel) | Hybrid: X 3H (21° Steel) |
Irons: 4-PW, MP-52 (TT DG S300) | Wedges: X-Forged Chrome 52°/13, 56°/15, 60°/10 (TT DG S300) |
Putter: Ping Karsten Anser


Posted

Correction on my earlier post:

I played Pro Tour irons (very hearty Ping Eye2 clones) for 14 years, along with assorted metal woods. When I begain switching out in Fall 1998, I knew it was time to dump Stiff for Regular, and tried lots of brands of clubs. I ended up with a lot of Callaway stuff, but Callaway won in an open audition against lots of other clubs.

I began switching out clubs in 2008, NOT 1998.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have always played what ever has worked best for me, sometimes it may have seemed biased but it was really based upon performance at that particular point and time.
If you always do what you've always done....You'll always be where you are right now..
Driver: C830.2 HOF Taiwan Proto
3 wood: Versus VS 1 Proforce V2
7 wood: DCT Fujikura Motore F1
3-pw: Nakashima NX-1 Project X 6.5 53*: ...

Posted
I'll be the first to admitt that I am absolutely brand bias.

I prefer to think of it as brand LOYAL.

I do this with most things I love. For my instruments, I only play Fender, Martin and Gibson. For photography, I only shoot with Nikon. For vehicles, I tend to only buy Chevy. For fishing, I like Quantum reals. For golf, I seem to only play Callaway for woods/metals and Titleist for irons and wedges.

I am brand loyal because once I find a company that does right by me, I stick with them. I may miss out on opportunities that may better fit my game, but at the end of the day, I will feel more COMFORTABLE and therefore CONFIDENT in a brand that I trust. And that confidence boost, for me, will outweigh any technological advancement that may "better" fit my game.

What I Play:

Driver: R9 460
4 Wood: G15

Hy: Callaway FT 3Hy

Irons: AP1 4-PW

Wedges: Vokey 52* & 60*, Mizuno MP-T 10 58*

Putter: Newport Studio Select 2.7

Ball: Nike One Vapor


Posted
I am brand biased (mostly towards Titliest and Mizuno), but thats because Ive experimented with various different brands and go with what I like best. Just as you could say that you arent obligated to play all the same brand, you cant exactly hate on someone for liking a certain brand and sticking with that brand.
Just because they like one brand, doesnt mean that they havent tried out different brands and found that brand x just suits them best.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted
Kinda I guess, but mostly I rule out brands. Some brands I just don't like, so chances are scarce that I'll buy any of their equipment. Still got a lot of good brands that I can pick from. Currently got four different brands on the clubs. I don't care about keeping the same brand on everything, I want good clubs that I feel comfortable with.

I agree.

It would be like only dating blondes. Too many other great chok
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
For my instruments, I only play Fender, Martin and Gibson.

Ha, nice. I have a couple of Fenders, although I don't know about

endorsements with them, as much as I like the ones I have. You probably wouldn't like them, they're very, very old... I think the only company I could sign with would be Yamaha (piano and bass, both of which I already 'endorse' in the sense I use them publicly, and on recordings). I've worked with guys who had endorsement contracts for different companies, and there are some perks, but most of those are relegated to things like strings, drum heads, and other perishables. As for golf equipment, any club is good as long as it fits you. Get them fitted with the right head, shaft, grips, and lie angles, and you really can't go wrong. I play the clubs I do because they are fitted to me, brand is totally irrelevant.

Posted
Based on my bag, no not at all.

Sumo 10.5*
R7 Draw 15* 3W
3dx 17* 2H
Pi5 3-PW
Spin Milled Vokey 54* CG11 60* C-01


Note: This thread is 5919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.