Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5592 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

2 members have voted

  1. 1. #1 Worse Amateur Mistake?

    • Casting/Flipping
      43
    • Swaying/Reverse Pivot
      33
    • Poor stance/set up/take away
      57
    • Overswinging
      73
    • Other
      33


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 221
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Swinging with their arms instead of their body.

Any quick tips or links to cure this one?

Taylormade M2 driver @ 9.5*+2

TM M6 D-type 3wood 16*, 
TM M2 Rescue 3H@19* and 4H@22* ,
TM RocketBladez irons 5-9,PW,AW, SW(23*,26.5*,30.5*,35*,40*,45*,50*,55*),
TM Hi-Toe 60* wedge,
Ping Karsten 1959 Craz-E, or a Scotty
Bushnell Tour V3 rangefinder


Posted
Swinging with their arms instead of their body.

Any quick tips or links to cure this one?

If I remember correctly, JackLee likes the "Golf Swing Master Key" by Noel Thomas. I haven't read it, but I think it advocates lead side control (left side for a right-handed golfer), which is supposed to automatically get the body and arms working in sync.

Callaway Big Bertha 460
Callaway X 3-wood 15*
Adams Idea Tech hybrid 19*
Titleist DCI 981 irons
Ping iwedge 56*, 52*Carbite Putter


Posted
they dont understand their swing. that means that they cannot have consistent success because they cant make adjustments when their swing gets bad. and the adjustments they try to make are swing tips from magazines or from other high handicap friends.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Again, I'm going to reiterate, but I think the real problem is even more broadly defined. The problem is that a high handicapper tries to hit the ball . The golf swing is a sequence of events, in which a ball is struck, but the higher handicap golfer's mind is focused on the strike more than the swing. The basic problem always remains the same: Lack of discipline .

The plain and simple truth is that the golf swing is not a natural move, and too many higher handicappers just can't discipline themselves enough. They refuse to listen to the repeated instructions of experienced golfers and pros, and continually let their subconscious take over and try so hard to hit the ball. When I stand over a golf ball, my mind isn't thinking about striking it, it's thinking about what in the sequence I'm working on. Right now, that's to keep my right arm tucked so the wrists break earlier. At the top, my next thought is to bring my right arm in close, and swing outward about 45° to the right of my target. Taken together, the sequence is basically a close right arm, and a swing away from my target.

Higher handicaps, however, aim at their target, swing and their target, and hit the ball out into the adjoining fairway on the right. They can't seem to get it in their head that golf is not a game of direct action. The body manipulates the club, and the club manipulates the ball. Higher handicaps try to manipulate the ball with their body and hands. The club is made to manipulate the ball, you don't need to help it. Your job is to get the club onto the ball, nothing more. The sequence is what's important.

You'll notice that one of the biggest things you'll see said here by people who stagnate is, "who cares about your takeaway/backswing/etc., Jim Furyk does it this way, so that means it's OK to do it wrong." This is a statement of ignorance. The swing is a sequence, and every part is crucial. Furyk is a great ballstriker, and his swing, while it looks unorthodox, is actually very sound. His unusual swing comes with an unusual grip and setup that allow them to work, and he was trained from day 1 under professional supervision. Don't mistake unusual for improper, because that's another major high handicap mistake.

Posted
A couple of things. Weight back is not a reverse pivot. It is a total lack of pivot. But, in order:

1) Over the top move, caused by:
2) Hip sway on the back swing, which causes:
3) Casting, and:
4) Chicken Wing-ing.

Which all lead to crappy contact and slicing. But those are all mechanical mistakes, not the many mental/strategical ones that plague the masses and have been mentioned here.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
they dont understand their swing. that means that they cannot have consistent success because they cant make adjustments when their swing gets bad. and the adjustments they try to make are swing tips from magazines or from other high handicap friends.

That's a good one! You need to know why you are getting the results you do. I think that's one of my strengths over the years. If I was slicing, I knew why and would try to fix it, not just make it work for me. I don't think getting tips from a magazine is a bad thing, but you definitely don't want to take tips from high handicap friends!

The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight. -Ben Hogan

 

Posted
If I remember correctly, JackLee likes the "Golf Swing Master Key" by Noel Thomas. I haven't read it, but I think it advocates lead side control (left side for a right-handed golfer), which is supposed to automatically get the body and arms working in sync.

Actually, with this swing, the arms, hands, and club are pulled down and through by the pivot of the body so the synchronization problem is eliminated. Also, no lower body key is needed.


Posted
I say bad stance and take away. My friend tried to golf and had the worst swing i'd ever seen by doing these. haha
What's in my Bag:
Driver-TaylorMade 09 burner 10.5* | 3 wood-TaylorMade 09 burner | 3 hybrid-TaylorMade Rescue 09 | 4-GW-Titliest AP1 710s | 54.08 wedge-Titliest Vokey spin milled | 60.04 wedge-Titliest Vokey spin milled | Putter-Odyssey white hot #7 | Ball - whatever i find

Posted
I don't think getting tips from a magazine is a bad thing, but you definitely don't want to take tips from high handicap friends!

getting tips from magazines isnt bad, but if its the only thing a high handicapper type might have to fix his swing he is just gonna get his head spun by conflicting tips that may not be specifically good for them. if they understood their swing they might be able know what tips to take or which ones not too.

the best way ive seen for a high handicapper to improve all the way into being a good golfer is to take tips from good golfers who know what they are talking about or seeing a pro, and then playing as much as they possibly can.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
A couple of things. Weight back is not a reverse pivot. It is a total lack of pivot. But, in order:

I want to edit mine:

1) Over the top move, caused by: 2) Overswinging, and 2) Hip sway on the back swing, both of which cause: 3) Casting, and: 4) Chicken Wing-ing.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would add not getting a video lesson haha as every mistake a high handi capper makes can be solved by video lessons

My Clubs:
Ping I3 + blade 3-pw
9.5 09 Burner with prolaunch red
Nickent 4dx driver
Taylormade Z tp 52, 56, 60
YES Carolyne putter


Posted
Hitting the big ball before the little one.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
As I high handicapper, It was overswinging. I still tend to but I have a more controlled swing than I use to. I have a buddy that swears by flipping with his wrist, he has a more controlled chip. My eyes still bug out when I see him flipping his wrist and he wonders why he is so inconsistent by hitting the ball fat or thinning the shot. Ive tried to tell him not to and use his arms but he tends to get angry and use the excuse, "Ive been playing for 10 years and your telling me what to do!" So I keep my mouth shut and just let him do his own thing.

Whats in the Four 5?

Burner 10.5 Stiff
Burner 3W
CPR 22/26 HybridsG5 5-PW Black Dot +2 Vokey Sm OilCanSV Tour 60* Black FinishBarbadosPro-V1 recycled


Posted
As I high handicapper, It was overswinging. I still tend to but I have a more controlled swing than I use to. I have a buddy that swears by flipping with his wrist, he has a more controlled chip. My eyes still bug out when I see him flipping his wrist and he wonders why he is so inconsistent by hitting the ball fat or thinning the shot. Ive tried to tell him not to and use his arms but he tends to get angry and use the excuse, "Ive been playing for 10 years and your telling me what to do!" So I keep my mouth shut and just let him do his own thing.

Tell him I said he's an idiot. Flipping is a great way to duff and blade chips shots. You have to use your body, legs and torso, to chip. That's why so many people are so bad at it, they try to move the ball with their hands. I've always been pretty good at chipping, and I use my legs to move the ball.


Posted
Swinging with their arms instead of their body.

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner.

Trying to use your arms (and hands) to swing/control the club is the single biggest problem (imho), because it is the most natrual thing to do. Give a glof club to anyone for the first time (child or adult) and they will swing it with their arms. Aren't several of the items on the original list caused by using your arms and upper body (shoulders in particular) to power/control the club instead of the lower body and core muscles?

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


Posted
I know I didn't explicitly state it, but I wanted to talk about the full swing, not short game or course management. Please keep the discussion to that.

For me it is casting casued by many things including overswinging. I've got days hot / cold where my chipping and putting is either ++++ or ---- and rarely ++--. But when I have enough time to warm up with 50 yard punch shots and hit a half bucket with a 9 to 3 swing drill my ballstriking alone puts me in scoring positions.

I save more shots from hitting the ball correctly (I know how obvious that sounds) than I do from hours of putting and chipping practice. Case in point I'm playing local 9 hole course twice this weekend and hole #7 is a par 4 - 380 and blew it twice and below is how: Round 1: 1 - Driver 280 - FIR - Perfect Lie: (Best shot of day) 2 - 50* wedge from 100 yards: FAT.~~.~... 60 yards 3 - 56* pitch from 40: Missed the green 10 yards to right 35' from hole. 4 - Chip: 10' 5 / 6: Putt... Putt = DB Round 2: 1 - Driver: 230 Slice but in next door fairway. Good lie. 2 - 150 Yds Uphill to elevated green: 6 Iron : FAT.~~.~... 40 yards 3 - PW - 110 Yards 18' from Hole 4 - Putt 3' left 5 - Putt Holed = Bogey I hit fat when I cast, had I warmed up correctly I could have a birdie and a par. This is just me but how many times has this happened to you???
ogio.gif  Grom Stand Bag: Stealth
ping.gif     G15  10 .5, G10 3W,  5W, S-57 3-W, Tour-W 50, 5 6, 60 : Redwood Anser Black Satin 34.5"
titleist.gif     Ball: ProV1

Posted
I'm with Shanks. High handicappers are crappy ballstrikers, mainly because they have 0 lag going into impact. When you know how to strike the ball well on your full swing, you will invariably have a clue of how to do it in your short game. Solid ballstriking (i.e. hitting the ball solidly in this case) is THE key to developing feel around the greens. Think about it: if you're constantly hitting it all over the face, the ball is always going different distances and the sound and feel is highly inconsistent. Your brain can't figure out how much effort to apply when things are changing so much. I'd bet if you could magically make anyone a solid striker around the greens, they'd have developed a great sense of feel inside of a week. Regarding the full swing, hitting solid, soaring shots gives you tremendous confidence that affects every area of your round. When I shot in the nineties several years ago, it didn't make a lick of difference in my score if I took 7-iron off of every tee box or hit driver OB, walked up to where it went out, dropped and took a penalty shot. Many of the 7-irons (the "smart" shots) would be bladed or flat-out chunked and I'd end up losing strokes anyway. So there really wasn't a course management option off the tee that would have suddenly made me start shooting significantly lower scores.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Note: This thread is 5592 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.