Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'd say you're unlikely to be winning much, but there are plenty of guys who never or very rarely win on tour but who keep their cards for a long time just by finishing somewhere in the money with regularity.  Averaging 250 yards carry seems like the very lower limit for this to be possible, though.  While you can probably focus on events where the courses don't put such an explicit premium on distance, it's going to be tough and you better put everything in the fairway and never miss a putt.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"




Originally Posted by zeg

I'd say you're unlikely to be winning much, but there are plenty of guys who never or very rarely win on tour but who keep their cards for a long time just by finishing somewhere in the money with regularity.  Averaging 250 yards carry seems like the very lower limit for this to be possible, though.  While you can probably focus on events where the courses don't put such an explicit premium on distance, it's going to be tough and you better put everything in the fairway and never miss a putt.



I'll agree with this... 250 is probably the bare minimum to still have at least a slight chance and to have that chance every other aspect of your game better be damn good.  I'd guess that at 250 you probably wouldn't win much but could make cuts and make some cash.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
PXG 0211 Driver (Diamana S+ 60; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrids (MMT 80; 22°, 25°, and 28°) · PXG 0311P Gen 2 Irons (SteelFiber i95; 7-PW) · Edel Wedges (KBS Hi-Rev; 50°, 55°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Vice Pro or Maxfli Tour · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · Star Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Sun Mountain C130S Bag

On my MacBook Pro:
Analyzr Pro

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So driving distance does matter? When I first started, everyone kept telling me that driving distance doesn't really matter.

IMHO drive it long then it'll eliminate the chances of using long irons / 3woods which have bigger margins of error compared to wedges and mid - short irons.




Originally Posted by Harmonious

250 carry probably equates to 270-275 total distance, with the fairways cut as close as they are on tour.


When you see those shots taken from the blimp of a drive landing, though, you often see it hit and stop pretty much right there -- all carry and no roll to speak of.


You will struggle, physically and mentally, as a short-hitting pro golfer. It can be done if you're an absolute bandit from the second shot on in -- Luke Donald has made, what, $20 million on the PGA tour so far -- but even he blew two years trying to learn to hit a draw off the tee to eke out a few more precious yards. With the length and athleticism that the younger guys have, I think your classic short-and-straight player will be worn down at the junior/amateur/collegiate level nowadays.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I see so many comments like 330 in the pine or 275 in the fairway ...... but I think it is the other way around ...... it are mostly not the longest shots that end up in the woods or in the rough, but it are the average drives in the fairway that bump along further through the fairway.......

What I see is that most of the "shorter" strikers hit a lot of fairways.

At the course we play 250 yds carry average mostly in the fairway means, you will probably play a near scratch handicap if the rest of you game equals your driving capabillities.

One of my buddies is a short hitter ..... about 225 including roll is best he can do from the tee, playing to a handicap 3.6 and he has been playing near scratch at some days.

Playing scratch at the courses we play isn't enough to compete at a professional level, I think you need to be able to play like a +3 or +4 at our courses to compete at lowest levels...... if you are not going for a birdie chance at at least 9 holes of the amateur courses you are not ready for the real thing.

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter




Originally Posted by Gerald

I see so many comments like 330 in the pine or 275 in the fairway ...... but I think it is the other way around ...... it are mostly not the longest shots that end up in the woods or in the rough, but it are the average drives in the fairway that bump along further through the fairway.......

What I see is that most of the "shorter" strikers hit a lot of fairways.

At the course we play 250 yds carry average mostly in the fairway means, you will probably play a near scratch handicap if the rest of you game equals your driving capabillities.

One of my buddies is a short hitter ..... about 225 including roll is best he can do from the tee, playing to a handicap 3.6 and he has been playing near scratch at some days.

Playing scratch at the courses we play isn't enough to compete at a professional level, I think you need to be able to play like a +3 or +4 at our courses to compete at lowest levels...... if you are not going for a birdie chance at at least 9 holes of the amateur courses you are not ready for the real thing.



Huh?

I cannot understand what you are saying in the first paragraph, however I THINK you are implying that the balls that go in the fairway are longer than those that land in the rough.  That is true when comparing an equally struck ball from the same player.  We are talking about guys who are just longer than the short hitters.  Bubba Watson carries the ball much further than Mark Wilson (and just about everyone else for that matter).  Bubba can carry the ball 330 into the rough, he can also hit it 400 into the fairway (keep in mind all of this depends on wind, landscape etc.  I am only talking about what has happened before).

No one is saying you cannot be a productive golfer by hitting it into the fairway at 250yrds each time.  What they are saying is it will still make for a long day on a 7200 yard layout with rough, greens, and pin placements set up for the world's best.




Originally Posted by Gerald

Playing scratch at the courses we play isn't enough to compete at a professional level, I think you need to be able to play like a +3 or +4 at our courses to compete at lowest levels...... if you are not going for a birdie chance at at least 9 holes of the amateur courses you are not ready for the real thing.


I'd even go as far as to say +3 or +4 at a normal course won't hack it professionally either. The reason I say this is because courses on tour are set up completely differently to the average clubs' course. The fairways on tour are twice as narrow, the greens are rock hard and the grass cut to nothing, the rough is much thicker etc. This is the reason why so many brilliant amateurs fade away the moment they turn pro. Unless they've had the chance to play the odd professional event or the very top amateur tournaments AND done well in them, they won't be able to keep up once they are on tour. I think you need to be a +6 or +7 on a regular course to even think about turning pro. If you are shooting between 64-66 regularly at your home course from the back tees, you'll be OK because that pretty much guarantees you can break par on tour.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Corey Pavin had a pretty good career. I think he was in the 260's average. But, he was great with his fairway woods. I remember his shot into 18 when he won his US Open. I think it was a 4 wood.


Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

If you are shooting between 64-66 regularly at your home course from the back tees, you'll be OK because that pretty much guarantees you can break par on tour.



WOW! that's some damn good golf! So theoretically, an average Pro could murder my home course. I'd love to see that!

Callaway FT-9 Tour 8.5* IMIX
Taylormade R9 3-wood 18* (neutral Position)
Callaway Fusion 3-PW, AW, SW, LW
Nike Method 002

Titleist DT Carry whenever possible

Last few rounds been playing Srixon Soft Feel 2-piece




Originally Posted by itching4scratch

WOW! that's some damn good golf! So theoretically, an average Pro could murder my home course. I'd love to see that!


What is your home course?

Pharaoh, it depends on the home course entirely.

Some have slope ratings of 120 par 72, some have slope ratings of 145 par 71.....

I could shoot 80's on the first but probably high 90's on the other LOL

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter




Originally Posted by Kieran123

What is your home course?

Pharaoh, it depends on the home course entirely.

Some have slope ratings of 120 par 72, some have slope ratings of 145 par 71.....

I could shoot 80's on the first but probably high 90's on the other LOL



That's true, but I'm referring to average difficulty i.e. where an 18 handicapper shoots 90, a scratch golfer shoots 72 etc.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill




Originally Posted by itching4scratch

WOW! that's some damn good golf! So theoretically, an average Pro could murder my home course. I'd love to see that!



The Sand Trap did a calculation showing that the pro that finished 125th on the money list was a +3 golfer ON TOUR!! So what would that make him on an average golf course set up for members?? I think they had Tiger at +9 or +10, Furyk (2nd on the money list at the time) at +7.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Quote:

What is your home course?

par 70 slope 109 from the tips

Callaway FT-9 Tour 8.5* IMIX
Taylormade R9 3-wood 18* (neutral Position)
Callaway Fusion 3-PW, AW, SW, LW
Nike Method 002

Titleist DT Carry whenever possible

Last few rounds been playing Srixon Soft Feel 2-piece


A +4 handicap golfer is a +4 wherever he goes.  At an average course of 72.0/130 he would expect to shoot around 69, for example.  At TPC Sawgrass, playing at 76.8/155 from the tips, he would expect to shoot around 73, approximately.   But his handicap would be the same.  His "course handicap"may vary depending on the course's slope, and is used to make for an equitable competition against others, but that doesn't affect his overall handicap.   Just a little clarification, FWIW.




Originally Posted by Leftee

Corey Pavin had a pretty good career. I think he was in the 260's average. But, he was great with his fairway woods. I remember his shot into 18 when he won his US Open. I think it was a 4 wood.



But no one was averaging 310 back then.  Courses were shorter and so were the players.

And not only was he great with his fairway woods he had an all-world short-game, including putting.  I just saw him on TGC on Lesson from a Pro.  A thoroughly good guy.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it would be possible but one would have to be a phenominal long/middle iron player. Also competing with the bombers now you'd have to hit the fairway on almost every tee shot.




Originally Posted by itching4scratch

Is 250yd carry enough to compete?

It may be enough for regional pro/am play, but not near enough for the modern PGA, Nationwide, Euro, etc. tours.  This would have been fine in the 70s, but not now.  The modern tournament course of 7200-7600 plus yards play long.  Even as long as they are playing, the par 5s play to par 4.5s for most of the field.  The guy who is swinging the club at 100 mph has a real disadvantage as he is hitting 4 wood to most players 5-6 irons on 220 yard par 3s.  This is a tall order unless you are "Pavinesque."

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Odyssey 2 Ball Blade | Vice Pro Plus  


Note: This thread is 4986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 307 - Mirror swings, focusing on rotation. That seems to take pressure off my lead hip. 
    • With a lot of help from @iacas, I was able to take a great trip down to Pinehurst this past week. Took advantage of having a day off because of Veteran's Day and spent 4 days in the Pinehurst area. @iacas, @Hardspoon, @GolfLug, and @NCGolfer joined me for at least 1 round on the trip. I got in 2 courses in Pinehurst proper - Southern Pines and Pine Needles - and then the Duke golf course in Durham and Tobacco Road. All of the courses were new to me, and I really liked all of them. I am going to add more to this later when I have some time, but I wanted to post a quick recap/thoughts for each course. Duke Golf Club I really enjoyed this course. It's a big ballpark that goes up and down a couple of hills. The front 9 starts off going straight downhill, with 1 and 2 being similar dogleg left, downhill par 4s. You make your way to the bottom of the hill with a par 3 that plays over a lake, and then you creep up slowly. The best hole on the front is the 7, the first par 5. It's a dogleg right goes downhill to a small green protected by a creek and bunkers. If you can get your ball to the fairway, you should have a chance at going for the green in 2. That shot was probably the most memorable one I had on this course. You then crest the hill again with the tee shot on 9, which is a par 5 that goes down the hill and then the green is back on top of the hill by the clubhouse.  The back only goes up and down the hill once, so it's slightly more tame than the front. I really liked 11, which is another par 5. The tee shot plays down the hill, and if you hit a good one, you could have a mid iron into your hand with your second shot. The green is huge, but protected by a creek that runs in front of it. The closing stretch of holes are pretty good. 16 is a short par 4 playing straight up hill. Distance control with a wedge is really important. 17 is slightly uphill, but the trick is navigating the uneven lies in the fairway. 18 is fairly straightforward but a stout par 4 to end the round. The only negative is that there were a lot of holes with forced carries to the green. 4, 7, 11, 12, and 13 all had ponds or creeks fronting the green. Most of those required hefty carries.  Bottom line, I liked the course and the setting. I would be happy to play here regularly. Pine Needles I loved this course. The setting reminded me a lot of #2, and it feels like a mini #2 with a lot of small, turtleback-type greens. The opening 5 holes were outstanding. 1 was a really cool par 5 that was no gimme. The green was pretty wild. 2 was a long, downhill par 4. 3 was one of my favorite par 3s that we played - over a lake with bunkers framing the green. 4 was a short uphill par 4 that I really liked. 5 was an excellent but tough par 3, sitting on a shelf well above the tee. It's a great opening stretch. And again, the feel and look of the place is unique to the Pinehurst area. It feels like something you wouldn't find anywhere else. Other highlights - the green site on 9 was really cool. There is a big run off area to the right of the green that you want to avoid. It reminded me a bit of the second hole at Sand Valley - you don't want to be right of that green either. 12 was a great hole. You can't see the green from the tee, as the tee shot plays over a hill. When you see the green, it looks tiny, with a huge runoff and bunkers to the left of the green. The fairway is pretty wide, so the trick is accuracy with your approach shot. 18 was an extremely cool finishing hole. You can't really see the fairway off the tee, but it turns out to be fairly generous when you get there. And then the green site is fantastic - sitting at the bottom of the hill, but still requiring precision to be on it. I really want to get back and play this course again. There are a few shots that I want to try again (the drive on 10, the approach on 12, the drive on 18). And I just really loved the look and feel of the place. A great course and a fun day of golf. Southern Pines I thought this was the best course of the 4 I played. It's wider than Pine Needles, and the greens are bigger. But the greens are much more undulating. The land here is truly excellent. There is a ton of land movement, and seemingly every hole has elevation changes you have to navigate. I really like both par 5s on the front. If you hit good drives on both, you will get a big kick down the fairway. If you don't, you're going to be faced with a long 2nd shot just to have a wedge in. 2 plays down the hill with the tee shot and then back up the hill with the approach. You have to be careful about club selection and distance control there. 7 was a good, fairly long par 3 with a green perched on a ledge. 11 was a driveable par 4 with a wild green. 15 was really cool as well - the tee shot is downhill, but then the green is back uphill. This is a course I would love to play everyday. It's a thinking man's course, because you have to be really careful with all the elevations changes there. You constantly have to play and commit to a club longer or shorter than the distance. And I don't really think there are any bad holes. Only negative is that a few holes are a bit repetitive - 4, 16, and 18 are all shorter par 4s where you're hitting an uphill approach wedge or short iron. This is a very minor nit, though. One of the best courses I've played. I'd have to think about where exactly to rank it, but easily within the top 10. Possibly cracking the top 5. I will play this again next time I'm in Pinehurst. Tobacco Road I had a blast at this course. It is unique and pretty wild. You start out with these massive dune-like hills pinching in on your tee shot on 1. And then the entire round feels like you're going around these massive dunes. There are a lot of interesting shots here. You have long carries over bunkers, blind tee shots, shots into tiny greens, shots into huge greens, carries over deep bunkers, downhill shots, uphill shots, you name it. The setting is incredible. It is a huge course, and the fairways and greens tend to be very generous. I want to write more about individual holes later. But I really liked 7, 9, 10, and 16. I want to play a couple of the par 3s again with different hole locations and/or different tee boxes. 6 and 17, in particular, could play like wildly different holes with a different hole location (for 17) or coming from a different tee box (for 6).  While I had a lot of fun seeing this course, I do feel like a smart golfer could get bored here. To me, it was fairly obvious that Strantz was trying to bait you into trying a bunch of hard shots. On 11, for example, if you hit a good drive to the right side of the fairway, you could have a shot at the green in 2. But the green is over a massive bunker that has to be 40 feet below the green. And the green is narrow, essentially facing perpendicular to you. The only chance you really have is to hit a perfect shot. The alternative is an easy lay up to a wide fairway, leaving you with a wedge at the perfect angle. Maybe I try going for it with a 7 iron or something shorter, but that's about it. I felt similar on 5 - the direct line to the green is not that far and the green is driveable, But if you miss, you're going to have a 40ish yard bunker shot or a lost ball. Meanwhile, if you play to the right, you have a massive fairway and you'll likely be left with a wedge in your hand. I think it would be fun to play with 2 balls on some of these holes and try the shots. If you are a LSW disciple, though, you are not going to try the crazy risky shots Strantz is trying to bait you into. In the end, I really enjoyed this course. But I think it's below PN or SP. It's still awesome, and it was fun to see and play. I would come back here, but it's a lower priority than other Pinehurst courses. Well, that ended up being longer than I was anticipating. I may add some more thoughts about specific holes later, but this is a good starting point. I do want to think more about course ratings out of 10 for these, too. More to come...
    • Day 123: did a stack session.
    • Day 48 - 2024-11-17 A little work before Junior Elite. Left thumb and the compensating left wrist are better; still not great.
    • I watched a re-release of The Fifth Element.  I am going to give this movie a tap in Eagle. It's a wells shot movie. The actors are great. The story is interesting, and the setting is fascinating. For it being just over 2 hours, the pacing is phenomenal. I really enjoyed watching this sci-fi classic. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...