Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Myth of Maintaining Your Address Flex in the Rear Knee


Recommended Posts

Posted
The flexibility of the pro's is so much more than the typical amateur. The amount of coil they can achieve with less hindrances is so obvious. Any amateur, may need to bend their left elbow, lift their left heel, flare feet and straighten their back legs, to allow a decent backswing of sufficient depth. Some of these things might create too much of a good thing for the pro's. Trying to emulate what they do is a futile task for most of us. Sure if you are young, supple and your shoulders have not been affected in a bad way from work or sports then keep it bent and see if it helps. I just think more of how Sam Snead swung a club is easier on most of us in the long run.

  • Administrator
Posted

The flexibility of the pro's is so much more than the typical amateur. The amount of coil they can achieve with less hindrances is so obvious. Any amateur, may need to bend their left elbow, lift their left heel, flare feet and straighten their back legs, to allow a decent backswing of sufficient depth. Some of these things might create too much of a good thing for the pro's. Trying to emulate what they do is a futile task for most of us. Sure if you are young, supple and your shoulders have not been affected in a bad way from work or sports then keep it bent and see if it helps. I just think more of how Sam Snead swung a club is easier on most of us in the long run.

I think you're overstating the differences between PGA Tour players and average players. They're a bit more flexible, but not as much as you seem to believe in my opinion. I don't have full measurements of "everyone" to verify this, but they're not super flexible. Flexibility only goes so far. If you're too flexible, it's almost a limiting factor to speed and things can easily get out of sequence.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Flexibility only goes so far. If you're too flexible, it's almost a limiting factor to speed and things can easily get out of sequence.

So true, and I'm glad someone finally said this. There are so many old guys that I know who can't ever reach parallel on the backswing due to physical limitations, and I don't think any of them realize how helpful this is to their consistency. A high handicapper who is insanely flexible may have a harder time improving than some out-of-shape stiff. Overloading the shoulders and arms on the backswing leads to really bad sequencing and rhythm issues.

People don't realize how important it is to have a relatively short and controlled backswing with not an excessive amount of wrist cock, forearm rolling, arm loading, and shoulder turn. It's so much easier to find the ball at impact.

Sorry for the off-topic post.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I just think more of how Sam Snead swung a club is easier on most of us in the long run.

And "most of us" includes plenty of tour players.

I think some of you guys are almost looking at decreasing flex in the rear knee as a "fall back" option if you fail to achieve a centered pivot with a fully flexed rear knee. Decreasing flex in the rear knee, gaining flex in the lead knee, is a much more common way to make a centered pivot than trying to turn 100 degrees with a steep enough shoulder/hip angle, while not decreasing flex in the rear knee. May not be "common" in the way a centered pivot is taught by most instructors but it's common in how players achieve it.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So true, and I'm glad someone finally said this. There are so many old guys that I know who can't ever reach parallel on the backswing due to physical limitations, and I don't think any of them realize how helpful this is to their consistency. A high handicapper who is insanely flexible may have a harder time improving than some out-of-shape stiff. Overloading the shoulders and arms on the backswing leads to really bad sequencing and rhythm issues.

People don't realize how important it is to have a relatively short and controlled backswing with not an excessive amount of wrist cock, forearm rolling, arm loading, and shoulder turn. It's so much easier to find the ball at impact.

Sorry for the off-topic post.

Michael Phelps comes to mind.  Hank mentioned he was too flexible which was working against him.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
When I see the pro's in person and on TV, first thing I see is how still they remain while being able to turn so far in their backswing. I got a little off topic and perhaps was a little unclear in suggesting that the right knee straightening was only for flexibility challenged individuals to adopt. Your thread shows many supple players doing it. Sorry for clouding it up a bit.

  • Administrator
Posted

When I see the pro's in person and on TV, first thing I see is how still they remain while being able to turn so far in their backswing. I got a little off topic and perhaps was a little unclear in suggesting that the right knee straightening was only for flexibility challenged individuals to adopt. Your thread shows many supple players doing it. Sorry for clouding it up a bit.

It's fine.

And as for the bold… Key #1. :) Though we like the word "steady" more… :-D

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The only issues I have with this analysis (and most analysis) is that I feel like it's neglecting the fact that these players are all trying to play a certain shot shape with nearly every shot they hit.  They're rarely trying to hit it straight because hitting a ball perfectly straight doesn't help maximize shotmaking.  Also, most tour pros prefer to play a fade shot as their stock shot because they're all trying to avoid a hook.  Knee flexion has a lot to do with shot shape.  In the video it appears that all these guys are playing to holes that setup for a fade shot.  Ask any amateur watching these analyses if they want a fade to be their stock shot shape and they'll mostly all respond no because they want to hit that nice baby draw.  Straightening the back leg to stay "stacked" over the ball and have a steep shoulder and hip angle is a must for a fade shot.  However, for a draw shot you would want to keep the back knee flexed so as to keep more weight on it throughout the backswing allowing the shoulders to turn flatter and the hips to not turn hardly at all which helps bring the club into the ball on a flatter plane and produce a draw.


Posted
The only issues I have with this analysis (and most analysis) is that I feel like it's neglecting the fact that these players are all trying to play a certain shot shape with nearly every shot they hit.  They're rarely trying to hit it straight because hitting a ball perfectly straight doesn't help maximize shotmaking.  Also, most tour pros prefer to play a fade shot as their stock shot because they're all trying to avoid a hook.  Knee flexion has a lot to do with shot shape.  In the video it appears that all these guys are playing to holes that setup for a fade shot.  Ask any amateur watching these analyses if they want a fade to be their stock shot shape and they'll mostly all respond no because they want to hit that nice baby draw.  Straightening the back leg to stay "stacked" over the ball and have a steep shoulder and hip angle is a must for a fade shot.  However, for a draw shot you would want to keep the back knee flexed so as to keep more weight on it throughout the backswing allowing the shoulders to turn flatter and the hips to not turn hardly at all which helps bring the club into the ball on a flatter plane and produce a draw.

Poppy cock! Plenty of pros play a push draw, not all, but plenty. Rory is well know for hitting beautiful, high push draws and he definitely releases flex in his trail leg. I'm on a phone so I can't link any pics but I'm sure someone else will. Weight forward is a large component of hitting a draw as it tends to move your path outward or to the right. Weight slightly back will do the opposite, moving your path inwards or to the left, this will cause fade bias. Of course, this all assumes you are controlling the face well enough to start the ball on an appropriate line.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Knee flexion has a lot to do with shot shape.

I agree pros aren't trying to hit it straight but knee flexion has more to do with making a centered pivot than curving the ball a certain way. If anything staying centered with a neutral alignment at address will tend to produce a draw.

Straightening the back leg to stay "stacked" over the ball and have a steep shoulder and hip angle is a must for a fade shot.  However, for a draw shot you would want to keep the back knee flexed so as to keep more weight on it throughout the backswing allowing the shoulders to turn flatter and the hips to not turn hardly at all which helps bring the club into the ball on a flatter plane and produce a draw.

You can certainly hit a draw with the knee decreasing in flex. Doing the flatter shoulder/hip turn pattern can rotate the swing direction too far OUTward, where a lot of good player get into trouble. Staying centered helps the path not "bend" too far left or right.

Both of these guys play draws and they both turn "steep" with the lead knee increasing in flex and the rear knee decreasing in flex.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Do you think it's also important to have the front knee move slightly inwards? I know when I work on knee flex, I often overflex the front knee and pull myself closer to the ball and this leads to a bunch of problems (Shanks, heel contact, standing up on the downswing to make room).

See how macs knee moves in a little bit and not straight down.


  • Moderator
Posted

Do you think it's also important to have the front knee move slightly inwards? I know when I work on knee flex, I often overflex the front knee and pull myself closer to the ball and this leads to a bunch of problems (Shanks, heel contact, standing up on the downswing to make room).

Yep no doubt there needs to be some inward movement of the left knee. General measurement is that the knee goes from outside the left hip at 1 to inline at 4. Left foot being flared not only helps on the downswing but it also helps regulate how far back the left knee can go.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Did anybody happen to see the Golf Magazine June issue? In the your game section there is an article called how to fix your death move.

Maintain your right knee flex yo blast your irons longer than ever.

Best two things I got from you guys is to let it straighten and flare my feet.

Mags and tips can driven you crazy.


  • Administrator
Posted

Okay, so here are my problems with this article. I won't even mention that his "START" position is not very well balanced. He seems to be way on his heels. Could be the camera position, though.

- "Maintain your right knee flex" is ambiguous. Maintain the same? Some of it?  What?

- "Straightening" your right knee technically means "to make straight." Does he mean "extending"? If so, why not say that? Too wordy? Not really. He then says "a locked right knee" implying he means to truly "straighten."

- The drill with the stick implies that he means ANY extension of the left knee.

- You lose your spine angle? Huh? Flat out wrong. Heck, his spine angle looks the same in his NO and YES pictures (it's within a few degrees - he's a bit steeper (IMO in a good way) on the left).

- Extending your trail knee does not limit how far you can rotate back . Flat out wrong. WTH? Goodbye power? Please.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
But he's a Top 100 Teacher, Erik!

I know. :)

"Friends" with him on The Facebook, too… but no, I'll be good.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

But he's a Top 100 Teacher, Erik!

I know.

Scary, isn't it.

I seriously don't know who this guy was watching during the 2012 and 2014 Masters.... how can people keep promoting this crap??

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
If this is being good I want to see the bad version. :-) Say what you really mean! :-) Detail question. What do you mean @iacas by any extension of the left knee? If you let the right knee extend doesn't that make the left knee bend more? Oh wait, by keeping the rear knee locked via stick it can make the left knee do some not so good things? Not a fan of the wording power-rich. Who talks like that? Just say great source of power if that's the case. We're not talking vitamins here.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 610 - 2026-06-03 Got some work in between lessons today. Rare late day, teaching until 7:30pm.
    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.