Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • iacas

      Snell 20% Off   11/24/2017

      TST Partner Snell Golf is having a 20% off Black Friday/Cyber Monday sale! Check it out at snellgolf.com.
Sign in to follow this  
mvmac

Holly Sonders Photos from Golf Digest's "Get Fit" Issue

42 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Originally Posted by zipazoid

Nice to see she's a fellow yogi too.

Yogi or Boo-Boo, but definitely not your average bare...er...bear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be the negative nelly.... I don't care for the shape of her legs. I have never been a fan of Holly but I wouldn't kick her outa the sack for her legs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think Golf Digest has a new policy of trying to include a bit of Maxim-style photo content in every issue - seems like they've thrown in a little T&A; photo for the past 3-4 issues.  I'm surprised we haven't seen letters to the editor about this new trend "cheapening" the magazine or something similar along with a some outraged demand to cancel subscriptions (some people go nuts over such stuff - I remember some lunatics cancelling their Automobile magazine subscriptions a few years back over a "Highly Offensive!" and  "Pornographic!!" cover story on Audi coupes because it feature the headline "Audi Shows Us Its TTs") .  On the one hand, the guy in me doesn't object to the fairly pleasing views (they ought to stretch the budget a bit to get more attractive models though - if you're going to do it, might as well do it right).  On the other hand, the intellect in me says it's a pretty blatant and cheesy gimmick that's not going to attract new readers or make the magazine's golf content substantively any better.

For that matter, Golf Digest's content has definitely gone downhill in recent years.  I don't need my golf magazines giving me reviews of high end cars that basically are there because the editors get a thrill out of driving around a $70,000 luxury sedan for a few weeks - I can get too many crappy, biased car reviews from the car magazines to which I subscribe - or some dramatized-but-still-dull-as-hell inspirational piece on how "golf saved my life!".  And that Hungover Caddy column is boring and often just stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Golf Digest has a new policy of trying to include a bit of Maxim-style photo content in every issue - seems like they've thrown in a little T&A; photo for the past 3-4 issues.  I'm surprised we haven't seen letters to the editor about this new trend "cheapening" the magazine or something similar along with a some outraged demand to cancel subscriptions (some people go nuts over such stuff - I remember some lunatics cancelling their Automobile magazine subscriptions a few years back over a "Highly Offensive!" and  "Pornographic!!" cover story on Audi coupes because it feature the headline "Audi Shows Us Its TTs") .  On the one hand, the guy in me doesn't object to the fairly pleasing views (they ought to stretch the budget a bit to get more attractive models though - if you're going to do it, might as well do it right).  On the other hand, the intellect in me says it's a pretty blatant and cheesy gimmick that's not going to attract new readers or make the magazine's golf content substantively any better.  For that matter, Golf Digest's content has definitely gone downhill in recent years.  I don't need my golf magazines giving me reviews of high end cars that basically are there because the editors get a thrill out of driving around a $70,000 luxury sedan for a few weeks - I can get too many crappy, biased car reviews from the car magazines to which I subscribe - or some dramatized-but-still-dull-as-hell inspirational piece on how "golf saved my life!".  And that Hungover Caddy column is boring and often just stupid.

Wow. Sounds like you should cancel your subscription then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

I'll be the negative nelly.... I don't care for the shape of her legs. I have never been a fan of Holly but I wouldn't kick her outa the sack for her legs...

I see what you mean, but when I look at Holly I don't pay much attention to her legs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read she is 28?  She is definitely hot for sure, but honestly she looks a good 10 years older to me (not necessarily in those pictures, but on TV absolutely).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...