• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
poser

Lee Westwood working with Sean Foley

15 posts in this topic

http://www1.skysports.com/golf/news/14866/8826026/Lee-Westwood-reveals-he-is-working-with-Tiger-Woods-coach-Sean-Foley

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I don't think it can be a bad idea. It looks like it has worked for Rose, Mahan and of course Tiger. These 3 have all been playing well under tutelage of Sean so Lee is probably making a good move.

It can't hurt because his game seems to have taken a step back of late and at 40 he needs to turn it around sooner than later. I'm not sure if it will show positive results this week as it takes time but you never know. Sometimes with a ball striker like Lee it just takes a little confidence building!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting... It kind of surprises me to see it since Westwoods ball striking is so good. I guess it can't hurt, just hope he doesn't completely change his swing..
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ball striking isn't what has kept Westwood from winning majors, it's putting. Put me in the camp that finds this odd.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by k-troop

Ball striking isn't what has kept Westwood from winning majors, it's putting. Put me in the camp that finds this odd.

Think this is a little short sighted. It's not only his putting.

Look at these stats.

Think it's more a mental thing.

Because on average he plays paydays over par.

clearly he isn't the best putter.

http://www.pgatour.com/players/player.20396.lee-westwood.html/performance-stats/#uber

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think this is a little short sighted. It's not only his putting. Look at these stats. Think it's more a mental thing.  Because on average he plays paydays over par.  clearly he isn't the best putter.  [URL=http://www.pgatour.com/players/player.20396.lee-westwood.html/performance-stats/#uber]http://www.pgatour.com/players/player.20396.lee-westwood.html/performance-stats/#uber[/URL]

Haven't really paid attention to Westy this year but looks like he's really sucking. Check out his 2011 and 2012 stats and they're much better, especially in GIR which is the one that really matters. But he's consistently outside the top-125 in strokes-gained putting.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hope this works out well for Westwood and Sean.  Westwood has always been a great ballstriker so I am sure Sean won't do much to change what he is already doing.  A few minor tweaks here or there will probably be the objective.  Maybe Sean will help Westwood with the ability to hit a couple different ball flights that he can add to his ballstriking arsenal.

I do however agree with the previous comments on Wesetwood's putting.  It's not only his putting but his short game play around the greens.  It's hard to have good putting stats when you aren't chipping or pitching it close to the hole.  Sean can probably give some guidance in that area as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by k-troop

Ball striking isn't what has kept Westwood from winning majors, it's putting. Put me in the camp that finds this odd.

A greed. He really should be working with Dave Pelz.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong David. Hopefully he gets Orr as a package deal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was watching Golf Channel last night, and Brandel Chamblee gave a long, impassioned speech how Lee Westwood is making the biggest mistake of his life. Foley is eventually going to have to sue Chamblee for libel.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second getting hooked up with Orr! I'm thinking it isn't too long before J Rose hooks them up!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

I was watching Golf Channel last night, and Brandel Chamblee gave a long, impassioned speech how Lee Westwood is making the biggest mistake of his life.

Foley is eventually going to have to sue Chamblee for libel.

What's Foley know? He just coached a first-time winner to his first major in the last major.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

I was watching Golf Channel last night, and Brandel Chamblee gave a long, impassioned speech how Lee Westwood is making the biggest mistake of his life.

Foley is eventually going to have to sue Chamblee for libel.

I saw that too and it just continues to suggest Chamblee might be a bitter man. He talked about how Westwood is too old to change his swing. Who told him Westwood is going for a swing overhaul. Talked about how Butch and Haney both have students with more majors than Foley, well that hardly a letdown for Foley all things considered. One of his student has the most wins on Tour, and another just won his first Major.

I really wish someone would debate him over his half-baked thoughts. If I had his record on tour, I definitely wouldn't sound so pompous. There are 24 yr olds achieving what he couldn't achieve in a fraction of the time he spent on tour

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's Foley know? He just coached a first-time winner to his first major in the last major.

Nothing against Foley, he's obviously great. It's just that ball striking isn't Westwood's historical weakness (though he's way off this year for sure) so we're wondering if his priorities are a little off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Foley is more than just a swing advisor, he does a great job with mental/motivation stuff.  Think this is a good way to go for Westwood.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
    • A couple courses around my house, in the fall, will use this promotion.   
    • As straight to the point as always, been one of those days? .  The advances in tech always amaze me in what they can do given the limits set by the rules. Yes, of course there differenced between Acer and Taylormade. One is a comparatively small company and the other is a huge company with enormous R&D budgets. However, speaking from a the average recreational golfers point view im not sure those differnces in performance will be that noticable to the majority.  Sure guys like yourself will be able to notice them as, lets face it, you probably hit more balls with different types/makes of clubs in a year than i will in my whole life. I just wonder how many people use the older stuff and why (other than its cheaper than buying more gear)
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries