Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think that is a fair plan. And I think it is fair to say that there are small adjustments to be made with any strategy. The problem is that the potential variables for SMALL adjustments are just too many to list here. That is why broad scope advice is difficult to give. That said, most people, without an in person GamePlan structure (which we will be offering with schools, etc. btw once the book is released) should heed this advice to shoot lower scores.  It is easy enough to pick an exact target in line with your start line in order to finish your ball in the center of the green. The statistics, very much, speak for themselves.

I second this.  Obviously I don't have the experimental evidence you guys are going to report, or even the nice personal long term data @MS256 nicely quotes above.  But just speaking from the analysis I did yesterday, I had to stop and think a decent amount about how to present the data since readable graphs have to be 2D but there are a TON of variables.  This is a many dimensional problem.  Like I said above, I tried to shade all the variables I didn't show varying strongly towards favorable towards aiming at the pin, but there are still a ton of variables.

There are various combinations of GIR %age differential and elements of the green and layout leading to differentials in 3-putt percentages, birdie percentages, and U/D %age, and of player ability and propensities that lead to the optimal aim point being in various places from center of the green to the pin or elsewhere on the green.  The point I think @david_wedzik was trying to make with the OP and that I was supporting with my analysis is that the aim point that minimizes your expected score is almost surely significantly more conservative than we all like to think.  Our unrealistic opinion of our own skill and our selective memory of the gratification of the times we did make the aggressive, non-optimal play and hit perfect shots and got the birdie pull us towards estimating the optimal aim point as way more aggressive than the true optimal aim point.

No one is actually arguing that the literal centroid of the green is always the optimal aim point for all combinations of all the variables.  That's a straw man interpretation of the argument to support ignoring the fact that you're probably playing non-optimal, overly aggressive lines.

  • Upvote 2

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
After reading through a lot of the comments I should add this now. This SEEMS as if it is very easy to implement in your game.  It SEEMS that you should just be able to read the advice and start heeding it.  It WON'T be that easy I can assure you. I have struggled at times in my own game to take my own advice.  Challenge yourself to see how good you can be at acting on this.  Make aggressive plays to conservative targets. Again, it WON'T be easy :-P

Any idea why it's so hard? I remember many times in the past saying I'll just aim at the center. Sometimes it makes it as far as hole three or four before I start missing long or short and realizing that I based the computation on going for the pin... or at least going up or down based on pin location. I believe I'm a reasonably smart guy but on the golf course, I can't even stick to a simple plan. Oh well. Two chances to make another attempt at "aim at the center 18 times" coming up...

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I used this strategy today and made two birdies and an eagle, thanks @david_wedzik and @iacas !

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  mvmac said:

I used this strategy today and made two birdies and an eagle, thanks @david_wedzik and @iacas!

I tried to use it, and failed miserably.  It's harder than it sounds!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

For me, it is hardest to think middle of the green when the flag is in the front, which is a mistake I guess.  My brain says short is better because it is an uphill putt if you are short on most greens.  But short of the green makes it a lot harder.  I will endeavor to revise this thought process when I get to play again.

When the flag is back or to the sides, it is easier for me to think "aim for the middle.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
For me, it is hardest to think middle of the green when the flag is in the front, which is a mistake I guess.  My brain says short is better because it is an uphill putt if you are short on most greens.  But short [U]of the green[/U] makes it a lot harder.  I will endeavor to revise this thought process when I get to play again. When the flag is back or to the sides, it is easier for me to think "aim for the middle.

Actually that does bring up another issue, for me. I only have a range finder and sometimes it's hard to tell if a pin is in the front, so how do I judge my yardage? Or should I just err on the long side on my shots anyway?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  billchao said:

Actually that does bring up another issue, for me. I only have a range finder and sometimes it's hard to tell if a pin is in the front, so how do I judge my yardage? Or should I just err on the long side on my shots anyway?

@billchao , I got a really inexpensive app for my iPhone, Sky Droid, that only gave center of green yardage.  I used it when my rangefinder went in for service.  It was pretty accurate too.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
@billchao , I got a really inexpensive app for my iPhone, Sky Droid, that only gave center of green yardage.  I used it when my rangefinder went in for service.  It was pretty accurate too.

Thanks, I'll have to check it out.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  billchao said:
Actually that does bring up another issue, for me. I only have a range finder and sometimes it's hard to tell if a pin is in the front, so how do I judge my yardage? Or should I just err on the long side on my shots anyway?

Aren't most flags color coded these days? Add or subtract 5 yards or so depending on the size of your greens.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  iacas said:
Aren't most flags color coded these days? Add or subtract 5 yards or so depending on the size of your greens.

A couple of courses I play use those tiny flags below the large flag, but I find that a lot of the time, the people setting the pins don't set them right. I don't recall them using different colored flags, but I know what you're talking about because I have seen it before.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  billchao said:
Actually that does bring up another issue, for me. I only have a range finder and sometimes it's hard to tell if a pin is in the front, so how do I judge my yardage? Or should I just err on the long side on my shots anyway?

Distances on sprinklers and for yardage markers themselves are to the center of the green.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  David in FL said:
Distances on sprinklers and for yardage markers themselves are to the center of the green.

Most of the time. Sometimes front.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  David in FL said:

Distances on sprinklers and for yardage markers themselves are to the center of the green.

Right, good point. I stopped using them when I got my rangefinder :whistle:

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  billchao said:

A couple of courses I play use those tiny flags below the large flag, but I find that a lot of the time, the people setting the pins don't set them right. I don't recall them using different colored flags, but I know what you're talking about because I have seen it before.


Most of the courses around here that have fairly good sized greens have three colors of flags for front, middle, and back.

I saw one course that had the distance from the center of the green to the flag on the score card. That was about the best and most accurate way of doing it that I've seen.


Posted
  Shindig said:
Any idea why it's so hard?

It's the difference between Tiger Woods in 1997 & Tiger in 2000. 97tw was crazy aggressive firing at every pin. He destroyed the masters after shooting a 40 on his first 9 holes. 97tw had no shot of winning the US open. He would land the ball a foot from the hole and end up nowhere near it. 00tw had the best year in modern golf winning 3 majors playing a totally different game. 00tw was dialed back. He wasn't firing at every pin he was going for the best leave. This could be aiming 40 feet left to leave a 15 foot up hill putt instead of going at the hole and having a 15 foot hard breaking downhill putt. 97tw was playing checkers and 00tw was playing chess.


Posted

For me, it is hardest to think middle of the green when the flag is in the front, which is a mistake I guess.  My brain says short is better because it is an uphill putt if you are short on most greens.  But short of the green makes it a lot harder.  I will endeavor to revise this thought process when I get to play again.

When the flag is back or to the sides, it is easier for me to think "aim for the middle.

Try thinking about it this way. If you play for the distance to the front pin and hit it perfectly you are next to the pin. If you are anything other than perfect you are short of the green. If you add 5 yards to the distance of a front pin and hit it perfectly you are looking at a 15 feet left with  a putter in hand. Anything other than a perfect shot is going to have you on the flag.

Unless there is severe slope I think people seriously over estimate the added difficulty of putting downhill vs uphill. I think it was Johnny Miller who said at the US open he actually wanted a downhill first putt so if he didn't make it his come back putt would be straight up the fall line.


Posted
  leftybob said:
It's the difference between Tiger Woods in 1997 & Tiger in 2000. 97tw was crazy aggressive firing at every pin. He destroyed the masters after shooting a 40 on his first 9 holes. 97tw had no shot of winning the US open. He would land the ball a foot from the hole and end up nowhere near it. 00tw had the best year in modern golf winning 3 majors playing a totally different game. 00tw was dialed back. He wasn't firing at every pin he was going for the best leave. This could be aiming 40 feet left to leave a 15 foot up hill putt instead of going at the hole and having a 15 foot hard breaking downhill putt. 97tw was playing checkers and 00tw was playing chess.

I agree with what you said, but I'm not sure what lesson to take from it -- it doesn't tell me why committing to "aim for the middle" is so hard.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Oh yeah the point that I forgot to get back around to...

Everyone knows the shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line. In golf the lowest score isn't always going to be found from the straightest path. TW a guy who was clearly better than everyone else on the golf course took 2 years to rebuild his swing and change his mentality from attack, attack, attack to setting the best opportunity to score well.

The hole is the final destination and not hitting directly at it is not what our brain wants to do. I speculate that it is part of our hard wiring from when we people had to hunt for their food. If we were hunting and aimed 40 feet to the left of a stationary target we would starve to death. In golf aiming 40 feet left might be the best way to setup a 2 putt for par.


Note: This thread is 1754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My best shot was BS, I classify as good result. When you try to hit a punch out on the yellow line. Then you just steepen the club from A6.5 and pull hook it way left. It wraps around a tree, gets past the big tree before the green, and rolls up to about 10-FT from the pin.🤣 Then I leave the birdie putt 1/2" short in the heart. I deserved that. 🤣
    • Got off to probably one of my best starts ever last night.   Was -1 thru 5 and finished the front 9 with a +1 (37).   The back 9 wasn't very good but we were playing speed golf to try and beat the darkness.   Ended up with 37/44 for an 81.   Still a great score for me.    My last 5-6 rounds have all contributed to my handicap index so we trending in the right direction.
    • I don't see the swing speed as any advantage or disadvantage either way. While they don't have the "WOW!" factor that some of the men have. i.e. "Did you see Rory's 380 yard drive on 17!" That kind of thing. They do, however, play the courses shorter. I think their average LPGA Tour course is like 6400 yards, compared to 7300 for the men. So when I watch it on TV it looks kinda the same. They hit driver then 8 iron, just like the men hit driver then 8 iron. I don't really care that the hole is 100 yards shorter or whatever.  Let me put it another way. If I was to watch the WNBA and then watch the NBA, I would immediately notice how much slower the players are. How much more the men play above the rim. etc... Why? Because the court is the same size. The hoop is the same height. When I watch the LPGA Tour and then watch the PGA Tour, I don't notice (as much). They hit driver then 5 iron into a par-5 just like the men do. Because the course is smaller, it looks similar. BTW - The same is true of softball vs baseball. The softball diamond is much smaller. So, the line shots look similar, there are equally as many home runs, because the field is smaller it looks pretty similar in play.  Here's where to my way of thinking, they can make some hay. If the LPGA Tour was to lead the way in terms of pace of play they may be able to add additional excitement to their game and possibly start to make some converts. I'm an idiot who has never been a sports commissioner. But it seems that when MLB noticed their games started approaching 4 hours and Major League Soccer was always done in under 2 hours. They made changes to try to improve and it seems to be working.  With the LPGA Tour it seems you either need exciting personalities or need exciting play. If they improve the pace of play issue it could add to exciting play. Again, I'm no expert but that seems like an area they could lead instead of follow. It does seem they've recognized this. So, we shall see. 
    • Wordle 1,483 4/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,483 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...