• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
Fozcycle

Taylormade Project (a) Golf Balls

Recommended Posts

You were selected to receive a free sleeve of our new Project (a) Golf Balls, the #1 Amateur Ball at the 2014 AT&T; Pebble Beach National Pro-Am.

You can expect them to arrive in the next 2-3 weeks. When you get them, we suggest that you take them out on course and test them from 30-60 yards. Notice how the ball reacts when it lands and you'll discover why Project (a) was the choice of 83 Amateurs in the AT&T; Pebble Beach National Pro-Am including the eventual winner.

We think you’ll be pleasantly surprised to see the extra spin you’ll be able to generate which will lead to closer proximity to the hole and hopefully lower scores! And you can get all of this without giving up the maximum distance you crave off the tee! We’d love to have your feedback! Be one of the first to review this new ball at http://taylormadegolf.com/balls/projecta.html - if you do, please note in your review that the balls were provided to you in connection with this promotion.

Thanks!
-TaylorMade Golf

That was the email I got today........looking forward to testing them.

Anyone get this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Yes, I got mine as well... except I didn't sign up for it. I DID sign up for the Speedblade thing, though. Is this a concession prize or something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I signed up, thinking sure why not give them shot, and got declined... Fine by me I'll stick to Titleist, who's had the same top-level ball for 15 years while TM is on 3? 4? in the last 5 years? TP Black, Penta, TP5, Back to tourpreferred?...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry- I just realized that it was part of the "iWant" promo and not the speedblade thing. So I DID sign up for it. So I WON!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this supposed to replace the TP5/Penta? I didn't get that impression, more so that it's going to be the mid tier ball like the NXT to the ProV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I signed up, thinking sure why not give them shot, and got declined... Fine by me I'll stick to Titleist, who's had the same top-level ball for 15 years while TM is on 3? 4? in the last 5 years? TP Black, Penta, TP5, Back to tourpreferred?...

I don't think that's a fair comment... just because Titleist hasn't changed the name of their top level ball doesn't mean that they haven't had just as many... They release a new one every other year, just like TM and Callaway, etc. TaylorMade just happens to have a new name each time.

Is this supposed to replace the TP5/Penta? I didn't get that impression, more so that it's going to be the mid tier ball like the NXT to the ProV

No. The Tour Preferred balls will replace the Lethal which was the replacement for the Penta and the TP5. The Project (a) essentially replaces their mid level urethane ball (the Rocketballz Urethane, TP3).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think that's a fair comment... just because Titleist hasn't changed the name of their top level ball doesn't mean that they haven't had just as many... They release a new one every other year, just like TM and Callaway, etc. TaylorMade just happens to have a new name each time.

No. The Tour Preferred balls will replace the Lethal which was the replacement for the Penta and the TP5. The Project (a) essentially replaces their mid level urethane ball (the Rocketballz Urethane, TP3).

Isn't that Taylormades MO really. They tend to go with a lot of different names. Titleist banks in on the same name. So it is just a different philosophy on business model really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah. Titleist seems to name things in a particular way whether that be 7xx irons, 9xx woods or the Pro V1 balls. I just didn't think it was fair to say "look at all the different balls TM has had while Titleist has only had one," when in reality they've had roughly the same number of balls but TM just uses new names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was just thinking the same thing- The "cachet" of a 'Pro V1' or V1X is plenty for them to get folks to buy them. And don't believe for a second they aren't a different ball EVERY YEAR. they just choose to stick with the recognition of the name. But Titlelist certainly has it's share of ball models that get confusing. It drove me nuts when I was playing the Callaway iX tour. Then it was gone.. changed the name to something else and never really could figure what replaced it. Dabbled with the Lethal and Rocketballz Urethanes and then spent most of last year playing the 3UP ball (and loving it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Taylormade, as can be seen if you select the link I poted earlier.....

TaylorMade engineers have designed a radically new ball for competitive mid-handicappers who need more approach-shot spin. Project (a) is long off every club and feels great. Best, it helps you generate the extra spin you need to stop the ball closer to the hole, leaving you shorter putts to promote lower scores. Project (a)'s game-changing spin comes from SOFT TECH™. TaylorMade's new cast urethane cover that's specially formulated to be soft, durable, and very responsive.

This ball is for those with average swing speeds that want more stop 7 grab around the green.......cost is set at $31.99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Taylormade, as can be seen if you select the link I poted earlier.....

TaylorMade engineers have designed a radically new ball for competitive mid-handicappers who need more approach-shot spin. Project (a) is long off every club and feels great. Best, it helps you generate the extra spin you need to stop the ball closer to the hole, leaving you shorter putts to promote lower scores. Project (a)'s game-changing spin comes from SOFT TECH™. TaylorMade's new cast urethane cover that's specially formulated to be soft, durable, and very responsive.

This ball is for those with average swing speeds that want more stop 7 grab around the green.......cost is set at $31.99

The RBZ Urethane at the same price point did a fine job stopping the ball on full shots. It's the delicate, partial shots or shots out of the rough with a 56-60 that balls in this price range tend to be weak - they roll out more than your higher priced premiums.

Now Callaway seems to say we've made a ball for different speeds for longer distance and great premium spin on all shots. For $16 less, TM says its new cover makes a spin difference ... but on partials at that price range? That would be nice, but color me skeptical.

As to naming, Titleist has built the ProV1 as a separate brand - it has a life of its own, so it's best to keep the ProV1 Brand -- it's substantial and stands for "the best ball in golf" in many golfer's eyes.

TM has no such sub-brand. Its brand is TM -- so its strategy seems to be "we'll name the ball something new every year to show golfers it is new and improved. The TM brand will sell it."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As to naming, Titleist has built the ProV1 as a separate brand - it has a life of its own, so it's best to keep the ProV1 Brand -- it's substantial and stands for "the best ball in golf" in many golfer's eyes.

TM has no such sub-brand. Its brand is TM -- so its strategy seems to be "we'll name the ball something new every year to show golfers it is new and improved. The TM brand will sell it."

Yeah, ProV1 is definitely a brand on it's own and there is a good reason that Titleist sticks with it.

I get the feeling that TM is going to try to do the same thing with their Tour Preferred brand as they are bringing that back this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, ProV1 is definitely a brand on it's own and there is a good reason that Titleist sticks with it.

I get the feeling that TM is going to try to do the same thing with their Tour Preferred brand as they are bringing that back this year.

Agree -

I don't know the strategy of Callaway and TM as to getting away from the respective "Tour Authentic" and "Tour Preferred" lines. After all, TItleist doesn't have a Tour Preferred brand. Perhaps these brands did not want amateurs to think there was any difference between what a fitted amateur uses and what a fitted professional uses. The strategy is "this is your R1." No difference, just fitted differently.

Now TM is abandoning that idea...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Got my sleeve of Project(a) balls in the mail today. Kind of neat that they are numbered 00. Now if the weather would break and the green grass would surface from below the sheets of ice I could give these balls a try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just thinking the same thing- The "cachet" of a 'Pro V1' or V1X is plenty for them to get folks to buy them. And don't believe for a second they aren't a different ball EVERY YEAR. they just choose to stick with the recognition of the name.

I actually think you've got it a little backwards.  Don't believe for a second that it's a "radical new ball design...."  Taylormade debuts the same ball every year with a new name, while Titleist sticks to the same name but slightly changes the box or the stamping.

Yes, it's a "different ball."  But it's not the revolution in golf ball design technology as the marketing would have you believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I actually think you've got it a little backwards.  Don't believe for a second that it's a "radical new ball design...."  Taylormade debuts the same ball every year with a new name, while Titleist sticks to the same name but slightly changes the box or the stamping. Yes, it's a "different ball."  But it's not the revolution in golf ball design technology as the marketing would have you believe.

Gods point k-troop, as a Titleist ball tester, I get a sleeve to test every October. It seems that they do change the design a bit every year, but they alternate years with the NXT & DT Solo one year then the ProV1 & ProV1x the next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • A half inch is a half degree. But that still doesn't make this chart make sense. 
    • I ordered a PING G400 LST Driver with a Tour 65 x stiff shaft back in August. I was told that it wouldn't even ship until October. I had hit the regular G400 head with the x-stiff Project X HZRDUS Yellow shaft at a demo day and liked it even though I had to adjust the loft as low as it could go (8°) and I still launched it too high with too much spin. I was told the SLT head along with the Tour 65 shaft would correct the issues so I took a leap of faith and ordered it. While I waited for my driver to arrive I have been playing the demo because I hit it really straight even though I lost some distance due to launch and spin. Fast forward to yesterday, my new G400 SLT driver arrives. I take it out to the range and the course to play a few holes. What a difference! Club designers must be geniuses. Now with the loft set at 8.5° I launch the ball on a great angle and it goes and goes without falling out of the air. I haven't hit it on the monitor yet but I can tell the spin rates are much better. I hit the new driver and the demo to side by side and the SLT goes a good 15-20 yards farther. I just find it amazing what they are able to do with these driver heads by just moving a little weight around here and there. It's also a huge reason to get fitting if you want to play your best.
    • That new chart is wacked.  I have the original on my PC at home. Arturo has it the way I understood it... " the dot refers only to the head in relation to the factory standard lie angle which is black" I was measured on my wrist to floor and that gave them the starting point of Black +1". I then hit some balls off the lie board with tape and that showed I needed to be a lil upright so they gave me Blue dot, standard length shafts but it still off a bit.  Grabbed Blue dot, +1" and I was hitting the ball and board good so that was what I went with.  Any of my other clubs I have gone with 1* upright and +1" on shaft length.   ***** Just found this so I thought I would add it to the post ***** " a well-known standard in golf is that each 1/2" added to the shaft length = a 1* more UPRIGHT lie angle" Don't know if it is 100% but wanted to share as it might help OP with his dilemma.
    • Guess I'm not going to win this argument, so can't see the rules changing anytime soon. Hopefully the new 3 minute searching rule and maximum score on a hole will speed things up, as I guess that's one of the main reasons for changing them? Agree that ideally, we should have the same rules as the pros, but they do have advantages when it comes to looking for balls, in the form of a travelling army of spectators and marshals. Anybody who has followed a wild hitting group round in the British Open will know what I mean.
    • There are, particularly with Ping, a rather large set of variables.  And a large number of part options.  PowerSpec irons, as I understand, are "hosel bent" to reduce the loft.  Probably a bad description of what is done on my part but it, apparently, utilizes the cavity indentation near the heal/hosel.    Imagine doubling the number of parts in a Ping demo area.  Actually.... that's probably what they should do if they are going to offer it.  Regardless, it's back to the fitter time I am afraid.   
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (35 years old)
    2. TobyC
      TobyC
      (50 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon