• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Keith White

Masters caddy banned for needing sandals - really !!

26 posts in this topic

Cant recall the player but one of the caddies has a medical condition which means he needs to wear sandals, so Augusta have said he can't caddy. That's really sad, the player suffers over a stupid rule.  Surely if there is a real medical reason they should allow the caddy to do his job in the spirit of the game?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/golf/article-2600230/Amateur-champion-Fitzpatrick-forced-new-caddie-Duncan-banned-Augusta-medical-condition.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the United States. I'm sure an ADA or some such suit will be forthcoming......
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Cheers Crim, and I have to agree with young Fitzpatricks reaction.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the United States. I'm sure an ADA or some such suit will be forthcoming......


The US has shown us many great sporting moments and true fair play, I think somebody needs to drag Augusta from the dark ages, keep the traditions of golf but don't have rules that alienate you.  Talk about spoiling your image !!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the medical condition?  Hard to believe that if there was 2 feet of snow outside he'd be walking through the snow wearing sandals.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow you've got to be kidding me? I know its their club, their rules, but come on man, the poor guy has bad feet. They should have made an exception.

I love the Masters, but some of their rules ruin the fun. Remember when Gary McCord made a comment about the greens being cut like bikini wax. They banned the poor guy for that one comment. I thought that was really gadamn stupid.

Then there was the guy that when Louis Oostazen dunked the double-eagle on the par 5 hole, and he tossed his ball to a fan. The bastards hunted him down and forced him to give them the ball, for the display case.

They do great things, like the drive, chip, putt thing. But in the same breath they do some really stupid crap that makes them look like the old rich white guys stuff club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the medical condition?  Hard to believe that if there was 2 feet of snow outside he'd be walking through the snow wearing sandals.

Yeah. I haven't heard of a medical condition that requires wearing sandals.

Not saying there isn't one, but it seems unlikely.

And I don't know that the ADA applies, as the field of play is not a publicly accessible place (it's different than being a spectator). You probably couldn't hire a caddie that needed a wheelchair to get around.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:Fitzpatrick's Caddie:
~~'I told the TD (tournament director) he was pathetic and I hate the place,' he said. 'Apparently aesthetics are more important than people.'

Bad, bad, move. Not good words toward to the Lords of Augusta National. No more badges for that guy. Instant escort from the premises, I'm sure.

He could have something like plantar fasciitis needed a softer soled shoe of some sort. I can't imagine a sandal making a difference versus  soft running shoe (that's what was prescribed for Soldiers who I worked with).  I can't imagine carrying a 40-80 lbs golf bag up and down the hilly fairways of Augusta would be good for the guy if he needs to wear sandals.  He's banished like Gary McCord, no doubt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad, bad, move. Not good words toward to the Lords of Augusta National. No more badges for that guy. Instant escort from the premises, I'm sure.

Yeah. You can't say stuff that, no matter the provocation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No word on that "condition". Maybe trench foot? I really can't see how sandals could be better than normal breathable sneakers. So many different types out there. Seems stubborn on both ends...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Cant recall the player but one of the caddies has a medical condition which means he needs to wear sandals, so Augusta have said he can't caddy. That's really sad, the player suffers over a stupid rule.  Surely if there is a real medical reason they should allow the caddy to do his job in the spirit of the game?

They do have some head scratchers in the name of "tradition."

I still hope the kid plays well.  I like when the amateur champions content.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Typical mean-spirited and silly Daily Mail article - an overblown, poorly written account of a storm in a teacup, with the actual info coming from a Twitter post the caddie concerned released to the world in error (it seems the poor bloke thought he was sharing his private thoughts on the tournament director's decision with a friend, not the world at large). The Daily Mail and Twitter - two dumb things the world would be better off without, in my opinion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. I haven't heard of a medical condition that requires wearing sandals.

Not saying there isn't one, but it seems unlikely.

And I don't know that the ADA applies, as the field of play is not a publicly accessible place (it's different than being a spectator). You probably couldn't hire a caddie that needed a wheelchair to get around.


Actually there are may medical conditions, some of which require non restrictive and non enclosed footwear such as sandals or slides. For some with diabetes it is a requirement.

As far as Augusta being inflexible on allowing or disallowing....Its easier just to say NO under any circumstance, than it is to monitor it. Its their club, their rules.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical mean-spirited and silly Daily Mail article - an overblown, poorly written account of a storm in a teacup, with the actual info coming from a Twitter post the caddie concerned released to the world in error (it seems the poor bloke thought he was sharing his private thoughts on the tournament director's decision with a friend, not the world at large). The Daily Mail and Twitter - two dumb things the world would be better off without, in my opinion.

The Daily Mail is still in mourning since Michael Jackson died.  Now they can't have "Jocko" headlines everyday.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What's the medical condition?  Hard to believe that if there was 2 feet of snow outside he'd be walking through the snow wearing sandals.

Only thing I can think of is Athlete's foot.  In which case sunlight exposure along with your prescribed medicine is recommended -- as opposed to the dark moist sock which would help the fungus grow.  But heck if you've got athlete's foot I'd hardly call that a medical condition.  And if you have athlete's foot, you wouldn't want to have galleries upon galleries of people (notice I didn't say mob!) glaring at your nasty fungus toenails while you're walking around at the Masters.

Maybe the caddy just forgot shoes and tried to play it off.  How funny would that be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta wonder if players are under some footwear, or clothing, restrictions at Aug?  Old Sam Snead advised practicing barefoot though i never heard of him competing without shoes. And i could imagine some shoe colors and styles might upset some folks of a highly conservative bent. I'm glad Augusta is over for the year, it's good golf but the entire scene is getting to be more of a clown circus.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't allow sandals on the course where I work. They claim it's to eliminate chemical exposure. I don't buy that because they don't have a rule against licking your balls.

The first time we played there my wife had a brand new pair of sandal golf shoes. On the way to the course she said she couldn't wait to play in her new shoes.

When they told her she couldn't go on the course with them I never felt more sorry for her in my life.

I work there now and I still think it's a BS rule but nothing I can do about it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
    • My irons are from 1978, driver and woods from 2004 (same G5 as you)....at my current playing level, I don't feel like my clubs are holding my scores back. I will be updating my wedges to something designed this century in the near future but I'll probably regrip and keep playing my grandfather's old Eye irons a couple more years. There's something to be said about being familiar with your equipment too. The control you talk about with your driver comes from hitting a lot of balls with it and getting to know how it responds to different things. That's tough to give up considering that it could take weeks to develop that relationship with a new driver...at least that helps me cure the new toy bug and keep the wallet closed. :)
    • Hah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw that pic go up on the landing page.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries