Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4349 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
I knew the rule to be correct, but I had my doubts that it made much of a difference, so I did a little research.  Turns out you were correct.  http://hockeymetrics.net/home-ice-advantage/

That lists it as a true but negligible advantage.

I recommend sports fans all read Scorecasting. It makes the case that in all sports, as I said, it's largely due to the refs. Sometimes the scheduling of games is an effect as well. He focuses on basketball IIRC, but then talks about soccer and the stoppage time allowed, and other sports too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That lists it as a true but negligible advantage. I recommend sports fans all read Scorecasting. It makes the case that in all sports, as I said, it's largely due to the refs. Sometimes the scheduling of games is an effect as well. He focuses on basketball IIRC, but then talks about soccer and the stoppage time allowed, and other sports too.

I looked up the data on that, and it says referees call 6% more penalties on the opposing team in the NHL. (http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2009/11/30/1173912/referee-homer-bias) Couple that with a 20% powerplay percentage and the home team scores 1.2% more goals from refereeing. There must be other factors that can't be backed up by statistics, such as the ability to sleep in your own bed, play in a familiar arena, and gain momentum from the home crowd.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So I just realized that I did the bracket challenge on nhl.com a while back, and I have a chance to come out of round one with all of my picks being correct (except series lengths). The rest of my picks are pretty damn bold though. :bugout:

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So I just realized that I did the bracket challenge on nhl.com a while back, and I have a chance to come out of round one with all of my picks being correct (except series lengths). The rest of my picks are pretty damn bold though.

I like the way you think! ;-)

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So I just realized that I did the bracket challenge on nhl.com a while back, and I have a chance to come out of round one with all of my picks being correct (except series lengths). The rest of my picks are pretty damn bold though.

Bold indeed, at least in the Eastern Conference. I give the Rangers a better chance over Pittsburgh (assuming they get by Philly) than I do for the Habs beating the Bruins. I realize they beat the Bruins 3 out of 4, but the playoffs are a different animal (see Detroit series). I just don't see where Montreal has any advantages over the Bruins.

As for the Rangers, I can see them getting by Pittsburgh. Lundqvist could be the difference maker in that series. Fleury is okay, but not as good as Lundqvist.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I like the way you think!

Lol, for some reason I like Montreal this year. Vanek and Brière fit in well there.

As for the Anaheim pick... Basically just a guess. I figured the winners of the other series would all be beat up physically.

Bold indeed, at least in the Eastern Conference. I give the Rangers a better chance over Pittsburgh (assuming they get by Philly) than I do for the Habs beating the Bruins. I realize they beat the Bruins 3 out of 4, but the playoffs are a different animal (see Detroit series). I just don't see where Montreal has any advantages over the Bruins.

As for the Rangers, I can see them getting by Pittsburgh. Lundqvist could be the difference maker in that series. Fleury is okay, but not as good as Lundqvist.

I don't like picking chalk. Montreal is the faster team; whether their speed can overpower the Bruins' tough game is up to debate.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't like picking chalk. Montreal is the faster team; whether their speed can overpower the Bruins' tough game is up to debate.

Their speed advantage is way overstated. This isn't the old Bruins. They have plenty of speed. And everyone said the same thing about Detroit.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Lol, for some reason I like Montreal this year. Vanek and Brière fit in well there.

As for the Anaheim pick... Basically just a guess. I figured the winners of the other series would all be beat up physically.

I don't like picking chalk. Montreal is the faster team; whether their speed can overpower the Bruins' tough game is up to debate.

Montréal's only hope is to play a fast paced transition game and wait for Lurch and Mongo to start losing their shit. That's how Montréal beats Boston, they get in their head, if OTOH Montréal gets sucked into Boston's style of play...toast.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Their speed advantage is way overstated. This isn't the old Bruins. They have plenty of speed. And everyone said the same thing about Detroit.

I don't think it's overstated at all. The Bruins don't play a fast game, they play a physical game and win all battles for the puck. They just wear the other team out. If Montreal plays a really fast game, Boston is going to get caught and start taking a lot of penalties. And like @Ernest Jones said, Montreal can really get into Boston's head. Subban is a pain to play against; he'll draw a lot of penalties for the Bruins.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Holy Wild! Best hockey game I have ever seen. I won't be able to sleep tonight. Niño! Niño! Niño!
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wow, impressive comeback, Los Angeles.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't think it's overstated at all. The Bruins don't play a fast game, they play a physical game and win all battles for the puck. They just wear the other team out. If Montreal plays a really fast game, Boston is going to get caught and start taking a lot of penalties. And like @Ernest Jones said, Montreal can really get into Boston's head. Subban is a pain to play against; he'll draw a lot of penalties for the Bruins.

Not playing a speed game is very different from not having speed. The Bruins have plenty of speed. Marchand, Paille, Smith, Krug, etc can all skate with anyone on the Habs. That's the difference between the Bruins and everyone else, they can play any style you want and still beat you. There really isn't a "bad matchup" for them, as the Detroit series showed.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not playing a speed game is very different from not having speed. The Bruins have plenty of speed. Marchand, Paille, Smith, Krug, etc can all skate with anyone on the Habs. That's the difference between the Bruins and everyone else, they can play any style you want and still beat you. There really isn't a "bad matchup" for them, as the Detroit series showed.

Nah I disagree, if they played a speed game with Montreal they would lose. If they played a speed game with Detroit they would lose. But they won't and they didn't. They play a physical game, and it works well in the playoffs when combined with a hot goalie. On a side note, I have a perfect bracket going! :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Holy Wild! Best hockey game I have ever seen. I won't be able to sleep tonight.

Niño! Niño! Niño!

:banana:

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Looks like the Rangers are coming to town on Friday. We need to play better then we did in the CBJ series. Let's go Pens!

Driver: Taylormade RBZ :tmade: Irons: Titleist AP1 :titleist: PW-4 All other clubs are needing upgrading as I am able to afford it.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Big fan of @boogielicious but I'm looking forward to pooping in his Cheerios come round 2!

Hey @boogielicious , hope you enjoyed that first serving of Cheerios. :banana: You guys must hate Subban sooooo bad!!! Lol :-$

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4349 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Hello Golfing Buddies, It has been awhile since I posted but I am the Retired Old Man that asked for advice because I suffered two "T.I.A.'s about switching from playing right handed to playing left handed.  I purchased a Callaway Edge Left handed golf clubs. I changed the grips to oversize grips.  Well, two weeks ago and still at 79 years old, I shot a 44 and 47 on a small course in my hometown.  I am currently changing my shafts from regular flex to Senior flex.  So, you can see' it can be done! So, you other old timers; get with the program! Blessings to all of you. Retired Old Man (Terry Warner)  
    • Haiduk - Archdevil        
    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.