inthehole

Bubba Watson....Fan or not a fan?

0   10 members have voted

  1. 1. Bubba - fan or not ??

    • Yes
      124
    • No
      67

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

285 posts in this topic

Bubba seems to be the most polarizing figure in professional golf today.     He has fans & haters ... for a multitude of reasons.      I know some may be ambivilent on the issue, but for the sake of the poll, lets keep to fan or no fan.     I'm curious how this turns out ... let me break the ice - as a fellow home made swinger, I like what he's able to do with that swing ... fan.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Where's the ambivalent option? I like his game, but he's a little too emotional and Jesus-y for me after the round.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tough call.

Big fan of his aggressive playing style.

Big fan of anyone who routinely hits a 9i 200 freakin' yards.

Can't stand his putting, especially his routine with the herky-jerky practice strokes that appear to bear no relationship whatsoever to the putt at hand.

He also comes off as a bit of a prick in a lot of situations although he seemed to be a pretty cool playing partner in the final round of the Masters.

I voted "not a fan"

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm a fan of his talent, style of play and the entertainment factor that both of them provide. But, from the very little I know about his personality and what I see on TV, I do not like his personality. TV can make almost anyone look bad, but he's constantly on camera/mic complaining and blaming everything else besides himself for mistakes and bad shots. This irritates the hell out of me.

I guess I am a fan though as I spent most of my time watching him this year. I'm usually glued to Tiger coverage at The Masters, or any tournament for that matter, so Bubba filled my void this year.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a fan and I actually appreciate the way he handles himself on the course.  He treats his caddie like $hit, but golf actually needs more of the emotion and passion people like Tiger and Bubba bring to the game, not less.  Hell, you hear more emotion on any given Saturday coming from 30 handicappers missing 20 foot putts, but people act offended when the pros expect themselves to play well.

All that being said...if I hear one more commentator say, "he's never had a golf lesson in his life" I might pluck my eyeballs out of my head.  He was on the UGA golf team.  OF COURSE he's had a lesson.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a fan and I actually appreciate the way he handles himself on the course.  He treats his caddie like $hit, but golf actually needs more of the emotion and passion people like Tiger and Bubba bring to the game, not less.  Hell, you hear more emotion on any given Saturday coming from 30 handicappers missing 20 foot putts, but people act offended when the pros expect themselves to play well.

All that being said...if I hear one more commentator say, "he's never had a golf lesson in his life" I might pluck my eyeballs out of my head.  He was on the UGA golf team.  OF COURSE he's had a lesson.

This is fine and I do agree with the sentiment in regards to raw emotion/words. However, I think there's a fine line where a player should not cross and keep their mouth in check. You can't sit there and belittle your caddy over every last thing that goes wrong. You're the one sponsored, you're the one making final decisions and executing the shot. You're also the one holding the big check.

I said this before, but I'll say it again. If he's going to jump on his caddy as if his caddy is costing him money, he needs to thank his caddy first when he wins. If he's playing that large of a role in your success, you need to realize the road goes both ways and pay him his dues.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a huge bubba fan. Followed him at the final round of the northern trust open and he seems like a really nice person who can really play them game. He yelled at some Guy next to me but he had it coming hitting record on his phone making a loud noise in bubba's backswing. So I voted fan
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As Frank N. on the GC said of Bubba, he see's the world through different glasses. I think he's a tad bizarre sometimes, But, the dude can play golf. Am I a fan ? no, but I don't dislike the guy either, at least until he blames his caddie for some ,mistake that He made.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Totally agree with the "golf lesson" storyline. Sure, I get it, he was raised in a tiny town and was homemade early on. As said, I'm pretty sure he had a golf lesson at Georgia.

Watson just doesn't have a TV personality. Mickelson, no matter what he really is, has TV charisma. Bubba just doesn't. Berating his caddy and going ape crap over a snapped twig as he steps to the ball doesn't help matters any.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't vote. Put me solidly in the "meh" category.

I don't particularly care for his attitude many times. I also appreciate his talent.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

All that being said...if I hear one more commentator say, "he's never had a golf lesson in his life" I might pluck my eyeballs out of my head.  He was on the UGA golf team.  OF COURSE he's had a lesson.

Totally agree with the "golf lesson" storyline. Sure, I get it, he was raised in a tiny town and was homemade early on. As said, I'm pretty sure he had a golf lesson at Georgia.

Yeah, the never had a lesson or any instruction in his life is pure horse shit IMO. He is certainly less technically minded than most but you don't get to the Tour without a little help along the way. Makes for good copy though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not a fan.  I dont appreciate the crying, the Bible thumping and the know-it-all attitude about his swing.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will say fan, because I do enjoy watching him play, especially when he gets the air time a final group gets.  He is just very fun to watch for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I said this before, but I'll say it again. If he's going to jump on his caddy as if his caddy is costing him money, he needs to thank his caddy first when he wins. If he's playing that large of a role in your success, you need to realize the road goes both ways and pay him his dues.

For all we know his caddie knows that's part of his game, and how he works best, so he rolls with the punches and knows that it's really nothing in the end. We only see the "show."

If Bubba said to you "I'm gonna bitch you out every time I hit a bad shot, because when I do that I play better golf than when I blame myself or worry about your feelings. Carry my bag, take the abuse and know when to make a wisecrack back - and when not to - and you can earn a few hundred thousand, caddie in the majors, etc. Do you want the job?" Most everyone here would say yes.

Of course, it's possible he could just be a jerk, and his caddie just puts up with it, but who knows?

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Where's the ambivalent option?

Put me solidly in the "meh" category.

This is me.  Don't love him (don't love any of them - don't know any of them) but don't hate him either.

I just like watching the guys who are the best at the game I love do their thing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For all we know his caddie knows that's part of his game, and how he works best, so he rolls with the punches and knows that it's really nothing in the end. We only see the "show."

If Bubba said to you "I'm gonna bitch you out every time I hit a bad shot, because when I do that I play better golf than when I blame myself or worry about your feelings. Carry my bag, take the abuse and know when to make a wisecrack back - and when not to - and you can earn a few hundred thousand, caddie in the majors, etc. Do you want the job?" Most everyone here would say yes.

Of course, it's possible he could just be a jerk, and his caddie just puts up with it, but who knows?

Well, his caddie has to know that being berated is part of his job and part of Bubba's game because he's subjected to it often. Trust me, I don't feel sorry for his caddie because I'm sure he's compensated well and he most likely enjoys his job (I can only imagine and assume he does, or he'd quit. So, he's enjoying some aspect of it at the least).  But, it doesn't take away from the fact that he comes off whiny and and as having a problem with keeping himself in check to some viewers at home. As long as he's winning and his caddie has no problem carrying his bag, who cares. I still forge my opinion based on what I see though, which is all I have to work with because I don't know the guy.

I don't care about the guy either way. I do appreciate his talent and I am a huge fan of the entertainment that he brings with his unorthodox playing style and aggressive nature, as well as his remarkable distance. If he's on, he is definitely watchable for these reasons. I can't help but be annoyed when he throws a hissy fit though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have mixed emotions. I believe in the increased responsibility of the sports star to act with dignity and professionalism. They are making a crap load of money and influence children AND adults. However I'm  not sure what people would think of me if I had a camera following me all around my job. And it only takes one misstep to label some a jerk or a hind end. Of course I make a lot less and don't get to walk the fairways of Augusta. With great blessings come burdens. Watson has a responsibility to act a little less arrogant. I'm just not sure he has the ability to do that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

Advertisement
Advertisement


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon