• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Aguirre

How big of an outlier is this particular stat?

17 posts in this topic

My dad has been golfing for over thirty years, but really only started playing seriously in his 50s.  He's 72 now, and retired at 57, so he's put in a LOT of rounds over the past 15 years.  At the minimum, 100 per year, and in his early retirement days, probably 150.  His handicap has ranged from 12-17 during this period.

Dude has SEVEN hole-in-ones.  Seven.

EDIT--All since he retired, I would add.  In fact, his first was two weeks after he retired.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

My dad has been golfing for over thirty years, but really only started playing seriously in his 50s.  He's 72 now, and retired at 57, so he's put in a LOT of rounds over the past 15 years.  At the minimum, 100 per year, and in his early retirement days, probably 150.  His handicap has ranged from 12-17 during this period.

Dude has SEVEN hole-in-ones.  Seven.


I have no idea how many rounds I've played but a very conservative estimate of 10 rounds a week for 40 weeks out of the year for the six years I was a club member and at least 100 rounds a year for the other 4 years of playing golf...And 0 holes in one.

I'm evidently just not good enough. :-D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have zero as well.  In fact, despite being a single digit handicapper for most of the past decade, I only have five damn eagles.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have few HIOs and I know I have played well over 3000 rounds of golf. It's a good stat to talk about, but does not mean that much. Having the skill, occasional or otherwise, to get the ball even close enough, does have a little to do with scoring an ace. Once you land the ball close enough, the  rest in my book, is just pure luck. I mean how many golfers can control the roll after the carry?

I have good friend that had never golfed in his life. He did not play sports of any kind when we were growing up. He had to chop wood to help support his family.  We were golfing at some track near Astoria, Oregon. First hole was a 170+/- par 3. I showed him some stuff, he took a few practice swings, and then proceeded to ace the first hole hole. His first swing in golf was an ace for crying out loud.  Go figure. He took a 12 on the next hole. Pretty sure if he had taken the time to hole out on every hole (ESC) he would have shot in the 150s. To my knowledge that was the only time he ever went golfing. :doh:

For your entertainment.......... :whistle: https://www.google.com/search?q=blind+golfer+gets+hole+in+one&rlz;=1C1CHFX_enUS551US551&oq;=blind+golfer+gets+hole+in+one&aqs;=chrome..69i57j0l3.13756j0j1&sourceid;=chrome&ie;=UTF-8

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, I think if I got a hole in one on my first swing I would have just quit and been like, "yeah, I conquered this game."

I personally think, that for me, its the failures that keep me coming back. I enjoy, and actually play better when I'm in trouble. Nothing makes me happier than pulling off a shot that I initially think is far-fetched.

Of course the successes also keep me coming back. Honestly think one of the top 5 moments of my life was getting my first birdie ever the other day :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a friend, Paul, who is my age - mid-50s. Very good player, about a 3 handicap. Back in the day when I was also a 3 we would play together all the time with his dad (has since died). Paul and I would be launching high drawing irons into par 3's. Paul's dad would bump n run hits shots into those holes.

Paul never had a hole in one. His dad had like 6 or something of the like.

So what we concluded, aside from outrageous good luck, was that Paul's dad was running the ball onto the green, and eventually the hole would just get in the way. In contrast, we were throwing darts. Where it landed is where it would stay. His dad simply had a higher chance of finding the hole than we did.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dad has been golfing for over thirty years, but really only started playing seriously in his 50s.  He's 72 now, and retired at 57, so he's put in a LOT of rounds over the past 15 years.  At the minimum, 100 per year, and in his early retirement days, probably 150.  His handicap has ranged from 12-17 during this period.

Dude has SEVEN hole-in-ones.  Seven.

EDIT--All since he retired, I would add.  In fact, his first was two weeks after he retired.

Sam Sneed had over 30 holes-in-one, and Tiger has had 18. I would say the ability to get a hole in one increases with playing ability, yet there is some form of luck involved as well.

Look at @Golfingdad 's Shot Zone for his Pitching Wedge from his My Swing thread. I calculated the area of his Shot Zone to be 140 square yards. The hole is 0.0109 square yards. Just assuming he has equal chance of his ball ending up on any spot in that Shot Zone, he has a 0.0073% chance of getting a hole in one from 145 yards. Sorry @Golfingdad :whistle:

Lets say @Golfingdad gets in 100 rounds of golf in, for the next 15 years. Lets say he has one shot from 145 yards each time he plays, then he should average 0.1 hole outs from that distance.

Yea, I would say that he's had some luck on his side.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's a guy I play with a lot at a local 9 hole course. I would say he's in his early 50's and a good single digit guy, probably a 3-4 handicap. He's got 9 aces in his career, which is incredible to me. Also, another cool stat he can claim is that on that 9 hole course, which consists of three Par 3's, three Par 4's, and three Par 5's, he has eagled every single hole.

There is a correlation between skill level and having several aces. There's not nearly as much of a correlation between skill level and having one or two aces though. My wife, who rarely plays golf, got a hole in one the first year she started playing. I've been playing all my life (only 23 though) and am still waiting on my first.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam Sneed had over 30 holes-in-one, and Tiger has had 18 . I would say the ability to get a hole in one increases with playing ability, yet there is some form of luck involved as well.

I wonder how up to date that is. IIRC, that's been listed on Wikipedia for years. Think he's made any since?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ok, seven holes in one is impressive on any level.  Rounds = opportunity = holes in one actually happening.  Hope I can go 150 rounds a year when I retire.

Good on your pop!

dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sam Sneed had over 30 holes-in-one, and Tiger has had 18. I would say the ability to get a hole in one increases with playing ability, yet there is some form of luck involved as well.

Look at @Golfingdad's Shot Zone for his Pitching Wedge from his My Swing thread. I calculated the area of his Shot Zone to be 140 square yards. The hole is 0.0109 square yards. Just assuming he has equal chance of his ball ending up on any spot in that Shot Zone, he has a 0.0073% chance of getting a hole in one from 145 yards. Sorry @Golfingdad

Lets say @Golfingdad gets in 100 rounds of golf in, for the next 15 years. Lets say he has one shot from 145 yards each time he plays, then he should average 0.1 hole outs from that distance.

Yea, I would say that he's had some luck on his side.

The odds are of course higher than that because a ball can be rolling and hit the hole and go in, while it would have finished outside of that 0.0109 square yards.

Also, I didn't check any of your math. Let's hope it's better than your putting stroke. It's virtually guaranteed to be… :-D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The odds are of course higher than that because a ball can be rolling and hit the hole and go in, while it would have finished outside of that 0.0109 square yards.

Rough estimate on the odds. Yea I didn't take into consideration the craziness that is the flag stick.

Also, I didn't check any of your math. Let's hope it's better than your putting stroke. It's virtually guaranteed to be…

Ouch!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The odds are of course higher than that because a ball can be rolling and hit the hole and go in, while it would have finished outside of that 0.0109 square yards.

Also, I didn't check any of your math. Let's hope it's better than your putting stroke. It's virtually guaranteed to be…

Bazinga!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Congrats to your dad, Mr. Aguierre. That's an impressive feat.

Aces are mostly luck, but when you get more than one, now it's skill, knowledge and reps because you've beaten the odds.

If Touring Pro's saw the same set of  short par 3's that I see on my Muni's twice a week,  they have the skill with their wedges to get a bunch of aces.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've holed out from 70, 89, 103, and 145 yards.  One for birdie, heh.  So I guess it's just a matter of holing out from distance on the right hole.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope he has insurance! Anyone ever heard of this? The article mentions Japan and UK, in particular, but I've never heard of buying insurance to cover the costs of a hole in one!! [URL]http://priceonomics.com/why-golfers-buy-hole-in-one-insurance/[/URL] [quote] A number of firms offer hole in one insurance, frequently bundled with other services that golfers commonly buy like insurance for golfing equipment or personal liability. (Apparently yelling “Fore!” can’t ward off lawsuits if you hit a ball right at someone.) Golfplan, a U.K. insurer, covers $340 to $510 worth of drinks for hole in one celebrations. (Clubs’ set of rules for validating a hole in one makes it easier to process claims.) When it is sold unbundled, hole in one insurance can be cheap; Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co. Ltd offers Japanese golfers hole in one insurance for as little as a $3 premium. [/quote]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Lots of private clubs have a hole-in-one fund.  Basically, you pay, I don't know, $5/month.  If anyone makes a hole-in-one in the club you get a free drink.  And if you get the hole-in-one you're not obligated to spend hundreds for every douche bag in the bar after the round.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    •   On one hand, you say you have trouble with lag putts, then you say you're not a poor putter.  And someone has told you that you're decelerating.  My suggestion, a FEELING of acceleration might help you get more putts to the hole, especially the long ones.
    • I first met with and talked about golf with Dean Snell when he was the main man at TaylorMade's moderately lavish TP Red/Black launch event the weekend before the 2006 Masters at Reynolds Plantation (coverage here, here, here, here, and elsewhere on the The Sand Trap .com). Dean had been snagged by TaylorMade after helping Titleist introduce the Pro V1/V1x to the golf world. A little while ago, we solicited questions from you, the members and readers of The Sand Trap .com, and what follows are Dean's responses to the first chunk of those questions. You'll notice that we jump right in to the Q&A. If you'd like to read more about Dean Snell, you can do so here. If you'd like to check out Snell's golf balls, they're right here. And of course, everything else is available at http://snellgolf.com/. One last note: Dean broke up a few of the questions so that he could more clearly answer pieces of them the way he wanted. Aside from editing for spelling/grammar, we've left these changes as is. Now, right into the Q&A… Technology Questions 1) How big of a difference is there between premium golf balls? DEAN: The biggest difference today between premium tour balls is the short game spin and control. Typically, when spin is controlled with mid and short irons, you can prevent the ballooning and problems in the wind… and when you get closer to the green, the thinner urethane covers allow for more short game spin and control. 2) Reducing SKUs seems wise but what percentage of golfers do you think you cover with only two models? Bridgestone has four B330 models but you have just one urethane ball. DEAN: I think two to three models is sufficient for entire market. The tour level players can really tell the difference in performance from one ball to another. some like more, some less spin… some firmer, some softer feel… so maybe two balls at tour level. As for the general public, I think if they choose to play a low compression, low spin ball, then the difference is so small that adding more for them is not worth it… also, when some companies talk about swing speed, I do not think this is worth having 3 SKU to fool consumers into thinking they need this in their game. 3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing? DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there… 4) Since the four piece urerthane seems so hot in the ball industry right now, is there any chance that Snell will come out with a four-piece ball? DEAN: Stay tuned… I am working on several types of protos to address performance. I think when there is a performance target, then we adjust to the layers and materials to meet that target… so layers to help in meeting these targets… let it develop… ha ha… 5) How much diminishing returns are there on the number of layers? DEAN: Every time you add a layer, you add cost and some level of new performance. When I did penta (5 layers) it was to address concerns with the tour players on certain shots that they were seeing. So I always recommend that players do 100 yard and in testing, and see what they like in the ball… choose the ball from the short game testing, as this is where they are different. 6) From your perspective, will you follow the market trend and produce a soft golf ball? DEAN: The GET SUM is very low compression, very soft feeling golf ball. The issue in tour balls going too soft is you lose the feel of hitting good solid shots… players think soft means more spin at that level, so we have to balance this in design. 7) And would you describe why the market is "Hot with Soft or Softer" golf balls? DEAN: The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance. Today, softer balls means lower spinning, whereas in the past tour balls were higher spinning if softer… 8) Given what we now know about the relative importance of the full swing (driving, approach shots) and the short game and putting, does the old concept of fitting yourself for a golf ball by starting at the green and working backward still apply? DEAN: Absolutely… you should really spend a lot of time from 100 yards and in when testing different golf balls. This is where they are different, and where you would be able to see performance differences. If you test here and cannot tell, then buy the cheapest one. 9) Or should more importance be given to how the ball performs off the driver and irons, which are now understood to be the true scoring clubs? DEAN: No chance. Fitting a ball with a driver is a big mistake… you hit one drive, but you have to finish the hole, and play most of your golf around the greens, so choose a ball around the green, not off the tee. They will all go about the same difference off the tee today. 10) Is electronic technology embedded within the golf ball ever going to happen? For instance are we likely to see trackers or sensors anytime soon? I have tested this concept several years ago. Problem is that it is illegal to the rules of golf. The USGA will not allow, as you would have an advantage over someone else who did not have it. The other problem is that it was super expensive — over $4 per ball to have technology put into the ball — so it added $48 per doz, plus you had to buy the controller to find it… it does not really speed up play unless everyone on the course has it… which will be tough to implement. We look forward to bringing you the additional parts of this Q&A in the coming weeks. Thank you to Dean Snell for taking the time to answer these and the other questions still pending. Again, if you're looking to pay less AND get the best ball on the market today, https://snellgolf.com/.
    • I'm all for ready golf, but I think it's rude for everyone to hole out before you've made it to the green. That's just me though. 
    • Exactly. Unfortunately, we had a ringside seat to just such a thing yesterday.  The group ahead of us had finally made it to the green on 3.  One was in a green side bunker, while the others were on the green itself.  I asked my buddy, blade or chunk, as we watched from 60 yards out.  He said he'd leave it in the bunker.  I won.  Hard blade 30 yards over the green.  The remainder of the group WAITED while he raked the bunker and then walked completely across the green and proceeded to chip all the way back, almost dumping it in the same bunker again.  Again, Larry, Moe, and Curly wait for Bunker Boy to meander back and play his shot before playing theirs.  After all, he was away...   3 more swings and he was finally in the hole.  Total elapsed time that group took from when they reached the green, nearly 15 minutes!   We caught them on the next tee box in time to watch two of them knock it into the junk short of the fairway.  When it became obvious that they had no intention of acknowledging us, we politely asked if we could play through while they searched for their balls, and thankfully they agreed.   3 hours later, as we were teeing off on 18, we saw them driving up to the tee box on 12.  Not good golfers, true, but more than anything, they simply didn't move with any sense of purpose, or efficiency.  If we'd have had to play behind them much longer, I would have cut my own throat with my wedge!  
    • I love watching those shows on the golf channel.  Especially Michael Breed.   But, ultimately, it's not really personalized instruction, so you don't really get too much instruction from it.   Maybe a swing thought idea here and there, and some short game drills to work on.  As a matter of fact, I think a long while ago, I learned how to hit out of the sand from the golf channel.  That is still, to this day, the one skill I gain strokes on all of my friends at.   (unfortunately, I imagine bunker shots are like a SV (-8), given that I have like 1 per round.  tops.) But, it's still quite enjoyable nonetheless.   It's always fun to listen to people talk about the golf swing.  If your'e in to that kinda thing.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Isaac03
      Isaac03
      (33 years old)
    2. phillyk
      phillyk
      (27 years old)
    3. PhishAreFriends
      PhishAreFriends
      (27 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon