• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MEfree

What's Fairest?

17 posts in this topic

2 Situations-

1. Mystery Holes Net Computation- 9 Mystery Holes are picked at random after the completion of an 18 hole round.  How would you compute NET SCORE?

a.  Half of each Players Handicap.

b.  Strokes as they fall (i.e. an 18 capper would always get 9 shots, but a 9 capper could get as few as 0 and as many as 9 depending on which handicap holes were selected.

c.  Something else.

2.  A " Closest to the Hole " Proxy was mistakenly set up by a green on a short par 5 without any specification of whether it was closest 2nd, 3rd or any shot from off the green.  The first name on the board marked "in 2" by his name, but the name after did not (and likely was in a scramble group that didn't reach the green in 2).  A subsequent player's 2nd shot comes to rest 2 inches outside the player who likely was there in 3.  How would you determine winner?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

42? Is the answer 42? I think it is but I'm not entirely sure I'm following the post. You know what? I think it's 42 and I'm sticking to that.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Half the players handicap in response to your question 1. No idea in response to your question 2. Sounds like whoever set that competition up screwed up pretty good.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 Situations- 1. Mystery Holes Net Computation- 9 Mystery Holes are picked at random after the completion of an 18 hole round.  How would you compute NET SCORE? a.  Half of each Players Handicap. b.  Strokes as they fall (i.e. an 18 capper would always get 9 shots, but a 9 capper could get as few as 0 and as many as 9 depending on which handicap holes were selected. c.  Something else. 2.  A " Closest to the Hole " Proxy was mistakenly set up by a green on a short par 5 without any specification of whether it was closest 2nd, 3rd or any shot from off the green.  The first name on the board marked "in 2" by his name, but the name after did not (and likely was in a scramble group that didn't reach the green in 2).  A subsequent player's 2nd shot comes to rest 2 inches outside the player who likely was there in 3.  How would you determine winner?

I agree.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

42? Is the answer 42? I think it is but I'm not entirely sure I'm following the post. You know what? I think it's 42 and I'm sticking to that.

Bennie's corollary: "What's 6 times 7?" :-D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, I dunno, but I used to have one. It was purple and then the wheels fell off. Damn shame, those peaches were ripe! Four stones to a windmill!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Half the players handicap in response to your question 1.

No idea in response to your question 2. Sounds like whoever set that competition up screwed up pretty good.


Agreed on both counts. "b" is like winning a lottery. It has as much luck as skill.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The guy that decided to put the "closest to the hole" contest on a par 5 should be forced to buy everybody a prize. ;-)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy that decided to put the "closest to the hole" contest on a par 5 should be forced to buy everybody a prize.

I was going to say...this is one of many good reasons to do your closest to the pin on a par 3.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 Situations- 1. Mystery Holes Net Computation- 9 Mystery Holes are picked at random after the completion of an 18 hole round.  How would you compute NET SCORE? a.  Half of each Players Handicap. b.  Strokes as they fall (i.e. an 18 capper would always get 9 shots, but a 9 capper could get as few as 0 and as many as 9 depending on which handicap holes were selected. c.  Something else. 2.  A " Closest to the Hole " Proxy was mistakenly set up by a green on a short par 5 without any specification of whether it was closest 2nd, 3rd or any shot from off the green.  The first name on the board marked "in 2" by his name, but the name after did not (and likely was in a scramble group that didn't reach the green in 2).  A subsequent player's 2nd shot comes to rest 2 inches outside the player who likely was there in 3. How would you determine winner?

Flip a quarter?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The concept of "fair" has no place in the game of golf!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am such an idiot!!!

I just realized how clever you are.

Lol. Take your time GD, we'll wait for you. :-P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am such an idiot!!!

I just realized how clever you are.

I see the humor in the Snow White reference, but have you figured out the humor in "42"?

The guy that decided to put the "closest to the hole" contest on a par 5 should be forced to buy everybody a prize.

The gal who does it was considering giving everyone a (likely small) prize or just drawing names from everyone on the list.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the humor in the Snow White reference, but have you figured out the humor in "42"?

The gal who does it was considering giving everyone a (likely small) prize or just drawing names from everyone on the list.

I assumed it was a reference to "Hitchhikers Guide. . ." Douglas Adams.

That makes the most sense for the solution to item 2.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I assumed it was a reference to "Hitchhikers Guide. . ." Douglas Adams.

DON'T PANIC.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Agree - If I go by the stats on pgatour.com then Day has made 245 of 247 (99.2%) 3" and less, 43 of 47 (91.5%) 3-4", and 27 or 34 (79.4%) 4-5" So it is very misleading to include shorter putts into that stat - seeing it laid out like this it isn't shocking that he missed a 4"-ish putt.
    • What? No quarter length wedge shot distances?
    • I was once one who didn't care for the penalty and thought Lexi got screwed, yes mostly just not agreeing with viewers being able to call in. However, with an open mind I read Iacas' responses and really don't see any reasonable nor logical argument against what he said (wrote). 'Sympathy' for Lexi as I heard on the radio this morning, 'redemption.' Redemption for what? Hey, I'm always up for debating but when such a clear point is brought that isn't just an opinion but solid facts, it's a bit futile to continue. When both parties have only opinion the debating can be endless. I don't see this case as that any more. Lexi -1.
    • Bullshit. Who has called her a cheater "over and over again"? What's the level at which you'd apply that label? Saying something twice? Four times? Plus, I don't enjoy criticizing her reaction. I also don't feel all that strongly about it. Mostly, I don't care… but I do care about golf, and I engage in discussion about it. That doesn't mean I enjoy criticizing her. It means I feel a certain way about it, and if that comes out in a discussion or a post prompted by someone else, so be it. There's no "enjoyment" in the criticism. The opposite is closer to the truth. Nobody's even come close to that. And if you've counted up posts or something, that's easy… you can't just look at post count. Plus, you're shifting the goalposts. First it was anger and/or enjoyment. Now it's "feel strongly" and "more than a casual interest." I have more than a casual interest in discussing the Rules of Golf. The player who did it - and her lame reaction to being caught breaching the rules - is not the topic of the vast, vast majority of my posts. What I've discussed largely is the actual rules, how they're applied, why I think they're applied properly now, etc. BTW you're up to 43 posts right now in this topic alone. When I said there were lots of other topics here… well, let's put it this way: you're the one with what appears to be the singular focus, the one with almost exclusive interest in THIS topic to the exclusion of almost all others. Oh, stop @Nutsmacker… you know you were angry she won! Just admit it! That's sarcasm, @RH31. You see, most people can appreciate things and have a range of emotions on all the various little pieces that played a role. They might think Lexi is both attractive, a skilled golfer, tall, talks funny, too steep with her short irons leading to poor distance control, a cheater, a multiple winner on the LPGA Tour, and all sorts of other things. Real people tend not to pigeon-hole people or have only one emotion attached to a complex series of events with many facets. Said better than I did above. Should've just left it for @Jeremie Boop to say.
    • But worse than him losing $500,000 dollars, I may have won this week's Fantasy Golf if the Aussie made the dang putt and went on to win!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Isaac03
      Isaac03
      (33 years old)
    2. phillyk
      phillyk
      (27 years old)
    3. PhishAreFriends
      PhishAreFriends
      (27 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon