Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
SafeBogey

Playing with half sets?

10 posts in this topic

I often hear it suggested to players with 20+ handicaps that they play, permanently or as an experiment, with a "half set" consisting of something like driver, 5 wood, 5 7 9 irons, sand wedge, and putter. I don't understand the rationale behind leaving 25-yard gaps in your iron set. The gap in the woods I can understand; in fact, I'm considering playing sans fairway woods myself. But I can't imagine how any benefit could come from leaving the even-numbered irons at home. Can anyone enlighten me on this?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

For each club, you can play a 3/4. 1/2 shot that will reduce the distance, so you can cover all the yardages.  It is a fun thing to try.  Example:

My 4 iron is my  180 club, 6 160 club, 8 140, PW 120.  If I have a 150 yard shot, I will do a 3/4 6 iron or even a 1/2 4 iron depending on the carry I need. For 155, a full 6 irons with choking up and inch on the grip.  For the 3/4 swing, you swing the same speed on the downswing, but just shorted the backswing a bit.  The shorter backswing often produces a more accurate shot as well and better contact.

I would not do it all the time.  It is fun though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I often hear it suggested to players with 20+ handicaps that they play, permanently or as an experiment, with a "half set" consisting of something like driver, 5 wood, 5 7 9 irons, sand wedge, and putter. I don't understand the rationale behind leaving 25-yard gaps in your iron set. The gap in the woods I can understand; in fact, I'm considering playing sans fairway woods myself. But I can't imagine how any benefit could come from leaving the even-numbered irons at home. Can anyone enlighten me on this?

I think it's a throwback to the thinking of previous decades, when a set of usable irons seemed like a more expensive investment than is the case today, and beginning golfers were encouraged to buy a half set, take a handful of lessons, and then start to play. It's how I began as junior golfer in the early 1980s - (persimmon) 4 wood; 3, 5, 7, 9 iron; SW; and a putter.

I think there's still some very sound logic in this approach. Learning to hit an iron well is still the most vital skill in being able to actually play golf (in terms of getting around the course and gaining a sense of enjoyment and fulfillment from the game - irrespective of the actual score). For beginners and very high handicappers, the frustration is not found in scoring 8 or worse on a par 4, it's in all the whiffs, topped shots, and rank failures to advance the ball. Getting the ball airborne, and advancing it a reasonable distance and in a direction more or less proximate to the original intention, is much more important. Hence, for such golfers, a 5 iron or a 7 iron (along with the SW and the putter, so that one can actually finish a hole), is more or less all one needs to get started and have fun on the golf course.

Golf seems so much more technical these days than it did back then (at least for amateurs). I wonder how many 1970s and 1980s mid-handicappers eyeballed a shot, rather than made an objective decision based on known yardages for each iron, (truth be told, I usually still do)? For better golfers, if you haven't a 6 iron in your bag, it's a poor show if you can't conceive of something useful with a 5 iron, instead.

For walking golf, carrying your clubs, there's also a lot to be said for a half set. The minimalist approach is often fun (carts and even pull-carts seem to encourage a terrible surfeit of equipment). Nothing like a nice day walking briskly around a links course with a few irons in your bag.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I too, remember when you had the option of buying a half set of clubs at a golf shop. Perfect for beginners, who are just trying to learn the golf swing and get in a decent round. In cooler weather, I always walk and carry with no more than 7 or 8 clubs in my bag. Seve Ballesteros and others learned the game using only 1 iron, and sharpened their skills by being creative.

And once in awhile, I walk 9 holes with one of these.....Not "legal", but loads of fun.....

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played a half set for a year or two as a junior. It was perfect because back then carrying a full set was too heavy, plus the distance gap between a 4/5 iron or even a 6/7 would have only been a few yards due to the low swing speeds. Once your SS with a driver gets much below 90 the distances with the irons really bunch up, making a half set ideal. A lot of the women golfers at my club play with half sets, usually: SW,PW,8,6, 5h, 5w, driver, putter and find that leaves nice distance gaps of 10-15 yards

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As a beginner, not playing with a full set. It's too much and too overwhelming. Too many clubs. The technical things you guys are saying in these posts sound like Latin to me. I'll let Zip help me choose a set, but no more clubs than this for me. http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71clcu8B0yL._SL1500_.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm...I have an old half set of Spalding Ultimates in my dad's garage. I may just regrip them to satisfy my urge to play blades that are way out of my league.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think the reasoning is to minimize choices but because beginners are going to hit more bad shots than good so they don't need to have as many clubs. They could hit a 7 iron 20 times and the north to south dispersion could be 10-100+ yards with no two shots being exactly the same.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think the reasoning is to minimize choices but because beginners are going to hit more bad shots than good so they don't need to have as many clubs. They could hit a 7 iron 20 times and the north to south dispersion could be 10-100+ yards with no two shots being exactly the same.

Exactly. There is no point in having a finer range of tools if you haven't got at least a reasonable chance of getting consistent distances from each of these tools. Similar to a range finder, there's no point in knowing the precise distance to something if you have no idea how far any of your clubs will travel on any given strike.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • That looks nifty, but… it's only really going to be an option for awhile in some high-end places, I'm wagering. If it's a full range, you can of course see your ball flight. So the tracer itself is probably not that important, right? The points and games are another thing, kinda TopGolf-like.
    • That looks awesome! I hope that sooner or later all driving ranges will have that technology built into them.  Was it more expensive than a regular bucket of balls?
    • I didn't take it that way. I know the HGG quote, and that it's a way of saying "goodbye." That's not exactly "cool" though either: Mike tells you he's mad at you, I demonstrate that your impact conditions and backswing are worse, and you say "okay, goodbye." But yeah, I took it this way: That fits quite well since you keep talking about how you have to know and understand the whole system just to implement a piece, and about how your brain works that way, and so on. How I took the fish quote is pretty clear from the response, is it not? All that said, I apologize. I took it the wrong way. I reacted more strongly than I would have had I taken it the HGG way, and I'm sorry for that. Disagreement isn't intolerable at all. But you're not really disagreeing with anything, either… you're choosing to ignore things, and you seem to think that you're not being helped. You're wasting our time. Disagreement? At least there's discourse there. Ignoring? That's just a (small) slap in the face… Mike and I - and others - have given you a boatload of free advice. I can't speak for others, but I don't expect you to pay for anything, ever. When all else fails, play the victim card again? Anyone who has met @mvmac will tell you he's not quick to anger. So if you pissed him off, well, then more than likely you did something, and are not just some passive victim. P.S. You're likely getting better because you're hitting balls. You're learning how to make the flaws in your swing at least time themselves up right. You're learning to time your flip just right so that you can pick the ball off the ground without fatting or thinning it. You're learning how to sway your hips and drop your head back/early extend on the downswing so you can hit out a little bit despite being super steep (and you need a really closed stance to help you with that). You're getting better at making a flawed swing because you're repeating it often. You're lowering the ceiling on how good you can get each time you visit the range and don't practice properly, or practice the proper things. Your swing may actually be worse now than a week or two ago. We tried to help you - free, and by giving you much of our most valuable asset (our time) - and you instead pissed off one of the calmest people around and ignored the advice of many others, including me, who knows what I'm talking about. Then you chose to play the victim after a vague reference to fish, and took the easy out of saying "oh, you just don't like people who disagree." No, I don't like people who waste my time, but the solution on my end is very easy: I simply choose to stop wasting my time on them. I don't care if you disagree. I prefer it, really, so long as you're a worthy adversary. You? You don't stack up. We can't talk about some intricate part of the golf swing. Nor should you at this point, or possibly ever, because you're a golfer, not a golf instructor. That's all fine. But I can choose to stop giving you free advice, and spending my time doing it.  So if your goal is to have me ignore you from here on out, you've succeeded! :-) I'll spend my time helping those who appreciate it.
    • Did anyone make it to this?  I had some things come up and couldn't make it. Also, we should get a spring round get together going...
    • You misunderstand. Yes, of course he is one of the ATGs on the current list. What I am saying is that can change, not that it will, but it can. Like I said it is an ever expanding/changing list.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. henry granic
      henry granic
      (61 years old)
    2. Jscrillah
      Jscrillah
      (45 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon