Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3678 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

18 hours ago, boogielicious said:

It was a different game back then. Put Lynn Swann on Pitt today and he would have Antonio Brown numbers. He was an excellent receiver.

That's a fair point but I could say that if Calvin Johnson was on those Steelers teams he would've been equally as awesome.  But If not for the Superbowl wins, does Lynn Swann make the HOF?  He's 222nd in receiving yards, behind such luminaries as Jerry Smith, Chris Burford and Ray Renfro (221, 220 & 219 respectively).  And he's not even in the top 250 for total receptions, Rob Gronkowski is #250.  I'm not saying he shouldn't be in the HOF, he was awesome in Superbwol X (which is still  #1 for most receiving yards in the Superbowl), and has 4 rings, but someone could make the argument that he does't belong based on his individual stats.  There are plenty of people with multiple rings, Cliff Branch has 3 for one, who has far better stats than Swann and will probably not get in the HOF.  

Branch finished his 14 NFL seasons with 501 receptions for 8,685 yards and 67 touchdowns.  When Branch retired he led the NFL in post season receptions (73) and yards (1289) for an average of 17.7 yards per catch, Scoring 5 TD's.  He also had a year in 1976 where he had 46 receptions for 1,111 yds, a 24.2 Avg and 12 TD's.

Calvin has over 11,000 yards and plays on a horrible team.  I don't think Calvin's a HOF'er but Swann should tread lightly when calling out other WR's for the HOF.

 

 

-Jerry

Driver: Titleist 913 D3 (9.5 degree) – Aldila RIP 60-2.9-Stiff; Callaway Mini-Driver Kura Kage 60g shaft - 12 degree Hybrids: Callway X2 Hot Pro - 16 degree & 23 degree – Pro-Shaft; Callway X2 Hot – 5H & 6H Irons: Titleist 714 AP2 7 thru AW with S300 Dynamic Gold Wedges: Titleist Vokey GW (54 degree), Callaway MackDaddy PM Grind SW (58 degree) Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch Heavy Balls: Titleist Pro V1x & Snell MyTourBall

"Golf is the closest game to the game we call life. You get bad breaks from good shots; you get good breaks from bad shots but you have to play the ball where it lies."- Bobby Jones

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 minutes ago, jsgolfer said:

 

That's a fair point but I could say that if Calvin Johnson was on those Steelers teams he would've been equally as awesome.  But If not for the Superbowl wins, does Lynn Swann make the HOF?  He's 222nd in receiving yards, behind such luminaries as Jerry Smith, Chris Burford and Ray Renfro (221, 220 & 219 respectively).  And he's not even in the top 250 for total receptions, Rob Gronkowski is #250.  I'm not saying he shouldn't be in the HOF, he was awesome in Superbwol X (which is still  #1 for most receiving yards in the Superbowl), and has 4 rings, but someone could make the argument that he does't belong based on his individual stats.  There are plenty of people with multiple rings, Cliff Branch has 3 for one, who has far better stats than Swann and will probably not get in the HOF. 

Branch finished his 14 NFL seasons with 501 receptions for 8,685 yards and 67 touchdowns.  When Branch retired he led the NFL in post season receptions (73) and yards (1289) for an average of 17.7 yards per catch, Scoring 5 TD's.  He also had a year in 1976 where he had 46 receptions for 1,111 yds, a 24.2 Avg and 12 TD's.

Calvin has over 11,000 yards and plays on a horrible team.  I don't think Calvin's a HOF'er but Swann should tread lightly when calling out other WR's for the HOF.

 

 

You can't look at his numbers based on the stats of today.  Where was he ranked in 2001 when he was inducted into the HOF?

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
39 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

You can't look at his numbers based on the stats of today.  Where was he ranked in 2001 when he was inducted into the HOF?

Doesn't make it into the top 150 on receiving yards. Even If you take out every receiver in the list that started their career after Swann retired, he still only makes it into the top 85.

78 Mac Speedie 5,602  1946-1952 
79 John Taylor 5,598  1987-1995 
80 Rich Caster 5,515  1970-1982 
81 Ray Renfro 5,508  1952-1963 
82 Chris Burford 5,505  1960-1967 
83 Jerry Smith 5,496  1965-1977 
84 Lynn Swann+ 5,462  1974-1982 

In receptions, if you take out everyone who started after 1982, not sure he cracks the Top 75 in receptions, here are 5 guys that are still ahead of him.  

  Elroy Hirsch+ 387  1946-1957 
  Dante Lavelli+ 386  1946-1956 
  Gene Washington 385  1969-1979 
  Tony Nathan 383  1979-1987 
  John Gilliam 382  1967-1977 

Again, i'm not saying he shouldn't be in, but someone could sure make a case that his individual stats don't merit being in.  His playoff performances were spectacular.  

I'm not a Cowboy's fan, but I could make the case that Drew Pearson, who isn't in the HOF, should be in before Swann.  Better stats than Swan, but has only 1 ring.  He was, like Swann and Stallworth, awesome.  489 Receptions, 7822 Yds and 48 TD's.  His problem is Dallas lost two close games to those great Steelers teams and the 49er's in the Championship round in 1981.

 

-Jerry

Driver: Titleist 913 D3 (9.5 degree) – Aldila RIP 60-2.9-Stiff; Callaway Mini-Driver Kura Kage 60g shaft - 12 degree Hybrids: Callway X2 Hot Pro - 16 degree & 23 degree – Pro-Shaft; Callway X2 Hot – 5H & 6H Irons: Titleist 714 AP2 7 thru AW with S300 Dynamic Gold Wedges: Titleist Vokey GW (54 degree), Callaway MackDaddy PM Grind SW (58 degree) Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch Heavy Balls: Titleist Pro V1x & Snell MyTourBall

"Golf is the closest game to the game we call life. You get bad breaks from good shots; you get good breaks from bad shots but you have to play the ball where it lies."- Bobby Jones

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 hours ago, boogielicious said:

It was a different game back then. Put Lynn Swann on Pitt today and he would have Antonio Brown numbers. He was an excellent receiver.

Nonsense.  Antonio Brown's numbers tower above most WRs.  Not so Swann.  And do not tell me about it being a different game back then, as Swann isn't even among the leaders on yards receiving even among those who played before and during his career.  He was a very good receiver but the reason h is in the HOF is that he played on a team that had the most dominant defense of its time.  

He had a very good career, but a very good career surrounded by HOFers is not more worthy of the HOF, IMO, than a great career, just because THAT guy was surrounded by the Keystone Kops.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 minute ago, turtleback said:

Nonsense.  Antonio Brown's numbers tower above most WRs.  Not so Swann.  And do not tell me about it being a different game back then, as Swann isn't even among the leaders on yards receiving even among those who played before and during his career.  He was a very good receiver but the reason h is in the HOF is that he played on a team that had the most dominant defense of its time.  

He had a very good career, but a very good career surrounded by HOFers is not more worthy of the HOF, IMO, than a great career, just because THAT guy was surrounded by the Keystone Kops.

Pitt was a running team. Swann was also an exceptional downfield blocker. I watched him play. He could do a lot of things that wide receivers are not asked to do today. I'm certain that Big Ben would have boosted Swann's numbers.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
41 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Pitt was a running team. Swann was also an exceptional downfield blocker. I watched him play. He could do a lot of things that wide receivers are not asked to do today. I'm certain that Big Ben would have boosted Swann's numbers.

 Which is great, but is that worthy of being a HOF-er.  Hines Ward was an awesome blocker as well as he caught over 1,000 receptions.  He's definitely worthy of the HOF, but I wonder if he will make it.  Just think, only six wide receivers with careers started since 1980 have made it,  Art Monk, Michael Irvin, Tim Brown, Chris Carter, Andre Reed and Jerry Rice, and now Marvin Harrison will be enshrined this year to make 7.  Which is amazing to me.  

-Jerry

Driver: Titleist 913 D3 (9.5 degree) – Aldila RIP 60-2.9-Stiff; Callaway Mini-Driver Kura Kage 60g shaft - 12 degree Hybrids: Callway X2 Hot Pro - 16 degree & 23 degree – Pro-Shaft; Callway X2 Hot – 5H & 6H Irons: Titleist 714 AP2 7 thru AW with S300 Dynamic Gold Wedges: Titleist Vokey GW (54 degree), Callaway MackDaddy PM Grind SW (58 degree) Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch Heavy Balls: Titleist Pro V1x & Snell MyTourBall

"Golf is the closest game to the game we call life. You get bad breaks from good shots; you get good breaks from bad shots but you have to play the ball where it lies."- Bobby Jones

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 minutes ago, jsgolfer said:

 Which is great, but is that worthy of being a HOF-er.  Hines Ward was an awesome blocker as well as he caught over 1,000 receptions.  He's definitely worthy of the HOF, but I wonder if he will make it.  Just think, only six wide receivers with careers started since 1980 have made it,  Art Monk, Michael Irvin, Tim Brown, Chris Carter, Andre Reed and Jerry Rice, and now Marvin Harrison will be enshrined this year to make 7.  Which is amazing to me.  

Randy Moss will be next. It is odd considering the HoF leaning toward offensive players. I think receivers have a harder time because the number of targets/touches per game is lower.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Randy Moss will be next. It is odd considering the HoF leaning toward offensive players. I think receivers have a harder time because the number of targets/touches per game is lower.

I don't think it should matter. You shouldn't compare between RB & WR or other offensive positions. If you are the top what ever in your position then you should be in the HOF. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I don't think it should matter. You shouldn't compare between RB & WR or other offensive positions. If you are the top what ever in your position then you should be in the HOF. 

Stop making sense. You have to think like a HoF voter, remember!

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I don't think it should matter. You shouldn't compare between RB & WR or other offensive positions. If you are the top what ever in your position then you should be in the HOF. 

Do you think Devin Hester (as KR/PR) should be in the HOF?  How about Jason Hanson (most points scored in a single-team career)?

Also, can we rename the Hall of Fame?  Fame clearly isn't the deciding factor for being featured in it.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Interesting article about player safety with regards to a pivotal play in the Super Bowl. I think Denver would have won regardless, but the author has a good point. A rule is a rule from the first pre-season game to the last game. What infuriates fans, players and coaches is the inconsistency of the calls, not necessarily the rules themselves.

http://www.footballbyfootball.com/column/super-bowls-best-play-features-another-nfl-safety-rule-lie

Quote

imagejpg1455032776384.thumb.jpg.071939f6

By Matt Chatham

The NFL has painted itself into another corner.  A corner they pray you don't notice they are in.

In the biggest game of the year with the world watching, the day's best player and Super Bowl 50 MVP had his seminal moment, an awesome olé pass rush move and forced-fumble sack of league MVP Cam Newton.  This perfect football play by Broncos outside linebacker Von Millerallowed teammate Malik Jackson to scoop the fumble and score.  That defensive touchdown was the only non-field goal on the board for the eventual champs until the final moments of the game, obviously critical points to buoy a Denver offense that struggled throughout the day.

The only problem?  This play is against the NFL's precious rules.  Love it or loathe it, by rule you can't hit the QB's head.  Period.  

What should be a perpetually-shown highlight of what the Broncos accomplished and a celebrated football play is a clear abomination of the nonsense rules alter created by pearl-clutching, integrity-free automaton, NFL Commish Roger Goodell.

After a season overflowing with nonsensical calls that leave players, fans, and honest bipeds unsure what the hell might be called on any given play, Goodell used his Super Bowl press conference to brag on what he believes (or at least says) is a better version of the game now due to his super-awesome improvements.  He crowed on the "thirty-nine rule changes to promote player health and safety." He also added:

"There is no higher priority than player safety."

As the following video shows, if Goodell is to be believed (don't do that), head referee Clete Blakemanstared down what was ultimately the biggest play of Super Bowl 50 and ignored the league's highest priority.  To be fair, Case Keenum's health is also the "highest priority," so maybe Goodell is just inventing word meanings again...

 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Scott, your Tom Brady fanboyism is showing.

Pretty sure you could go find a bunch of plays missed on both sides of the ball on both teams. Carolina lost. Peyton won (despite playing like poo). Tom Brady lost two weeks before.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, boogielicious said:

Interesting article about player safety with regards to a pivotal play in the Super Bowl. I think Denver would have won regardless, but the author has a good point. A rule is a rule from the first pre-season game to the last game. What infuriates fans, players and coaches is the inconsistency of the calls, not necessarily the rules themselves.

http://www.footballbyfootball.com/column/super-bowls-best-play-features-another-nfl-safety-rule-lie

 

The hit was made with Miller's head up and his facemask made incidental contact with Newton's.  Hell, it wasn't really even a hit, not in the normal usage of that term in the NFL.  No foul, not even in the strictest sense of the rule.  If that contact is disallowed then they had best just say that nobody is allowed to rush the passer at all.  

Note that the writer of that article is an ex Patriot - 'nuff said.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3678 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 525 - 2026-03-10 Got some work in before lessons today (was going to play after but it decided to POUR). Then like three minutes in later on.
    • Day 2 (10 Mar 26) - Worked on weight shift feel using slap stick drill (hands about 6” apart - coming back weight on trail foot - down - thru weight on lead foot….moved it to hitting chips w/9i playing what I call “leap frog” - hit 1st about 10yds, the next a couple past the 1st, for about 6 balls total.  Love it as the lies change, the distances vary making each swing slightly different. 
    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.