Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3922 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Off to church so that I may pray for the souls of all the heathens in this thread.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 356
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
[QUOTE name="Gator Hazard" url="/t/84340/what-is-the-purpose-of-life/198#post_1199146"] Off to church so that I may pray for the souls of all the heathens in this thread.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

@9wood

Please use multi-quote. I've read about 25 instances of you not using it. It is easy.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@9wood

Please use multi-quote. I've read about 25 instances of you not using it. It is easy.


Amen to that...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by turtleback

I completely agree.  But some folks are just so threatened by the very thought that there might be a God that they feel compelled to crap on religion.  Maybe they will take your words to heart.

No, they feel compelled to "crap on" the beliefs of people that would be rejected by a seven year old after five minutes of contemplation. And are then outraged and offended by comments like I just made.

That is why they are frustrated. They are not threatened. If my dog doesn't learn a simple (to me) command and keeps making a mess, it frustrates, it doesn't threaten me.

They are frustrated that believers never defend their beliefs, because they can't. They just resort to dogma. I really don't think that any people think there "might be  a God". 2000 years ago -it was understandable. But we have progressed.

I would love to see some of you in a discussion with Christopher Hitchens, were he still alive. Saying "the bible told me so" doesn't cut it, I'm afraid.

And BTW, I don't think there are any atheists who expect to change the minds of Christians here. But it would be nice if the would engage in the debate.

They could start by doing the following: Please supply ONE piece of information that would support the existence of God. They don't because they can't.

Now THAT is what I call tolerance.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorty View Post

I am trying to have a dialogue, but you refuse to engage.
Again - why are you so offended that people ask for extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims?

Pleas - I am more than happy to be convinced.
Do you not think it strange that a "belief" held by millions can not be justified by ANY of them?


I can justify my beliefs rather easily. I believe that no human could have ever come up with what is written in the Quran that was revealed to the Prophet Mohammad a little over 1400 years ago.

Since I have come to that conclusion then by default I believe everything in it, including Noah's Arc, the virgin birth of Jesus and the splitting of the sea by Moses and it is where I got the purpose of life from as well by the way.

This is rather a simple conversation actually.. Because the Quran is available relatively easily to everyone (the original is in Arabic (in which it was revealed) and in any other language it is considered the translation of the meaning of the Quran and not actually considered the Quran, but we don't need to get into that untill later) and people can read it and decide for them selves there is only one question to be debated, and that question is who is the author of the Quran...

Now.. this isn't the thread to discuss this, and actually more than 75% of the thread is not on topic so no need to dive further off topic. However, I do want to quickly mention very important so that you understand that I'm not merely throwing things out there, and I am willing to engage in scientific discourse regarding the author of the Quran.. I am sure you know what a falsification test is, so I won't go into details about it, but I will mention 2 of them that were put fourth in the Quran.

Quote:

“Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction.” [Chapter 4, verse 82]

Say, “If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Qur’an, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants.” [Chapter 17, verse 88]


Now, I don't want to get into the details of each right now, but what I do want you to notice and concentrate on is the strange method used in the Quran.. it is challenging the reader to go ahead and prove that it is the work of someone other than GOD.. i.e. Allah is the arab name of the LORD and it is still used by the Christian and Jewish Arabs of today.

Finally, just another piece for you to ponder over..

Quote:
“Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say, “This is from Allaah,” to purchase with it a little price! Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for that they earn thereby” [al-Baqarah 2:79]


Before you jump and tell me how the Prophet Mohammad wrote the book, I want you to pay attention to the fact that he would be basically cursing him self if it has ever been discovered that it was him who was writing the book.. Very strange don't you think?


If you are serious about engaging in a good civil discourse where things are discussed objectively without letting your emotions get the best of you then I have no problem doing that, if you are not then I'm fine with that too.  However, if you are not I request you stop saying things like please show me one shred of evidence ect ect unless you are willing to go the whole way.

I will put it on you to either open a thread to discuss this topic, or just leave it as is and don't challenge anyone to prove anything to you in this thread, as it is about the purpose of life and not proving ones beliefs one way or another.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As an agnostic I subscribe to no religion but leave open the potential that there is a superior being that many here refer to as God.  I've found these discussions in my past and here quite mundane because the discussion quickly devolves into "prove there is a God".   One cannot prove there is a God any more successfully than one can prove there isn't a God.  That is what faith is, the belief in something even though it's not tangible.

Human arrogance never ceases to amaze me.  Why do we assume that within the vast reaches of multiple solar systems that we are the most "superior" being.  The "God" many refer to could be a more evolved human race, it could be alien life forms, it could be a spiritual presence.

Throughout history we've assigned natural occurring events to Gods because we couldn't explain them so in turn we defer to a higher power but the current generation has become so arrogant that we no longer defer things such as how the first single cell organism came to "life" to a "God".  Our generation is too "smart" (I consider it arrogance) to defer to a higher being so the explanation is it's not God we just haven't figured it out yet.

Those who do believe are written off as uneducated, sheep, misinformed, yet those who demand there is no God still can not prove there isn't one nor accept that there are many things far beyond our intelligence to comprehend or explain.  Our scope of the world is very limited, on a planet that's been around for over 4.5 billion years some of our greatest minds claim that in less than 100 years we've destroyed the planet with our carbon emissions.   We are a mighty species considering that a planet that has sustained life for 3 billion years could be wiped out in a few hundred years.  Science tells us what we should eat, how much we should sleep, what we should do to be healthy, what is normal and what is not.  Maybe the new religion is "science", we seem to believe everything "science" tells us, without any tangible proof, except some research documents which much like the manuscripts and narratives of the past can't be proven or disproven by the average layman.

Was there an Adam and Eve, or Noah?  Of course not, the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and other religious books are a collection of stories that teach the basic fundamentals of what should exist in society so that society may survive.  The stories provide examples of where society went astray and the punishments that were associated with it.  One only needs to refer back to the Roman empire to see what happens to a society that loses its way.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

Well written bunkerputt.

Any other religion could make a similar case. No reasonably intelligent person has converted to another religion because of a post they read on the internet. Let's leave it at that.

No one is trying to convert anyone, except for the atheists.  No believer here has prosleytized.  It is (some of the) the atheists who are so upset at the thought that someone might have faith that they have lost all sense of civility.  Look at the messages and see who is losing their minds and who is answering calmly.  Who has just talked about what they themselves believe and who has felt compelled to attack OTHERS' beliefs?

Serious question here: have you ever taken a logic course in school?

Is that where you learned how to use misplaced hyperbole, red herrings, and appeals to authority, among other various other logical fallacies?  That is absolutely hilarious.

@Duff McGee

Your last couple of posts are total cop-outs. I'm a "non-believer" too, although I do believe in the broader aspects of most religions which could and should be boiled down to "thou shalt not be an arsehole".

Notice which side in this discussion is violating that one.  One guy links his purpose in life to a creator and takes a bunch of crap.  Someone else (me) points out how religious answer gets such different treatment than the other answers including the silly ones, and then BOOM! the attack of the pigpiling of atheists.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
As an agnostic I subscribe to no religion but leave open the potential that there is a superior being that many here refer to as God.  I've found these discussions in my past and here quite mundane because the discussion quickly devolves into "prove there is a God".   One cannot prove there is a God any more successfully than one can prove there isn't a God.  That is what faith is, the belief in something even though it's not tangible. Human arrogance never ceases to amaze me.  Why do we assume that within the vast reaches of multiple solar systems that we are the most "superior" being.  The "God" many refer to could be a more evolved human race, it could be alien life forms, it could be a spiritual presence. Throughout history we've assigned natural occurring events to Gods because we couldn't explain them so in turn we defer to a higher power but the current generation has become so arrogant that we no longer defer things such as how the first single cell organism came to "life" to a "God".  Our generation is too "smart" (I consider it arrogance) to defer to a higher being so the explanation is it's not God we just haven't figured it out yet. Those who do believe are written off as uneducated, sheep, misinformed, yet those who demand there is no God still can not prove there isn't one nor accept that there are many things far beyond our intelligence to comprehend or explain.  Our scope of the world is very limited, on a planet that's been around for over 4.5 billion years some of our greatest minds claim that in less than 100 years we've destroyed the planet with our carbon emissions.   We are a mighty species considering that a planet that has sustained life for 3 billion years could be wiped out in a few hundred years.  Science tells us what we should eat, how much we should sleep, what we should do to be healthy, what is normal and what is not.  Maybe the new religion is "science", we seem to believe everything "science" tells us, without any tangible proof, except some research documents which much like the manuscripts and narratives of the past can't be proven or disproven by the average layman. Was there an Adam and Eve, or Noah?  Of course not, the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and other religious books are a collection of stories that teach the basic fundamentals of what should exist in society so that society may survive.  The stories provide examples of where society went astray and the punishments that were associated with it.  One only needs to refer back to the Roman empire to see what happens to a society that loses its way.

As usual, people don't seem to understand the difference between "evidence" and "proof." It is a straw man when theists say "atheists wouldn't believe in god was right here talking to them." No. We are actually asking for just ONE PIECE of actual evidence. Show us evidence of a miracle. Just one. There have apparently been millions, so..... Oh and are you guys considering becoming Muslims now? I mean, didn't you see the post with all that "proof?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To believe in God takes faith in something that can't be proved.

To believe their isn't a God also takes faith in something that can't be proved.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
As usual, people don't seem to understand the difference between "evidence" and "proof." It is a straw man when theists say "atheists wouldn't believe in god was right here talking to them." No. We are actually asking for just ONE PIECE of actual evidence. Show us evidence of a miracle. Just one. There have apparently been millions, so..... Oh and are you guys considering becoming Muslims now? I mean, didn't you see the post with all that "proof?"

Is that supposed to be insulting? Not that it matters, but I am interested why you have so much disdain for what others believe in.. I said in my post that I am willing to engage in a discussion (a civilized one). You must have not read what I wrote, or didn't understand what I said and for that you are excused.. When we get over the childish "hey did you read that ha ha ha" stage let me know and we can have a scientific discussion on the subject I mentioned.. Until then please keep your mockery to your self as it reflects poorly on you.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I spoke with God about this thread at church. He says anyone going forward who doesn't post pics of women in yoga pants will be cast into the eternal pit of misery aka Rosie Odonells lap
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As usual, people don't seem to understand the difference between "evidence" and "proof."

It is a straw man when theists say "atheists wouldn't believe in god was right here talking to them."

No.

We are actually asking for just ONE PIECE of actual evidence. Show us evidence of a miracle. Just one. There have apparently been millions, so.....

Oh and are you guys considering becoming Muslims now? I mean, didn't you see the post with all that "proof?"

You're a lawyer but your reading comprehension is very poor.  I clearly stated that I don't subscribe to any religion, so why would I become Muslim?

Again, I can no more prove that a miracle occurred than you can prove a miracle didn't.   You seem to like these straw man arguments.  What's to say when an entire village is wiped out by an earthquake or tsunami and a few people survived that it wasn't a miracle they survived.   How about when a child is born with a birth defect in their skull formation and doctors project that the child won't live beyond two years old and instead goes on to have a wonderful life and still healthy at 28 years old?

You don't want to see these things as miracles so how can anyone prove something is a miracle when your mind is already closed.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Can't believe I'm joining the fray, but here goes...

I want to first state that I'm not a Christian, Jew, Muslim, or part of any other organized religion. But I will always defend people of faith up to the point where they become intolerant to those who believe differently.

For those who believe in the Big Bang Theory or at least scientific theories that would disprove religion, I've alway wondered if their opinions don't require a bit of faith as well. Unless you have a complete (or at least a very advanced) understanding of physics, geology, astronomy, organic chemistry and biology, how can you possibly know what is fact and what is theory?

Granted, science is quite a bit easier for me to believe than the Vatican, for example. And I understand why the desire to keep alive the memories and soles of lost ones, as well as the desire to prevent humans from resorting to what can sometimes be horrific nature, might kindle the need to invent religion.

But life is so incredible and complex that it seems almost as hard to believe in the concept that it just occurred by chance, as is the concept of a red guy with a pitchfork making soles miserable for eternity because they didn't go to confession. Ok, maybe not quite as unbelievable, but you get my point.

I am honestly sorry if this opinion offends or pisses off anyone - that's not my intention. This is one of my favorite subjects to discuss with reasonable people, but even the Grill Room is probably not a good place for me to share my opinions on religion and science.

Back on topic... the purpose of life, it seems, is to spend ridiculous amounts of money, time, thought and effort on a game I have little chance of getting very good at.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I spoke with God about this thread at church. He says anyone going forward who doesn't post pics of women in yoga pants will be cast into the eternal pit of misery aka Rosie Odonells lap


How about Jesus in yoga pants?

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To the OP and any other people of no faith, golf with purpose. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors drive. . .:-P

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
How about Jesus in yoga pants? [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/131925/] [/URL]

LMFAO. We have a winner, close the thread!

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Is that supposed to be insulting? Not that it matters, but I am interested why you have so much disdain for what others believe in.. I said in my post that I am willing to engage in a discussion (a civilized one). You must have not read what I wrote, or didn't understand what I said and for that you are excused.. When we get over the childish "hey did you read that ha ha ha" stage let me know and we can have a scientific discussion on the subject I mentioned.. Until then please keep your mockery to your self as it reflects poorly on you.

That's great and all, but I was actually defending you. Christians act like their religion is so unique and advanced. Yet they would discard information like yours about Islam or any of the other thousands of religions in human history as rubbish. Because it is about Islam, no one is actually giving your claims any consideration. Yet they demand that atheists give their beliefs some kind of special treatment.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3922 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.