Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3656 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Is it possible to go from a 30 to a scratch in 18 months?   

53 members have voted

  1. 1. Is it possible to go from a 30 to a scratch in 18 months?

    • Yes
      12
    • No
      41


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Dave2512 said:

Absolutely. My instructor was $120 an hour. I did bi-weekly one on one at $120/hr and weekly group sessions with access to FlightScope at $35/hr that got me about 10 minutes of face time with my instructor. I used an indoor range with video stalls that was $25/hr several times a week. I did Evolvr etc. It was a chunk of cash for sure. Around $200-400 a week at one point with green fees, it was nuts.

Actually, $400*10/12*52 (high price per week * 10 months in weeks)= $17,333 doesn't seem that bad if you could really get to scratch. Add to that about $6000 for a few equipment changes and fitting costs. Net cost is about $23,333 plus about 5 hours a day (round plus lesson time).

Golftec combined with Evolvr would probably cost something like that: https://www.golftec.com/golf-lessons/pricing

I wouldn't spend that kind of money though. :-P

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think the question was with the assumption we are talking about adults. Kids differ a lot, because they cannot hit it far enough. 

So lets stop talking about kids here, maybe start an other thread?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, MacDutch said:

I think the question was with the assumption we are talking about adults. Kids differ a lot, because they cannot hit it far enough. 

So lets stop talking about kids here, maybe start an other thread?

I was guessing the OP is 14 to 17 years old?

BTW, the "kid" I was talking about drives 270 yards on average. Do you?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@Lihu

you were talking about a 7 years old and how long it took him to get to scratch. Thats what I ment with kids. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, natureboy said:

Pretzel's progress to date indicates he might have ~ +2.5 long-term potential so I'm surprised he isn't playing on the college team, but maybe he started late relative to the guys on the team.

This is part of it (most kids on college teams started playing competitively in middle school or earlier, I waited until high school), but the funny thing is I actually was offered to play golf at a number of colleges, one of which was one that I had already been considering going to. I got like 50 emails from DIII coaches, just because they take practically anyone with a sliver of talent (most guys in that division don't break 80), but one of the school I was considering attending was a DII school that also offered me the opportunity to play. Unfortunately their engineering advisers were lying through their teeth to me about them having the required EE courses for the first two years of an EE degree, and they wouldn't let me see the course list until 30 before I was supposed to register, so I dropped that school at orientation and went to my second choice that I knew specifically had the EE courses I needed. This was too late for me to make the team since this school doesn't have tryouts, only recruitment. I'm not transferring to a DI school, CU Boulder, which means the competition level is much higher. I have to play better than scratch, likely at least at a +1, to be able to make the team there. Not impossible, it just means I'm going to work my keister off to attempt to get to that level. In the meantime I plan to tryout for the job of "Ralphie Handler" in the spring, since I have a farm background and can run fairly fast in short springs so it sounds like a fun way to make sure I stay in shape!

More onto the topic of the thread, what gives you indications of potential? For example, what things have I said that gave you the impression that I have the potential to be a +2.5 golfer versus a golfer who may not even reach scratch?

I can't give you an idea of how my rounds correlate to my handicap over the years, since I pretty much never kept track of every single round, but I can give you an accurate approximation of how it dropped last year versus the number of rounds I played during that timeperiod(since I know how many practice rounds I played for each tournament).

0 rounds - 2.5 - 5/1 revision

4 rounds - 1.8 - 5/15 revision

11 rounds - 1.7 - 6/1 revision

I then proceeded to break my toe and had to nearly a month off, but I think I must have posted scores late because the 

11 rounds - 1.3 - 6/15 revision

14.5 rounds - 1.3 - 7/1 revision

I must have also entered the rounds for this tournament late, or they didn't count until the next revision because I didn't play again and this is what it came up to.

14.5 rounds - 1.0 7/15 revision

I then proceeded to play in the neighborhood of 5-10 more rounds for the rest of the year, but no more tournaments so I didn't post any scores to my handicap. Coming this next summer I plan to post all scores, rather than just tournament scores, to my handicap to potentially get a better idea of my true progress (even if it may become less accurate for tournaments in the process). 

 

  • Upvote 2
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, MacDutch said:

@Lihu

you were talking about a 7 years old and how long it took him to get to scratch. Thats what I ment with kids. 

Oh, okay.

Yeah, I corrected myself later and stated that he went from around a 6 down to scratch in 2-3 years after his growth spurt. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Pretzel said:

I can't give you an idea of how my rounds correlate to my handicap over the years, since I pretty much never kept track of every single round, but I can give you an accurate approximation of how it dropped last year versus the number of rounds I played during that timeperiod(since I know how many practice rounds I played for each tournament).

hood of 5-10 more rounds for the rest of the year, but no more tournaments so I didn't post any scores to my handicap. Coming this next summer I plan to post all scores, rather than just tournament scores, to my handicap to potentially get a better idea of my true progress (even if it may become less accurate for tournaments in the process). 

 

So are these tournament rounds during 2014 or during 2015? If 2014, did you have tournaments in 2015 and have a HCP adjustment or did it stay at 1.0? Even if so it seems to not impact the curve too much - still about the same potential track. I'm giving you about 2,000 hours to date as I don't find the 1,500 hours progress track realistic. I would guess your halfway point in hours was around a 4. So your experience of rapid initial progress followed by slowing fits.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
5 minutes ago, natureboy said:

So are these tournament rounds during 2014 or during 2015? If 2014, did you have tournaments in 2015 and have a HCP adjustment or did it stay at 1.0?

Those are from 2015. I have a spreadsheet somewhere of my tournament rounds since the beginning of 2014 with a cumulative scoring average and such, but I was just pulling this info from my ghin number, 7706075. They don't give me handicap history from 2014, only 2015 so I can't make the direct correlation like from the 2015 tournaments. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Pretzel said:

0 rounds - 2.5 - 5/1 revision

4 rounds - 1.8 - 5/15 revision

11 rounds - 1.7 - 6/1 revision

I then proceeded to break my toe and had to nearly a month off, but I think I must have posted scores late because the 

11 rounds - 1.3 - 6/15 revision

14.5 rounds - 1.3 - 7/1 revision

I must have also entered the rounds for this tournament late, or they didn't count until the next revision because I didn't play again and this is what it came up to.

14.5 rounds - 1.0 7/15 revision

I see a nice linear pattern here, congrats!   What do you think is the difference in your game between 5/1 and 7/15?  Where does the 1.5 improvement coming from? 

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
27 minutes ago, natureboy said:

So are these tournament rounds during 2014 or during 2015? If 2014, did you have tournaments in 2015 and have a HCP adjustment or did it stay at 1.0? Even if so it seems to not impact the curve too much - still about the same potential track. I'm giving you about 2,000 hours to date as I don't find the 1,500 hours progress track realistic. I would guess your halfway point in hours was around a 4. So your experience of rapid initial progress followed by slowing fits.

Just wanted to bring out to light that something that looks like "fits" on a graph could mean only 1 stroke variation in handicap which at a: 4 is 25%; 3 is 33%; 2 is 50%.

19 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

Those are from 2015. I have a spreadsheet somewhere of my tournament rounds since the beginning of 2014 with a cumulative scoring average and such, but I was just pulling this info from my ghin number, ########. They don't give me handicap history from 2014, only 2015 so I can't make the direct correlation like from the 2015 tournaments. 

Don't give out your GHIN and last name (not sure if you did in the past or not), @iacas mentioned that somewhere in the past. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, rkim291968 said:

I see a nice linear pattern here, congrats!   What do you think is the difference in your game between 5/1 and 7/15?  Where does the 1.5 improvement coming from? 

It's not linear if you track back to where he started, how quick he progressed and where he is likely to end up. Remember there are no plus 15's on the planet...that we know of anyway. ;-)

7 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Just wanted to bring out to light that something that looks like "fits" on a graph could mean only 1 stroke variation in handicap which at a: 4 is 25%; 3 is 33%; 2 is 50%.

Not sure I understand what you mean by '25% at a 4', but sure they are only data points. I am talking about a rough relationship pattern in progress to time invested. Do you work in an industrial engineering field?

As far as your friend's son, if you count only the time in since his growth spurt as 'starting over' then he would be roughly on @Pretzel's track because of the time per year he plays & practices. But he could continue to make big gains as he grows. But I consider @Pretzel to have a bit more 'talent' because he has less than half the total time invested in learning and practicing the game and even if it's only short game skills that transfer from youth play, that counts for at least 30% of the game.

Kevin


Posted
15 minutes ago, natureboy said:

It's not linear if you track back to where he started, how quick he progressed and where he is likely to end up. Remember there are no plus 15's on the planet...that we know of anyway. ;-)

Not sure I understand what you mean by '25% at a 4', but sure they are only data points. I am talking about a rough relationship pattern in progress to time invested. Do you work in an industrial engineering field?

As far as your friend's son, if you count only the time in since his growth spurt as 'starting over' then he would be roughly on @Pretzel's track because of the time per year he plays & practices. But he could continue to make big gains as he grows. But I consider @Pretzel to have a bit more 'talent' because he has less than half the total time invested in learning and practicing the game and even if it's only short game skills that transfer from youth play, that counts for at least 30% of the game.

I am an engineer, and I was just mentioning that you saw "slowing fits" in improvement. Just saying that a 1 stroke variation at that low a handicap is quite a large jump! This year he is hoping to make a >100% improvement in his game going from a 1 to a 0 or +.

The trends you are analyzing are interesting to look at, but I'm not sure you can really learn a lot? Golfer improvement could be very chaotic and highly non-linear.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Lihu said:

I am an engineer, and I was just mentioning that you saw "slowing fits" in improvement. Just saying that a 1 stroke variation at that low a handicap is quite a large jump! This year he is hoping to make a >100% improvement in his game going from a 1 to a 0 or +.

The trends you are analyzing are interesting to look at, but I'm not sure you can really learn a lot? Golfer improvement could be very chaotic and highly non-linear.

The overall fit is that in the past year he has made relatively little progress compared to when he started investing time in learning / developing. Half @Pretzel's accumulated play and practice were from beginner / max HCP to a 5 (I would estimate) and the remaining accumulated practice time has taken him from a 5 to a 1. That is the important shape. I'd wager the overall average shape of the average curve is pretty steady. Talk to your company's production folks.

Sure the HCP jumps around in the relatively short-term, and individuals can stray off their initial trajectory. You are right that to some extent, the proof is in the pudding / the accomplishment in itself as lots can happen along the way to actualizing potential, but there is also something to how you got there. I respect the kid's accomplishment, better than I am likely to ever get, and a likely scholarship candidate. Just talking in the abstract about progress rates.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
23 minutes ago, natureboy said:

The overall fit is that in the past year he has made relatively little progress compared to when he started investing time in learning / developing. Half @Pretzel's accumulated play and practice were from beginner / max HCP to a 5 (I would estimate) and the remaining accumulated practice time has taken him from a 5 to a 1. That is the important shape. I'd wager the overall average shape of the average curve is pretty steady. Talk to your company's production folks.

Sure the HCP jumps around in the relatively short-term, and individuals can stray off their initial trajectory. You are right that to some extent, the proof is in the pudding / the accomplishment in itself as lots can happen along the way to actualizing potential, but there is also something to how you got there. I respect the kid's accomplishment, better than I am likely to ever get, and a likely scholarship candidate. Just talking in the abstract about progress rates.

Progress rate really depends upon many external and internal factors. IMHO, it's hard to glean anything off of a person's progress rate.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Progress rate really depends upon many external and internal factors. IMHO, it's hard to glean anything off of a person's progress rate.

I would agree with you if we are talking about a short time span. But across thousands of hours of cumulative invested development time, I think there's a fairly dependable relationship,

Also, I am talking about expected potential. I do believe everyone is individually capable of personal breakthroughs and setbacks that matter to long-term progress Could be wrong, but I expect I'm not.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
12 minutes ago, natureboy said:

I would agree with you if it was across a short time span, but across thousands of hours, I think there's a fairly dependable relationship.

What if there are significant gaps between the hours spent?

 

BTW, just changed my vote to "yes", because Greg Norman did it. So it is possible, even though not likely for the OP.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Lihu said:

What if there are significant gaps between the hours spent?

I think that may be potentially important, because a lot of accumulated skill / touch / feels can be lost (forgetting curve) and may be slow to be re-acquired. One reason a lot of serious golfers have very short off-seasons and do a lot of off-season work to stay sharp. I suspect they intuitively recognize that regression lurks around the corner. That said a lot of pros spend a lot less time practicing than when they were coming up so the maintenance seems a bit less effortful than the progressing. Rory's time off due to injury hasn't seemed to hurt him too bad, nor Tiger's knee. Riding a bike is fairly complex and most can go without riding for decades and still do it fine so I think there is some retention of basic levels of complex skills, but there're probably a decay rate. Probably steeper for golf.

Quote

BTW, just changed my vote to "yes", because Greg Norman did it. So it is possible, even though not likely.

I would agree it's in the realm of possible and I started at yes. I switched to 'no', because I think it's super unlikely given his progress to date. If he had gotten to 5 in 5 months, I would have voted yes. I would still root for him to make it or gets close.

His progress is impressive. He shouldn't be discouraged if he doesn't turn out to be the next Greg Norman.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted (edited)
On 12/10/2015 at 7:06 AM, natureboy said:

Assuming your practice estimates are correct at about 10 hours per week since January then you appear to be on a prodigious curve toward +3 pro territory.

As far as your scratch goal, a zero handicap is probably likely around 4000 hours of cumulative practice on your curve. At the time you set your goal you had ~ 160 and now you have 480 hours. You better up the practice time if you want to make it 'on schedule'. This works out to about 88 hours a week in your remaining 10 months. Assuming you are in school, this seems unlikely. But don't get frustrated by the slow progress, you have demonstrated considerable talent. Work toward building up a competitive game for school teams as a shorter-term goal.

Update @Mjrowe1 that I may have been a hair off with the way I set up your curve relative to the others. Sorry if you put too much stock by it.

I would reassess that depending on progress in the next few months the window might be longer to scratch - closer to a full 10,000 hours at the roughly estimated current rate of progress.

Given your relatively little time playing your performance will be up and down and it's very early to make a definitive call. The coach will help assess long range potential from there, but give it your best shot for the 10 month goal and see what happens - you could hopefully have multiple breakthroughs along the way!

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Note: This thread is 3656 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.