Jump to content
IGNORED

Jordan Spieth's Slow Play


Note: This thread is 3155 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

(edited)
23 minutes ago, tdiii said:

Yes, but no counter to the more important point that Spieth played the same course in the same conditions as all his competitors but took 15 minutes longer. 

The score in itself and your description of Na's disgust at his play is the counterpoint.

But I think others have made valid points ... Spieth is deliberate, has the lead. 15 minutes -- less than one minute per hole. Plus it was a bit of army golf from what I understand from both.

After watching Friday's circus, I was on the range in the afternoon.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, tdiii said:

Are you deliberately ignoring my comment that I like the kid a lot?  It is not an additional 15 minutes.  It is an additioal 15 minutes on top of an already very slow pace.  And the entire world is watching with a lot of golfers emulating this crap. 
 

The pace of those in front of him can't be blamed on Spieth, so all you can put on him is 15 minutes, let's also remember both him and Rory were hitting out of the trees a lot which takes more time than a shot off the fairway.  

Pro's can't be held responsible for what muni golfers do, we all know about ready golf and we're not playing on television for millions so there's no reason for our rounds to take as long as a pro's ever.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, newtogolf said:

The pace of those in front of him can't be blamed on Spieth, so all you can put on him is 15 minutes, let's also remember both him and Rory were hitting out of the trees a lot which takes more time than a shot off the fairway.  

 

Oh, so none of the players in front of them were hitting out of the trees?

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 hours ago, tdiii said:

. . . with all the s l o o o o w w w play, he's dead to me. 

I would love to watch today's round with you.  Will you freak out when a zombie is featured on TV regularly? ;-)

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, tdiii said:

Oh, so none of the players in front of them were hitting out of the trees?

I don't think most want to invalidate your point - Spieth is deliberate. I think the reason many don't say "he's dead to me" with humor is the entertainment value of watching the Player-Caddie interaction. The consistency of the interaction is unusual and gives you insight into the Player. If we must endure another 45 seconds per hole, I believe it's worth it.

I mean, it's not as emotional as Stevie breaking a camera for Tiger. With Spieth, we learn a bit of what's going on in the player's head.

  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 hours ago, Mr. Desmond said:

I don't think most want to invalidate your point - Spieth is deliberate. I think the reason many don't say "he's dead to me" with humor is the entertainment value of watching the Player-Caddie interaction. The consistency of the interaction is unusual and gives you insight into the Player. If we must endure another 45 seconds per hole, I believe it's worth it.

I mean, it's not as emotional as Stevie breaking a camera for Tiger. With Spieth, we learn a bit of what's going on in the player's head.

Oh the lengths to which you'll stretch to defend someone you've decided to defend…

Just hit the damn ball. Figure stuff out faster. Don't fidget. Don't take three minutes to read a putt.

Play faster. I like Jordan Spieth just fine, but this part of him is terrible and will hopefully be addressed. Count me among the many who think that pros should be able to play in 3:30 or so in twosomes. This is lame. They're entertainers, and this isn't entertaining.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

Oh the lengths to which you'll stretch to defend someone you've decided to defend…

Just hit the damn ball. Figure stuff out faster. Don't fidget. Don't take three minutes to read a putt.

Play faster. I like Jordan Spieth just fine, but this part of him is terrible and will hopefully be addressed. Count me among the many who think that pros should be able to play in 3:30 or so in twosomes. This is lame. They're entertainers, and this isn't entertaining.

Yes, he can play faster. And Yes, I also said he's exhausting to watch. And yes, I wish they'd told us that they'd staging a  20th anniversary re-enactment of Greg Norman's meltdown. We all have meltdowns and I think Spieth is strong enough to recover from this one.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, tdiii said:

It is an additioal 15 minutes on top of an already very slow pace.  And the entire world is watching with a lot of golfers emulating this crap. 

HS football and basketball play a shorter game (fewer minutes), with fewer TV timeouts.  The length of the games have nothing to do with a slower pace.  And, yes, MLB is suffering for its worsening pace of play issues.  A game in the 1970s took less than 2:30.  Now it is 3:00.  And fan interest is declining. 

I'm not sure that the overall field pace isn't planned on or 'built in' to some degree for Majors. You have to have breaks in play to allow fans to cross fairways and for the players to get around / through the roped-in areas. There may be a desire for TV coverage to have an 'expected' length for the tournament that is over a certain minimum. In other words it might not be possible for an 'ideal' 3.5 hour round to be played.

Kevin


8 hours ago, tdiii said:

And, yes, MLB is suffering for its worsening pace of play issues.  A game in the 1970s took less than 2:30.  Now it is 3:00.  And fan interest is declining. 

This guy says commercial time accounts for all the difference:

http://www.101sports.com/2014/08/22/math-mlbs-bogus-pace-game-issues/

Makes sense to me.  I haven't watched more than half-an-inning for years, because I wander off during the commercial break and don't come back.


21 minutes ago, natureboy said:

I'm not sure that the overall field pace isn't planned on or 'built in' to some degree for Majors. You have to have breaks in play to allow fans to cross fairways and for the players to get around / through the roped-in areas. There may be a desire for TV coverage to have an 'expected' length for the tournament that is over a certain minimum. In other words it might not be possible for an 'ideal' 3.5 hour round to be played.

Nah, those players are slow. Very few players are actually quick. DJ and Rory are pretty fast. Most of the time the camera cuts to them just before they swing. With Spieth it's 5 minutes of backing off, re-evaluating, ect..

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 hours ago, boogielicious said:

4:30 for two Pros to play 18 is ridiculous. 

Really? Maybe you should try to play Augusta National and have to hole out every putt. Better yet, have a $1,000 Nassau while you're playing. I'd bet you wouldn't finish in 6 hours.


5 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Nah, those players are slow. Very few players are actually quick.

Not quite sure what you're saying here?

Kevin


22 hours ago, boogielicious said:

4:30 for two Pros to play 18 is ridiculous. 

The leaders are only as slow as the slowest group in front of them.  I think it is more like freeway traffic.  The first ones on are fast and go at full speed.  As soon as one group goes slow, everyone behind grinds to a halt.

Example, in round 2 one group that had Stenson, Phil Mickelson and I think it was DeChambeau.  It was on the 12th hole when Stenson hit his ball way long into the hill.  Everyone went looking for his ball and spent a lot of time.  Finally Mickelson and DeChambeau went and putted out.  Then they went to the next hole and even teed off.  Meanwhile Stenson found his ball, but was trying to find the point of closest relief.  Well in the end he decided there was no relief and had to re-tee his ball.  He wound up with bogey which is pretty good considering, but the group behind was forced to wait.  Again, if you are forced to wait and your caddie informs you before your putt, "no need to hurry the other group is still there", then of course over time one becomes accustomed to take their time.


5 minutes ago, Howling Coyote said:

The leaders are only as slow as the slowest group in front of them.  I think it is more like freeway traffic.  The first ones on are fast and go at full speed.  As soon as one group goes slow, everyone behind grinds to a halt.

Example, in round 2 one group that had Stenson, Phil Mickelson and I think it was DeChambeau.  It was on the 12th hole when Stenson hit his ball way long into the hill.  Everyone went looking for his ball and spent a lot of time.  Finally Mickelson and DeChambeau went and putted out.  Then they went to the next hole and even teed off.  Meanwhile Stenson found his ball, but was trying to find the point of closest relief.  Well in the end he decided there was no relief and had to re-tee his ball.  He wound up with bogey which is pretty good considering, but the group behind was forced to wait.  Again, if you are forced to wait and your caddie informs you before your putt, "no need to hurry the other group is still there", then of course over time one becomes accustomed to take their time.

Not when Spieth has 1-2 open holes in front of him.

  • Upvote 3

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, SavvySwede said:

Not when Spieth has 1-2 open holes in front of him.

Well if this is consistent and he had one hole open before him and this number grew to 2 or even 3 before being over.  And lets say on round 1 when he was one of the early groups, he had 2 groups backing up behind him, well then he becomes the source of the freeway traffic jam and I take it back.


(edited)
Just now, SavvySwede said:

Not when Spieth has 1-2 open holes in front of him.

Especially when the group in front has notorious rain delay Langer in it and JS still can't keep up. 

Edited by tdiii
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
33 minutes ago, JimF27 said:

Really? Maybe you should try to play Augusta National and have to hole out every putt. Better yet, have a $1,000 Nassau while you're playing. I'd bet you wouldn't finish in 6 hours.

Don't think so. Plus I'm not a pro player play par or better. I'm expected to play 18 in a foursome in 4:30 or less.  In a twosome, I should be much faster. 

  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3155 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...