Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

David Ledbetter rant-ish on Michelle Wie criticisms


Note: This thread is 3541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
17 minutes ago, BallStriker said:

Great post.....

I disagree, as I did above.

For anyone to say that Michelle Wie doesn't have talent is bogus as heck. She had tremendous talent. She finished in the top five of every LPGA major when she was a mid-teen… consecutively (T3 2005 British, T3 2006 ANA, T5 2006 LPGA, T3 2006 U.S. Women's Open). She was 15/16 then IIRC.

She won the WAPL at 13, then shot 68 on the PGA Tour.

It astounds me that people are saying (typing) with presumably straight faces that Michelle doesn't have much talent. If she doesn't have much talent, then how can she fall short of expectations and not live up to her billing? For most LPGA Tour players, 4 wins and a major is massively exceeding their talent level.

Annika's comments date back just over three years ago.

Sorenstam apologized, too, not that it means much.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

I disagree, as I did above.

For anyone to say that Michelle Wie doesn't have talent is bogus as heck. She had tremendous talent. She finished in the top five of every LPGA major when she was a mid-teen… consecutively (T3 2005 British, T3 2006 ANA, T5 2006 LPGA, T3 2006 U.S. Women's Open). She was 15/16 then IIRC.

She won the WAPL at 13, then shot 68 on the PGA Tour.

It astounds me that people are saying (typing) with presumably straight faces that Michelle doesn't have much talent. If she doesn't have much talent, then how can she fall short of expectations and not live up to her billing? For most LPGA Tour players, 4 wins and a major is massively exceeding their talent level.

Annika's comments date back just over three years ago.

Sorenstam apologized, too, not that it means much.

No kidding. I'd rate her as a massive talent. Clearly she could destroy every single poster on this forum. 

  • Upvote 1

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, Ernest Jones said:

I'm no Leadbetter fan (looks too much like an Eric Idle character), but to be fair, the only reason any of these coaches are on PGA Tour Radio is because they are associated with *insert Tour Pro name here*. 

Exactly, that was kind of my point.  Haney would have never gotten Golf Channel shows if he wasn't associated with Tiger.  Leadbetter is the Haney equivalent on the LPGA Tour cashing in on the opportunity to coach Wie and Ko.    

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, iacas said:

For anyone to say that Michelle Wie doesn't have talent is bogus as heck. 

"Talent" is an elusive term......from a purely physical standpoint, the world is full of players who have all the shots, but not the ability to "get it done" (Ty Tyron, for a loose comparison).  I think there are two different thoughts going on here.....one believing that Led Poision  is to blame.....the other believing that Wiesy doesn't have the six inches between the ears to really get it done.....the truth probably is somewhere in the middle.....and I am of the opinion that Led is far, far less to blame than Michelle

Edited by BallStriker

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


  • Administrator
Posted
9 hours ago, BallStriker said:

"Talent" is an elusive term......from a purely physical standpoint, the world is full of players who have all the shots, but not the ability to "get it done" (Ty Tyron, for a loose comparison).

Ty Tryon != Michelle Wie

Please.

9 hours ago, BallStriker said:

the other believing that Wiesy doesn't have the six inches between the ears to really get it done.....the truth probably is somewhere in the middle.....and I am of the opinion that Led is far, far less to blame than Michelle

I'm not. He started coaching her when she was 13. She had success before and has failed to realize her potential after.

If you want to blame Michelle for sticking with Leadbetter, that's fine, but him blaming his student is lame. It's not like she's not putting in effort. That's about the only time I'll blame a student (to their face) - when they don't put in the effort.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, BallStriker said:

"Talent" is an elusive term......from a purely physical standpoint, the world is full of players who have all the shots, but not the ability to "get it done" (Ty Tyron, for a loose comparison).  I think there are two different thoughts going on here.....one believing that Led Poision  is to blame.....the other believing that Wiesy doesn't have the six inches between the ears to really get it done.....the truth probably is somewhere in the middle.....and I am of the opinion that Led is far, far less to blame than Michelle

You can see fairly dramatic differences in her swing from her peak teenage years to today. I really think Michelle fell into the classic trap of "being a great student of a bad teacher." She listened and committed to Lead-poison's bad advice for years, and this is the result. People get coached out of the game all the time. That's nothing new. It happens everyday on every driving range in the world.

It doesn't surprise me that "she's stubborn" and doesn't listen to him as much these days. It does surprise me though that she still works with him, and that's on her.

 

Just as one example, here's Michelle in 2003:

Capture.PNG

Then compare her to now (right photo) and see how much she leaves her weight back (left is Yanni Tseng when she was ranked no.1 a few years ago).

456e55ed_lpgaswings1.jpeg

Note the difference in how much more weight/pressure she still has on her back foot that late into the follow through.


It's not a secret that Lead-poison was a fan of x-factor stuff, maintaining excessive flexion in the trail knee on the backswing, and "releasing the club" -- stuff that has long since been exposed as horrendous advice.

In the end though, it doesn't surprise me that he thinks he's blameless in all this. The guy wouldn't be able to get out of bed in the morning if he was honest with himself or aware of what he did to her.

  • Upvote 1

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 minutes ago, JetFan1983 said:

It's not a secret that Lead-poison was a fan of x-factor stuff, maintaining excessive flexion in the trail knee on the backswing, and "releasing the club" -- stuff that has long since been exposed as horrendous advice

Now you have Leadbetter trying to make everyone swing like Furyk. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

 

Notice how much more fluid her swing was in 2005 than it is in 2015. I don't like that restricted hip.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

But I think she was restricting the hip some even back in 2003. I'm not convinced that can be blamed on David, and I don't think it's what he actually teaches. And it's something he has specifically said he doesn't like in her swing.

I think one thing with Michelle is she hasn't really been doing one thing consistently. But I also think it might be a case not so much of "bad teacher", as "wrong teacher".

It seems to me the golfers who have had success with Leadbetter have been mostly those who use a more upright stance, not too wide, two plane, full hip and shoulder turn, very rotational with minimal lateral movement, and yes, "release the club" (which actually works well with that swing type).

Michelle though seem to like to be more bent over, wide stance, almost single plane, doesn't really look like a "Leadbetter golfer" to me. And yet she's been with him for 13 years.

Lydia Ko by contrast, look at her swing pre-Leadbetter, and it was more one plane, less upright, etc., but she seems to have taken to Leadbetter's method like a fish to water. Look at her swing during her outstanding 2014 season, and she was already more upright, with the typical Leadbetter posture, Leadbetter pivot, Leadbetter release. 

 


Posted
On 4/29/2016 at 3:15 PM, iacas said:

I don't think Leadbetter's instruction is blameless. I don't like the things he did with Michelle, and I'm in a position to know.

There's a reason Leadbetter is called "Lead Poison."

I am not so sure if you can or want to tell a bit more about that. You do have more insight than others and I would really like to know about leadpoison etc. But I would also understand if you can't.

 

When I picked up a golfclub for the first time, I bought a dvd of LeadB. At that time, his info made sense. How naïve of me. 

 

For what is worth, I do not think you should critisize your student in public. Most of the members of public probably do not have a clue what teacher and student are working on. To me, it seems to be a split-up in the making.

 

 

3 hours ago, KKGolfPro said:

Really it is no one's fault. The typical golf swing is to blame for inconsistency even among the best players. 

I am sorry,  I fail to see quoting your own article contributes here in relation to mr Leadbetter.


  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, taxgolf said:

I am not so sure if you can or want to tell a bit more about that. You do have more insight than others and I would really like to know about leadpoison etc. But I would also understand if you can't.

 

When I picked up a golfclub for the first time, I bought a dvd of LeadB. At that time, his info made sense. How naïve of me. 

 

For what is worth, I do not think you should critisize your student in public. Most of the members of public probably do not have a clue what teacher and student are working on. To me, it seems to be a split-up in the making.

 

 

I am sorry,  I fail to see quoting your own article contributes here in relation to mr Leadbetter.

I deleted the link.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.