Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3021 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

With regard to the new unattended flag stick rule, if I want the flagstick in and my playing partner wants it out, we could be pulling it out, and putting it back in depending on who's putting. This could cause a delay in play rather than speed it up. I suppose I could just putt out with the flag in and then take it out for my playing partner to putt out.

However if that means standing on my playing partner's line, they I'd have to mark it, pull the flag, let him putt, put the flag back in, take my putt etc.

Or do you think golfers will simply never play with the flagstick out? That would suit me.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, Pete said:

Or do you think golfers will simply never play with the flagstick out? That would suit me.

The flagsticks never lean at the courses you play?  At my local course there are a lot of times where the flagstick is leaning and would keep the ball out of the hole.  Hitting it may not be a penalty but if it keeps the ball out of the hole, you still have to putt again, don't you?

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, krupa said:

The flagsticks never lean at the courses you play?  At my local course there are a lot of times where the flagstick is leaning and would keep the ball out of the hole.  Hitting it may not be a penalty but if it keeps the ball out of the hole, you still have to putt again, don't you?

Yeah of course. I'd probably still leave it in but adjust it first so it leans the other way. Basically, leaving it in has been proven to be an advantage, so I would want to always leave it in and wondered how big a problem this could be.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Areas the Committee May Mark as Penalty Areas  - it will be interesting to me to see the guidelines issued by the USGA/R&A [not that guidelines from the USGA has ever stopped public courses from doing what they want].

I see a potential conflict between committee members Long John and Bunting Brian.  Bunting Brian prefers it if Long John has to hit three from the tee when his attempt at driving the green goes into that patch of native grasses 20 yards from the green.  Long John prefers dropping 20 yards from the green with a chance to save par.

Depending on the guidelines, this may tilt the game a bit more in favor of the long and slightly inaccurate hitter.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Pete said:

I'd probably still leave it in but adjust it first so it leans the other way.

So not only could we hit it without penalty, we could adjust it for maximum advantage?  Makes me wonder if any pace-of-play advantage gained by not having to remove it is going to be lost by people messing with it.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A question for @iacas.  A course chooses to red stake significant areas of forest and wild grassland, where in the past "stroke & distance" was the likely outcome for an errant shot.  Will the course rating and/or slope drop a bit or do these changes matter little in the grand scheme of things?  Probably slope is more affected in any case, yes? 

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The flag stick rule is interesting.  As someone who often plays alone, I can see the benefit to pace of play.  Especially when facing long putts.  Then again, I don't think solo rounds technically count anymore anyway.  It certainly does not speed up play if one person likes it in and the other likes it out and they keep switching it. 

Is there an existing rule that tells us what happens if the ball gets wedged between the lip and the stick?

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, krupa said:

So not only could we hit it without penalty, we could adjust it for maximum advantage?  Makes me wonder if any pace-of-play advantage gained by not having to remove it is going to be lost by people messing with it.

That's exactly my point. I would leave it in. I think an awful lot of people would, but some will insist on it being removed and I can see this as an issue. The different choices on leaving flag in or taking it out are demonstrated well in this thread: 

I hope they can keep this change whilst negating any cases of flag stick hokey cokey somehow. 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
28 minutes ago, Pete said:

With regard to the new unattended flag stick rule, if I want the flagstick in and my playing partner wants it out, we could be pulling it out, and putting it back in depending on who's putting. This could cause a delay in play rather than speed it up. I suppose I could just putt out with the flag in and then take it out for my playing partner to putt out.

However if that means standing on my playing partner's line, they I'd have to mark it, pull the flag, let him putt, put the flag back in, take my putt etc.

Or do you think golfers will simply never play with the flagstick out? That would suit me.

The flagstick rule, on first glance, is one i hope does NOT stick.

I'll be filing a note on that one.

I don't think taking the flagstick out is a significant cause of delay, and as you point out, taking it out and putting it back in can cause a significant delay.

One advantage if this rule perplexingly stays in place is that at least people will study the advantage more and properly conclude the flagstick in (so long as it's not leaning toward you a lot) helps the ball go in the hole more easily). :-)

3 minutes ago, bkuehn1952 said:

A question for @iacas.  A course chooses to red stake significant areas of forest and wild grassland, where in the past "stroke & distance" was the likely outcome for an errant shot.  Will the course rating and/or slope drop a bit or do these changes matter little in the grand scheme of things?  Probably slope is more affected in any case, yes? 

Yes. It would affect slope and course rating.

Right now, for example, even if a course puts red lines around an area of thick trees we ignore it and create it as an area likely to lead to lost balls. Now we'll have to consider it and rate it as less severe.

3 minutes ago, dsc123 said:

Is there an existing rule that tells us what happens if the ball gets wedged between the lip and the stick?

Yes.

3 minutes ago, Pete said:

I hope they can keep this change whilst negating any cases of flag stick hokey cokey somehow. 

How?

I hope they can this change.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, Pete said:

That's exactly my point. I would leave it in. I think an awful lot of people would, but some will insist on it being removed and I can see this as an issue. The different choices on leaving flag in or taking it out are demonstrated well in this thread

I agree that leaving the flagstick in is an advantage, especially from off the green. 

You say, "I would leave it in", but you wouldn't... not really.  You'd leave it in and adjust its position if necessary.  

19 minutes ago, Pete said:

I'd probably still leave it in but adjust it first so it leans the other way.

I have two problems with that.  One, you're not longer playing the course as you find it.  Two, pace of play would drop because everyone is adjusting the flagstick for their putt. 

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, iacas said:
15 minutes ago, Pete said:

I hope they can keep this change whilst negating any cases of flag stick hokey cokey somehow. 

How?

I hope they can this change.

I hoped they would keep it because for a while I would benefit from it whilst others still chose to take the flag out. But yeah, for the pace of play issues it could (ironically) cause, ditching the change may be for the best.

I suppose when everyone understands that there is an advantage to leaving it in, perhaps it will eventually be normal that the flag always stays in the hole, maybe? 

 

Edit: Flagsticks that are permanently attached to the base and are built to not lean at all! Problem solved :-D

Edit 2: By the way, this is actually a good idea, but is perhaps a little too drastic for now. 

Edited by Pete
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
7 minutes ago, iacas said:

One advantage if this rule perplexingly stays in place is that at least people will study the advantage more and properly conclude the flagstick in (so long as it's not leaning toward you a lot) helps the ball go in the hole more easily). :-)

Even if the flagstick rule stays in the final version, it would certainly be revisited if and when new data becomes available.  This is the only rule change in this section that I dislike significantly

9 minutes ago, iacas said:

Right now, for example, even if a course puts red lines around an area of thick trees we ignore it and create it as an area likely to lead to lost balls. Now we'll have to consider it and rate it as less severe.

I know you do course ratings.  Have you heard whether the current course ratings system is being evaluated in light of the proposed rules changes?

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, cutchemist42 said:

So does this get rid of the rediculousness of the HD 100x zoomed in sandtrap incident?

Nope.  They specifically said that the Anna Nordqvist ruling would not have changed.  The bunker is not a "penalty area".

  • Upvote 1

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
32 minutes ago, Pete said:

Yeah of course. I'd probably still leave it in but adjust it first so it leans the other way. Basically, leaving it in has been proven to be an advantage, so I would want to always leave it in and wondered how big a problem this could be.

Unless they change that too, you are not allowed to lean the flagstick in any particular direction.  The way it reads now is that if the flagstick is leaning, you may straighten it.  You may not lean it in a way that is favorable to your shot.  

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, NCGolfer said:

Nope.  They specifically said that the Anna Nordqvist ruling would not have changed.  The bunker is not a "penalty area".

Ah okay, read it wrong. I still hate the era of HD cameras but it not being uniform across a whole tourney on every golfer.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Fourputt said:

Unless they change that too, you are not allowed to lean the flagstick in any particular direction.  The way it reads now is that if the flagstick is leaning, you may straighten it.  You may not lean it in a way that is favorable to your shot.  

You know what I mean. All I'm talking about is rotating the flag stick so the ball can fit in, typically this means rotating it 180 degrees so it no longer leans towards me. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3021 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.