Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3311 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Who do you guys use for your mortgage? I have been with Wells Fargo since day 1, but have gotten some pretty descent offers in the mail. I usually just trash them because I am always skeptical when companies seek me out for that kind of stuff, but maybe I should look into more of these offers. Some offer a full point under my current percentage.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

There's a rule of thumb somewhere about how much of a rate improvement you need to offset the closing costs involved in a refinance.  I'm sure someone out there could tell you, but I'm not sure that a 1% difference would make refinancing beneficial.  Our mortgage is with Suntrust, for two reasons.  First, their rates were competitive when we refinanced.  Second, the broker is a friend of ours, which made doing the deal pretty dang easy.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
17 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

There's a rule of thumb somewhere about how much of a rate improvement you need to offset the closing costs involved in a refinance.  I'm sure someone out there could tell you, but I'm not sure that a 1% difference would make refinancing beneficial.  Our mortgage is with Suntrust, for two reasons.  First, their rates were competitive when we refinanced.  Second, the broker is a friend of ours, which made doing the deal pretty dang easy.

1% was always the least I had heard for it to be beneficial. And I cannot remember the exact offers but I know they were at least that 1%.

Are there any benefits to staying loyal to a certain company?

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Just now, TN94z said:

Are there any benefits to staying loyal to a certain company?

I kind of doubt it, they don't offer discounts to long time customers as far as I know.  I think its all a matter of getting the best total deal that you can.  Remember that the closing costs, points, appraisal fees, PMI requirements, etc, can all add up, so its more than just the rate.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I kind of doubt it, they don't offer discounts to long time customers as far as I know.  I think its all a matter of getting the best total deal that you can.  Remember that the closing costs, points, appraisal fees, PMI requirements, etc, can all add up, so its more than just the rate.

Agreed and I know all of that. I would do the math to make sure it was worth the deal. That's kind of what I meant by "look into them."  I just wonder how stable some of the companies are that have sent me the offers. For instance, Quicken Loans sent me a really good offer but I have never heard of anyone in my area that used them.

Edited by TN94z

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I do not agree with rules of thumbs for finance related matters. 

You need to use a mortgage refinance calculator available online. Make sure to take in to consideration the cost of refi, the rate of course and any heloc and its rate if applies. 

The calculation should show a break even time frame. How much would I have paid in interest + refi cost and how long would take my current mortgage to catch up? The two lines should cross at some time in the future..

What if the "SAVINGS "under the new available interest rate mortgage plus the cost of refi kicks in after 20yrs? are you ok with that? would you still live there? because if you sell before the break even you are actually loosing money.

Remember lowering the interest is not a benefit if the cost of getting that rate ruins the deal. Right now you have no other cost other than the current rate.

And lastly, when you refi you might be restarting the clock..if you are 5yrs in to a 30yrs...would you want to go in to a new 30yrs?, even if the new interest is lower that might not work...after all is set and done you might have not saved anything.

What carrier?  I don't think it really matters, but gov. owned mortgages as you might already know can get you qualified for some relief programs in the future...may be. 

BofA is my lender, I would not hesitate to move to another lender if I find a lower TOTAL cost for my mortgage. 


  • Moderator
Posted

We aren't in any kind of bind or anything like that. We actually only have 8-9 years left on the mortgage and I would not refi for any longer. It would have to be a deal that would save me money while still keeping the current time frame for payoff. I just never really give these offers a second thought before trashing them and it just hit me that maybe I should look at them more closely.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, TN94z said:

1% was always the least I had heard for it to be beneficial.

I work in the mortgage industry.  My two cents on if it's worth your time, it's very scenario specific.  I.E., your current balance along with the other items you and others have already discussed above.  It sounds like you have a good handle on how to figure out if it's a good deal.  I would encourage you to seriously consider moving forward if you will save a percent for 8-9 years it's likely worth your time.  Companies like Quicken might not have the local presence of other large banks, but they are obviously totally legit.  Although I would say that they don't normally have the lowest rate.  If you have good credit, debt to income, etc., and only 8-9 years left, you will probably get a good deal with a local bank or credit union.  Good luck,

Matt          My Swing

 

 :ping: G425 Max Driver

Sub 70 3 wood, 3 hybrid and 5-p 639CB

Edison wedges 51, 55, 59

Sub 70 004 Mallet

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

What rate are you looking at?   The best rate around here is about 4 1/8%.   

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
24 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

What rate are you looking at?   The best rate around here is about 4 1/8%.   

I'm paying 2.25 variable. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
26 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

What rate are you looking at?   The best rate around here is about 4 1/8%.   

I can't remember the offers now but we have 4 now and I'm thinking one of the offers was like 3-3.25 maybe

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I always look at it from two points of view: cash flow on a monthly basis and long term costs. If you are diligent at growing your asset base (saving/investing) only the first matters as money is cheap and as long as mortgage interest is tax deductible growing your saved cash flow will outpace the long term costs since money is so cheap.

Find a good independent financial advisor (without conflicts to the transaction) to help guide you through it if you do not feel confident making the best decision for yourself. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quicken is well rated. We've bought two homes in the last 5 years.We went with a small guy and then with Wells Fargo. FYI getting a mortgage through a reputable, large company has it's merits. Firstly, a lot of time they hold the loan for a lot longer. The smaller guys typically sell to other guys. We were unlucky in that our first mortgage got sold to some small Texas bank. Literally couldn't even set up an online auto-pay. That was incredibly frustrating, HAVING to write a check every month... and this was freaking 2013! 

The 2nd time when going with Wells Fargo I specifically asked and they said that Wells guarantees that they will service the loan for the life of the loan. That means I see the principle, balance, interest paid, and get all my tax info through Wells even if they sell the loan to someone else (who will collect the interest and be on the hook for the loan if we defaulted). 

So that's something to consider as well.

Everything else I can think of has already been said by others. It's pretty straightforward. Mostly (for us) it mattered what cash we could have on hand in the short run as well as understanding that we're on the "rise." Our combined income went from X, to 1.10X, to 1.33X, to 1.42X in 5 years. And I'm crossing my fingers on a promotion I've applied for to push us to ~ 1.66X. We're investing in our future by working hard and will likely move one more time (to another location), or at least another house in the near future, so plopping down a lot of cash to reduce the long term interest paid isn't in our best interest right now. I'd rather be able to work hard, pay for additional education (MBA), and have a large nest egg to reduce our stress. Focus on us, and growing. We'll start fighting the home interest later. We also have no other debts, which is a big deal.

Refinancing CAN be a great option, but what I don't recommend is refinancing to "free up monthly budget money." What I recommend is refinancing (if increasing the term of course) to drop your monthly payment only if you have strong plans to grow the balance of that saved money. Like if you weren't matching a 401k and can't do it with your expenses now then I would absolutely recommend refinancing and putting that money in the 401k if matched. Don't just use it to buy a new boat or car or something lol.

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3311 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 610 - 2026-06-03 Got some work in between lessons today. Rare late day, teaching until 7:30pm.
    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.