Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What Would a 20.1 (see post #95) Index Shoot at a Local U.S. Open Qualifier Site?


Note: This thread is 2228 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
21 minutes ago, Groundhog34 said:

The problem the 20 is going to have on a PGA course…

That's not the topic, though.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, Alx said:

Really depends on how your game is built.

With a very good long game and terrible putting/short game I think you can do fairly well on any course. 

If you cant drive well past 200 youre going to have issues on any long course even without forced carries.

I guess this depends on how good  a "very good long game" is and how you define "fairly well". If you're describing one who can hit it long and stay in bounds all round, only to pile up shots when they get in close, you may be right. But I don't know how common it is for someone to be that good at keeping the ball in bounds with the long clubs while sucking at the short game.

One the other hand, don't you think there are some good players (10 HC) who lack the power but because they excel at everything else, could play just above bogey golf on 7,000 yards (without the forced carries as you said)?

I'm not saying I know this to be true @Alx. Just my thoughts.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, iacas said:

There aren't 4-5 carts following guys in local qualifying.

True, but how would you emulate  an honest match then?

It should be as impressive as playing your first qualifyer ever. Thats not the same as just a round with friends from the tips.

Edited by MacDutch
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
29 minutes ago, MacDutch said:

True, but how would you emulate  an honest match then?

Simply bet enough money on the outcome!

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
45 minutes ago, MacDutch said:

True, but how would you emulate  an honest match then?

Play as close to the same conditions as possible. There's virtually nobody out there watching local qualifying. Anything other than that is artificial, contrived.

A true 20.1 should break 127 pretty easily.

Let's say the course is a stiff test for a local qualifier at 75.5/145 course. 127 is about a 40 differential. That means, to have a 50/50 chance of shooting 127… the 20.1 golfer would have to have an average differential of 40.

That's just not realistic. Your handicap is your best 10 of your last 20, so to have an AVERAGE differential of 40, they'd have to have 10 rounds that average 20.1, and the other 10 rounds would have to average 60! 60! For every round in those 10 under 60… another round would have to be above a 60.

And that's just for the guy to have a 50/50 chance of not breaking 127.

Yeah, the pressure of the "bet" may add a few strokes here and there. Though, if he's good under pressure, he may play better. The latter is less likely, but hell… even 18 strokes less - a 109 - is a 26 differential. He probably doesn't average more than a few above that that for his 10 WORST scores.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think it depends on a couple factors. First, forced carries. If he has a forced carry off the tee or into a green that he simply cannot carry he doesn't have a chance. 

Second, his iron and wedge play. If he is able to hit the ball reasonably accurately with reasonable contact (by this I mean not blocking it off the planet or chunking every other shot) with some of his mid to short irons and has the discipline to hit them on every shot I think he has a very good chance at breaking 127. It's much harder to hit the ball way offline with a 6 iron than with a driver and the course length isn't that big of a deal because he has so many shots to give he doesn't need to even try to reach them in regulation. This means that trouble isn't in play in the same manner as his tee shots would often be in areas that the course designer didn't put as much trouble due to it not being a normal landing spot for a better golfer playing from those tees. 

 

I think if these two conditions are met the golfer will break 127 fairly often provided they do not have some extremely poor play around the greens (taking 5 shots to get out of a bunker bad/can't hit clean chip shots with any regularity at all). My (purely anecdotal) experience with worse players is that often the game is made so much harder because they are so inaccurate off the tee. It's tough to play smart golf when you have little to no idea where your tee shot is going and it often ends up behind a tree, out of bounds or in the woods. From there you are forced to hit tricky recovery shots rather than more straight forward shots out of the fairway and it only compounds the problem because their mechanics aren't particularly great. Often when you get to some of the shorter irons they are able to make contact that is good enough consistently with good enough direction as well. 


Posted

I've seen a lot of comments regarding the forced carry issue.  With the sole goal of breaking 127, couldn't he just lay up to the red tees/ closest area to the hazard and proceed from there?  If I'm him, Im hitting wedge / my most consistent club to as many safe spots as I can.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, DannyMac said:

I've seen a lot of comments regarding the forced carry issue.  With the sole goal of breaking 127, couldn't he just lay up to the red tees/ closest area to the hazard and proceed from there?  If I'm him, Im hitting wedge / my most consistent club to as many safe spots as I can.  

A good strategy if all he wanted to do is break 127. However some set ups make it difficult to lay up from the tips. Often the hazard is in front or almost surrounding the tips. Laying up would give him the best chance at avoiding a huge number.  


Posted
10 minutes ago, Groundhog34 said:

A good strategy if all he wanted to do is break 127. However some set ups make it difficult to lay up from the tips. Often the hazard is in front or almost surrounding the tips. Laying up would give him the best chance at avoiding a huge number.  

I was commenting on the original poster's bet, with the only goal of breaking 127.  I do agree that some back tees would make this strategy a little difficult, especially if there is a "chute" of trees on either side, but I still think a LEGIT 20.1 would be able to break the 127 barrier following a very conservative strategy.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

FWIW, at the risk of embarrassing myself, here are the drives from my last three rounds:

Capture.PNG

Admittedly, these are total distances, but it's been wet so I'm not getting crazy roll-out on any of these (except that 289-yarder...haha).

I'd be curious for someone to take a stab at the actual forced carry distances on one of these courses (@Pretzel?), since it's the thing that a lot of people are harping on.  If it's just one hole with a 240-yard carry, I'll happily wedge it to the red tees, but that's not going to work as a strategy if this is something that happens repeatedly.

Something to keep in mind...there's nothing wrong with driving short of a fairway and playing from the rough.  I'm talking about true forced carries over a hazard.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

FWIW, at the risk of embarrassing myself, here are the drives from my last three rounds:

Capture.PNG

Admittedly, these are total distances, but it's been wet so I'm not getting crazy roll-out on any of these (except that 289-yarder...haha).

I'd be curious for someone to take a stab at the actual forced carry distances on one of these courses (@Pretzel?), since it's the thing that a lot of people are harping on.  If it's just one hole with a 240-yard carry, I'll happily wedge it to the red tees, but that's not going to work as a strategy if this is something that happens repeatedly.

Something to keep in mind...there's nothing wrong with driving short of a fairway and playing from the rough.  I'm talking about true forced carries over a hazard.

Yes, true forced carries from the tee are pretty rare in most cases. I think I've only played a few holes that had actual forced carries and even those were short enough that I don't think you'd typically have any issues with them. I think the worst ones are the long par 3s that require 200+ to hit the green, but those can be a problem for people of just about any handicap.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I would say a 127 is doable but highly unlikely. I'm a HH and played Torrey Pines South a few years ago. Its not exactly the toughest course, but still quite a challenge. Ended up with a 130ish round. Its not the distance so much as its the rough. If you land there after a 200+ yard drive, you might as well add an additional 3-4 strokes just to get to the green even on their Par 4's. Also, the greens were so fast and the contours were not easy to predict. Gives you a new respect for how the Pro's make it look so easy.

Edited by Rough Wanderer

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

FWIW, at the risk of embarrassing myself, here are the drives from my last three rounds:

Capture.PNG

Admittedly, these are total distances, but it's been wet so I'm not getting crazy roll-out on any of these (except that 289-yarder...haha).

I'd be curious for someone to take a stab at the actual forced carry distances on one of these courses (@Pretzel?), since it's the thing that a lot of people are harping on.  If it's just one hole with a 240-yard carry, I'll happily wedge it to the red tees, but that's not going to work as a strategy if this is something that happens repeatedly.

Something to keep in mind...there's nothing wrong with driving short of a fairway and playing from the rough.  I'm talking about true forced carries over a hazard.

I've played at least two courses that had qualifiers this year, Classic Club in Palm Desert - @tristanhilton85's home course, played it with @mvmac and @DaveP043 - and La Costa.  Neither of those courses have any forced carries.  Classic does have a couple of holes where you can choose to carry a certain amount of a hazard to your advantage (like #8) , but nothing that it actually forced.

I think people are over-selling (or maybe over-buying? ;)) the forced carry thing.  IMO, they're not common.

Edited by Golfingdad
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Golfingdad said:

I think people are over-selling (or maybe over-buying? ;)) the forced carry thing.  IMO, they're not common.

My home course has marsh or a wide ravine running across 6 of the 9 holes, 4 of which are in front of the tee boxes (no real room/advantage laying up). Some of us get like 200 yards of carry on our drives and one of those 4 has about that much marsh.

Even on holes that don't require a good drive, playing from the tips can mean carrying water to a tight green or fairway with a long iron or wood off the tee instead of a mid or short iron. Not saying that's anything special for better players, only that it adds a little extra challenge to those of us less skilled when we know we have to hit our distances with those longer clubs.

All I'm saying is carrying those hazards isn't as much of a concern when playing from the forward or middle tees.

That said, looking over the other courses I play, you're right, most are not that bad.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Just to update you guys, the member guest tournament starts tomorrow and man they got the greens rolling fast. When I get back from my trip in 2 weeks I am going to get this round on the books so we can see what the true test is. 

Btw, here is a snapshot of my buddies scores. Granted, he hasn't hit a full 20 rounds yet, and he does pick up instead of taking an 8 or whatever he is allowed, so his index probably a bit lower than it should be. 

IMG_0059.PNG

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I still remember my first couple of rounds playing strokeplay from the backtees on my home course. Because I went down to under hcp 15 I had to play in cat1 group, before that I only played Stableford from the medal tees.

First couple of times 100+ scores as a hcp 14. I even got so fed up with this strokeplay, I picked up a couple of times. It took me two handfull of rounds to get used to it.

later I played as a single digit player twice a strokeplay tournament on a nice but to me unknown course and scored both times 103. This year I will play it for the third time, to break that record.

Strokeplay, no esc will get into his head. I would bet on it.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

I'd be curious for someone to take a stab at the actual forced carry distances on one of these courses (@Pretzel?), since it's the thing that a lot of people are harping on.  If it's just one hole with a 240-yard carry, I'll happily wedge it to the red tees, but that's not going to work as a strategy if this is something that happens repeatedly.

On the course I played there wasn't any sort of 240 yard forced carry over water that I can think of. Looking over the course I played on google maps the longest forced carry of the day was 205 yards on the 18th hole over a ravine. Even on that hole though, you could hit a half wedge to the front of the ladies tees and need only 135 to carry it to the fairway. 

That said, your mileage may vary depending on what course you played.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2228 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.