• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
boogielicious

Blackhawks v. Bruins

27 posts in this topic

"Old time hockey.  Eddy Shore." - Hanson Brothers.

Good to see two of the original teams in the finals.  Brings back memories of Bobby Orr and Bobby Hull.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Yea, and Phil Esposito, Stan Makita, Magnuson, etc. etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to be the first Stanley Cup Finals between two Original Six squads since 1979. Now that's old school.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

It's going to be the first Stanley Cup Finals between two Original Six squads since 1979. Now that's old school.

The Good Guys won that one!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Although I've lived in Texas for 34 years I grew up in Joliet IL and I'm still a Hawks fan.  Go Chicago!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Red Wings can't win it all, I'd like to see Chicago win.   Detroit had Chicago on the ropes and let them escape. but I believe Chicago is the best team playing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Its going to be a great series.  Both are great teams who like to hit and have great goaltending.  Im probably biased, being a Hawks fan but I see the Hawks taking this one.  IMO, the Bruins just dont have the talent to run with the Hawks.  The Bruins havent yet played a team that can score at will, plays great defense, hits you hard and has great goaltending.

The Pens were close but the Pens dont play defense and their stars didnt show up in that series.

I fully expect the series to go 6 or 7 games but if the Hawks show up and play their game, they should be able to get it done.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Its going to be a great series.  Both are great teams who like to hit and have great goaltending.  Im probably biased, being a Hawks fan but I see the Hawks taking this one.  IMO, the Bruins just dont have the talent to run with the Hawks.  The Bruins havent yet played a team that can score at will, plays great defense, hits you hard and has great goaltending.

The Pens were close but the Pens dont play defense and their stars didnt show up in that series.

I fully expect the series to go 6 or 7 games but if the Hawks show up and play their game, they should be able to get it done.

That is what the media said about Boston versus the Penguins.  Pitt averaged 4.2 goals per game before playing Boston.  Penguins were the odds on favorite to win the cup.  Their great offense was held to zero power play goals and two goals total in the series.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Its going to be a great series.  Both are great teams who like to hit and have great goaltending.  Im probably biased, being a Hawks fan but I see the Hawks taking this one.  IMO, the Bruins just dont have the talent to run with the Hawks.  The Bruins havent yet played a team that can score at will, plays great defense, hits you hard and has great goaltending.

The Pens were close but the Pens dont play defense and their stars didnt show up in that series.

The Pens were a team that could score at will. They play pretty darn good defense too - you know there was a stretch where they gave up 11 goals over 12 games? And "their stars didn't show up"… possibly because they were playing the Bruins? Crosby and Malkin were having a pretty good playoffs until Boston.

Now, the Pens also hit unlimited goal posts, and not once in the series could you say "the Pens got a lucky break there," but go ahead - overlook the Bruins all you want. It'll depend on which team shows up - the one that barely beat the Leafs or the one that beat the prohibitive favorite.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

As much as I despise the bruins, they are for real. Anyone who thinks they don't have the talent to shut down teams is not watching. Pittsburg's goaltending has been suspect IMHO. I think the HABS would have given Boston a much harder time than Pittsburg. Pittsburg should have played their game not the bruin's game, that was stupid.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

As much as I despise the bruins, they are for real. Anyone who thinks they don't have the talent to shut down teams is not watching. Pittsburg's goaltending has been suspect IMHO. I think the HABS would have given Boston a much harder time than Pittsburg. Pittsburg should have played their game not the bruin's game, that was stupid.

Oh, and one more thing... GO HAWKS!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

This will be a great matchup but Bruins in six (no bias being from Boston I assure you (; ). Think the Pens had stretches of decent defensive play but that's clearly not their game and with average at best goaltending the series loss is no shock. Of course no one up here was talking sweep but we had a quiet confidence.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

As much as I despise the bruins, they are for real. Anyone who thinks they don't have the talent to shut down teams is not watching.

Pittsburg's goaltending has been suspect IMHO.

I think the HABS would have given Boston a much harder time than Pittsburg.

Pittsburg should have played their game not the bruin's game, that was stupid.

The Habs, ha. Give me a break. Yeah, they'd have given Boston a harder time than the second leading points getter in the entire NHL. Right. A team that was 3-0 against them in the regular season.

Pittsburgh played their game. Got away from it a little bit in game #2 but that's because they pressed hard after game #1 where nothing went their way. The game could have easily been 3-0 Pittsburgh five minutes in. Buddies for the Sabres texted and said the same thing.

Pittsburgh's goaltending was not suspect. In game 2 their defense was suspect, and towards the end of game 1 because they had to push to try to score, but that was it. Pittsburgh's goaltending (Vokoun) and defense gave up 3 goals in the last 5 periods of hockey.

Not a single break went the Pens way. If Game 1 was 1-0 or 2-0 inside the first five minutes, the series likely plays out very, very differently. Rask had a save percentage of something like 0.985. NO TEAM can beat that with ANY offensive output of their own.

The question is: which Boston shows up? Which Chicago? Boston almost lost to freaking Toronto, and Chicago almost lost to Detroit. The NHL isn't like the NBA where the team with the stars always seem to advance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by iacas

The Habs, ha. Give me a break. Yeah, they'd have given Boston a harder time than the second leading points getter in the entire NHL. Right. A team that was 3-0 against them in the regular season.

Pittsburgh played their game. Got away from it a little bit in game #2 but that's because they pressed hard after game #1 where nothing went their way. The game could have easily been 3-0 Pittsburgh five minutes in. Buddies for the Sabres texted and said the same thing.

Pittsburgh's goaltending was not suspect. In game 2 their defense was suspect, and towards the end of game 1 because they had to push to try to score, but that was it. Pittsburgh's goaltending (Vokoun) and defense gave up 3 goals in the last 5 periods of hockey.

Not a single break went the Pens way. If Game 1 was 1-0 or 2-0 inside the first five minutes, the series likely plays out very, very differently. Rask had a save percentage of something like 0.985. NO TEAM can beat that with ANY offensive output of their own.

The question is: which Boston shows up? Which Chicago? Boston almost lost to freaking Toronto, and Chicago almost lost to Detroit. The NHL isn't like the NBA where the team with the stars always seem to advance.

That is why I like Hockey better than Basketball.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by iacas

The Habs, ha. Give me a break. Yeah, they'd have given Boston a harder time than the second leading points getter in the entire NHL. Right. A team that was 3-0 against them in the regular season.

Pittsburgh played their game. Got away from it a little bit in game #2 but that's because they pressed hard after game #1 where nothing went their way. The game could have easily been 3-0 Pittsburgh five minutes in. Buddies for the Sabres texted and said the same thing.

Pittsburgh's goaltending was not suspect. In game 2 their defense was suspect, and towards the end of game 1 because they had to push to try to score, but that was it. Pittsburgh's goaltending (Vokoun) and defense gave up 3 goals in the last 5 periods of hockey.

Not a single break went the Pens way. If Game 1 was 1-0 or 2-0 inside the first five minutes, the series likely plays out very, very differently. Rask had a save percentage of something like 0.985. NO TEAM can beat that with ANY offensive output of their own.

The question is: which Boston shows up? Which Chicago? Boston almost lost to freaking Toronto, and Chicago almost lost to Detroit. The NHL isn't like the NBA where the team with the stars always seem to advance.

Habs won 3 out of 4 matchs vs Boston this season, and yes, I do believe the HABS would've been a better match-up for the Bruins. The HABS are a little more experienced at NOT playing the bruin's game, we've learned the HARD way, lol, you beat the Bruin's with speed, frustrate their D and let them start taking the bad penalties. The Laffs almost pulled it off but their D is a joke.

Regular season stats don't necessarily transfer over to playoff performance, Boston's a good example of that right now.

Agree that Pittsburg didn't have a single bounce go their way.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

As someone is as fair-weather a fan of hockey and the Bruins as one can be and who doesn't claim to know anything about the sport, I'm just enjoying the entertaining games. Especially since I can't stand the Heat or Spurs.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by boogielicious

That is why I like Hockey better than Basketball.

I can't stand basketball. I don't even care to watch it in person let alone on TV.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by iacas

I can't stand basketball. I don't even care to watch it in person let alone on TV.

I used to like basketball but kinda grew out of it. After watching more baseball, football (and futbol), and hockey, I feel each score in basketball is so watered down. I now like watching sports where scoring is more difficult and one goal (or run) means a whole lot more than repeatedly shooting a ball through a hoop throughout the game.

I feel like it's the same story every season for the SJ Sharks. They get to the semis and then done. Very surprised to the the Blackhawks play really well against the Kings, especially with how goal stingy they are at home. Not a fan of either the team in the finals, but I'll put my money on the Blackhawks to win.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • New GolfNow layout is Awful
      Every customer is different, some know exactly what they want and expect you to execute their vision.  Others want more consultation and input from the designers as to what others are doing or what trends are on the rise.  Another factor is maintenance, how much time is required to keep the site updated, can the business maintain the site on their own or must that be outsourced, etc. There are numerous reasons why a business would redesign their site, such as; The business has undergone some fundamental changes that they want reflected in a new website The cost of maintaining the current site is too high The provider of their data has changed the feeds or discontinued certain elements of the data. Users have complained about how the site works The site is outdated or dependent on outdated technology or servers. They want a site that is "responsive" meaning the same site works on desktop, tablet and smart phones. I've never done work for a business that said they want to make their site worse, less user friendly, less functional or more frustrating for their customers to use.  My guess is that given the popularity of sites like GolfNow, that some standards were created for how the data would be distributed and updated to the GolfNow like websites from the different courses to make it easier for them all to get the data (the same thing happened to the airline industry).  The change to the backend likely warranted the changing of the front end as well. In some cases compromises must be made.  I've redesigned sites that were written in HTML, PHP and jQuery which are not easy for end users to maintain and update themselves.  The client wanted a responsive site that they could maintain easily on their own.  I suggested we develop the new site using Joomla, Drupel or WordPress as those platforms provided them with everything they requested.  They ultimately ended up with a WordPress site that was responsive and very functional but because of the platform certain nuances of the old site were lost. Users initially complained but we worked out some issues and over time they appreciated the more frequent updates and ability to easily view the site on their iPads and cell phones.  Website redesign like life is full of compromises.
    • Shorts On the PGA Tour (Updated 2013, 2016)
      I don't think the PGA Tour's stance on this has only to do with "tradition." Ultimately the PGA Tour is a member-run organization. If they strongly wished for shorts, they'd vote to allow it. That they've not done so speaks volumes, IMO.
    • Donald Trump for president?
      I heard something on the radio along the lines of New Hampshire having "super delegates" that will vote for Clinton regardless of yesterday's vote.  As far as Trump goes, my bottom line  is that he simply is not electable. Moderates, women and minorities aren't going to vote for that guy.    
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Just to clarify, I consider myself a committed Trump supporter, I like him. I am not a conservative in the traditional sense. Like anyone, I don't agree with every position that my candidate stands for, I do, however, agree on his main points re: immigration. 
    • Putting downhill vs uphill (2x distance of downhill length) poll
      Yep.  The first hole at TPC looks like they buried an elephant.  I lost a playing partner on that green. The course in the above posts I believe is The Bayou Club.  Checking tonight.  Not sure the hole number yet, but the green is next to the road.  If that's the course, I'll work out the hole number.  Their scorecards don't show hole layout, so I'll have to walk through the holes on the card. BTW, there is (or was) a hole at the Corry Pa muni (North Hills) that could have a 225 foot putt.  That's over 70 yards!  They don't make like that any more! Plus, the Links of Lake Bernadette has a shared green.  Haven't played there in a while, but as I recall the green was "U" shaped with bushes in the "U".  Had to putt to the bottom of the "U", then back on the other side.  Need to Google that later. St Andrews has shared greens but I don't recall any being like that.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries