• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iacas

Official 2013 British Open at Muirfield Discussion Thread

380 posts in this topic

http://www.theopen.com/History/OpenVenues/Muirfield.aspx

Opens: 1892 , 1896 , 1901 , 1906 , 1912 , 1929 , 1935 , 1948 , 1959 , 1966 , 1972 , 1980 , 1987 , 1992 , 2002 , 2013
Location: Gullane, East Lothian, Scotland

The Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers — as the golf club at Muirfield is properly known — is one of the oldest golf clubs in the world, and the source of the earliest written rules of golf, which date back to 1744. Yet the club has only been based at Muirfield comparatively recently: it was in 1891 that the current course was opened and the club moved from its previous home at the links in nearby Musselburgh. Just a year later, in 1892, Muirfield hosted the first of its fifteen Open Championships, which was won by Harold Hilton, one of only three amateurs to have lifted the Claret Jug.

The course is renowned amongst golfers as being perhaps the fairest test of all the Open venues, with few of the quirky bounces and hidden danger that links courses often contain. Two circuits of nine rotate in opposite directions, the back nine looping inside the front nine, ensuring that the golfer is never faced with the same wind direction on two consecutive holes. As Jack Nicklaus once put it, “What you see is what you get.”

Whether the honesty of the layout has had anything to do with it or not, the fact remains that Muirfield has an astonishing record of identifying the greatest golfers of the age, with a roll of honour which reads like a Who’s Who of golf over the last century, with winners including Els, Faldo, Watson, Nicklaus, Player, Hagen and Vardon.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Muirfield has hosted the Open Championship fifteen times, and has crowned thirteen champions. Eleven of Muirfield's champions would lift the Claret Jug more than once in their careers, and only Alf Perry in 1935 could not be considered an all-time great. This course has inarguably the greatest roll call of winners of any venue in golf history, and I suspect that its reputation will continue this year. This is as good of a place as any for Tiger Woods to win his first major in five years, and for once, I will predict that he'll do it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve Stricker sitting this one out to celebrate his wedding anniversary.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by BostonBrew

Steve Stricker sitting this one out to celebrate his wedding anniversary.

Usually, I criticize people who don't to make a trip overseas, but I don't really blame him in this case. Steve wasn't going to win this tournament; his last realistic chance to get a major is next month at Oak Hill. He should do whatever he feels will best prepare him for the PGA, and if that means skipping the Moline-to-Edinburgh flight, so be it.

(Note: I grew up in western Illinois. I know the Moline airport well: I flew into there just last month. That flight is not part of the airport's regular service.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing better than waking up early in the morning to watch the coverage here in California... well, other than playing of course ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be very easy for me to decide which group to follow the first two days. Especially since they are one of the few teeing off once I am awake Thursday.

I typically follow Tiger any way...but the rest of his group is of special interest to me for this tournament.

From the prediction thread...

Originally Posted by Lash

Graeme McDowell   -6

Louis Oosthuizen   -8

http://scores.theopen.com/TeeTimes.aspx

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's get this thing going! Love the Open Championship primarily because the shotmaking is so creative--there are so many different ways the winner can get it done. I also love Tom Watson, which I guess adds to my fondness of this tourney. A conspicuous absence of d-bags from the gallery doesn't hurt either.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Some interesting thoughts of Sir Nick, reported by the BBC this morning in a short article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/golf/23323492

Apparently, McIlroy's troubles stem from a "[lack of] focus," the remedy for which is concentration, in the form of "hit[ting] golf balls all day long, 9am-5pm," because, after all, one only has a "20 year window of opportunity," before "retiring in one's 40s."

Maybe McIlroy would benefit from some Pringle sweaters, too, with a diamond pattern on the front?

In all seriousness, I was a huge fan of Faldo in the 1980s and 1990s, and am looking forward to watching his swansong at Muirfield this week. He seems to have made it perfectly clear that these days he is a broadcaster just out to enjoy himself on a course that holds particular memories for him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's get this thing going! Love the Open Championship primarily because the shotmaking is so creative--there are so many different ways the winner can get it done. I also love Tom Watson, which I guess adds to my fondness of this tourney. A conspicuous absence of d-bags from the gallery doesn't hurt either.

I still haven't gotten over Watson's loss at Turnberry. Poor Stewart Cink, probably the only Open Champion in history to be despised for his win! .....and I couldn't agree more about the d-bag fans that run amok at so many tournaments.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I agree with you. I'll get up an hour to an hour and a half early brew some coffee and watch as much as I can before work.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by David in FL

I still haven't gotten over Watson's loss at Turnberry. Poor Stewart Cink, probably the only Open Champion in history to be despised for his win!

It was so heart-breaking. I don't think I've ever rooted so hard for a golfer than I did that day.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Winners at Muirfield:

Ernie Els

Nick Faldo (2)

Tom Watson

Lee Trevino

Jack Nicklaus

Gary Player

Henry Cotton

Walter Hagen

Ted Ray

James Braid (2)

Harry Vardon

There were a few other winners, but Muirfield must be a true Championship track.That list leads me to believe it is Tiger or Phil time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by phan52

Winners at Muirfield:

Ernie Els

Nick Faldo (2)

Tom Watson

Lee Trevino

Jack Nicklaus

Gary Player

Henry Cotton

Walter Hagen

Ted Ray

James Braid (2)

Harry Vardon

There were a few other winners, but Muirfield must be a true Championship track.That list leads me to believe it is Tiger or Phil time.

I believe everyone on that list save two won multiple the Open multiple times. However, it was the site of a first win for a few, so we could certainly see a good young player win it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I expect all of you to be in the chatroom at 1AM PST starting Thursday morning....

OR ELSE!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping for wind and weather.  That is what gives this championship special character.  Each Major should provide different challenges.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Tiger's not a good wind player, so if the winds are up he's got little chance.  If it's calm his chances are good, although I wouldn't pick him as the favorite.  Look for someone like a Graeme DeLaet or Matteo Manassero to win.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by boogielicious

I am hoping for wind and weather.  That is what gives this championship special character.  Each Major should provide different challenges.

Agreed. Weather can play such a huge part in links golf, and it's just not the same when it's sunny and calm. Plus I like to see the pros have to get creative.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by phan52

Winners at Muirfield:

Ernie Els

Nick Faldo (2)

Tom Watson

Lee Trevino

Jack Nicklaus

Gary Player

Henry Cotton

Walter Hagen

Ted Ray

James Braid (2)

Harry Vardon

Stannis Baratheon won at Muirfield! Wooo!

Originally Posted by bplewis24

I expect all of you to be in the chatroom at 1AM PST starting Thursday morning....

OR ELSE!

We'll also be doing a live chat with CoverItLive on Sunday. Sunday morning. LIVE. :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • 2016 Waste Management Phoenix Open Discussion
      Where they let Rickie take that drop from is some BS. He should've been further back.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      He said something like "even your typical PGA Tour player these days would have been a superstar in my day." His point was that there are a TON more talented players who are far better than the guys he played against. I don't think it's quite as exaggerated as you might, but I also really don't care to get into it too deeply. The strength of field is multiple times stronger today than in 1968. There weren't that many overseas players. Or players in the U.S., for that matter. That alone accounts for strength of field differences. Very few foreign players came over to play on the PGA Tour. The money wasn't that good, unless you were one of the top players. It wasn't like it is today, and travel was still expensive. There's a reason players back then had to carpool, share hotel rooms, etc. Just look at the basic numbers. Once you get past the top one, two, maybe three players… it's folly to suggest it was likely that the top 15 players out of 1.5 million players is at all on the same level as the top 15 players from 100 million golfers. It's possible but highly, highly, highly unlikely. Furthermore, golf has attracted more and better athletes recently, too, which wasn't anywhere near as true in the 1960s. I get it. People like to romanticize the past. But the games and athletes move on and get better. That's irrelevant. He could only beat who he played against, and the truth is, he didn't beat weaker competition more often than Tiger Woods except in majors, he didn't win more money titles, more scoring titles, more individual awards, have higher margins of victory, etc. than Tiger Woods, all against weaker (Nicklaus's) competition. Jack might have chosen football if he grew up today. He might have been a career Web.com Tour player. Or he might have won 23 majors because he was that good and the modern advancements would have helped him that much. We don't know. It's pointless to speculate, IMO. I think the depth of field still matters and mattered in the majors. Even in the Opens. Even in events including only the top 50 players, there's still a big gap in depth from the 60s to the 00s.
    • 2016 Waste Management Phoenix Open Discussion
      Come on guys, I'm missing the 1st quarter of the Super Bowl. That being said, I think Fowler just sent his chances to a watery grave.
    • The Films and Movies Thread
      A little late finding this - X-Men, Days of Future Past Quicksilver scene in realtime.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'd be curious to see just what Jack said. I think "10 or 15" having a chance to win for typical PGA Tour events in any era is an exaggeration of the relative weakness of the fields. Even before there was a depth of talent in the U.S. and the 'golf craze' here took off, the money drew top level golfers from overseas who were following the better money available here in tournaments and pro positions. I accept there's been a general strengthening of fields as the expansion in prize money and the total population of competitive golfers (see chart below) have forced top golfers to have more preparation and polish, but I don't think there's really ever been a lack of generally elite level competition on the PGA tour or at the Majors since about the 20's or 30's. I think if the effect of a tiny number of truly top level competitors taking on a bunch of club pro relative 'dubs' was as strong as you seem to think that most of the top multiple Major winners would be golfers from the early days of the tour. But to me it looks pretty balanced across eras. I'll see if I can work up some actual numbers. By the 1920s there were likely about 1.5 million golfers (in the U.S. alone), which is a pretty healthy base from which to draw potential 'top talent'. Total participation in golf from when Jack started to when Tiger started roughly tripled. As far as rating 'achievement' you play in the era you play with the existing disadvantages and advantages. IMO, if Jack had grown up as a contemporary of Tiger with the same advantages of technology and swing instruction / coaching and the same disadvantages of a greater number of potential competitors that they would both have risen to elite levels and would have regularly been battling for Amateur and Major Championships. I don't think the potential ranges of human abilities / talent really change much in a few generations. Would I consider Tiger more competitively vetted, yes. Do I think that means his talent level and achievements were automatically greater than Jack's? No. I could see valuing Tiger's win total more than Jack's (and certainly Snead's with some 'iffy' events in the total) because of the relative talent base depth, but not sure that transfers as readily to the performance in Majors, particularly the Opens. I think it would have been amazing and exciting to be able to see them compete at their peaks rather than a boring foregone conclusion.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries