Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TourSpoon

Tiger Woods bitten by the Curse of the Bimbino

40 posts in this topic

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Interesting and incendiary.

He has some good points, but I'm not sure he's cursed, or that karma has caught up to him. I think the field has caught up to him. I think other golfers have realized that he's not unbeatable.

I would hardly say that Woods shot himself out of the tournament on Saturday. He left a couple of strokes on the course, but who didn't. He and Phil shot the same score on Saturday. The simple fact of the matter is that Tiger has always been the best defensive golfer in the world (during his career at least), but he's never been a good offensive player on Sunday. Everyone's aware of the fact that he's never come from behind to win a major on Sunday.

Whitlock's article is full of hyperbole and entertaining to read, so it serves it's purpose. But I don't buy into him being curses. He may or may not catch Jack, but he won't retire with 14 majors.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Jason Whitlock? So how does Tiger's whoring relate to The Wire ?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So....cuz he was banging Perkins waitresses he can't make putts on a Sunday of a Major?

Interesting take...to put it nicely. Stupid take....to put it bluntly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he copied one of my posts.... as to karma.

Yes, Tiger apparently doesn't treat people well. He has lived in a bubble all his life. He has no idea....

Disagree with the author as to the problems with Tiger's game ...

I think it was the 2009 PGA, Shankgiving, Injuries, Divorce, New Swing... Now, it's his head ... this guy is the biggest whiner since my last ex-wife...

Tiger needs to practice those Hindu-Budhist virtues he extolls ... practice what he preaches, instead of blaming every over or under-hosed green...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I thought the "Curse of the Bimbino" is just classic. I am not endorsing the article, just making a comment about the name of the alleged curse. I also can appreciate the Prince reference.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I skimmed it ... looks like a really lame story - normally I like Jason Whitlock - though.  And it doesn't make any sense anyway.  The timeline doesn't work at all if you're going to pull the 'karma' card.  It would make sense if:

1.  Tiger Woods was a great family man.

2.  Simultaneously, Tiger Woods won lots of majors.

3.  Then, Tiger Woods decided to start messing around.

4.  Now Tiger Woods sucks at golf.

However, I believe the timeline is something more like:

1.  Tiger Woods won a lot of majors while SIMULTANEOUSLY messing around with waitresses and pornstars.

2.  He gets caught and then decides to start being a good family man.

3.  Now he sucks at golf.

One could write an article for Fox claiming that if Tiger wants to win more majors he needs to start screwing around again.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I skimmed it ... looks like a really lame story - normally I like Jason Whitlock - though.  And it doesn't make any sense anyway.  The timeline doesn't work at all if you're going to pull the 'karma' card.  It would make sense if:

1.  Tiger Woods was a great family man.

2.  Simultaneously, Tiger Woods won lots of majors.

3.  Then, Tiger Woods decided to start messing around.

4.  Now Tiger Woods sucks at golf.

However, I believe the timeline is something more like:

1.  Tiger Woods won a lot of majors while SIMULTANEOUSLY messing around with waitresses and pornstars.

2.  He gets caught and then decides to start being a good family man.

3.  Now he sucks at golf.

One could write an article for Fox claiming that if Tiger wants to win more majors he needs to start screwing around again.

Agree ...

He seems very uptight on the weekends.

"Lindsey!"

Wonder if she can fit into various outfits so Tiger does not feel so monogamous...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

One could write an article for Fox claiming that if Tiger wants to win more majors he needs to start screwing around again.

I think you have an interesting point. Not necessarily the screwing around part, but the "nice family man" attitude. He was really cutthroat before all the sh*t hit the fan. Now it seems like he's trying to say the right things and act like a nice guys. I think that's messing with his head. After his Sunday round he said "I'm very please with the way I'm playing, there's no doubt. I'm right there and I hit a ton of good shots this week, and the only thing that I would look back on this week is I just never got the speed after the first day, because it got progressively slower." Tiger from 2000 would never have said that. He would have said something along the lines of: "I hit some good shots, but it wasn't good enough. I'm going to keep working and keep improving. I came to win and wasn't able to do it."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was amazing to see how Mickelson reacted after closing out the Open on Sunday. Signing autographs, bumping fists with the fans and hugging his entire family who were waiting for him. Tiger would have not looked at anybody and just marched off to the scorers' tent. That's why you have Phil fans and Tiger haters. Like Arnold Palmer, Phil looks you in the eye, similes, and interacts with the crowd. I think Tiger still feels ashamed that everyone remembers his episodes with the bimbos while trying to cultivate the image of a family man. Not a happy camper.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting take...to put it nicely. Stupid take....to put it bluntly.

Im with you on this. Jason Whitlock is a 350lb idiot sometimes. Well he's 350lbs all the time and an idiot most of the time.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

I think you have an interesting point. Not necessarily the screwing around part, but the "nice family man" attitude. He was really cutthroat before all the sh*t hit the fan. Now it seems like he's trying to say the right things and act like a nice guys. I think that's messing with his head. After his Sunday round he said "I'm very please with the way I'm playing, there's no doubt. I'm right there and I hit a ton of good shots this week, and the only thing that I would look back on this week is I just never got the speed after the first day, because it got progressively slower." Tiger from 2000 would never have said that. He would have said something along the lines of: "I hit some good shots, but it wasn't good enough. I'm going to keep working and keep improving. I came to win and wasn't able to do it."

I have to disagree with the trying to act like a nice guy. He may be answering a few more questions but a nice guy would have congratulated Phil for the historic Open performance and would have thrown the fans a bone at his return to the Master's. He did neither, which is really what we expected, but he could have turned some more fans around (the ones that care about niceties) with some positive comments.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[QUOTE name="geauxforbroke" url="/t/68727/tiger-woods-bitten-by-the-curse-of-the-bimbino#post_873103"] I think you have an interesting point. Not necessarily the screwing around part, but the "nice family man" attitude. He was really cutthroat before all the sh*t hit the fan. Now it seems like he's trying to say the right things and act like a nice guys. I think that's messing with his head. After his Sunday round he said "I'm very please with the way I'm playing, there's no doubt. I'm right there and I hit a ton of good shots this week, and the only thing that I would look back on this week is I just never got the speed after the first day, because it got progressively slower." Tiger from 2000 would never have said that. He would have said something along the lines of: "I hit some good shots, but it wasn't good enough. I'm going to keep working and keep improving. I came to win and wasn't able to do it." [/QUOTE] I have to disagree with the trying to act like a nice guy. He may be answering a few more questions but a nice guy would have congratulated Phil for the historic Open performance and would have thrown the fans a bone at his return to the Master's. He did neither, which is really what we expected, but he could have turned some more fans around (the ones that care about niceties) with some positive comments.

I think you're right. Maybe instead of saying he's trying to be a nice guy, I should say he's trying not to be such as *******.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why can't people understand that not everyone is built the same.

  • Phil is very comfortable showing public displays of affection (PDA) towards his family and friends, Tiger apparently isn't, but that doesn't make him a bad guy.  He just has a different personality.
  • We know for a fact Tiger cheated on his wife, we have no idea if Phil ever cheated.  Ultimately unless you're a family member why do you care?
  • Everything Tiger does is placed under a microscope and blown out of proportion usually in a negative sense.  Phil usually gets the benefit of the doubt (unless he criticizes CA tax hikes).

I like both of these guys, but for different reasons.  I like that Phil appears to be the super nice guy that loves his family, is a fellow lefty and always has a smile on his face.  I like that Tiger is a super intense competitor that wants to win at all costs even if it means people don't like him.

As for the article, Whitlock joins Miceli, Chamblee and a bunch of others that bash Tiger to gain popularity or notoriety, which means they are bottom dwellers in their industry and desperate for attention.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Like just about everything else Jason Whitlock writes, it's opinionated uninformed tripe that makes him sounds like a complete idiot. But I'm sure he's used to that now...

He thinks he's clever and intelligent, when in all reality, he comes off as neither. He writes garbage to get a rise out of people, he's a blatant racist, and just a general scumbag writer. I've never read an article from him that didn't make me wanna punch him square in his fat ass face.

If you couldn't tell, I'm not his biggest fan...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger is not winning majors because of bad karma? Cool story bro.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

I think you're right. Maybe instead of saying he's trying to be a nice guy, I should say he's trying not to be such as *******.

Well said.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically, because Tiger cheated on his wife, karmic forces are extracting their pound of flesh from him in the form of...not winning majors?

Cuz he is winning tournaments. He is #1 in the world again. He's still filthy rich with a trophy girlfriend & two apparently good kids. He jets around from tournament to tournament on his Gulfstream.

But....karma is silent on that but not letting him win majors anymore.

Interesting. I didn't think it was that selective. You would think if "karma" was indeed in control here, he would be beating balls at the back of some range in the middle of nowhere trying to get his tour card back & pleading for sponsor's exemptions while his houses were being foreclosed upon.

Ergo, the conclusion I reach is twofold: Karma ain't that picky, and Tiger isn't winning majors because he simply isn't winning majors. It's not karma, it's golf. Fickle damn game.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      @iacas Not sure why you feel the need to try and make people feel stupid? What's the attitude all about?

      Because you seem to think that nobody else has any valid arguments, I felt compelled to contact a friend of mine and ask him about the subject. He has won twice on the MacKenzie Tour, 4 times on the Gateway Tour and played in the US Open in 2010 at Pebble Beach. I Facebooked him a few days ago and heard back from him today. He said that his Tour buddies of that calibre typically shoot in the mid 60's (or lower) if they play an "average" course for a Pro-Am or a sponsor's event or for a casual round. He added that he played a municipal course in Phoenix last week (he didn't say which one) and shot -8 without ever having seen the course before. And he was never able to make it through the final stage of Q-School so he self-admittedly doesn't have the skillset of the PGA guys. I still say the average Tour player would shoot in the low 60's at my course. Here's the scorecard of it, and Nick Taylor's scores from the 2006 Provincial Tournament.

        Nick Taylor   Round: 4 Position: 1 Score: -11 Strokes: 277 Tip: Click on a hole number to compare Nick’s score to the field. Hole 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Out 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 In Total Yards 363 381 374 191 496 406 524 197 401 3333 530 197 424 446 559 166 393 428 286 3429 6762 Handicap 16 4 14 18 10 2 12 8 6   11 15 1 5 7 13 9 3 17     Par 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 3 4 36 5 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 36 72 Round 1 5 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 34 4 3 4 4 5 3 3 3 5 34 68 Round 2 4 3 4 3 4 3 6 3 5 35 5 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 36 71 Round 3 4 4 3 2 5 4 4 3 4 33 4 3 3 4 6 3 4 4 4 35 68 Round 4 4 3 4 3 5 3 5 3 4 34 5 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 36 70 Key:   Eagle   Birdie   Bogey   Dbl Bogey
    • Standing on Tee Marker for Aiding a Swing
      However, the ruling given by the RBs that, when Preferred Lies are in operation, a player may place his ball on a stray tee already in the ground, may suggest that he make take advantage of the tee marker.  A tee being defined as a device. But a tee is designed for the specific purpose of raising the ball off the ground. The tee marker is not designed to provide a footstand.
    • Your worst golf bargain
      Golf can be an obsession in terms of equipment, so my worse bargain this past offseason was stock piling several boxes of Golf Balls.  I over did it ten fold...duh.  
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      @pumaAttack, please read what I've said, I've answered your questions and spent my free time trying to help you. I'll try to be as clear as I can. It's not just about hitting positions or angles, you have to consider the entire motion and how you arrived there. The golf swing is a dynamic movement. There is no "perfect" A4 or A6, etc. @iacas has already answered this but if you go shallow to steep (what you're doing) the sweetspot is going to want to kick out. You can make compensations so it looks ok but it's not an effective way to hit the ball. It's going to cost you contact control, face control and speed. If you can go steep to shallow you'll have a better chance of creating the most speed and best contact. A sweetspot kicking out (which yours is) leads to pulls, inconsistent contact and glancing blows. We've answered your questions but here is more detail (more detail than most students should get): Shallow to steep = Not Effective, the weight of the clubhead is going to want to be "thrown" out which will have the club working across the ball. It will also widen the arc so in order not to fat it you have to make compensations with your hands/body. Steep to shallow = Most Effective, potentially creates more speed, on downswing you can load into the ground and rotate while still swinging out (without trying to swing out). Easier to rotate and maintain your tilt because if the sweetspot is kicking out (widens the arc) you have to do something to make room. Very, very few good players swing across the ball on the downswing. Nobody is out to get you, I had no idea you were still on Evolvr, it would have been helpful to post something like "Here is my latest swing, here's what my Evolvr instructor said my priority is". If you did I would have never posted what I did. I was just trying to help. If @iacas offers his opinion, rather than take the defensive route, give him the benefit of the double and listen to what he's saying, he knows what he's talking about. Even after this post I get the feeling you'll want to say "But my A6 is perfect!", I'd recommend you take a look at these threads.    
    • What'd You Shoot Today?
      Shot 86 yesterday on my home course. A back 9 of 39 (+3) really helped, 2 birdies, 2 double bogies included in that back 9. Got my handicap last week as a 23, so to shoot that I'm super impressed
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (26 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (24 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (54 years old)
  • Blog Entries