• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Big C

Matt Kuchar allowed to repair an irregularity on the putting surface?

64 posts in this topic

Are any rules guys watching the Barclays? What is the precedent for this ruling on hole 8? My understanding was that spike marks or other "irregularities" could not be repaired until after completion of the hole.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I just saw that too. Spike marks are totally different than a putter mark, or ball mark. Which you can repair.

The guy even called in the rules comittee to verify. Not sure whats the problem?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't repair it himself, but got an official to repair it. A player can only fix ball marks on the green. When it comes to repairing damage to the course in general, and when officials should or should not do it, I don't know. [QUOTE] c. Repair of Hole Plugs, Ball Marks and Other Damage The player may repair an old hole plug or damage to the putting green caused by the impact of a ball, whether or not the player’s ball lies on the putting green. If a ball or ball-marker is accidentally moved in the process of the repair, the ball or ball-marker must be replaced. There is no penalty, provided the movement of the ball or ball-marker is directly attributable to the specific act of repairing an old hole plug or damage to the putting green caused by the impact of a ball. Otherwise, Rule 18 applies. Any other damage to the putting green must not be repaired if it might assist the player in his subsequent play of the hole.[/QUOTE]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I understand Kuchar did not repair the damage himself. My question is why would the official allow the repair at all? Given the ruling you cite, my impression was that this could not be done
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

This is a possibility:

16-1a/13

Line of Putt Damaged Accidentally by Opponent, Fellow-Competitor or Their Caddies

Q. An opponent, fellow-competitor or one of their caddies accidentally steps on and damages the player's line of putt. What is the ruling?

A. There is no penalty. Rule 1-2 is not applicable as the physical conditions were not altered with the intent of affecting the playing of the hole.

In equity (Rule 1-4 ), the player may have the line of putt restored to its original condition. The player is entitled to the lie and line of putt he had when his ball came to rest. The line of putt may be restored by anyone.

If it is not possible to restore the line of putt, the player would be justified in requesting the Committee to grant relief. If the damage is severe enough, the Committee may declare the area to be ground under repair, in which case the competitor may take relief under Rule 25-1b(iii) . (Revised)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for posting this, but my understanding is that this exception only applies when the green is accidentally damaged by a member of the player's group. I don't believe Gary Woodland caused the damage in question. If it is an unknown prior group, don't you have to play the course as you find it?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Honestly i hate the rule were you can't fix spike marks. I always thought it was stupid that you could fix ball marks, which a BALL (and outside object) caused, yet you can't fix a spike mark which a SHOE (outside object) caused.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Another possibility

16-1c/3

Old Hole Plug Sunk or Raised on Line of Putt

Q. A player's ball lies on the green. An old hole plug is sunk or raised on the player's line of putt. What relief is available to the player?

A. The player may attempt to raise or lower the plug to make it level with the surface of the putting green - Rule 16-1c . If this is impossible, he may discontinue play and request the Committee to raise or lower the plug. If the Committee cannot level the plug without unduly delaying play, the Committee should declare the plug to be ground under repair, in which case the player would be entitled to relief under Rule 25-1b(iii) .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do as well. I think it's the worst rule in golf, actually. But given that it is on the books, I am having trouble understanding the dispensation the rules official gave Kuchar today.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Rulesman thanks for the reply. I did not hear the entire discussion (I was watching the tournament on mute till that point), but the commentators did make reference to the fact that it appeared to be an indent from a prior players putter - it was not a hole plug, I don't believe.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Big C

Thank you for posting this, but my understanding is that this exception only applies when the green is accidentally damaged by a member of the player's group. I don't believe Gary Woodland caused the damage in question. If it is an unknown prior group, don't you have to play the course as you find it?

The Decision 16-1a/13 doesn't require that the damage to the putting green be caused by a member of the aggrieved player's group.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Decision 16-1a/13 doesn't require that the damage to the putting green be caused by a member of the aggrieved player's group.

I don't believe that is correct. The rule specifically references a line of putt, which cannot exist outside a players group.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The committee (which the rules official is part of) may repair any damage on the putting green which it sees fit to do.  Damage to the hole is another case where the committee or their representative should be called in to make the repair.  The only point in the rule being discussed is that the player is limited in what he is allowed to repair.  (By the way, I didn't see the incident in question as I was playing golf )

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The committee (which the rules official is part of) may repair any damage on the putting green which it sees fit to do.  Damage to the hole is another case where the committee or their representative should be called in to make the repair.  The only point in the rule being discussed is that the player is limited in what he is allowed to repair.  (By the way, I didn't see the incident in question as I was playing golf z5_smartass.gif )

Woo hooooo....... First round in how long?! Why haven't I seen it posted on "what did I shoot today" ? Talk to us! ;-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by David in FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

The committee (which the rules official is part of) may repair any damage on the putting green which it sees fit to do.  Damage to the hole is another case where the committee or their representative should be called in to make the repair.  The only point in the rule being discussed is that the player is limited in what he is allowed to repair.  (By the way, I didn't see the incident in question as I was playing golf

)

Woo hooooo.......

First round in how long?!

Why haven't I seen it posted on "what did I shoot today" ? Talk to us!

Actually 3rd round... but nothing to talk about.  I'll post more over there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Motley01

I just saw that too. Spike marks are totally different than a putter mark, or ball mark. Which you can repair.

The guy even called in the rules comittee to verify. Not sure whats the problem?

Not sure if you are saying you can fix a putter mark, but you can not.

Saw the telecast.  At first Slugger, (rules guy), was not going to give relief  Said something about not knowing how/where he would move the ball,  the ball was off the green I believe.  Kuchar protested and Slugger got on the radio.  Next thing we see, Slugger is repairing the green.  FWIW, Feherty  said afterwards he was told by Slugger it was determined that the damage was excessive so he repaired it.  I believe the comment was that it was more than a putter mark made by someone leaning on their club.  Looked like some one banged the green with a putter.

As a player you can not fix things like this on the green.  If you think it's excessive, you need an official.

Also, keep in mind that relief for interference for an abnormal ground condition for line of putt/play is not applicable if the ball is not on the green.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Also, keep in mind that relief for interference for an abnormal ground condition for line of putt/play is not applicable if the ball is not on the green.

And Kuchar was not on green.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Not sure if you are saying you can fix a putter mark, but you can not.

Saw the telecast.  At first Slugger, (rules guy), was not going to give relief  Said something about not knowing how/where he would move the ball,  the ball was off the green I believe.  Kuchar protested and Slugger got on the radio.  Next thing we see, Slugger is repairing the green.  FWIW, Feherty  said afterwards he was told by Slugger it was determined that the damage was excessive so he repaired it.  I believe the comment was that it was more than a putter mark made by someone leaning on their club.  Looked like some one banged the green with a putter.

As a player you can not fix things like this on the green.  If you think it's excessive, you need an official.

Also, keep in mind that relief for interference for an abnormal ground condition for line of putt/play is not applicable if the ball is not on the green.

So if the damage was excessive doesn't that make it abnormal?  The problem I had with the ruling was that he was off the green.  I don't know where in the rules it says that damage has to be excessive in order to be fixable.  I was also a little surprised when I looked to see exactly what the definition of putt was (wondering if it was still a putt if the ball is off the putting green).  I could not find a definition of putt.  It mattered because Decision 16-1a/15 talks about getting the committee to repair a green when there is a mushroom on the players line when he is putting, but it didn't specify whether the player was on the green or not.  Unlike Decision 16-1c/3, which specified that the player's ball was on the green.  So what makes a putt a putt?  The nature of the stroke or the position of the ball.  If the latter then wasn't the repair of the indentation some kind of line of sight relief, in effect?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries