• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
saevel25

Haney talks about Tiger again

47 posts in this topic

http://hotlinks.golf.com/2014/01/27/haney-on-tiger-he-has-gotten-too-big/?sct=hp2

Quote:
“My opinion is he did too much of that,” Haney said. “He does a lot of the gym stuff. I know you need to do some for golf, no doubt about it. You need to be in shape, you need to avoid injury, but my opinion is he really overdoes that. … I look at him now and a lot of guys mentioned on the telecast, he looks bigger this year. I think Peter Kostis mentioned that. He looks like he’s gained more muscle mass. When he was thinner and younger he was actually faster then.  The strength maybe helps you get out of the rough but I’d agree that he’s overdone it. But he loves to work out.”

I am calling BS! I think the problem with Tiger's ability to hit the long ball like he use to. Tiger has been hovering around 292-293 yards for the past 5 years or so. He maxed out one year at 311. Then he went and screwed up his knee. That is were his power issues are from. He can't rotate his hips as fast as he use to because it causes him to snap his front knee straight.

As for the MYTH that muscles call inflexibility, that is total BS. Weight lifting increases range of motion, not decreases it. Look at the Olympic Squat competition. Those guys get their butts near their heels when they squat. They all have huge legs, but a ton of flexibility. So weight lifting does not decrease flexibility.

Now does he work out too much compared to working on his golf game. Not sure. I watched an interesting video of him and Rory at their personal match they did last year. Their mutual friend and former NFL player was commentating the match. I think it was over in China. Well Tiger was talking to Rory about the off season , and about how he has to go to the gym to rehab his body, especially his back, and do a lot of injury prevention stuff.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Oh god, Haney actually backs Chamblee. Honestly if he actually did the research than his opinions would be completely 180. I don't know what he researching, but he's obviously wasting his time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why is Hank Haney talking so much right now? Is he promoting a new book or TV Show?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Haney chap has been having a pop at Sir Nick as well.

http://hotlinks.golf.com/2014/01/27/haney-on-faldo-he-does-next-to-no-research/

Cheeky sod.

I don't know if Haney knows what Sir Nick does at night or during the day interviews, but with all the deals and ownership, and changes Sir Nick has made with OEMs and guys like Edel, I'm thinking he's a very difficult guy ...

Did anyone notice how they announced the Edel deal with Sir Nick, and less than 6 months later, his name disappeared from the Edel website...

As to Haney, he needs to keep his name out there ... someone might have a product they want to promote and see his name.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

"Less time in the gym. He’s beat himself up, no doubt about it, but less time in the gym, more time on the putting green. There’s just no way he should three-putt five times. That’s just ridiculous. He’s Tiger Woods. That just can’t happen.”"

- Hank Haney

I think that is dead on. JMO.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Haneys point is tiger works out with weights too much, much more than he needs to....I tend to agree with him. My roommate in college was a wonderful athlete, basketball, golf, baseball, soccer and at the time a great ultimate frisbee player. He started lifting and he got in great shape, then he continued lifting and more and more. In baseball he was short stop as a result of his defined physique he lost all touch of throwing to first, agility to find the ball in his glove and I believe he lost a step. Some of the other sports he just lost that fast twitch and fluid movement. So yeah Haney could be right, who am I to say otherwise, he had first hand knowledge of his training and impact if any.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speed is pretty much genetic. People can only train so much fast twitch muscle fiber, so there is a limit there. I agree he could have worked out enough the wrong way to the point he did loose a step. Look at Rory. He went from slightly chubby to ripped, and he gained massive distance on his drives. He got with a guy who knew his stuff. Found out he was weak on his left side, so he did a ton of dumbbell stuff, and single arm, single leg exercises to build up that side of his body. So its doing things the right way more than just working out. In general though adding muscle does not mean you loose flexibility or inhibit golfing movements. Of course you have to add it the right way.

Yea I agree he could be right with how much time Tiger is spending on working out, not prioritizing his weaknesses in his golf game.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Speed is pretty much genetic. People can only train so much fast twitch muscle fiber, so there is a limit there. I agree he could have worked out enough the wrong way to the point he did loose a step. Look at Rory. He went from slightly chubby to ripped, and he gained massive distance on his drives. He got with a guy who knew his stuff. Found out he was weak on his left side, so he did a ton of dumbbell stuff, and single arm, single leg exercises to build up that side of his body. So its doing things the right way more than just working out. In general though adding muscle does not mean you loose flexibility or inhibit golfing movements. Of course you have to add it the right way.

Yea I agree he could be right with how much time Tiger is spending on working out, not prioritizing his weaknesses in his golf game.

That right on, and if its not done the right way then the body can be exposed to injury by over developed muscles, for example an over developed thigh and calf will but an under developed knee at risk. Its all about balance. I have to believe that Tiger is getting holistic training.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All sounds like pure speculation to me. If Tiger loses flexibility through weight lifting then it could affect his game, but I'm sure he has more sense, and access to the finest trainers, to let that happen. The point about time spent in the weight room as opposed to the putting green is just a shot since he no longer has any idea how much time Tiger actually spends on either. The one thing he said that I do agree with is that 5 3-putts is ridiculous for Tiger Woods. Makes me think his main problem is on the 6 inch course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haney is such a joke...he just seems like he is constantly seeking media attention. I still can't get over the book, it was completely unnecessary.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hasn't he more than used up his quota of 15 minutes of fame?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I worked out at the Y with a state champ weightlifter.  He was way strong, held the Iowa benchpress record but could hardly bend his body.  We went jogging around the gym and he was not at all comfortable.  His entire body, every joint,  seemed stiff and tight, hardly what is needed for golf. .  So i would not agree that lifting benefits flexibility.

As far as Haney, he is not unlike a journalist who needs to produce lines of text every day/week/month, whatever.  And i view all those types as 'parasites' since they feed off the experts. Haney, Chamblee, etc are little more than " Paparazzi of print".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought his book was a bloody good read.  Does he actually work with any PGA Tour players at the moment?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought his book was a bloody good read.  Does he actually work with any PGA Tour players at the moment?

My understanding from what I've read on the subject is that Haney has sworn off working with PGA professionals.

I worked out at the Y with a state champ weightlifter.  He was way strong, held the Iowa benchpress record but could hardly bend his body.  We went jogging around the gym and he was not at all comfortable.  His entire body, every joint,  seemed stiff and tight, hardly what is needed for golf. .  So i would not agree that lifting benefits flexibility.

As far as Haney, he is not unlike a journalist who needs to produce lines of text every day/week/month, whatever.  And i view all those types as 'parasites' since they feed off the experts. Haney, Chamblee, etc are little more than " Paparazzi of print".

I would never compare Haney to Chamblee (or anybody else in the golf media for that matter) in that regard. Haney had a six year personal relationship with Tiger Woods and has much more insight into what makes Tiger tick than just about anybody else in the golf world.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I worked out at the Y with a state champ weightlifter.  He was way strong, held the Iowa benchpress record but could hardly bend his body.  We went jogging around the gym and he was not at all comfortable.  His entire body, every joint,  seemed stiff and tight, hardly what is needed for golf. .  So i would not agree that lifting benefits flexibility.

As far as Haney, he is not unlike a journalist who needs to produce lines of text every day/week/month, whatever.  And i view all those types as 'parasites' since they feed off the experts. Haney, Chamblee, etc are little more than " Paparazzi of print".

Probably depends on the weightlifter, and what he was doing. The type of weight lifting is key. Its not true to say that weight lifting or getting bigger will inhibit movement. The body just doesn't react that way. Now that guy might do a lot of stuff that isn't full range of motion, who knows.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

As far as Haney, he is not unlike a journalist who needs to produce lines of text every day/week/month, whatever.  And i view all those types as 'parasites' since they feed off the experts. Haney, Chamblee, etc are little more than " Paparazzi of print".

You do know that Haney was a well-known golf instructor long before he worked with Woods, right? Apparently, Woods thought he was an "expert" on the golf swing for a number of years.  I would hardly call him a parasite. While I don't agree with some of his ideas, I sure wouldn't turn down a lesson from him.

Haney is such a joke...he just seems like he is constantly seeking media attention. I still can't get over the book, it was completely unnecessary.

From the OP link, he was being interviewed on Sirius. If you were famous enough to be asked to be interviewed, wouldn't you do it?  And I have to ask whether you in fact read his book. I though it was pretty good; not the Tiger-bashing like so many people tried to portray it to be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote: You do know that Haney was a well-known golf instructor long before he worked with Woods, right? Apparently, Woods thought he was an "expert" on the golf swing for a number of years.  I would hardly call him a parasite. While I don't agree with some of his ideas, I sure wouldn't turn down a lesson from him. From the OP link, he was being interviewed on Sirius. If you were famous enough to be asked to be interviewed, wouldn't you do it?  And I have to ask whether you in fact read his book. I though it was pretty good; not the Tiger-bashing like so many people tried to portray it to be.

Please understand that for one I absolutely have read the book. To be honest, I actually did think it was a good book. My issue with the book is why did he write it in the first place? I would think that upon being a players swing coach on the PGA Tour, there is a mutual understanding of respect and privacy (between both player and coach) which should be honored even after your employment ends. I am not saying the book was painfully personal in regards to Tigers life. However there were certainly some anecdotes which should not have been included (Tigers interest in armed services, the interactions between Tiger and his wife etc.). I am against the fact he wrote the book altogether but he could have at least been more tasteful about it. That is just my opinion and everyone is entitled to their own ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (coop6)
      It pretty much is, I'm not going to debate 5 degrees with you. As I've said repeatedly, Tiger's swing and a standard swing do not require rotation. On this shot he rotated 5 degrees, not much. If you want to play with rotation to closed enjoy. I prefer to keep the club square. 
    • Struggles of turning pro
      http://thesandtrap.com/blogs/ Normally you must be an Established Member to create a blog, but I've enabled this for you now.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      Completely bogus. The arms (forearms) rotate in every good golf swing. Here's an old thread that's appropriate for this discussion.   Also, I don't think I've ever really seen a golfer, throughout his backswing, rotate his forearms the opposite way. For short periods of time, maybe a few golfers "counter-rotate," but all end up rotating some. No, there won't be "arguments" over this, or there shouldn't be, because… like many things, this is pretty much a fact. There really doesn't need to be an argument or a discussion. It's a knowable, understandable thing. Hunter, like every other PGA Tour pro, rotates his forearms during the backswing. You're rotating your arms as you do this. It's subtle, but if you just pick the club up straight without rotating, you'll have the shaft resting against the top of your head. Look at where the back of your left hand points. Toward the target at setup, and then rotated to put the club on your right shoulder. Turn to the top when the club is on your face or the top of your head and the club will be leaning out over the target line (it'll be roughly parallel to your bend toward the ball, since it's basically just staying inline with your spine). Bending your right arm rotates your forearms. It pulls everything to the right (you can't bend your right arm straight in front of you without also bending your left arm). Then even more rotation is added after that. I agree that you don't want to be doing a lot of "things" on the downswing, but that's not how physics works. You can do all sorts of things on the backswing and not do them on the downswing. We have students who swing steep to steep, steep to shallow, shallow to steep, shallow to shallow, and all sorts of things. We have students who address the ball with a closed clubface, roll it way open, and then return it wide open, etc. The "equal and opposite" does not mean a delayed reaction - it means that if I push on something it will, right at that very moment, push back. If I fire rocket propulsion downward, the missile or space shuttle or whatever will move upward. You don't fire rockets and then, a week later, a different missile takes off as a "reaction." Furthermore, PGA Tour players have a variety of backswings. Ray Floyd was underneath, Rickie Fowler or Ryan Moore are steep or over the top on the backswing. The golfer who comes closest to the "square" or "no rotation" backswing is a guy who CAN'T really rotate his forearms: Tim Clark. And even Tim rotates some. But notice how far "out over his head" the clubhead is, despite the fact that he's well short of parallel on the backswing. It's so much more than that. I ask people in my lessons how much skill or raw natural talent it takes to set up properly. The correct answer: none. They just have to know how to do it. If golf was as simple as "set up properly and then turn" we'd all be a whole lot better than we are. Golfers can be set up the same and make very, very different backswings, and both can be successful. So Bubba is doing it wrong? And what does that have to do with the swing flaw of "rotating your forearms"? (Is overswinging a big problem? Absolutely. More, IMO, for what it tends to do to the trail elbow and the subsequent inability of the player to get the arms and hands down fast enough. I'll never really argue against overswinging, except when it's made as a blanket statement covering all golfers who go past parallel or something.) Also, you said (though it feels off topic since this is mostly about forearm rotation, n'est-ce pas?) "the more you have to wait for them to come down." That's not really true - you can MAKE them come down faster. Your arms aren't just limp things hanging from your shoulders that get dragged behind your hips and torso rotating. Because, biomechanically, making a swing with no forearm rotation would be ridiculous and resemble the golf swings of precisely no good players, ever. Tim Clark comes closest, and people don't even copy his swing, and if Tim Clark's forearms would rotate as most people's do, even Tim Clark would have a different golf swing. Modeling your golf swing on someone with a disability hardly seems like the prudent choice. My last piece of evidence, right here: This should drive the point home pretty significantly. Spoiler One last thing here. Consider the sagittal plane (in the spoiler above, just so it's not taking up a ton of space) and the back of the left hand (assuming a right-handed golfer). At address, they're parallel - the back of the left hand is parallel to the sagittal plane. Yet at the top of the backswing, what do we see? The sagittal plane (at the point of attachment of the arms, i.e. near the shoulders) is about 90° from where it started. It's inclined at about 35° or so, but otherwise just is still just a plane bisecting the sternum, neck, face, etc. What plane is the back of the left wrist on? Why, it's one that's about 90° to the sagittal plane. I've illustrated this here: In this illustration, I've drawn a little "cube" in the screen on the left. The green face of the cube is parallel to the sagittal plane (the edge of the plane is pointing "at the camera"). The blue side - perpendicular to the green side - is parallel to the back of the left hand. It too is pointing at the camera, but has rotated about 90°. That's why it's parallel to a perpendicular side of the cube. On the right, above, to make the back of Mike's left hand parallel the green face of the cube, he'd have to rotate his arms BACK about 90° to the red line. Now, then, @Golfer2223, you'd set a record as the first human being in history to present an argument as you have done and immediately recognize, given my response and a little thought on your part, that you want to take back your entire argument and completely change your position. In other words, I don't expect that to happen. A small part of me hopes it will some day, but I don't think today is going to be that day. But, realistically, that's what should happen. As I see it, you have no real ground to stand on here. Not biomechanically, not based on simple geometry, nothing. The arms rotate during the backswing in EVERY good player. Even in Tim Clark's backswing (or he'd truly have the club hanging out over his head. I will also say this, @Golfer2223: I appreciate your willingness to help, and to jump in, and to offer your thoughts on things. I hope you can take this rebuttal in the spirit in which it's intended - to help and to discuss. I don't know who you are (you should add more info to your profile), and I'm not responding just to be mean, but to help people learn, think critically, and better understand the golf swing. We encourage debate and discussion here, and that's all my response is to be taken as - more debate and discussion. Do I think I'm right? Yes. And I think I've backed up why. P.S. As someone noted above, often students need to feel like there's no rotation in the backswing. But that doesn't make it accurate.
    • Northern Michigan Courses
      I have been to Northern Michigan on several occasions. There are a lot of great golf courses but they are SPREAD OUT so keep driving distance in mind.   Arcadia Bluffs Forest Dunes True North Little Traverse Bay Belvedere Dunmaglas Black Lake Grand Traverse Resort (Nicklaus and Player Course) Lochenheath  Leelanau Boyne Hills Course   These are all EXCELLENT golf courses that are worth playing
    • Crandon/Key Biscayne or Biltmore
      Wow, tough choice! Key Biscayne or Crandon. Either one would be awesome.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries