Jump to content
IGNORED

"After three years of playing, you've reached you're maximum potential" is this true?


gildea909
Note: This thread is 5004 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I heard this once and it was from a quote by the usga. Do you guys think this is true? I've played for four years now in high school (started freshmen year) and am still getting better each year i think. I managed to shoot a 34 (-2) the other day on 9, and shot a 79 at legaues last year. Besides those two rounds, i shoot low 80's consistently, will i really not get any better than that?

Here i found it!



19 Second mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites


thats the biggest load of crap i've ever heard lol.

practice hard and you'll get better.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Agree that it is a big load, I've been playing over 20 years, granted only seriously and consistently for the past 4-5 years, but I am better now than I ever was, and continually improving.

Gus
---------------
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I heard this once and it was from a quote by the usga. Do you guys think this is true? I've played for four years now in high school (started freshmen year) and am still getting better each year i think. I managed to shoot a 34 (-2) the other day on 9, and shot a 79 at legaues last year. Besides those two rounds, i shoot low 80's consistently, will i really not get any better than that?

How often do you play? Have you taken lessons from an accredited professional? How much do you practice? How serious are you about the game? These are just a few questions which, depending on how you answer them, will provide a widely varying length of time for reaching one's potential. If I can think of these questions off the top of my head, then the USGA would have don'e so too. I would have to see that "quote" before I'll believe that it wasn't taken out of some context which either qualifies it or gives it an entirely different meaning. That just isn't the sort of thing that the USGA is in the habit of spouting off about.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Utter crap.

I'm guessing the statement was probably something about 'on average', for example..."On average, most players will improve rapidly over the first three years of consistent playing/practicing and then will see that learning curve slow afterwards."
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you put in the practice even the pros are getting better in different aspects of their games. Look at Bubba Watson and his scrambling around the greens this weekend at Whistling Straights

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The statement is false, there is no logic to support it whatsoever.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've been playing for 10 years on a pretty consistent basis and I played all the way through high school. I've gotten better and played better this year than any year in the past. I've dropped a good 9-10 strokes from my handicap this season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've read this before, but it was phrased in less absolute terms. It was merely an observation, based on USGA handicap data I think, that most golfers don't improve much after they've been playing for three years. Which is probably true, especially for casual golfers who don't hang out on Internet forums.

Brad Eisenhauer

In my bag:
Driver: Callaway Hyper X 10° | Fairway Wood: GigaGolf PowerMax GX920 3W (15°) | Hybrid: GigaGolf PowerMax GX920 3 (20°)
Irons: Mizuno MX-25 4-PW | Wedges: GigaGolf Tradition SGS Black 52°, 56°, 60° | Putter: GigaGolf CenterCut Classic SP3

Ball: Titleist ProV1x or Bridgestone B330S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not true for me. I am better in every aspect of the game at 54 then I was at 50, except pure power, and I was really awful at 36 after playing 3 years, It was a great day if I broke 95. More importantly look at Ben Hogan at the senior end who played his best golf after age 35. Even more ridiculous what about Tiger Woods at age 16 and age 23. I will say this if you have worked at it hard for three years you will have an idea of your potential, but that is all. I knew after 3 years my chances of playing at scratch were next to nil. If my health holds I still have a shot at single digits though.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Stupid statement, and a terrible video too.'The golfing world doesn't know about the one plane swing'.Riiiiiiiight.
A great shot is when you go for it and pull it off. A smart shot is when you don't have the guts to try it. ~ Phil Mickelson.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've read this before, but it was phrased in less absolute terms. It was merely an observation, based on USGA handicap data I think, that most golfers don't improve much after they've been playing for three years. Which is probably true, especially for casual golfers who don't hang out on Internet forums.

Bingo!! People's average score may be lower as they become more consistent, but their "potential" as in their lowest scores and index typically plateau early on.

Since people are using personal anecdotes - to this day, my lowest 18 hole rounds were shot in my 3rd and 4th years playing (late 1980s). 20 years later I'm a better player, but my "potential" is about the same.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since people are using personal anecdotes - to this day, my lowest 18 hole rounds were shot in my 3rd and 4th years playing (late 1980s). 20 years later I'm a better player, but my "potential" is about the same.

Interesting topic...

If your lowest rounds were 20 years ago, and you admit that your "potential" best rounds is the same as 20 years ago, why are you saying that you are a better player now? By what standards are you better now than 20 years ago, if your scores now aren't better than 20 years ago?

HiBore 10.5 driver
GT-500 3- and 5-woods
Bazooka JMax 4 Iron Wood
Big Bertha 2008 irons (4 and 5 i-brids, 6i-9i,PW)
Tom Watson 56 SW Two-Ball putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Interesting topic...

My lower average scores are lower and I've reduced my lost ball numbers. I'm probably playing tougher courses too. Back then, I had scores in the 95-110 range and scores in the 70s. Now they're mostly between 78 and 85. I haven't broken 78 in over 15 years, but in the 80s I shot several scores between 75 and 78.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My lower average scores are lower and I've reduced my lost ball numbers. I'm probably playing tougher courses too. Back then, I had scores in the 95-110 range and scores in the 70s. Now they're mostly between 78 and 85. I haven't broken 78 in over 15 years, but in the 80s I shot several scores between 75 and 78.

I would argue that all those facets of the game factor into potential, not just raw score. So, with that way of thinking, you reached your maximum potential when you started shooting the consistent scores and losing fewer golf balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well... I guess I'll just give up now and sell my clubs.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is a misrepresentation of a "fact".
I think what you will find is that after three years, a lot, if not most players don't get any better. That doesn't mean that they have reached their potential.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It feels that way to me, sometimes. I got to where i am now relatively quickly, and even though i feels like i am a better player than i was a few years ago, my scores on average are probably only 2 strokes lower. At the most. I still feel i have alot of room to improve to scratch or better, but progress comes more slowly now.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5004 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I’m not sure I agree. It’s just what the majority find more entertaining. Most people prefer women’s gymnastics over men in the Olympics. How much hype is there with the men’s compared to the women’s? I bet you can rattle off several big names in women’s gymnastics and only a handful of men. Women’s tennis …same thing. And sure enough, their purses are the same. However, WNBA, awful…LPGA, not near as much interest than PGA. Don’t think it’s really that complicated IMO.
    • Wordle 1,042 5/6* 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Dancing all around it….lip out city…
    • Hence your Avatar!😜 I drink a lot of water during the day if I’m playing or exercising. I get cramps otherwise.
    • If you walk up to a food/drink kiosk at Magic Kingdom and ask the person for a cup of "magic water" they will give you a small cup of Sprite for free. About 3 fingers worth. They don't sell alcohol at MK anymore so I go over to one of the courses while she hangs out there. 
    • This isn't some kind of natural fact. It's a lot more complicated than this implies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...