Jump to content
IGNORED

How good are hybrids, really?


Chipless
Note: This thread is 4303 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I am new to golf.  In the short time I have been around, I have noticed that most players seem to have at least one hybrid in their bag.  Some have two, three or even four.  I have even read some comments that go as far as to say that all today's players need are woods, hybrids and wedges.  Then yesterday I read this comment by Butch Harmon in Golf Digest magazine:

Quote:
If you're out there trying to hit a 3-iron, or even a 4, you're crazy.

I have never hit one yet, so I am wondering if hybrids are really that much better than long irons.  And if you could start over with a fresh new set of clubs, which irons would you replace with hybrids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hybrids allow you to get an iron with very little loft into the air very quickly with minimal effort.  I wouldn't directly agree with Butch's comment (I personally see the merit in a 3 or 4 iron), but they are a much better alternative to long irons for the vast majority of recreational golfers.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As far as "which would you replace...?"  Well, it depends on you.  I might consider replacing my 3-iron, though I currently carry one and hit it well enough.  Which long irons do you frequently mishit?  Do you routinely slice or fail to carry it the expected distance?  Do you want to hit it higher?  If you answered yes to any of those questions WRT your 2, 3, 4, or even 5 iron, then you might consider replacing them with a hybrid.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If you can find hybrids you hit well, they will typically be longer and easier to hit than long irons.  I've had trouble finding hybrids I hit as well or better than irons on a golf course.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I also 'got back into golf' in the last couple years.  I started with an Adams set that had 3,4, and 5 hybrids.  I later went back to a 4 and 5 iron and only carrying a 3 hybrid.  That set up works best for me.

I struggled with the hybrids early on.  I think I expected them to be "easy".  No long iron/club is easy to hit.

I recommend just trying them.  And to hit them 'like an iron'.  Hit 'down on them' like an iron (not sweeping like a fairway wood) with a smooth swing.   Don't try to hit them too hard.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I found my 3i easier to hit than the 4h I used to use and the distance off the fairway to be comparable.

Nowadays my irons stop at 4i but then hop up to my 3h before my 3w and driver.

Set up like you're hitting a long iron and you should be ok.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Gresh24

I also 'got back into golf' in the last couple years.  I started with an Adams set that had 3,4, and 5 hybrids.  I later went back to a 4 and 5 iron and only carrying a 3 hybrid.  That set up works best for me.

I struggled with the hybrids early on.  I think I expected them to be "easy".  No long iron/club is easy to hit.

I recommend just trying them.  And to hit them 'like an iron'.  Hit 'down on them' like an iron (not sweeping like a fairway wood) with a smooth swing.   Don't try to hit them too hard.


Good points. I think most hybrids I tried aren't stiff enough in the tip, making them just as likely to twist on slight mishits as an iron, if not more. I find contact to be muted so my swing and impact can start to drift to a bad place without really knowing it. This results in one shot going pretty straight and the next one that "feels" the same resulting in a snap hook. With an iron I seem to get more feedback on every shot and don't tend to go off the rails as quickly.

When I play blades I've found replacing long irons with Game Improvement long irons (2 and 3) works better, but I still tend to favour the blade 2 and 3 on windy days. Yeah, I often have 16 clubs in the bag during transport then have to do some visualization and mental math before deciding which pair makes it to the course. That alone might make hybrids the smarter choice.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have bought a bunch of hybrids ranging from 2 - 5 lofts.    I found through much trial and error, they are simply not the as easy to hit as advertised.    Mishits are magnified when compared to irons.     I still prefer my 4 iron, but once in a while, I carry a 4h.    Fairway woods seem to agree with me better - I recently picked up a 7 wood (loft is between a 3 & 4 hybrid) ... don't have much experience on it yet, but from what I see on the practice range, I think it's going to work out better for me than hybrids.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

At the amateur level, there's a huge variation in the quality and consistency of  swings. Many amateurs with slower swing speeds can't launch a long iron and find hybrids much easier to hit. Then as you get to the Pro level, where the swings are true and accurate, you will find many Pro's also using hybrids because they work for their needs. For example, Y.E. Yang clinched his win over  Tiger in the 2010 US Open with a beautiful hybrid shot to the green.

I guess that if you know how to hit a long iron well, you don't need to experiment with hybrids.

There does seem to be disagreement over how to hit hybrids. Some say you swing them down like irons. Others say you swing them like woods, It probably also matters what kind of hybrids  you own. Some are like fat irons on steroids. Others look like little woods.

Anyway, I think Harmon isn't wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm also a beginner, age 60 and just flirting with breaking 100.  After trying a few sets of clubs, and on advice both from my teacher (a local country club pro) and a couple of knowledgeable golf store guys (using a swing monitor) I got a set of Cleveland HB3's.  All the irons are hybrids, with the 3 being a full hybrid, gradually stepping down to the 9 which has just a bit of added hybrid-ness.  I'm very happy with them.  I find that the 4 has become my favorite club, and I suspect that if it was an iron instead of a hybrid, at my stage of development that would not be the case.  But I like all of them.

My opinion is, if you're a beginner, get some clubs that make it easier on you.  The hybrids will do that.  The game is hard enough to learn, even with the most forgiving gear.  In a few years, you may want something different, or you may not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have noticed a lot of it depends on your trajectory with your irons.  I learned to play in Oklahoma, where the wind is crazy, so I always learned to hit low, boring shots.  My average 7 iron is around 155 yards, but with a low, flat trajectory.  So I've always struggled with long irons and didn't play them much, I'd come out better just laying up short with a 6 iron if I had a long shot in.  I went with the Taylormade hybrids, which resemble more of a fairway wood about a year ago to try to get some mid-range shots.  They look like a fairway wood, so I play them like a fairway wood and it works well for me.  I hit nice high shots with them and right now I'm carrying a 4 and 5 hybrid, which are typically 175 and 185 yards respectively.  When I need longer than that, I have a 7 wood that is my 200 yard club.

I have friends that hit their irons very high, and they do better with their long irons.  But they're the same guys that are hitting their 4 irons 160 yards, where I'm hitting an easy 6 iron.  I like the setup I have right now and wouldn't even think about carrying a 3 or 4 iron anymore, I just hit the hybrids better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Those are some crazy distances.



Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I have noticed a lot of it depends on your trajectory with your irons.  I learned to play in Oklahoma, where the wind is crazy, so I always learned to hit low, boring shots.  My average 7 iron is around 155 yards, but with a low, flat trajectory.  So I've always struggled with long irons and didn't play them much, I'd come out better just laying up short with a 6 iron if I had a long shot in.  I went with the Taylormade hybrids, which resemble more of a fairway wood about a year ago to try to get some mid-range shots.  They look like a fairway wood, so I play them like a fairway wood and it works well for me.  I hit nice high shots with them and right now I'm carrying a 4 and 5 hybrid, which are typically 175 and 185 yards respectively.  When I need longer than that, I have a 7 wood that is my 200 yard club.

I have friends that hit their irons very high, and they do better with their long irons.  But they're the same guys that are hitting their 4 irons 160 yards, where I'm hitting an easy 6 iron.  I like the setup I have right now and wouldn't even think about carrying a 3 or 4 iron anymore, I just hit the hybrids better.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I have friends that hit their irons very high, and they do better with their long irons.  But they're the same guys that are hitting their 4 irons 160 yards, where I'm hitting an easy 6 iron.  I like the setup I have right now and wouldn't even think about carrying a 3 or 4 iron anymore, I just hit the hybrids better.



Hitting a 4 iron 160 is not 'doing better' with long irons...

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I borrowed a couple hybrids from my brother last season to give them a go and after a little practice I enjoyed hitting them.  My long irons are easily my least confident clubs and the hybrids have helped.  I do want to eventually replace them with irons if my skills increase enough but for a beginner I prefer them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I currently carry a 3H and a 5H.  The 3H I'm able to hit it 205 to 210 carry...  The 5H I'm hitting it 185 to 195 carry.  They are nice alternatives for me as my miss with my longer irons (3i/4i) are low hooks.  And with the hybrids... I can get the ball up in the air with a nice trajectory... Which is exactly what I needed to be able to fly more forced carry shots on long par 3's and some par 5's where I'm trying to reach it in 2.

IMG_0447.JPG

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

In my personal opinion, hybrids are easier to hit, but harder to control. I've got one hybrid in my bag, which flies a bit farther than my 4 iron. They usually launch higher, are very useful in a bad lie from the rough and if you really need some height. For the average amateur I would say they are a good investment simply because they are easier to hit. I don't use my hybrid a whole lot. I used them more earlier, before I was able to hit my long irons worth anything. Now that I feel confident with my irons, I prefer hitting them.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm thinking about taking out my 5 iron for a 27 degree hybrid. Know it's deeply unmanly but, to be honest, I'm finding myself hitting a lot of 180ish approaches right now with a choked-down 24 degree hybrid instead. If it's a critical shot -- over water, say -- I won't even think twice about ditching the iron because I just don't trust it the same way.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Chipless,

Your OP says "new to golf." IMHO, everyone except the most accomplished player should be using hybrids and carry no iron with a 4, 3, 2, or 1 on it. I would also make the long-iron exception for those who play in very high winds and are willing to trade a hybrid's forgiveness for a long iron's lower ball flight.

When you are ready to buy clubs, consider an integrated set that seamlessly adds hybrids into the set. As others have said on this thread, hybrids may not be easy to hit but they are easier than the irons they replace.

Adams makes great integrated sets (they may have invented the concept). You will see that Adams makes irons that appear to slowly meld into hybrids as the clubs get longer. The A&OS; set has a 7-hybrid. I also have heard good things about the slightly more "traditional" Mizuno JPX-800HD. The hybrids on the Mizuno set are hybrids of hybrids in that they are shorter and supposed to be even easier to hit than most hybrids. They don't even offer a 3 iron replacement, The hybrids replace the 4 and 5 iron. These integrated sets, targeted at beginner golfers, should tell you something about beginners using hybrids instead of long irons.

http://adamsgolf.com/products/irons/a7os.php

http://www.mizunousa.com/golf/products/mizuno-jpx-800hd-golf-irons

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4303 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...