Jump to content
IGNORED

How Do You Deal With Different Bunker Conditions?


Killa
Note: This thread is 1698 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I don’t expect the same lie, let alone a perfect or consistent lie if I’m in the middle of the fairway.  Why should a bunker be any better?

I simply deal with it as best I can.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, David in FL said:

I don’t expect the same lie, let alone a perfect or consistent lie if I’m in the middle of the fairway.  Why should a bunker be any better?

I simply deal with it as best I can.

It’s not about the lie. It’s also not about bad bunker conditions. I can deal with concrete bunkers, I can deal with fluffy bunkers. I can’t deal when I’m in a fluffy bunker on one hole, then a concrete in the next and then on the next hole one that looks and feels like concrete but plays like a fluffy one or vice versa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 minutes ago, Killa said:

It’s not about the lie. It’s also not about bad bunker conditions. I can deal with concrete bunkers, I can deal with fluffy bunkers. I can’t deal when I’m in a fluffy bunker on one hole, then a concrete in the next and then on the next hole one that looks and feels like concrete but plays like a fluffy one or vice versa. 

One fairway is firm, another wet.  One area of rough is long, another bare.  It’s all part of the game. 

At least as I see it. 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What bums me out is I used to be a good bunker player.  Probably still am but our bunkers used to be fine.  The thing is they fixed 2 of them by making them less than half the size they were and making them more of a pot bunker to save the sand from being washed out.  This could be done in half our bunkers.

 

Just the other day we were walking up #8 and I was pointing out to my friend Frank where the bottom edge of the bunker used to be.  It  is now 8-10 feet past that due to wash out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

28 minutes ago, Killa said:

It’s not about the lie. It’s also not about bad bunker conditions. I can deal with concrete bunkers, I can deal with fluffy bunkers. I can’t deal when I’m in a fluffy bunker on one hole, then a concrete in the next and then on the next hole one that looks and feels like concrete but plays like a fluffy one or vice versa. 

Conditions change from hole to hole, and course to course.

Golf has always been a game of adjustments during a round of play. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This year I went away from the Ping SW that came with my set. I bought a Vokey SM6 in 54*-08 M grind for hard pan bunkers and a 58*-12 in K grind for deep sand bunkers. It seems to have helped me, as I usually get out on my first try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 9/13/2019 at 4:36 PM, NavyDave said:

Bunkers are my nemesis, and firm sand is the worst of all.

 

Are you saying you would approach playing the ftim sand shots like you would from from the grass? I'm assuming a softer strike and let it pop out and roll on? These shots have always eluded me.

No actually the opposite - with firm sand you have to give it a good thump behind the ball so that the club won't bounce off the surface of the bunker.  Hitting it firm takes away a lot of distance control and the ball rolls more, so my expectations are lower.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Lots of sand - You have to be the most precise with your contact point. I almost feel like I want to pick the ball clean. 
Right amount of sand - You got more leeway. I play this like a normal pitch shot. I try to hit the sand about half an inch behind the ball. 
Little sand - I just assume the ball will come out a bit lower with more spin and make the adjustment on landing point. I tend to hit it like a normal bunker shot. 
 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 hours ago, gbogey said:

No actually the opposite - with firm sand you have to give it a good thump behind the ball so that the club won't bounce off the surface of the bunker.  Hitting it firm takes away a lot of distance control and the ball rolls more, so my expectations are lower.

Didn't  realise this. Thanks for the advice. I've got a round tomorrow and given the usual standard around South London I'm guessing most of the bunkers are going to be bare, stoney pits I'll probably have to give it a try! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 9/14/2019 at 5:43 PM, gbogey said:

No actually the opposite - with firm sand you have to give it a good thump behind the ball so that the club won't bounce off the surface of the bunker.  Hitting it firm takes away a lot of distance control and the ball rolls more, so my expectations are lower.

Interestingly, I find firm (not rock hard) sand to be much easier to control my distance from than very soft.  I also find it easier, not harder, to spin shots.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hit two greenside bunkers today and, to my surprise, they both had sand in them (not at L.A. City course evidently).  I hit one to 18' and the other to about 10'.  So maybe it's the lack of sand that's my issue.  OR maybe what I think is lack of sand in L.A. city is actually firm sand and that means I need to learn something or another, like @gbogey's technique from above. 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A few of the courses I play pretty regularly have some "bunkers" that are entirely dirt.  No sand anywhere in sight.  In those instances where it looks like the course has abandoned any upkeep on them, my group will usually just drop in the grass behind the bunker.  I imagine if courses wanted to save money, filling in bunkers they aren't going to maintain would be a good start? I get it's supposed to be a greenside hazard, but thick rough would probably give the same penalty without nearly the cost of upkeep.

In My Bag:
Driver: :cleveland:  Hi-Bore XLS
Irons: :cleveland:  CCi 3i-PW
Wedges: :nike:  VR V-Rev Cast Black-Satin
Putter: :ping:  IC 20-10A

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1698 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...