Jump to content
IGNORED

When Is It Time for a New Driver?


Note: This thread is 1507 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Go and look at any video of any professional tournament from 2013. 

Ask yourself what the players are lacking in their driving and how using the drivers that they had six years ago would disadvantage you.

6 hours ago, ForePlayAce said:

I agree, $500+ is a bit too much to afford. If you don't mind me asking, where do you get used clubs online? I've heard stories about counterfeit clubs and stuff like that, so if I do buy online I'd like to avoid that.

3ballsgolf is an excellent source for pre-owned clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


33 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

You are correct, in a way. If you hit the ball in the center of the sweet spot, and if the launch angle and path are going to be maxed out, the rules of golf only allow for a given COR (Coefficient of Restitution). Which means the ball speed can only be a given percentage of the club head speed. In theory, any driver made in the last 20 years will have the same COR for the center of the sweet spot. That is not true for the rest of the face.

The area where drivers HAVE improved over the last 20 years is for off-center hits. Divers have gotten better and better at delivering higher and higher COR for hits that are further and further from the center of the sweet spot. When somebody speaks of driver forgiveness, this is what they are referring to. 

In addition, some drivers are more "workable" than others. Which is basically the shape of the face will create some degree of "self-correcting". This is advantageous for some golfers, but a hinderance to other golfers. 

So, while a 19 year old driver will perform just as well or nearly as well (assuming the shaft fits the player's swing) as this year's model on hits from the very center of the face. The newer driver is likely to produce longer "average" drives because most of us use far more than just the center of the face. How much longer depends on a myriad of factors.

Oh, and most importantly … the new driver is shiny... Hmm.... I like shiny things. 

Yeah, to some degree, but I still think those forgiveness and workability are drastically overrated buzz words.  I do love my Rogue though now that you mention it haha.

 

1 hour ago, Bonvivant said:

Another point, sometimes a new club can make you want to practice with it more. You could probably get the results you want with some good hard practice, but may not want to practice that much with the old club.

I guess, but that's a vain way of looking at it.  I like to play golf and I like to play what works.  I have (mostly) a few years older clubs and they play well.  I don't agree that it is the "newness" of the club, but rather the performance and "likability" of the club.  Example, I game 2011 Nike VR TW forged irons.  We know why.  They're not new at all, but they perform really well and they look darn nice in my bag.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

I guess, but that's a vain way of looking at it.  I like to play golf and I like to play what works.  I have (mostly) a few years older clubs and they play well.  I don't agree that it is the "newness" of the club, but rather the performance and "likability" of the club.  Example, I game 2011 Nike VR TW forged irons.  We know why.  They're not new at all, but they perform really well and they look darn nice in my bag.  

When I say new, I mean new to the player. If someone isn't happy with their drives, it is easy to blame it on the club and not practice much with that club because of it. Just a mental thing of being bored/frustrated with performance, and sometimes a purchase of anything is enough to get you over the hump and back on the practice horse because you know you need to learn to hit something new (to you). That is kind of what happened with me this year. I decided I was going to get back into it, but had a hard time because I had the same clubs since I was fully grown (the last 14 years), and just needed a refresh to get me excited about it.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

When I say new, I mean new to the player. If someone isn't happy with their drives, it is easy to blame it on the club and not practice much with that club because of it. Just a mental thing of being bored/frustrated with performance, and sometimes a purchase of anything is enough to get you over the hump and back on the practice horse because you know you need to learn to hit something new (to you). That is kind of what happened with me this year. I decided I was going to get back into it, but had a hard time because I had the same clubs since I was fully grown (the last 14 years), and just needed a refresh to get me excited about it.

I understood what you meant.  I guess that works for some people.  Playing well and enjoying the game is good enough for me.  I think the "I need something shiny to make me excited to play golf" (for ME) is a silly reason and one that is typically found in players that don't play to a good standard or stick with the game very long.  Similarly, some people play golf purely for the social aspect of it.  I don't.  I enjoy the company of others, but I'm perfectly happy being alone--practicing and playing because I love the game.  I find intrinsic value in my own performance in playing golf (however mediocre it is haha). 

To me, shiny clubs is just a temporary release of euphoric consumerism that will eventually dissipate after you hit a few bad shots.  

(None of this is meant to implicate you; it's just my observation of my own friends.)  🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

I think the "I need something shiny to make me excited to play golf" (for ME) is a silly reason and one that is typically found in players that don't play to a good standard or stick with the game very long.  

I'm not exactly sure what you mean. But I think I get your point. I will say this; Some folks who love golf are just really into the equipment stuff and some just aren't.

I have both kinds of people included in my golf friends. One of them, hasn't changed a thing in his bag for more than 15 years. Another plays a new set of clubs nearly every year. Some of us like to sit around and chit chat about the new equipment coming out. We go to the golf shows. We take trips out to Golf Galaxy when the new stuff arrives just to hit them. We don't always buy new stuff, but man, we love testing the new stuff when it comes out. 

That's me. I go out and hit all the new clubs. I'm interested in the new tech. I find that sometimes the new tech is old recycled, and or renamed tech, but its interesting all the same. One of my buddies and I already have an appointment to go hit the new Cobra Speed Zone driver the day after it comes out. I'm already playing a Cobra F9, which is less than a year old and I love it. So, I'm unlikely to change. But you can bet I'll hit the new one. 

By the same token, the afore mentioned guy who hasn't changed clubs in over 15 years is always like. "Bah, new clubs aren't any better than the old ones, bah." He never joins us on our excursions to go test out the new stuff. … unless it's just to ridicule and mock. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I'm not exactly sure what you mean. But I think I get your point. I will say this; Some folks who love golf are just really into the equipment stuff and some just aren't.

I have both kinds of people included in my golf friends. One of them, hasn't changed a thing in his bag for more than 15 years. Another plays a new set of clubs nearly every year. Some of us like to sit around and chit chat about the new equipment coming out. We go to the golf shows. We take trips out to Golf Galaxy when the new stuff arrives just to hit them. We don't always buy new stuff, but man, we love testing the new stuff when it comes out. 

That's me. I go out and hit all the new clubs. I'm interested in the new tech. I find that sometimes the new tech is old recycled, and or renamed tech, but its interesting all the same. One of my buddies and I already have an appointment to go hit the new Cobra Speed Zone driver the day after it comes out. I'm already playing a Cobra F9, which is less than a year old and I love it. So, I'm unlikely to change. But you can bet I'll hit the new one. 

By the same token, the afore mentioned guy who hasn't changed clubs in over 15 years is always like. "Bah, new clubs aren't any better than the old ones, bah." He never joins us on our excursions to go test out the new stuff. … unless it's just to ridicule and mock. 

Yeah I get that too.  I have friends, like you, that like to hit everything.  I'm just really happy with my bag.  It took a while for me to even get a new driver.  But I liked the way the Rogue felt and I liked the ball speed results.  In the bag she went. 

Something has to be really measurably better than what I already have in order for me to buy it.  I'll test anything on my GC2, and it's fun, but I just really like my current setup.

I'm not completely an old fart--I've got a Rogue and a Gapr hybrid!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I liked the Rogue as well. I preferred the Rogue Sub Zero which I found to sit just a bit flatter. Where as the standard Rogue was more upright. 

  • Like 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No doubt modern clubs are better than ones made 10 to 15 years ago, but they are not that much better when hit out of the middle of the club face.  Where you see benefits is in off-centre hits.

I don't really see a need to purchase a new driver unless you are struggling and the specs don't suit you.

Ideally lessons and a session on the simulator will help a lot more than a new club, but that being said, check out the specs of your current club and change shaft/head/club/ball if it doesn't suit you.  Be aware that changing a golf ball can affect how you play.  Better/worse dispersion and length.

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Soft 500 golf ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, ncates00 said:

I understood what you meant.  I guess that works for some people.  Playing well and enjoying the game is good enough for me.  I think the "I need something shiny to make me excited to play golf" (for ME) is a silly reason and one that is typically found in players that don't play to a good standard or stick with the game very long.  Similarly, some people play golf purely for the social aspect of it.  I don't.  I enjoy the company of others, but I'm perfectly happy being alone--practicing and playing because I love the game.  I find intrinsic value in my own performance in playing golf (however mediocre it is haha). 

To me, shiny clubs is just a temporary release of euphoric consumerism that will eventually dissipate after you hit a few bad shots.  

(None of this is meant to implicate you; it's just my observation of my own friends.)  🙂 

I definitely see this too sometimes. My case was kind of extreme because the clubs I was playing with before this year were from the 60s. But a 20 year gap in tech (for OP) is significant enough to warrant a 100-200 dollar purchase, I think.

  • Like 1
  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 11/20/2019 at 4:56 PM, ForePlayAce said:

So my question is, do you guys think that it would be worth it for me to upgrade? I was thinking about seeing if the price for the TaylorMade M5 drops when they release their new 2020 driver.

Since you are asking... probably now... especially if you bought that driver new.

If you plan to keep your new driver for a number of years, do it right, research new and recent drivers, hit a lot of them, and get fit.  10 years from now the difference is negligible.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/21/2019 at 6:03 AM, ForePlayAce said:

I agree, $500+ is a bit too much to afford. If you don't mind me asking, where do you get used clubs online? I've heard stories about counterfeit clubs and stuff like that, so if I do buy online I'd like to avoid that.

I have gotten my used clubs at Callaway Pre-Owned. The clubs' condition are generally understated, they are authentic, have multiple shaft options, and are priced really well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

After the rotten season I've had, my driver is done like dinner.

Sure my swing sucks. It will suck with a new driver as well, but I'm not mentally prepared to deal with my old one for another season. Truthfully, I think the shaft flexes too much on the old one. If I spend the big money on a fitting, the guy should be able to tell me for sure. For all I know, maybe it's something entirely different.

Either way, I'm stocking up a fund to address the 1W situation for next year.

Edited by mcanadiens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to When Is It Time for a New Driver?

Hello,

I saw a serious test with old golf balls (1970 to 2000) and old drivers vs new one (2019). The conclusion is that new balls take less sidespin and are longer.

Regarding the drivers, the distance is the same (+/- 5yards) but the new drivers  gives  less effect on the balls.

So, if your driver is more than 10 years, a change won't give you a lot more distance, but tons of forgiveness and/or feeling. Some clubs are better than others  of course.

For example, if you like working the ball, take a Mizuno ST120, if you want to smash it like never and give you a chance to stay on the fairway, the Ping G400Max is your best choice.

If you want a good balance, the Epic Flash is worth a try. And if you are athletic, and like maximum feeling, give a try to the Cobra F9

Regarding only distance, all those drivers are playing in the same garden. Anyway to get the best of a club, the shaft must be considered seriously.

Sorry, Mizuno ST190 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 months later...
Note: This thread is 1507 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...