Jump to content
IGNORED

Arm Lock Putting - Ban or Continue to Allow?


iacas

Arm Lock Putting  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. If you were czar of the USGA and R&A, would you ban or continue to allow "Arm Lock" putting?

    • Continue to Allow
    • Find a Way to Ban


Recommended Posts

On 4/25/2021 at 9:44 AM, longiron205 said:

Simple fix. Just make a rule that when gripping any club, the hands must be in contact with one another and that the club cannot extend more than 3 inches beyond the two hands in contact with one another. 

Why? 

EX15tBEXQAoddSG.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I don't think Arm Lock is anywhere near as big of an advantage as people act like. I think it's also tougher to have a good sense or feel for things, especially as a righty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
On 4/20/2021 at 11:09 PM, iacas said:

I grip down on chip shots all the time.

Agree. It’s a must for me with chip shots. I usually press the club forward gripping much lower down the grip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Meh, I voted to allow it to continue, as I can't see how it provides an unfair advantage. To me it looks like you're taking something that should be so simple, natural and flowing and making it overly complicated and mechanical so it doesn't seem it makes putting easier. Then again, I've always been an arc putter with a conventional grip and think straight back straight through and nontraditional putting grips are for the birds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I voted to ban just to stir the pot. I won't defend either one although the "asshat" crowd make a valid point. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I voted to allow it to continue.  Personally I do not like how it looks but last I checked Golf is not a beauty contest.  Also, for those saying to limit the length or loft nothing in the rules dictate which club or loft to use for a particular shot,  if I want to use my 48” driver to hit a putt I should be allowed to.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...

Let me start by saying I'm not the greatest putter in the world. But I'm far from the worst. Anyway, Yesterday I popped into a PGA superstore. 

I'm not in the market for a new putter, but I was checking out the new Cobra 3D printed models, because I think the concept is interesting. So, me and the sales guy are chit-chatting and he starts in on the "Bryson Arm-lock putter". 

So, I test drove it. It SEEMS like a cool concept. I even like the SIK face idea. Seems to make sense to my feeble mind. 

Anyway, I hated it. After trying about 3 or 4 different adjustments mostly on the advice of the sales guy. I just couldn't make it work for me. 

So, I have no problem with it being legal, because truthfully, I don't think it is enough of an advantage. For every one thing it helps it seems to screw something up. It may help some, but I think there are as many disadvantages as there are advantages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it's ok. Arm locking looks "odd" and is less golf-like than a conventional style, but it is not as weird as the long putter, anchoring, broomstick style. And FWIW, it sure seems like some guys "soft anchor" against their shirt rather than pushing firmly into their chest, so there are always limits to what you can do with rules....

I've found there's a trade off in putting...lots of things we do to reduce variability also seem to reduce feel. I've tried arm lock style putting, and I guess that while it maybe reduces or eliminates the error of "flipping" the putter head through impact, it is at first anyway much harder to feel the putter head and therefore to precisely vary how hard you are swinging. It's like trying to write with the pencil held in the crook of your elbow versus in your hand. 

What bugs me about many of the rules issues in golf is that many seem motivated entirely on appearance. I'm pretty sure the reason they went after long putters was that a bunch of stuffy people at the USGA and R&A didn't like the look of someone winning their championship with a putting stroke that looked like they were sweeping the floor. It's the same as the angst over distance, where I'm pretty sure the main R&A motivation is to make sure The Old Course isn't made obsolete for championships. 

There's only so much you can do...it's a game, it should be fun, and we shouldn't take it too seriously. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
6 hours ago, Big Lex said:

What bugs me about many of the rules issues in golf is that many seem motivated entirely on appearance. I'm pretty sure the reason they went after long putters was that a bunch of stuffy people at the USGA and R&A didn't like the look of someone winning their championship with a putting stroke that looked like they were sweeping the floor.

That's not why. Not if you talk directly to the people, as I have at Rules seminars, etc. who made those calls.

It was legitimately about anchoring not being a true "swing" or a "stroke." It's not like belly putters or anchored putter people were winning everything. Nor were they even just putting really well, overall.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

I don't think it offers some great advantage.  I see it as an option some guys like and others don't.  In fact, only a small percentage of players use it which leads me to believe if it is so great and such an advantage then why doesn't everyone use it?  Many players try it and end up going back to what they did before.   Just look at that silly sidesaddle putting technique Bryson tried in the past. LOL!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
6 hours ago, Hardluckster said:

I don't really care one way or another, but to me it is Idiotic to consider limiting the length of the driver and still allow the extra long putter to be legal. 

Why?

Do people hit their putters too far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I’m sure the limit will remain just fine for a while. I believe Bryson tried to go long and ultimately couldn’t control it well enough to bring it to the course. I heard Rory tried it out too but had the same issue. Matt Wallace? I think he tried a 48-49 shaft and just couldn’t do it either. Not sure why Phil thinks it’s such a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, Hardluckster said:

I don't really care one way or another, but to me it is Idiotic to consider limiting the length of the driver and still allow the extra long putter to be legal. 

New rule. No putters over 29 inches.....give the short guys some sort of edge lol.

  • Funny 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, iacas said:

Why?

Do people hit their putters too far?

I do all the time. 

2 hours ago, Bonvivant said:

New rule. No putters over 29 inches.....give the short guys some sort of edge lol.

I'm pretty sure that's what the new drop rule was for. When you little guys drop it from your knee, you're basically placing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Well, at least you have the par-4s down!  I had a round a few weeks ago at my home course that would have been my second-ever no sixes (first was not at my home course)... played the par-5s in -1 (all pars and a birdie), but two sixes on par-4s did me in for the challenge.  Thankfully I have the badge from two years ago or so, but it'll be nice to have a few more rounds that fit this. 
    • Day 206.  Stop me if you've heard this one before.  15 minutes after work of 6-iron shots (about a half dozen total balls this time).  Same focus:  setup, backswing pace and length.
    • Day 52: COVID-19 day 6/7 short game drills. After that, did a few minutes of rehearsals for my priority piece. Lesson coming up at the end of this week to see where I have gone wrong with this one.
    • Agreed. You always seem to have a brain-fart hole where you even just make bogey on a par-five and you’re toast. I usually am able to do it about 1 in 4 rounds, and it’s usually a bogey on a par-five that does me in. (Or the occasional brain-fart 6 on a par-3)
    • This winter I have access to a simulator that is being left with me so I am planning to start working through a few other issues. Nice time to do it when you have 6 months of winter!
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. goofi22
      goofi22
      (43 years old)
    2. HackardLaw
      HackardLaw
      (38 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...