Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Do You Pull the Flag?


Note: This thread is 1416 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Pull The Flag?  

33 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Pull The Flag Or Not?

    • Yes
      1
    • No
      15
    • Sometimes
      17


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I leave it in since there is a good chance when pulling it after making the putt I can pop the ball out.

Edited by KMP
Clarity

Posted

Uphill putts, its always pulled so the back of the hole can be a backstop. Downhill, it's seldom pulled.


  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, Esox said:

Uphill putts, its always pulled so the back of the hole can be a backstop. Downhill, it's seldom pulled.

Uphill the hole can act as a backstop (the high side of the hole is the back side), and downhill the far side of the hole is lower, so you'd want the flagstick to help you there. Plus a ball at the same speed will roll out much farther downhill than uphill.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, iacas said:

Uphill the hole can act as a backstop (the high side of the hole is the back side), and downhill the far side of the hole is lower, so you'd want the flagstick to help you there. Plus a ball at the same speed will roll out much farther downhill than uphill.

Isn't that simply a reiteration of my post you quoted?


  • Administrator
Posted
17 minutes ago, Esox said:

Isn't that simply a reiteration of my post you quoted?

With a bit more detail for others, yeah.

Bear in mind, too, that you're talking about maybe a 1-2% slope, which is only 0.085" higher or lower. So…

In reality, it makes little sense to differ your strategy by whether the putt is uphill or downhill for "backstopping" reasons.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Personally, with the flagstick in, I dislike the pick the ball out of the hole technique of two fingers or the finger and the thumb routine.  I prefer to just reach in the hole and use all my fingers and thumb to fetch the ball, with no flagstick getting in the way.

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Posted
36 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Personally, with the flagstick in, I dislike the pick the ball out of the hole technique of two fingers or the finger and the thumb routine.  I prefer to just reach in the hole and use all my fingers and thumb to fetch the ball, with no flagstick getting in the way.

I forgot to mention this is from my new book, "The Minutiae of Ball Retrieval".  A quick read of 191 pages.  

  • Funny 1

  • Moderator
Posted
22 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

I forgot to mention this is from my new book, "The Minutiae of Ball Retrieval".  A quick read of 191 pages.  

I thought 191 pages would be titled, “My Putters.” 😉

  • Funny 1

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, phillyk said:

I thought 191 pages would be titled, “My Putters.” 😉

😀    That would be less than 8 pages per putter.

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Posted

I leave it in for long putts, like 25 feet plus. On the rest I just don't care, unless the pin is leaning towards me. Have to recognize that is nicer in the eye to hole a 6 footer with the flag out, also the sound of the bottom of the hole is a lot better than the sound of the ball hitting the flag and going in. 

Besides that.. having decent speed control, I've hardly remember a putt from long distance that I hit it way pass the hole and got lucky hitting the pin. I leave it in because I have a better reference for distance control. 

Funny enough, the other day a guy asked me to tend the flag for him. Boy it was awkward, and felt old. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 2/21/2022 at 6:21 PM, mdl said:

I switched to leaving it in the moment the rule changed. Definite pandemic silver lining for me that it's shifted tons of golfers who probably would've kept pulling it into pin-in players!

I agree.  I too imagine the pandemic helped quicken the crossover of many a player who might've preferred to keep pulling their flags.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I leave the pin in because it gives me 5 definitive targets when putting. 

Left lip, left edge of flagstick, center of flagstick, right edge of flagstick, and right lip. It really helps me focus on entry point. 


Posted

I leave it in on longer putts and inside of 10 feet or so I pull it out.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1416 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.