Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Slow Play on the Cactus Tour


Note: This thread is 1210 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

EX-CRU-CI-A-TING

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
53 minutes ago, iacas said:

EX-CRU-CI-A-TING

That’s horrific 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

EX-CRU-CI-A-TING

Wow, it really seems like this should have been addressed long before she got to this point. I assume she has a swing coach. Or has had a swing coach or a friend with which she has played. Somebody should have told her this isn't acceptable before she got this far. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Wow, it really seems like this should have been addressed long before she got to this point. I assume she has a swing coach. Or has had a swing coach or a friend with which she has played. Somebody should have told her this isn't acceptable before she got this far. 

I’m generalizing but women in particular are often reluctant to say anything.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I read somewhere (maybe within the Tweet responses) that she knows she is slow and just doesn't care. Allegedly she has been put on the clock by the 2nd hole and they frequently try to send her out last, and she asks how much her fine will be as she turns in her scorecard.

War Eagle!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Easy to fix. As in many sports trying to address various issues. start in the lower tiers.

A shot clock that begins in the Junior Ranks. AJGA, High School, then Collegiate, etc... Get a warning when "on the clock". After that- First offense in a tournament- 1 stroke. 2nd- 2 strokes, 3rd- DQ.

 


  • Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I assume she has a swing coach.

I don't know that swing coaches, in general, care much about pace of play.  If a pre-shot routine helps the player his better shots, then use it and hit better shots.  If an additional step to the routine will help more, use that additional step.  The player's "job" is to shoot the best score she can, that's her primary motivation.  She's only going to speed up if she think's she'll lose strokes.  Most Pace of Play policies make it pretty dang difficult to penalize anyone.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I don't know that swing coaches, in general, care much about pace of play.  If a pre-shot routine helps the player his better shots, then use it and hit better shots.  If an additional step to the routine will help more, use that additional step.  The player's "job" is to shoot the best score she can, that's her primary motivation.  She's only going to speed up if she think's she'll lose strokes.  Most Pace of Play policies make it pretty dang difficult to penalize anyone.

To a large degree, I think you are correct, Dave.

But I would think any swing coach worth his/her salt would upon evaluating your pre-shot routine suggest making it so that you aren't penalized for slow play. 

I remember very early in my golf life having a swing coach tell me that if you want to stand behind the ball and pick a line, fine. If you want to take a practice swing or two, fine. But you don't take a practice swing or two and then stand behind the ball only to take more practice swings after standing behind the ball. I'll bet a dachshunds to donuts that the first two practice swings add no benefit if you take them and then go stand behind the ball and then go do more practice swings after standing behind the ball. 

13 hours ago, iacas said:

I’m generalizing but women in particular are often reluctant to say anything.

You are probably right. I had a buddy tell me years ago that my putting pre-shot routine was too long. I appreciated his comments and made changes to where now I think I'm one of the faster players on the green. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

63831B10-3B86-4E88-97C7-3846C948A19E.gif

I use that on my wife and she says "That ship has already sailed!"

  • Funny 2

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yikes! 1:15 to hit. I have timed a few players I consider slow, and it always amazes me how loooooong 30 seconds seems.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Hey, that's nothing! I once played with a player that took 1 minute and 40 seconds on average. I timed him on several holes for several kinds of shots (driver, approach, short game and even putting), so I had data to back up my talk with him.

I then told him he was slow because this and that, showed him the the 40 seconds rule in the current rules (5.6), and gave him his time. He said, Ok that may be a "bit" slow, and he indeed sped up for the rest of the round, taking only 50 seconds on average. 🤦‍♂️. Happy to see the improvement, but not happy enough to want to ever play with him again, lol

ETA: Never mind that immediate memory does not last more than 8 seconds and it's way longer than that between practice swings (plural) and the actual hit, both with this video and the guy I was talking about. 

Edited by sjduffers
  • Thumbs Up 1

Philippe

:callaway: Maverick Driver, 3W, 5W Big Bertha 
:mizuno: JPX 900 Forged 4-GW
:mizuno:  T7 55-09 and 60-10 forged wedges,
:odyssey: #7 putter (Slim 3.0 grip)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 hours ago, sjduffers said:

...I then told him he was slow because this and that, showed him the the 40 seconds rule in the current rules (5.6), and gave him his time...

Thank you for taking the time to talk to this player. It is a slow process but if we all educate a few slow players each year, something might sink in.

  • Like 1

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1210 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yea, I think it is just human nature. It could be subconscious as well.  The studies on Belief Perseverance, Cognitive Dissonance, Confirmation Bias, Motivated Reasoning are all interesting topics in psychology.  Being that people are probably on a spectrum regarding how susceptible they are to these behaviors; I am not shocked by his response. It helps me cope with this sort of thing as well. I am like; Oh, they can't help it. Honestly, they probably can't with out some sort of major pattern changes in how they process information. I wish, I would be like 80-lbs lighter than I am now! 🤣 I am glad the GEARS avatar doesn't blow up in size to match the person's outline.       
    • Hasn't happened yet but there's a lot of smoke now, I guess.
    • Nailed that one right on the head. Force the data to match the theory, not the other way around. Come on people!
    • Andy Plummer (@andy_plummer) • Instagram photos and videos 32 likes, 3 comments - andy_plummer on April 15, 2026: "Rory Mcilroy. What do you see? 2 images of the same player. Masters Champion Rory Mcilroy. One is a still photo from a video, the other Is an AVATAR from a... The text is: Rory Mcilroy. What do you see? 2 images of the same player. Masters Champion Rory Mcilroy. One is a still photo from a video, the other Is an AVATAR from a 3D system of the same player. The 3d system AVATAR fails to represent the reality of the trail shoulder, arm, or wrist position. Or much else for that matter. This raises the question, Which is a more accurate representation of reality the still photo or the cartoon? Next, To demonstrate the value of systematically comparing still photos I have included 2 images of Rory to train your eyes. Is the trail shoulder the same? The trail arm? The trail wrist? :sigh: I love when people think they’re punching back, but they’re just punching themselves in the face. The rest of this post is a compilation of some text conversations. 😄  Andy, and all of S&T have, for years now sought to diminish the role of measurement tools in the game. Whether that's force plates, 3D, perhaps HackMotion, etc., they continue to rely on their interpretations of 2D photos and video to "show" what the game's best players do. In reality, they do very little of what S&T teaches, and often do the exact opposite of what S&T teaches. With the post above, Andy continues to find new ways to demonstrate his stupidity. With this post, he's effectively comparing… a 2D photo to a 2D photo of a 3D avatar. GEARS owners/users know… it's not about the avatar. It's about the numbers, the measurements, etc. GEARS doesn't capture your exact body dimensions. The trail elbow has been a little goofy for a long time. But you can compare one swing to another, and compare the data. And the data continues to show that golfers do not move like S&T or Andy Plummer insist that they move. Either Andy doesn’t know that, which is a big concern, or he’s lying about what he’s saying. Andy is essentially saying that no numbers are good because no avatar will match his random still image. Who can blame him? The last time Andy tried to use numbers, we got… stuff like this: How do S&T "network" folks and GEARS owners like Manavian and Sales feel about being pooped on by their "leader"? How will Andy (or will he at all) moonwalk this one back with them? How do GEARS users use GEARS? To get the numbers, to compare the numbers. Occasionally you can compare a "before" avatar against an "after" avatar, but in those cases, you know the "camera angles" are perfect and, more importantly, consistent or uniform. With GEARS Hybrid, too, you can put the numbers right on the actual person. My two color cameras are pretty close to FO and DL views, so… I see the pretty common angles. Other times, you're just looking at the data, and the avatar is "just for show." To put that together: The GEARS Avatar is a representation. Occasionally you compare the “before” avatar to the “after” avatar, and you can rest assured when doing that the camera angles are perfect and consistent… but that it’s more about the measurements and data/numbers. I'm reminded of this quote: It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It (or variations at the link). It doesn't fit perfectly, because outside of a shrinking band of devotees, S&T has a horrible reputation amongst golfers and golf instructors. It likely has more to do with a desire to "be right" than to "get it right." And a healthy dose of good old-fashioned stupidity. I hate poor golf instruction. It grinds my gears, no pun intended. It works against what I've spent the last nearly 20 years of my life doing: helping golfers to play better golf. I hate it when people do not advance their knowledge. They dig in, insist that they "got it right" fifteen years ago, and ignore all advances in technology. They keep their heads in the sand and reject everything that doesn't match what they think they saw years and years and years ago. They don't adapt or grow. They make up "data" and hold golfers back from getting better. It's sad, and frustrating as a golf instructor trying to help golfers to battle the misinformation put out by the stubborn and ignorant. And… that's enough time spent on this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.