Note: This thread is 4557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Admirable! Me--No matter where I bring my hands on the backswing, it's the downswing and impact speed that determine how far I flight a ball. I might bring the back to shoulder, then my brain computes the distance and decelerates the club. On short shots, just the opposite. Maybe tempo is my problem, but I do okay trusting my brain to the throw the club. Too much technique and thinking really mess me up in the longrun.
I wouldn’t. I like to see one number on the top as I quickly pull it out of my bag to play my next shot. If you want to know the loft of your club, say for gapping purposes, then look it up. Knowing the static loft of your club is not going to help you on the course, and does nothing but force me to look at two digits instead of one to determine which club I’m pulling out of the bag.
This is disconcerting as I was Pfizer'd and if given a choice, back in March, I said I'd take Moderna, but because it was easier to store, not that I had some foresight of its effectiveness relative to Pfizer. This is one study, maybe outlook will change... again. Whatever happens, being cautious regardless of whatever news comes up.
Big gap between Pfizer, Moderna vaccines seen for preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations
LOS ANGELES — Amid persistent concerns that the protection offered by COVID-19 vaccines may be waning, a report released Friday by the...