Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iacas

"Power Golf" by Ben Hogan

18 posts in this topic

Discuss "Power Golf" by Ben Hogan here.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I read the paperback, but saw from online reviews that the hardcover was better, especially the illustrations. I am new to golf, but noticed that some of the content was outdated, especially in reference to equipment. The swing mechanics he suggests differ from other books I've read and what I've been taught by my instructor but I'm not close to being expert enough to know if that's a flaw in his teaching or just another swing philosophy. When it comes to instructional books I tend to look for books from good authors with publication dates that are fairly current so I could be biased since this book is 20 years old.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My only comment would be that the author of that book had the following statistics / honors to back up his writings: Which is hard to say for modern day books written by golf pros and instructors...

In 292 career PGA Tour events, Ben Hogan finished in the Top 3 in 47.6-percent of them . He finished in the Top 10 in 241 (82.5 percent) of those 292 events.
Tour Victories:
64
Major Championships:
9
• Masters: 1951, 1953
• U.S. Open: 1948, 1950, 1951, 1953
• British Open: 1953
• PGA Championship: 1946, 1948
Awards and Honors:
• Member, World Golf Hall of Fame
• PGA Tour money leader 5 times
• PGA Tour Vardon Trophy winner 1940, 1941, 1948
• PGA Tour Player of the Year 1948, 1950, 1951, 1953
• Member of 2 U.S. Ryder Cup teams
• Captain, U.S. Ryder Cup team, 1947, 1949, 1967

Jack Nicklaus 'Golf My Way' and Tiger Woods 'How I play the game' which are more recent are the only two that hold a candle to golf instruction when considering they came from the pros themselves with similar career statistics.

What I liked about the book was it showed more depth than his later book 'Five Lessons' His approach to chipping, pitching, putting and even how he played the fade or draw was all covered in that.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised that there are so few reviews considering how really well written this book is.

The drawings match what he's describing better then then photos would have.  I can't think of another golfer that describes their swing so well.  This oldie puts many more modern books to shame.

Hogan's swing doesn't need me to tell you how effective it is. At this point all I can think of is a long list of books that I wish were as clearly written as this one and are not.

Update Aug 2011

I found a 1969 hard cover edition printed in the UK with photos instead of drawings. The photos are clear and the drawing were made from the photos.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wanted to thank Robert Hatfield for sharing these pics with me from a 2nd edition "Power Golf"

5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow Mike!  Thanks!  Looks like the poster boy for the 5 Simply Keys.

His upper body was so flexible.  His pitch elbow incredible.  I can't even come close to his finish position and I constantly stretch to improve my flexibility.

I have read that he played a fade.  Was it a push fade?

He also played the ball back off his heel with the driver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by boogielicious

Wow Mike!  Thanks!  Looks like the poster boy for the 5 Simply Keys.

His upper body was so flexible.  His pitch elbow incredible.  I can't even come close to his finish position and I constantly stretch to improve my flexibility.

I have read that he played a fade.  Was it a push fade?

He also played the ball back off his heel with the driver.

I'm not sure if he played a fade during this time.  This was before his 5 Lessons book and I think he still struggled with a duck hook at this time.  Another reason he probably tended to align the driver on the heel, gear effect.  Can see from this driver swing, how far the left shoulder has gone back, left foot has rolled back.

Compared to his "5 Lessons" swing.  More centered, left foot stays planted.  The swing above would tend to rotate the baseline too far to the right.  Then when he transfers forward, get under at A6, left shoulder gets too high, hit toe hooks.  This is just an assumption on my part from looking at the pics and knowing his miss was a hook.

Few more "before" and "afters".  Again you can see how the upper center starts tipping back.  Compare the left shoulders and the right heels.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I love those close up pictures of Hogan's grip. I used to really struggle with a hook and had to figure out how to correct it. I found something called the pistol drill where you hit full shots with your thumb and index finger of your right hand off the club the entire swing. That drill basically forces your right hand to be more passive. The drill worked wonders for me, but didn't transfer to the course. In Hogan's 5 Lessons, he describes his right hand grip. He says, basically, to have your thumb press against and be inseparable from the index finger. To me, that is the pistol drill in action! Once I figured that out, I started using his grip recommendations and my hook went away...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice photos!! Thank you for sharing. I love Hogan's right elbow action. And his finish from A8+++. Money.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm thinking of buying Ben Hogan's Five Lessons . Would anyone have any recommendations whether I should buy Power Golf instead? Maybe both?

Also, how much does Hogan's instruction differ from the 5 Simple Keys method?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by JonMA1

I'm thinking of buying Ben Hogan's Five Lessons. Would anyone have any recommendations whether I should buy Power Golf instead? Maybe both?

Also, how much does Hogan's instruction differ from the 5 Simple Keys method?

I haven't read Power Golf, but I absolutely love Five Lessons. Such a great description of the golf swing. I occasionally go back and flip through it to read certain sections.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just finished reading this book. It's a great book to read after 5 Lesson (IMO) . . . and also for someone just starting to (try and) develop a solid golf swing. Particularly the thoughts in the very last section were encouraging. Basically he says to not worry about scoring while you are developing your swing. Once your swing is solid, the scores will come. He also mentions how golfers who never bother to learn the correct swing fundamentals can still score, but it wont hold up for them. I had never really heard these thoughts before. Awesome words of wisdom for a new golfer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MVMAC thank u so much, have never seen these before have power golf but not with these photos in it
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Power Golf was written in 1948, nine years before 5 Lessons. As Mvmac said, this was when Hogan fought the hook, and before he found his new swing in the dirt. He definitely revised some his thinking by the time he got to 5 Lessons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MVMAC thank u so much, have never seen these before have power golf but not with these photos in it

Yeah pretty cool stuff. I love the old black and white pics of the "classic" players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This book is uber good..,uber,,uber,,,,uber,,,uber,,, yea baby,,,yes [URL=http://s1259.photobucket.com/albums/ii547/cpeterich/?action=view¤t;=1lMJa.gif][IMG]http://i1259.photobucket.com/albums/ii547/cpeterich/th_1lMJa.gif[/IMG][/URL]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Power Golf was written in 1948, nine years before 5 Lessons. As Mvmac said, this was when Hogan fought the hook, and before he found his new swing in the dirt. He definitely revised some his thinking by the time he got to 5 Lessons.

Oh interesting . . . didn't realize that. 5 lessons is definitely more technical.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon