Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

I've heard several times........


Note: This thread is 5703 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
that almost all golfers reach their full potential within their 1st 3 yrs of golfing. That even scratch golfers reach this point within the same 3 yrs. I sure hope this isn't true. But I'm starting to wonder. My very best summer was 5 yrs ago. I shot under 80 4 times. 74 being my best. And haven't been back in the 70's since. It's at the point now where I don't even know how I shot those rounds. My index got under 10 for a very short stint and has settled in the 11's ever since. What do you guys think? Are any of you still improving after 15 or 20 yrs. of golf? If so, what are your keys?

Posted
Not true at all.

No matter how good, anyone's game will certainly go through ups and downs over period of time. It's the amount of practices you put in the game that determines your confidence and your overall performances during a certain period. The more you put into it, the more you will likely get out of it. There is no time frame to conclude that your best years have passed.

If you stopped playing after 3 full years and came back practicing harder than ever, you will be better.

Posted
I don't think this is true at all.

My case, I started with a 26 hc and got to 0.0 in about 8 months. But, i no alot of people who were stuck on around 13-15 and now play off 4 and 5 a few years later

Driver: 909D3 8.5* Diamana White Board X
3 Wood: MP 630 15* GRAFALLOY PROLAUNCH RED X
Hybrid: 909H 19* "Real" VooDoo X
3 - P: MP-68 KBS Tour Black Nickel X
56* 10 Wedge Vr60* 06 Wedge: VrPutter: Custom Made.Golf Ball: TOUR B330SI am the greatest, I said that even before I knew I was....


Posted
Technically I first played full-length championship level golf my senior year of high school, which was over a decade ago. But after that I didn't play again until college was over, then I only played sporadically until April of last year. I've been playing seriously now for about a year and a half, and I have been steadily improving, but I realistically expect that I will plateau relatively soon. If my last 2 rounds are any indication I may have already. There's always room for improvement, but I think 3 years is reasonable given relatively consistent play and practice. Without a significant influx of time, money, and lessons it's become exponentially harder to improve the better I get-and this probably applies to most people after they reach a certain level of time invested and skill.

But...my Dad has been playing for 30 years and is better than ever, so there's always hope.

Posted
I think that statement is true if you are playing golf full time. Definitely not true for most and especially not true for weekend warriors.

« Keith »


Posted

For some people it is probably true, but there is no rule. I believe that as long as you play golf, you will slowly improve. I've seen this among people of all ages. Even those 70+ years of age can make progress after the first 3 years.

I think that statement is true if you are playing golf full time. Definitely not true for most and especially not true for weekend warriors.

What? So the best players in the world does not improve after 3 years?

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't buy it...you can always improve...but if you are talking about a person who takes the game up as a hobby and just kind of plays without practicing and lessons, then you are probably as good as you will get.

My best golf was played in the early to mid 90s and then I just recently got serious again and have posted more consistent rounds than ever. I am getting to the point that I close to playing the best golf of my life, 15 years since peaking.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
that almost all golfers reach their full potential within their 1st 3 yrs of golfing.

Complete BS, give it no further thought. I have been playing for 20 years and have improved more in the last 8 months than the first 19 years. -Dan

Posted
I started in -93 (at the age of 33) and in 3 years got hcp appr 15. Then it took me 3 years until I got the idea of chipping close to the hole and started scrambling way better. Dropped my hcp from 15 to 9.6 in two months.

Next plateu was around hcp 7 where I stayed a few years. Then around 5.5 - 6.0 again a few years. This year I have played my best golf ever after changing my swing during two winters and it has finally paid off. Also I have concentrated on putting for a few years and that has improved my game as well.

At the same time my shot distances have decreased so I need to use longer irons in approaching and YET my scores have been much better this year than during previous years. Next year I will play even better!

Posted
that almost all golfers reach their full potential within their 1st 3 yrs of golfing. That even scratch golfers reach this point within the same 3 yrs. I sure hope this isn't true. But I'm starting to wonder. My very best summer was 5 yrs ago. I shot under 80 4 times. 74 being my best. And haven't been back in the 70's since. It's at the point now where I don't even know how I shot those rounds. My index got under 10 for a very short stint and has settled in the 11's ever since. What do you guys think? Are any of you still improving after 15 or 20 yrs. of golf? If so, what are your keys?

Definitely not true. I've been playing on-and-off since the age of 5, and now at 28 I'm playing my best golf. I couldn't legitimately break 100 for the majority of my life, and now I'm flirting with mid to lower 80's scores. To top it all off, I'm managing to do this without regular range time or playing time: I get out for 9 holes once a week during my work's league (my job & my 2-year-old take priority over my golf). How and why am I getting better? The few balls I do hit on the range are with a purpose, I took one lesson this year (which helped and hurt my game until I figured out what was most important), and I putt for at least 15 minutes prior to my league round. The point of all of this isn't to brag, it's to point out that you get better the more focused time & effort you put in. If you hit the range with a purpose, putt with a purpose, and take your lessons seriously, you'll improve until you hit whatever ceiling your physical attributes impose.

Posted
I am at exactly the end of my 3rd year of my golfing career. I have improved more in the last 6 months than I did in the first 30 months. With that being said, if I dont get to the range or practice at least once during the week, my handicap will rise a little bit. As soon as I get back to practicing its scary what I can do on the weekends. I only see my game improving from here on as I learn more and more about my swing and the proper techniques.

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't buy it...you can always improve...but if you are talking about a person who takes the game up as a hobby and just kind of plays without practicing and lessons, then you are probably as good as you will get.

agreed

i was a 4 in H/S, but am playing better more consistent golf than i ever have...and playing less than i did in school career round this year was a 66, before that was a 69 in 1996 been playing since 1993 roughly
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
that almost all golfers reach their full potential within their 1st 3 yrs of golfing.

Common sense and experience both tell me that this is completely false! I started playing golf about 15 years ago, in my mid to late 20's. I'd shoot in the 120's for 18. I started playing on a regular basis (ie - more than 10 times a year) about 10 years ago (right after my divorce)

. First I broke 100, then shot in the 90's, then broke 90 and shot in the 80's on occasion. Wow...then I broke 80 and shot in the mid-80's consistently, with only the occasional 91 popping into view. This year I've broken 80 at least a half-dozen times and shot my lowest round ever (+1, 73) just a few weeks ago. This has been a steady progression over 10 years of golf, driving range practice, a few lessons, short game practice, putting, etc. I've been improving bit, by bit and look forward to getting even better next year. This year has been a true breakthrough (thanks to this website and videos online, etc) in beginning to fully understand the swing mechanics, ball-flight paths, and how to correct and make adjustments in my swing. I'm sure I'll have a few more 'ups and downs' over the next few years as I further understand the game of golf and my swing. Have I reached my full potential...nope, not even close.

In my :nike:  bag on my :clicgear: cart ...

Driver: :ping: G10 9*    3-Wood: :cleveland: Launcher
Hybrid: :adams: 20* Hybrid      Irons: :ping: i5 4-GW - silver dot, +1/2"
Wedges: :cleveland: 56* (bent to 54*) and 60* CG10     Putter: :ping: Craz-e (original blue)


Posted
I think that statement is true if you are playing golf full time. Definitely not true for most and especially not true for weekend warriors.

I think, if anything, it's the other way around. Most "weekend warriors" get good enough to be able to whack the ball around without being laughed at. Whether or not they are the majority I don't know, but I doubt that it's "almost all".

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Gotta meet a man at the Crossroads.

Wings inhibit swings.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5703 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • No, but I'm also in disagreement that golfers have no thoughts over the golf ball, and/or don't ever think I've met someone I truly believe is thinking nothing but "target" or something on most shots.
    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.