• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iacas

Tiger's Immediate Post-Masters Interview - Good, Bad, or Ugly?

0  

  1. 1. How would you rate Tiger's answers (see video in first post)?

    • They were about as good as you can expect.
      20
    • Not good, but not bad.
      8
    • Rude like always!
      5

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

38 posts in this topic

The media made this a big deal.

I voted "they were about as good as you can expect." The tournament is still going on, Tiger's one back at the time, he's disappointed and pissed that he played the last 10 holes in even par at likely his favorite major, and that he's so close and yet still not there yet.

The questions were lame. Tiger still thinks second (let alone T4) sucks. He answered the questions he was asked, and at least he answered them - he could have said "I'm still in it and I need to get some food" and turned down the interview.

And seriously, what do you expect at this point? Tiger's answers are always like this. If you're expecting him to wax poetic about something for 40 seconds, you've not lived on planet Earth for the past 15 years. The tournament was still going on - Tiger was still in game mode. His interview in the media center later on was vastly different (still typical Tiger, but not as clipped as this interview).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

This was another tiny incident blown way out of proportion by the media...Feinstein probably got an erection when he saw this....gave him something to babble on about for the next 3 months while he spits when he talks...guy could fill up a bucket after one sentence

Tiger was pissed off. He shot a 31 on the front nine to get into the lead at one point, then played a boring back nine and got nothing out of it.

I don't understand the need people have for Tiger to do happy-go-lucky interviews...who cares? I don't watch the tournaments to see interviews, I watch them to see golf ( and I assume 99% of enthusiasts are the same )....so why do we make such a big deal over this stuff? Are we lacking gossip now that Tiger's past issues are dying down in the media? Or is it because he isn't winning? It seems the tabloids etc are about how amazing Tiger is or how much of an asshole he is for stuff like this 'poor' interview...he's never been one to not be blunt and straight to the point, why should he change?

Tiger doesn't need everyone's approval....we should stop looking to him to fulfill our shallow needs.

I actually thought it was funny

"Tiger, are you back?"

"Right now I'm one back, we'll see how it goes"

Good, bad or ugly?

None of the above...I would say, normal, expected.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I need a fourth option.

It was a brief interview of a stressed out player who'd just left a couple out there, which was conducted by man who could see the interviewee was stressed and not in the mood to elaborate on his round and his career. The interviewer probably was required to as the "are you back" question, but when he got the answer he did, he gave Tiger an easy out with the next question. It seemed short but professional on both sides and if someone had an issue with it, well, they have issues.

PS. just found the edit button - d'oh! - I think option one fits the bill.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by sean_miller

I need a fourth option.

It was a brief interview of a stressed out player who'd just left a couple out there, which was conducted by man who could see the interviewee was stressed and not in the mood to elaborate on his round and his career. The interviewer probably was required to as the "are you back" question, but when he got the answer he did, he gave Tiger an easy out with the next question. It seemed short but professional on both sides and if someone had an issue with it, well, they have issues.

PS. just found the edit button - d'oh! - I think option one fits the bill.


What is wrong with you?  Why are you being reasonable and using context to paraphrase what happened?  You need to pick one extreme side or the other and explain what happened in 5 words or (preferably) less.

Let me show you how it's done:

Option 4: What an a**hole!

/Sarcasm

When I saw the interview live, I knew it would be made a big deal by at least a couple media types.  There was a stark contrast to his demeanor and another golfer who finished at -10 (Luke Donald?).  What it showed me is that Tiger was not willing to entertain the thought that the Tournament was over yet.  He was trying to maintain his competitive focus in case of a playoff, and therefore was pretty curt with his responses.  In reality, if people already think he's a douchebag and is the worst thing that ever happened to the tour, this is just further validation of that.  For most other people, a 10 second interview isn't a big deal.

Brandon

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a big deal. When Tiger's not winning, he's not happy. That's how he was brought up and how he learned to approach the game. He knew he likely hadn't done enough to win or get in a playoff and he wasn't pleased, and that came through in the interview, simple as that. Tiger's been like this in interviews when he's done poorly for the last 6 or 7 years at least, why are people surprised? I think one of the reasons they've made such a big deal of this is because it's in stark contrast to the interview Rory gave after his Sunday collapse. He was gracious and polite given what happened to him, and it made Tiger's interview look even worse. It just comes down to different personality types though, it's not something to criticise people for.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see role reversal with players interviewing media.

Player:  So, you botched that last commentary tripping over your tongue like a rookie reporter, what was going through your mind as you were stuttering?

Reporter:  Well I was a little nervous standing next to a player who has far more talent than.....

Player: Sorry to interupt, but I didn't like your answer.  Were you not prepared to ask a question?  You can write it down on an index card you know.

Reporter:  Well I...

Player:  So you have been divorced six times.  How does that affect your interviewing technique?  And you better give me the Disney answer or we'll rip you a new one on the next Golf Talk show.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Tiger Spuds

It just comes down to different personality types though, it's not something to criticise people for.



Really? I criticize people for their personalities all the time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see what there is to get acted up about in this interview. Q: Do you think you can win? A: We'll see, I'm one back. Q: Are you back in the thick of things? A: Well yeah, I'm one back. Q: Are you going to eat, hit the range, or what is your plan? A: I'm getting something to eat, I'm starving. Would someone have reacted to the interview if it was [b]anyone[/b] other than Tiger being interviewed? Come on, this stuff has been going on for one and a half year now. Good thing is that it's starting to calm down.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow ... I hadn't seen the interview after all this time.  From the complaints of some, I was expecting something horrible.  This was his typical non-win interview.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Non-issue interview.  Just bein' Eldrick down by one when clipped.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the interviewer seems to not understand is that the tournament is NOT OVER. Tiger is one stroke off the lead and there is still golf to be played. Tiger is still competing, he may have a playoff coming up! You might as well interview him as he is teeing up the 18th.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I saw this one as it happens and the only thing I could think was that the questions were somewhat inane.  What sort of interesting answer can you possibly get from those, particularly before the tournament is over?  It was basically, "So, Tiger, you said you wanted to be in contention on the back nine.  Were you?"  What else can you answer but, "Look at the scoreboard, dumbass"?  The just-off-the-course interviews are pretty much always pointless, but particularly when your questions all have self-evident answers.  Maybe asking about the course conditions or other things that you can't find the answers could be interesting, but even that is doubtful.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was really, really impressed with McIlroy's interview. He handled it so well. Sorry off topic...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger couldn't go to church without somebody finding something wrong with it. Everyone wants tiger back, its great for the game of golf, but the media seems to have nothing better to do than criticize everything he does.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to piss of any Americans on here.. but he is rude! No question

Look at Rory Mcilroy's interview. 21 years old and extremely mature and polite.

Theres no excuse for rudeness.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok maybe he was brief, but he certainly wasn't rude. He dodged the questions a bit but who cares, he could've just refused an interview...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to piss of any Americans on here.. but he is rude! No question

Look at Rory Mcilroy's interview. 21 years old and extremely mature and polite.

Theres no excuse for rudeness.

How is it rude to answer the questions you are asked?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's absolutely nothing wrong with the interview whatsoever. If someone wants to ask stupid questions then why should the person being interviewed have to sugar-coat everything and not reply with "you're an idiot" answers?

Tiger was a lot more polite than I would have been with ridiculous questions like that. His answers were clear, concise and honest; you can't ask for more than that.

Or would you have preferred a whole load of useless drivel?

Q: Do you think you can win?

A: I think I'm playing quite well at the moment, based on the fact that I'm only a shot back.

My swing feels a lot better than it has in recent months and I'm getting stuck less often. I really want to spend time working on my short game ideally but likewise I need to maintain the training I've been doing with my long game; it's really a juggling act to make sure everything's up to scratch so fingers crossed I can do that.

Speaking of fingers I heard that Rory has some which is just amazing. I thought I was gifted when I found out I too have fingers. I tend to use them gripping the club with my left hand higher than my right on the grip, which incidentally is made of rubber. Do you know rubber comes from a tree? I had no idea; I though it was created by the rubber fairy who's a distant cousin of the tooth fairy. Teeth! OH MY! I have those too! What are the odds of that? Possibly the same as the odds this morning of me playing golf today. Today is a good day but I'm hungry so I think I'm going to go and eat. Do you mind if I go and eat? I'd like to make use of those fingers and teeth I have if that's ok with you mr interviewer?


1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • A run of the mill slice is something I can actually live with (though it'll be an annoying existence).  A push slice is probably the most off line I ever get with a shot (even more than a shank due to distance) as it starts right and goes further right.  Luckily those are so rare that when they do pop up they usually aren't in a spot where it causes me trouble.
    • The point that I was specifically responding to was, just because you're on top of another group, it still may be appropriate to allow others through.  Just because @No Mulligans hadn't experienced it, didn't mean that the concept was moot by any means... And fwiw, our relatively fast group has allowed 5-somes through....
    • These guys haven't gotten to where they are without being ultra-competitive.  I don't think the lack of money had any real effect on their desire to win.
    • The slice is just such a devastating miss for your game. It is a shot that I really have to eliminate from my game. I am an incredibly inconsistent player, to the point where I can be hitting a beautiful high fade and start to go pin hunting for several holes, having several looks at birdie in a row and then within the next several holes be almost unable to hit the ball without hitting a horrendous slice. I am so inconsistent that it is not abnormal for me to go something like par, birdie, par, birdie, par, quad, quad, quad in an eight hole stretch.
    • I recently won some pro shop credit ($100) at a semi-private course nearby.  Thing is, I need to use it before November or it expires. I don't really need any clothes or accessories so I was thinking I might put it towards a new driver.  The problem is, while I'm sure I can test it out on the range, they just have regular old range balls and I'm doubtful there's any kind of fitting process.  I also can't really play a round there with a demo club unless I'm someone's guest or I'm willing to shell out $100+ to play off-peak times (which I'm not).  There's a decent golf shop down the road from the course that offers fittings for $75/hour, with a $50 credit toward a related purchase within 30 days.  I've never had a proper fitting, so would it make sense to go to the golf shop, get fit, assume I'll probably get a custom shaft, go buy the same driver at the pro shop using my credit, and then buy the shaft from the golf store, applying the fitting credit?  When you get fit and end up with a custom shaft, is the shaft price usually totally on top of the full price of the off-the-rack driver, or is there typically a discount since you're not getting the OEM shaft? Obviously different stores do things differently, but I'm just wondering what is common practice. I'm trying not to overthink it but I also don't want to waste my pro shop credit. Any advice would be much appreciated!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. wadekilpatrick76
      wadekilpatrick76
      (40 years old)
  • Blog Entries